Social Stratification Systems of Stratification Questions to think about: What are characteristics of the caste systems and class systems? How do major theories of social stratification differ? Social Stratification Divisions of society into categories, ranks or classes. Vary from society to society Ascribed and achieved statuses Social inequality – major factor – unequal sharing of scarce resources and social rewards. Types of Stratification Systems Varies according to degree to which society’s system is open or closed. Closed system-movement between strata, or status levels is impossible. (person is assigned or ascribed social status at birth) Open system-movement between social classes is possible depending upon the flexibility of the system. CASTE SYSTEMS VERSUS CLASS SYSTEMS Caste Systems Scarce resources and social rewards are distributed on the basis of ascribed status. A newborn’s lifelong status (or CASTE) is determined by the status of his or her parents. India’s Caste System Caste System Continued Because status is inherited, there is a system of elaborate norms governing interaction among castes.\ Exogamy or marriage outside of one’s social category is strictly forbidden. Endogamy or marriage within one’ s own social category is practiced. Castes were very common form of stratification dating back 3,000 years ago. India is the best example, but is also common in South Asia. In 1950, the Indian constitution outlawed discrimination against the lowest social class. Dismantling the caste system in India has proven extremely hard. India’s Caste System http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15elG wkFUYE Class Systems Distribution of scarce resources and rewards is based on ACHIEVED STATUS. Individuals have some control over their place in the stratification system. Talent, effort, opportunity (and marriage) can help individuals move up the social ladder. Karl Marx-Class System Defined social class in terms of production. Means of production are the material used to produce goods and services. Social class is divided into two (2) groups: Those who own the means of production. Those who own only their labor. Marx Social Stratification (cont.) 2 GROUPS: Bourgeoisie-owners of the means of production in a capitalist society. Proletariat-workers who sell their labor in exchange for wages. According to Marx the bourgeoisie reaps all of the benefits and profits, the proletariat does all the work. ‘Class’ is determined by ownership of property. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtXF6bJ UzMQ Max Weber Expanded on Marx’s ideas Class consists of three (3) factors: 1. Property (same as Marx) 2. Prestige 3. Power Dimensions of Social Stratification Social Class – a grouping of people with similar levels of wealth, power and prestige. WEALTH Made up of assets and money: – assets-the value of everything a person ownsand income – money earned through salaries, investment returns, or other capital gains. In the U.S., wealth is concentrated in the hands of a small portion of the population. Some interesting statistics for the USA: 1. 1% of population controls 1/3 of nations wealth! 2. Top 1/5 of income earners receive over 50% of the total national income. Power Power is the ability to control the behavior of others, with or without their consent. Power can be based on: force, the possession of a special skill, or type of knowledge, a particular social status, personal characteristics, or custom and tradition. Prestige Prestige is the respect, honor, recognition, or courtesy and individual receives from other members of society. Based on characteristics of a society or group consider important. Income, occupation, education, family background, area of residence, possessions, and club membership are common factors that determine prestige. In the U.S. occupation tends to be the most important determinant of prestige. Socioeconomic Status (SES) – way to rank people according to wealth, power, and prestige. Combines social factors such as education level, occupational prestige, and place of residence wit economic factor of income. Functionalist Theory Stratification is a necessary part of society Certain roles in society must be performed in order for the system to be maintained. The more important the roles, the higher reward. Without varying rewards, many jobs would not be fulfilled. Criticisms to Functionalist Perspective of Social Stratification Fails to recognize that not everyone has access to resources such as education. Functionalist perspective also fails to explain why rewards sometimes do not reflect the social value of the role. For instance: Why should movie stars and professional athletes, whose importance to society is LIMITED, command such high incomes. CONFLICT Theory Competition over scarce resources as the cause of social inequality. (classic Marx theory – based on class exploitation) American conflict theorists include: C Wright Mills, Irving Louis Horowitz, and G. William Domhoff – take a broader view on social inequality. Various social groups compete for scarce resources. Once a group gains power, it can shape public opinion and public policy and maintain power. Criticism of Conflict Fails to acknowledge that unequal rewards are based in part, on differences in talent, skill and desire. Synthesizing the perspectives Ralf Dahrendorf suggests that each perspective can be used to explain different aspects of stratification. EX-Functionalist perspective explain why people spend years to become doctors and lawyers, while the conflict perspective might explain why children of the wealthy attend the best colleges. The American Class System 9.2 Questions to think about: What are characteristics of the American class system? How do different motivations and cultural values influence the American class system? The US is seen as a fairly open class system. Laws forbid discrimination based on ascribed characteristics such as race, religion, ancestry and sex. However, the US does have a wide range of social classes and the rate os social mobility is not equal for all members of society. Sociologists rely on three (3) basic techniques to rank individuals in a social class: Reputational method-individuals in the community are asked to rank other members based on what they know of their characters and lifestyles. Subjective method-individuals are asked to determine their own social rank. Objective method-defined by income, occupation and education. Least biased in determining class. Social Classes of the United States The Upper Class 1% of the population “old money” and “new money” Education commonly at prestigious universities. Occupations include owners of large businesses, investors, heirs to family fortunes, some top business executives. The Upper Middle Class 14% percent of the population High-income business people and professionals. Education: College or university, many have advanced degrees. Business executives and professionals Lower Middle Class 30% of the population Education: High school, some college Occupations: Lower level managers, skilled craft workers, some supervisors Working class: 30% of the population Education: High School Occupations: Factory workers, clerical workers, lower-level sales people, some craftworkers. Working poor 22% of the population EDUC: Some HS Laborers, service workers, gardeners, house cleaners Underclass 3% Some HS Undesirable, low-paying jobs. Unemployed, on welfare Many families have experienced poverty for generations. Social Mobility Social Mobility-the movement between or within social classes or strata. Types of social mobility: Horizontal mobility-movement within a social class of stratum. EX-when an individual moves from one job to another of equal social ranking. Types of social mobility: Vertical mobility-movement between social classes or strata. Upward or downward. Types of social mobility: Intergenerational mobility-special form of vertical mobility between generations. EX-daughter of a mechanic becomes a doctor. Structural Causes of Upward Mobility Technology changes –Farming in the early 1900s led to changes in employment and specialization Structural Causes of Upward Mobility Changes in merchandising patterns –Growth of credit industry, greater emphasis on insurance, increase in real-estate transactions, growth of personal services. Structural Causes of Upward Mobility Changes in general level of education –1940: 75% of the population did not finish HS, today that is 9% –1940: 5% of the population had a college education, today +26% has completed bachelor’s degree or higher. Causes of Downward Mobility Changes in the economy: – Changes in technology-if new technology comes out and a worker may no longer find themselves marketable. – Changes in the economy: during times of economic recession many desirable jobs are not as plentiful. Chapter 9.3 Poverty Think about: What groups of Americans are affected by poverty? What steps have been taken by the federal government to lessen the effects of poverty? Poverty Classification of the state of being poor. Defined as a standard of living is below the minimum level considered to be adequate by society. US Standard of Living Many people in poverty in the US live much more comfortably than the majority of people in other industrialized nations because the US has a high standard of living. Defining Poverty in the US Poverty Level US Bureau of the Census defines poverty in terms of the minimum annual income needed by a family to survive. Poverty level cont. Determined by calculating the cost of providing an adequate diet, based on the US Department of Agriculture’s minimum nutrition standards. (This figure multiplied by 3 b/c research has indicated that poor people spend about 1/3 of their money on food). American Poverty Age-Children make up 25% of poverty, but represent 35% of the people who live in poverty. (The level of poverty among AfricanAmerican and Hispanic children is three times that of whites) American Poverty Sex-About 57% of the poor are women. Women head about one half (1/2) of all poor families. American Poverty Race and Ethnicity- African Americans and Hispanics are more likely than whites to live in poverty (they have rates that are about twice that of the US as a whole). Percentage living in poverty The Effects of Poverty Life Chances-the likelihood that individuals have sharing in the opportunities of society. (Ex-health, length of life, housing, education) Health poses a serious disadvantage – rates of diabetes, heart disease, cancer, arthritis, pneumonia are highest among those living in poverty. The Effects of Poverty Life expectancy-refers to the average number of years a person born into a particular year can expect to live. Differences are particularly dramatic in the case of infants-poor children are more likely to die in the first year than children not born into poverty. The Effects of Poverty Reasons for shorter life span: Inadequate nutrition Less access to medical care-health care *Poor people have less money to spend on food and are less informed about good nutrition. The Effects of Poverty The working poor are more likely to have jobs that involve considerable health and safety risks. Educational life chances are often limited because school funding is based in part by local property taxes = low-income areas = inadequately funded schools=negative effect on future chances. Patterns of Behavior Divorce rates are higher in low-income families Poor Americans are more likely to be arrested, convicted of, sent to prison People in poverty are more likely to commit violent crimes and crimes against property (burglary and auto theft) Government Responses to Poverty 1964 – Lyndon B. Johnson declared a “War on Poverty.” Federal government has taken steps to reduce inequality. Government’s Response Mixed Results 31 million people in the US live in poverty. Poverty rate itself is the same as in the 1970s Government’s Response Improvements: Poverty for 65 and older is lower than the country as a whole Credited towards Social Security and Medicare Social-Welfare Programs Two approaches: 1. Transfer payments- redistributes money to various segments of society (takes % of money collected from taxes and funnels it into public assistance) 2. Subsidies- transfer goods and services rather than cash. EX- Food stamps, school lunches, Medicaid. Criticism of Welfare System Critics have charged that the social-welfare system has created a permanent “welfare class” who choose to live off the government rather than work. Government Reaction to Critics Government responded by passing the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. –Has moved people off of welfare to work