Science

advertisement

UW-ACE Survey

Results: Students’

Experiences of Using

Technology in Learning

Vivian Schoner and Katrina Strampel

Centre for Learning and Teaching through Technology (LT3)

University of Waterloo

The Setting: Teaching, Technology, and UW-ACE

Student Encounters with the Blended

Learning Experience

Technically Viable? Yes

Pedagogically Sound? Yes, No, Maybe,

Depends…

Survey Research Results

The UW-ACE Survey

 We asked students to tell us about their experiences with

Online Learning Activities

Online Collaborative Learning (small group)

Technology Function

Student Satisfaction

Online Instructor Feedback

Students Completing Survey

Faculty Quest Enrolment % Survey

AHS 1525 6

Arts

ENG

3041

739

6

5

ENV

MATH

SCIENCE

1414

3170

9474

7

4

4

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Comparisons of Scales

Technology Function

Student Satisfaction

Online Instructor

Feedback

Online Learning

Activities

Online Collaborative

Learning

Technology Function: Access; Ease of Use; Navigation

26. logging in to be…

27. accessing my courses to be…

28. navigating around the UWACE course pages to be…

29. accessing the course tools/announcements to be…

30. posting, reading, responding to messages in the online discussion forum to be…

31. accessing feedback on submissions to be…

32. accessing my grades to be…

33. submitting assignments to be…

34. accessing quizzes to be…

35. accessing team or small group resources to be…

Scale Results

Technology (alpha .953)

Faculty % Very

Difficult

SCIENCE 2

FES

ARTS

AHS

MATH

ENG

Av for %

Combined

1

3

1

6

6

Neg 9

5

6

4

5

11

%

Difficult

4

12

9

12

14

%

Undecided

8

16

UnD 12

%

Easy

%

Very Easy

32 53

35 38

32 51

26 56

34 48

32 35

Pos 79

83

83

82

74

67

Cum.

Positive%

85

Technology: Accessibility and Ease of Use

 “quick access to grades and assignment feedback, access to past lecture notes, announcements, additional resources”

 “UW-ACE helped a lot in centralizing my courses online”

 “the fact that you can connect anytime/anywhere”

 “a safe online environment”

 “easy to use, helpful, good interactions with profs and peers”

 “I could sign in and have everything at my fingertips”

Appreciation for Technical Potential

“it enhances the learning process by offering supplemental resources for course related topics”

“it is certainly appropriate to post lecture notes and other resources, but the absolute most important thing to remember is not to invent uses just because the UW-ACE software is there. Legitimate uses are great, but online activities just for the sake of doing them are frustrating”

“it is desirable because it gives students an alternative way to find information about the course, also allows them to communicate with others who need help and who can offer help”

“if you have a question, but hate raising your hand and asking in front of all your peers, it can be asked and answered online”

“I believe it’s an integral part of the university to have students using technology which will be useful once we are out there in the workforce. Developing this skill is essential for us to be able to learn to be technologically diverse”

Overall Student Satisfaction:

Course Organization; Instructions;

Workload; Technical Support

36. the organization of the course content and activities?

37. the instructions for completing learning activities?

38. the number of course learning activities through the term?

39. the distribution of course learning activities through the term?

40. the technical support?

41. the professional look of the course web page(s)

Scale Results

Overall Student Satisfaction (alpha .916)

Faculty Very

Unsatisfied

Unsatisfied Undecided Satisfied Very

Satisfied

AHS 2

SCIENCE 3

ARTS

FES

ENG

5

3

3

MATH 5

Av for %

Combined Neg 10

7

6

8

4

4

9

17

16

14

17

22

24

UnD 18

38

42

44

4

35

427

39

35

30

30

32

15

Pos 72

74

74

67

Cum

Positive

%

77

77

62

Online Instructor Feedback:

Helpful; Informative; Appropriate;

Timely

42. instructor feedback helped me learn and understand difficult concepts

43. the frequency of instructor feedback met my information needs

44. the quality of instructor feedback was helpful and informative

45. the timeliness of instructor feedback was appropriate for my needs

46. the amount of instructor feedback was appropriate for my needs

Scale Results

Online Instructor Feedback (alpha .972)

Faculty Strongly

Disagree

Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly

Agree

ARTS

AHS

5

4

SCIENCE 5

FES 13

ENG 2

MATH

Av for %

Combined

23

Neg 18

6

7

10

8

18

9

17

22

21

24

26

25

UnD 23

39

36

26

31

41

26

33

31

38

24

13

17

Pos 59

Cum.

Positive

%

72

67

64

55

54

43

Online Instructor Feedback

 “I got assignments back sooner and easier with the site”

 “the professor always kept us informed of news by posting announcements frequently on the UWACE website”

 “the immediate feedback from quizzes written as well as the correct answers is a definite asset”

 “took too long for marks to be posted”

 “not being able to see answers on actual quizzes”

 “grades are not properly recorded”

 “there was an announcement that marks for an important section would be posted which they never were”

Online Learning Activities: Learning

Support Features, Concepts, Skills,

Applications; Integrated Parts;

Study Time; Performance Level

1. Discussion forum activities

2. Self-Assessment (un-graded)

3. Self-assessment (graded)

4. Collaborative/Peer Review submissions

5. Individual Submissions

6. Lecture notes

7. Links to external resources

8. Information literacy/library modules

9. Lab modules/activities

10. helped me learn the new skills and concepts for this course

11. helped in that it reduced the amount of time spent studying text or notes in order to grasp the material to be learned

12. helped me to better analyze and apply key points in the material to be learned

13. encouraged me to take responsibility for my own learning

14. I found that working online improved my performance on graded course assessments

15. I found that the online component(s) were well integrated with the other course components not offered online

Scale Results

Online Learning Activities (alpha .965/.935/.919)

Faculty

ENG

FES

AHS

6

7

SCIENCE 11

Strongly

Disagree

6

Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly

Agree

5 27 36 26

11

13

11

21

22

24

35

30

33

27

28

21

Cum. %

Positive

62

62

58

57

ARTS

MATH

Av for %

Combined

11

12

Neg 20

12

14

20

25

UnD 23

33

34

24

15

Pos 57

57

49

Online Learning Activities

“I’m sure there are situations where it would be desirable to “use technology to support teaching and learning”, but that in itself is too broad a goal. You should be using technology to solve a particular problem, or to compensate for a recognized weakness in existing methods. In the case of my course, I can’t see how UW-ACE has added anything to the course. I found the written quizzes far more helpful than the online ones, and I prefer to read printed course notes rather than getting course material from the web (you can’t highlight/underline/scribble on a webpage)”

“it helped me develop the habit of studying for the course regularly. It allowed me to learn course material through practice questions. A chance to do the same quizzes again and again which helped me learn and understand course concepts better. Unlimited time to do the quiz”

“a good way to practice concepts learned in class. Particularly I found the ‘fill in the blank’ type exercises to be very helpful”

“the information was very complete and organized. I feel that the textbook for the course would not have been sufficient on its own to learn all the course material. The resources offered on UW-ACE enhanced my ability to learn the material”

Online Collaborative Learning:

Learning Activities; Peer

Interaction; Reflective Learning;

Community

16. Team or small group graded assignments

17. Whole class discussion activities

18. Peer review submissions

19. Team or small group un-graded assignments

20. Giving/receiving peer feedback

21. I was able to develop a better understanding of the material because of my interaction with my peers

22. I put more thought into my comments when interacting with others online

23. I felt part of a learning community when working online

24. I found that working online encouraged me to take responsibility for my group contribution

25. I am more comfortable asking questions to members of my group in an online setting

Scale Results

Online Collaborative Learning (alpha .961/.964/.895)

Faculty Strongly

Disagree

Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly

Agree

Cum. %

Positive

ARTS 10 14 22 33 21 54

AHS 10

SCIENCE 12

FES

ENG

8

19

MATH

Av for %

Combined

14

Neg 25

17

7

16

13

12

20

28

27

18

35

UnD 25

34

29

43

35

35

19

24

17

14

4

Pos 50

53

53

49

49

39

Online Collaborative Learning:

Benefits

 “the group discussion page made it a lot easier to communicate with my group members since we are all in different classes and communication for projects is an issue”

 “I don’t mind the discussions online, I’m more comfortable since it gives the sense of anonymity (privacy thing)”

 “It depends on what type of activities: I think group tutorials are a good way to learn, whereas group projects are hard to realize”

 “they allow me to communicate with others, evaluate their thoughts and compare them to my own”

 “the addition would benefit learning because it would provide a place for quick review and knowledge testing as well as the style of the lecturers questions”

Construct Validity: Pearson

Correlation Matrix

Correlations (Unadjusted)

S1OnlineEnvironment

S2OLEHelpedMe

S3CAExperience

S4CALearning

S5Eas eOfUs e

S6Satis faction

S7FeedbackExperience

Pears on Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pears on Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pears on Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pears on Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pears on Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pears on Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pears on Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

N

S1Online

Environment

1

.

602

.573**

.000

561

.604**

.000

245

.572**

.000

267

.483**

.000

582

.581**

.000

571

.526**

.000

241

**. Correlation is s ignificant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

S2

OLEHelped

Me

.573**

.000

S3

CAExperience

.604**

.000

561

1

726

.

.493**

.000

251

245

.493**

.000

251

1

.

265

.626**

.000

287

.371**

.000

710

.568**

.000

693

.598**

.000

266

.623**

.000

217

.493**

.000

258

.477**

.000

255

.507**

.000

165

S4

CALearning

.572**

.000

267

.626**

.000

287

.623**

.000

217

1

.

296

.460**

.000

294

.510**

.000

289

.556**

.000

180

S5Eas eOf

Use

.483**

.000

582

.371**

.000

710

.493**

.000

258

.460**

.000

294

1

812

.

.642**

.000

773

.521**

.000

273

S6

Satisfaction

.581**

.000

571

.568**

.000

693

.477**

.000

255

.510**

.000

289

.642**

.000

773

1

.

778

.661**

.000

274

S7Feedback

Experience

.526**

.000

241

.598**

.000

266

.507**

.000

165

.556**

.000

180

.521**

.000

273

.661**

.000

274

1

275

.

Identifying Patterns

Science:

Technology (85) and Student Satisfaction (77)

Instructor Feedback (64) , Learning Activity (57), Collaborative Learning (53)

Applied Health Sciences:

Technology (82) and Student Satisfaction (77)

Instructor Feedback (67) , Learning Activity (58), Collaborative Learning (53)

Environmental Studies:

Technology (83) and Student Satisfaction (74)

Learning Activity (62), Instructor Feedback (55) , Collaborative Learning (49)

Arts:

Instructor Feedback (72) , Technology (83), Student Satisfaction (74)

Learning Activity (57) and Collaborative Learning (54)

Math:

Technology (74) and Student Satisfaction (62)

Learning Activity (49), Instructor Feedback (43) , Collaborative Learning (39)

Engineering:

Technology (67), Student Satisfaction (67), Learning Activity (62)

Instructor Feedback (54) and Collaborative Learning (49)

81%

57%

80%

59%

79%

55%

76%

56%

68%

44%

65%

52%

All Faculties, All Scales

General Patterns

Technology function and student satisfaction scales represent the more straightforward scales group addressing technical support and student workload in all

Faculties

Online Learning Activity, Online Collaborative Learning

(Small Group) and Instructor Feedback scales represent the teaching and learning pedagogy group in four of the six Faculties

Exceptions

Instructor Feedback, a pedagogy scale, grouped with technical support and student workload

Learning Activity, a pedagogy scale, grouped with technical support and student workload

Faculty Scales

AHS: All Categories

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree Undecided

Ratings

Agree Strongly

Agree

Online Learning Activity

Collaborative Learning

Technology Function

Student Satisfaction

Online Instructor Feedback

Arts All Categories

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly

Agree

Ratings

Online Learning Activity

Collaborative Learning

Technology Function

Student Satisfaction

Online Instructor Feedback

Faculty Scales

Engineering All Categories

50

40

30

20

10

0

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree Undecided

Ratings

Agree Strongly

Agree

Online Learning Activity

Collaborative Learning

Technology Function

Student Satisfaction

Online Instructor Feedback

FES: All Categories

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree Undecided

Ratings

Agree Strongly

Agree

Online Learning Activity

Collaborative Learning

Technology Function

Student Satisfaction

Online Instructor Feedback

Faculty Scales

Math: All Categories

50

40

30

20

10

0

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree Undecided

Ratings

Agree Strongly

Agree

Online Learning Activity

Collaborative Learning

Technology Function

Student Satisfaction

Online Instructor Feedback

Science: All Categories

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly

Agree

Ratings

Online Learning Activity

Collaborative Learning

Technology Function

Student Satisfaction

Online Instructor Feedback

Survey Results: 865 Students; 113

Courses; 6 Faculties

UW-ACE All Faculties All Scales

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly

Agree

Ratings

AHS

ARTS

ENG

ES

MATH

SCI

Percent Student Response Ratings by Faculty

Faculty Strongly

Disagree

Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly

Agree

Total #

Responses

Total #

Course

AHS

ARTS

ENG

ES

MATH

5

7

7

6

12

9

9

11

9

10

18

16

22

29

25

33

36

36

36

35

35

32

24

29

18

1924

4013

904

1836

2628

12

42

6

16

9

Total #

Students

Taking

Survey

90

185

37

96

120

SCI

Av. %

%

Rounded

7

7.33

7

7

9.16

9

20

20.17

20

32 34

34.67

28.67

35 29

6299

17,604

28

113

337

865

Overview of Student Commentary

Students are aware of the benefits of technology in the classroom and commented frequently on instructors under use of this resource.

They responded positively to technology use perceived to add real value to learning outcomes as evidenced in improved performance on quizzes, tests, assignments or projects.

Students provided suggestions for improvements and/or described new features they would like to see developed for UW-ACE.

They did not see value-added in working in small groups or teams online when they could readily interact with their peers in person.

Recommendations for Online

Pedagogy

 We need to further explore ways to improve instructional design and teaching techniques for online learning and collaborative learning activities. (LT3 Centre interface)

 Some of the needed changes suggested by the students should be considered for implementation either in the technology itself, using the technology more fully to support learning, and reducing the ambiguity

(undecided) noted in all the Scales except

Technology Function.

Looking Ahead

We need to think how to reduce the “undecided” rates,

Rethink providing this as a response choice

Forced choice is one option

Use “intermediate” instead of “undecided”

Provide instructors with key information on the pedagogy of online teaching and learning

Encourage instructors to direct their students to the online survey available in students’ course pages

Analysis of the features of individual course profiles should be undertaken (Liaisons)

THE Capstone Statement

Learning technologies should be used to support, enhance, supplement and/or expand learning opportunities; Technology should NEVER be used to replace teaching and learning in the classroom setting.

Download