Compensation as A Source of Competitive Advantage Christina L. Greathouse, Ph.D. Strategic Performance Group October 15, 2013 Strategic Performance Group • • • • • Founded 1995 Three partners, 32 contract employees Work across all industries Human Capital Solutions, OD, Coaching Christina Greathouse Bio 25+ years consulting experience with Arthur Andersen and KPMG Peat Marwick prior to co-founding SPG Ph.D. Industrial/Organizational Psychology Taught graduate level courses at GMU and Marymount University 2 Strategic Performance Group • The Great Recession has radically changed the way many companies do business • Dramatic shifts in corporate strategy requiring re-alignment of compensation practices to support those changes • Newly conservative approach to compensation spending 3 Today’s Topics • What science has taught us about work motivation • The relationship between pay satisfaction and job satisfaction • Why “pay for performance” systems often fail • How compensation can be used effectively as a management tool to gain and keep a competitive advantage 4 Compensation Redesigned • The Great Recession has radically changed the way many companies do business • Dramatic shifts in corporate strategy requiring re-alignment of compensation practices to support those changes • Newly conservative approach to compensation spending 5 Compensation as a % of GDP 6 Compensation and Productivity 7 Global Salary-Budget Trends 2012-2014 India China Brazil Singapore Australia UK Netherlands Canada France Germany United States Spain Japan Actual 2012 Actual 2013 11.2% 9.1% 7.7% 4.3% 4.0% 3.1% 3.1% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 2.8% 2.8% 2.6% 10.5% 8.2% 6.8% 4.2% 3.7% 2.9% 2.8% 2.9% 2.7% 2.9% 2.9% 2.4% 2.4% Projected 2014 10.9% 8.5% 7.2% 4.3% 3.8% 3.0% 2.8% 3.1% 2.8% 3.0% 3.1% 2.5% 2.5% Source: WorldatWork 2013-2014 Salary Budget Report 8 Pay Dissatisfaction • Washington Post (9/29/13) reported: “Four years into an economic recovery in which most of the benefits have flowed to the top earners, a majority believe that the American Dream is becoming markedly more elusive (source: Washington PostMiller Center Poll) • 58% of those polled believe they earn less than they deserve • 6 in 10 workers worry these will lose their jobs because of the economy • SPG employee survey research indicates that many employees are dissatisfied with their compensation 9 Employee Surveys: Low Scoring Items • I receive reasonable compensation compared to my peers at my company. • The pay at my company is competitive with other similar organizations. • I am paid fairly for someone with my qualifications. • I am paid fairly for my accomplishments at my company. • I receive reasonable compensation compared to my peers at my company. • People are compensated at my company for what they accomplish. • My hard work is rewarded appropriately. • I have been adequately recognized for my work contributions. • I understand how the current compensation system works. • I understand how performance increases are awarded. 10 Relationship of Pay Satisfaction to Job Satisfaction Items Correlating with, “Overall, I like my job” Correlation I have the opportunity to gain skills and knowledge necessary to perform my job. There is adequate opportunity for growth and career development for me at my company. I feel my company values my work. 0.70 At my company, our culture builds a feeling of teamwork and collaboration. 0.64 The amount of stress in my job is not a problem. 0.61 I receive adequate training on an ongoing basis. 0.60 I usually have a clear idea of what my supervisor expects of me. 0.59 My hard work is rewarded appropriately. 0.59 I have been adequately recognized for my work contributions. 0.50 The pay at my company is competitive with other similar organizations. 0.32 I am paid fairly for what I accomplish at my company. 0.37 0.69 0.66 11 Work Motivation Theories • Expectancy Theory (Vroom) • Equity Theory (Adams) • Motivator-Hygiene Theory (Herzberg) • Self-Determination Theory (Deci) 12 Expectancy Theory (Vroom) 13 Motivator-Hygiene Theory (Herzberg) 14 Equity Theory 15 Equity Theory (Adams) • There is an expectation to be paid according to one’s contribution • Research has shown that most people – Perceive themselves as top performers when compared with others – Believe they work as hard or harder than others – Attribute their success to hard work and/or skills – Attribute others’ success to luck or favorable conditions • This leads to feelings of inequity and unfairness when comparing one’s compensation with others’ compensation 16 Goal-Setting Theory • Clarity: Specific, measurable, time-bound • Challenge and Complexity: Enhances feelings of achievement • Commitment: Input and ownership • Feedback: Assessing progress 17 Self-Determination Theory (Deci) • People have three innate, psychological needs: • Competence: succeeding at challenging tasks • Autonomy: having choice over one’s actions • Relatedness: enjoying mutual respect and reliance with others • Meeting these needs leads to job satisfaction, work motivation, and high performance 18 Putting It All Together • Employees can be de-motivated by receiving less pay than they think they deserve (equity theory) • There are very few jobs where “paying for performance” is motivating because the rewards are too small (expectancy theory) • Compensation can lead to job dissatisfaction, but has a limited effect on job satisfaction (motivator-hygiene theory) • Employers need to get employees to stop obsessing over compensation, so they are open to other powerful motivators such as a desire to do meaningful work, intellectual challenge, recognition, and self-determination (self-determination theory) 19 Achieving a Competitive Advantage Adopt pay practices that avoid de-motivation: • Implement a transparent compensation philosophy and process in line with organization’s values • Pay people fairly in relation to the market and to each other (internal and external equity) • Stop using salary increases and bonuses as an incentive, unless they are large enough to make a difference • Reward results, not effort • Use pay as a recognition tool • Use goal setting to motivate performance, not as a method to determine compensation 20 Establishing Equity • Internal equity: job classification • External equity: market analysis • Integrate equity analyses into pay decisions • Establish fair pay administration processes 21 Differentiation Among Talent Segments • Must be willing to pay a premium to attract and retain highly skilled talent critical to the successful execution of the business strategy • Identify talent segments critical to success • Identify key drivers for each talent segment • Identify talents segments at risk • Design strategies employing a full range of rewards for critical talent segments • Integrate these strategies into corporate compensation program 22 Mapping an Organization’s Human Capital Architecture Unique skills Alliance/ Partners Core knowledge workers Lower High strategic value strategic value Contract labor Traditional job-based employees Generic skills Employee Functions Production R&D Quality IT Marketing Accounting HR 23 Pay Increases as a Function of Performance Mercer U.S. Percent of Workforce* Highest-rated 7% Average Pay Increase* 4.6% Next highest-rated 30% 3.5% Middle-rated 54% 2.6% Low-rated 7% 0.9% Lowest-rated 2% 0.2 Source: Mercer 2013/2014 U.S. Compensation Planning Survey Report 24 Holistic Compensation Strategies • Use compensation programs strategically, to support the business strategy • Integrate the compensation system with other components of the HR life-cycle • Employ a full-range of strategies to recognize and reward employees 25 Holistic Compensation Strategies • • • • • • Base salary Short-term rewards Long-term rewards Equity-based rewards Employee benefits Non-financial recognition and rewards 26 Recognition and Rewards • • • • • • • Spot bonuses Project completion bonuses Retention bonuses Investment in training and development Paid time off Flexible work schedules Cross-training 27 Transparency and Communication • • • • Employee input/buy-in Providing market pricing data Publishing internal salary ranges Publishing total compensation statements • Publishing compensation and benefits information on website 28 Total Compensation Statements Benefit Employer Cost Employee Cost Medical Insurance or Stipend $4,565 $910 Disability/Life $1,245 ___ 401(k) Match or Pension $8,194 ___ Salary/Bonus $65,654 TOTAL COMP $79,658 29