Cost Impact of Integrated Practice with Autodesk
Revit, Navisworks, & Inventor
Matthew Miller
District BIM/VDC Coordinator
© 2012 Autodesk
Class AB2848 Summary
Autodesk 2013 suite provides a comprehensive and flexible set of
software for the AEC project lifecycle. By focusing on key aspects of the
delivery process related to effective exchange, review, and scheduling of
construction data the current instruments of service reduce risk in project
delivery. We will look at the minimum required components to effectively
direct a projects development and why the Autodesk 2013 tools are
capable of assisting. When the project architects, project managers, and
project superintendents leverage the new functionality of Autodesk 2013
they move BIM from document management to integrated project
management.
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Learning Objectives
At the end of this class, you will be able to:
 Explain opportunity costs of BIM technology adoption
 Describe potential cost & profit differentials of integrated practice
 Recognize reinforcing hierarchy of project data of Autodesk suite
 Plan the project lifecycle inclusion of integrated practice
BIM as Vessel for Project Data
 Attempt to highlight fundamental challenges of Project Data
 Display a cross-disciplinary organization structure to address them
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Pandora’s Box
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Professionals can kill the collaboration process;
•When their Quality Control becomes isolated
towards individual work processes that block the
inclusion & transfer of project information.
•In the collaboration process Quality Assurance
provides the accurate interchange of project
directives. Directives developed by the key
professionals holding ultimate responsibility.
B.02
© 2012 Autodesk
BIM as Vessel
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
BIM technology adoption
Data migration to the cloud enterprise processing
Software as a solution is being replaced by software tools as a utility
backed by single entity managing hardware, database platform, &
software. Web-based software interfaces are connecting via the cloud
beyond storage, instead they drive the cloud computing databases.
Cloud 3D models require structuring beyond IFC, beyond FBX
viewing, & beyond API applications. 3D model object based coding
requires enterprise structuring to compete in global market.
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Building Information Management
Enterprise asset database’s encompass economic project modeling
•
The present maturity cycle of building information modeling does not
meet a minimum level of functionality within cloud-based enterprise
project controls environment.
•
Data migration will be a primary indicator of a successful and
profitable practice in the transition to Cloud. Project Controls that
display real-time project data with define a ‘best in class’ cloud
implementation
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Theory
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Guidelines & Standards
May 1, 2007 GSA Building Information Modeling Guide
Series: 02
“The overall purpose of validating a spatial program using BIM is to
efficiently and accurately assess design performance, relative to GSA
space program requirements.”
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Guidelines & Standards
June 2007 California Community Colleges,
Space Inventory Handbook
“The Space Inventory provides basic information used in calculating
state funding for capital outlay projects and maintenance and
operations.”
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Guidelines & Standards
June 18, 2009 LACCD Building Information Modeling Standards 2.0
“In conjunction with its Sustainable Building Program, the Los Angeles
Community College District (LACCD) is committed to utilizing the tools
of Building Information Modeling (BIM) to execute the design,
construction and management of its new High Performance buildings,
and the upgrade of its existing facilities and infrastructure to achieve a
carbon neutral footprint for its nine campuses.”
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Guidelines & Standards
December 18, 2007 National Building Information Modeling Standard
“Transforming the Building Supply Chain Through Open and
Interoperable Information Exchanges”
-buildingSMARTalliance, National Institute of Building Science
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Guidelines & Standards
June 18, 2009 LACCD Building Information Modeling Standards 2.0
“In conjunction with its Sustainable Building Program, the Los Angeles
Community College District (LACCD) is committed to utilizing the tools
of Building Information Modeling (BIM) to execute the design,
construction and management of its new High Performance buildings,
and the upgrade of its existing facilities and infrastructure to achieve a
carbon neutral footprint for its nine campuses.”
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Growth
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Scope Creep
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Find profit to share
B.01
© 2012 Autodesk
Construction risk may not be equivalent
to risk associated in other industries
because most WBS work packages are inevitable.
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Quality Assurance
5.3.3 Project Management Body of Knowledge
“The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is a deliverable-oriented
hierarchical decomposition of the work to be executed by the project
team, to accomplish the project objectives and create the required
deliverable, with each descending level of the WBS representing an
increasingly detailed definition of the project work.”
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Savings & Profits registered simply as goals
B.01
© 2012 Autodesk
•Savings might be accounted for (S.O.V.)
•Profits might be agreed to (CONTRACT)
Savings & Profits lost as simply goals
B.02
© 2012 Autodesk
Potential Cost Differential
Never ask a client to pay more for the same service & never let a
repeat customer think you did not learn from previous deliverables.
Initial Offering:
• Competitively Volume-Based Price for Documentation Service
• Pre-Structured & negotiated Additional Services
Repeat Customer:
• Slight Reduction Base Price
• Slight Increase Global Quality
• Slight Increase Additional Service Offering & Price
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Potential Cost Differential
Beyond the separation of project development, documentation, &
management we have also seen a shift in work package delivery.
Incremental Cost:
• Marginal Cost increase
• Labor cost to complete equivalent work packages
Decrement to Cost:
• Marginal Revenue Potential
• Labor cost to complete minimum billable work packages
• Labor cost to complete minimum usable work packages
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Compliance Agreements & Directives
Computer aided documentation is not currently structured to have
inherent value, presently it is a vessel delivering project asset in the
form of data
•
Code Compliance, Owner Project Requirements, & Basis of Design
•
Contract Agreements
•
Consultant Directives converted into Project Documentation Data
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Compliance BIM Mandated Programs
May 1, 2007 GSA
“We are making this fiscal ’07 requirement as a minimum
requirement,” “We are encouraging [people], project by project, to go
over and above the minimum.”
Calvin Kam, GSA’s BIM Project Manager
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Agreements-Contracts
December 14, 2007 the AIA California Council
Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide with the statement
“Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) is a project delivery approach that
integrates people, systems, business structures and practices into a
process that collaboratively harnesses the talents and insights of all
participants to optimize project results, increase value to the owner,
reduce waste, and maximize efficiency through all phases of design,
fabrication, and construction.”
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Agreements-Contracts
June 30, 2008 AGC ConsensusDOCS 301 BIM Addendum
“For many years, BIM has been seen as a promising new technology
that could revolutionize the construction industry by enabling
construction professionals to engage in virtual design and
construction, thus allowing the parties to achieve an unprecedented
level of collaboration, cost efficiency, and effectiveness.
- William Mitchell
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Digitization and distribution of the Architectural Practice
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Recognize reinforcing hierarchy
Defining Who (BIMx & QAVC), What (IDM & BIMx), & When (QAVC &
IDM)
Information Delivery Manual (IDM): defines the schedule of virtual
project submittals by defining the file property types displayed in a
graph/chart showing the responsible parties for creating, reviewing, &
accepting the defined files.
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Recognize reinforcing hierarchy
Defining Who (BIMx & QAVC), What (IDM & BIMx), & When (QAVC &
IDM)
BIM Execution Plan relates the project roles to project responsibilities
found in the OPR, BOD, & listing of scope. The roles are assigned to
the team personnel. The scope definitions are attributed to
information vessels defined in the IDM.
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Recognize reinforcing hierarchy
Defining Who (BIMx & QAVC), What (IDM & BIMx), & When (QAVC &
IDM)
The Quality Control Validation Checklist is the monitoring and control
document of the project progress.
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Surety
A310
Architect
BIMx
B101
B103
Owner
QAVC
A101
A102
A103
A312
Contractor
C401
A401
B104
Consultant
E202
IDM
A107
Subcontractor
Design-Bid-Build
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Consultant
B142
Owner
B141
Architect
C401
B143
BIMx/QAVC
DesignBuilder
A142
Contractor
E202
IDM
Consultant
A441
Subcontractor
Design-Build
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
QAVC
BIMx
B195
Architect
C401
Consultant
Surety
A295
IDM
A312
Contractor
A401
Subcontractor
Integrated Project Delivery
Transition Documents
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Architect
B103
Owner
C401
A133
A134
Const. Mgr.
Constructor
A401
A201
Consultant
Subcontractor
Construction Manager
as Constructor (CMc)
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
C191
BIMx
Owner
QAVC
Architect
Contractor
C401
A401
IDM
Consultant
Subcontractor
Integrated Project Delivery:
Multi-Party Agreement
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Owner
QAVC
C196
Architect
C197
BIMx
Owner/
Architect/ CM
C195
C198
Consutlant
Construction
Manager
C197
IDM
C199
Trade
Contractor
Integrated Project Delivery:
Single Purpose Entity
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
False Finish Lines
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
POINT FOR THE
MEASUREMENT
OF DISTANCES
FROM WASHING
TON ON HIGH
WAYS OF THE
UNTED STATES
-ZERO MILESTONE D.C.
Measuring Lines
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Reinforcing hierarchy of project data
Profitability gained from work package delivery
coinciding with the effectively managed processes
Autodesk Revit:
• Project Organization & Compliance Data
Autodesk 360 Glue & Navisworks:
• Consultants negotiating & project work environment
Autodesk Inventor:
• Component Assembly & Fabrication Data
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Plan Submission
Submitted Building Permits & Planning Applications must be complete:
Site Permit: Based on conceptual preliminary drawings that describe the exterior of the building in sufficient detail to mark heights, lengths, &
widths at a standard scale. This shall include court sizes, openings, and other significant projections or recesses. The interior shall indicate
code exit paths and major fire separations that may be required for area separation walls or occupancy separation greater than one hour.
Site Survey: This dimensional grade plan must be signed by a licensed registered state surveyor.
Scope of Work: Include calculations of existing & proposed square footages (use gross square footages).
Scaled Site Plan: This dimensional plan must be signed by the preparer who, in most cases, must be a licensed state registered architect.
Show all existing and proposed development on the subject lot used to compute the maximum project depth pursuant to required planning
code. Show north arrow.
Scaled Floor Plans: Include dimensioned existing & proposed floor & roof plans. Show existing & intended use of all spaces. Show all existing
& proposed plumbing stacks. Show north Arrow. Show stairs with direction of ascent & descent. Notate all walls, doors & windows both
existing and proposed.
Scaled Elevations: Required for each building face related to work listed in application. Building type materials for wall surfaces and
fenestration must be shown as do adjacent buildings clearly showing the relationship of projections and fenestrations. Include grade plan and
height of building.
Scaled Sections: Required for all vertical & horizontal expansions, in addition to areas involving excavations.
Scaled Landscape Plan: When required, a landscaping plan with significant measurements dimensioned must show details such as curbs,
materials, plants, species, and size of trees. Please also include drip lines.
Material Specifications: Provide general design details exterior surface finishes to include fenestrations
© 2012 Autodesk
Timeline of delivery process
2010 Location Based Management for Construction
“It is useful to develop an understanding of the basics of the activitybased methodology (primarily CPM), of which location-based planning
and scheduling is an extension and super-set”
-Russell Kenley and Olli Seppanen
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Timeline of delivery process
Navisworks Source Data
• Baseline Schedule
• Current Schedule
• Look-ahead Schedule
•
Project lifecycle inclusion of integrated practice
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Timeline of delivery process
e-Code Review:
• Code Dimension Style, Code Keynote
• Code Workset for Code embedded RFA
Computer aided documentation is not currently structured to have
inherent value, presently it is a vessel delivering project asset in the
form of data
• •Code Compliance, Owner Project Requirements, & Basis of Design
• •Contract Agreements
• •Consultant Directives converted into Project Documentation Data
•
Project lifecycle inclusion of integrated practice
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Revit operability
Interference Check Advantages:
• Daily coordination accounting
• Direct access to referenced views
• Direct access to referenced sheets
•
Project lifecycle inclusion of integrated practice
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Revit constructability
Site Staging
•
Project lifecycle inclusion of integrated practice
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Revit directives
Basis of Design delivered thru Information Delivery Manual (IDM)
• LEED verification analysis tracking
• CalGreen verification analysis tracking
• Energy Analysis
• Geospatial Verification
• Fire Protection Requirements
• Water Management
• Daylight Harvesting Analysis
•
Project lifecycle inclusion of integrated practice
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Revit directives
Owner Project Requirements
Keep & organize redundancies
• COBie Spaces
• Omniclass Spaces
Component Assemblies
• MasterFormat, Uniformat, Cobie, Omniclass
•
Project lifecycle inclusion of integrated practice
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Inventor Tool: Shrinkwrap
•Protect intellectual property by removing holes & internal components
•Business Proposition: Develop .rfa catalog thru collaborative process
Fabrication Model
file type
Vs.
Preset tabulation of
fabrication formulas
•
Project lifecycle inclusion of integrated practice
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
Inventor Tool: Simplify
Maximize Level of Detail efficiency by using the derived component
command to import an assembly to Revit & remove intellectual
property (IP)
Fabrication Model
file type
Vs.
Preset tabulation of
fabrication formulas
•
Project lifecycle inclusion of integrated practice
I.A
© 2012 Autodesk
About the Speaker
Matthew Miller
District VDC/BIM Coordinator
matthew.miller@build-laccd.org
lewismm@me.com
Autodesk, AutoCAD* [*if/when mentioned in the pertinent material, followed by an alphabetical list of all other trademarks mentioned in the material] are registered trademarks or trademarks of Autodesk, Inc., and/or its subsidiaries and/or affiliates in the USA and/or other countries. All other brand names, product names, or trademarks belong to their respective holders. Autodesk reserves the right to alter product and
services offerings, and specifications and pricing at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. © 2012 Autodesk, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2012 Autodesk