P16081: SYSTEMIC CIRCULATION MODEL SUBSYSTEM DESIGN REVIEW John Ray Fabian Perez Robert Kelley Mallory Lennon Jacob Zaremski Agenda Our goals for this review Updates from Phase II Review (10 minutes) CAD Schematic Analysis Subsystem Analysis (25 minutes) Risk Analysis Bill of Materials (BoM) Project Plans (5 minutes) (5 minutes) (5 minutes) Goals 1. Introduce progress in engineering analysis 2. Address budget concerns 3. Demonstrate efforts to design for modification 4. Receive feedback 5. Create action plan Finalized Objective Our goal is to deliver a functioning physical model of systemic circulation which, when used in conjunction with P16080’s heart pump, will be used as a teaching tool, allowing students to validate mathematical models of the circulatory system from Chapter 5 of “Quantitative Human Physiology” An Introduction by Joseph Feher. The model will ultimately enhance students' understanding of the circulatory system by enabling them to analyze the circulatory system under normal, exercise, and pathological conditions through the measurement of pressure and flow. Updated Use Case ER Metrics of Quality (1 of 3) ER Metrics of Quality (2 of 3) ER Metrics of Quality (3 of 3) ER mapping to F.D. (1 of 2) ER mapping to F.D. (2 of 2) Functional Decomposition Morph Chart (1 of 3) Morph Chart (2 of 3) Morph Chart (3 of 3) Undecided Concepts Pressure • PASCO versus Honeywell • LabVIEW versus DataStudio Resistance • External Clamp vs. Valve Updated System Architecture CAD Schematic Main Components Barb tube fitting: cheapest, easiest connection Ball pump: cheapest, easiest way to add air pressure Pressure tap into tubing Pressure release value: easy release valve Drill and screw into acrylic 7 9 8 1 Pressure, PA Flow P16081 Pump Arterial Compliance, CA 4 5 Venous Compliance, CV Pressure, PV 2 3 Resistance Pressure, v PC 6 LabVIEW Subsystems Agenda 1 & 5 - Pressure 2 & 4 - Compliance 3 - Resistance 6 - Labview 7, 8 & 9 - Consult with P16080 Pressure Sensor Analysis 1. Flow Diagram 2. PASCO Sensors 3. Honeywell Sensors 4. Bill of Materials 5. Test Plan 6. Risks Energy Pressure Flow Diagram Analog Pressure Signal Information Digital Pressure Signal Amplifier Board DAQ Pressure vs. Time Graph LabView Program Computer AC Power PASCO Sensors Pros Already Owned Differential Pressure Capabilities Cons http://www.pasco.com/file_downloads/product_ manuals/PASPORT-Dual-Pressure-SensorManual-PS-2181.pdf No integration with LabView Special Pressure Taps Needed User Friendly Will need more than one computer for real time system analysis • LabView for heart, DataStudio for circulatory pressures • LabView needed for automatic resistance control Maximum Sampling Rate 1000 Hz Absolute Pressure Range 0-1500 mmHg Differential Pressure Range -750-750 mmHg Resolution 0.075 mmHg at 10 Hz Repeatability 7.5 mmHg Tubing (Type) Polyurethane Tubing Size (Diameter) 3.2 mm Tubing Length 2.4 m Interface Data Studio (New one coming soon?) Source: PasPort Instruction Sheet (01209969A) Honeywell Sensors Pros Cons Integration With LabView More Expensive than PASCO Accuracy Will need a Sensor Board/DAQ Liquid Friendly Only one computer program needed for both heart and circulatory • DAQ is already provided, but would need to build the circuit board/LabView Program http://www.mouser.com/ProductDet ail/Honeywell/HSCMRNT005PGAA 5/?qs=%2fha2pyFaduhkciXVz6btF HLY3u79xkDhknp39AuPvmffYIGgr Gx0aQ%3d%3d TruStability Board Mount Pressure Sensors: HSC Series (HSCMRNT005PGAA5) Operating Gage Pressure Range 0-258 mmHg Output Type Analog Pressure Type Gauge Operating Supply Voltage 5V Operating Temperature -40-85 C Operating Supply Current 20 mA Accuracy 0.25% Liquid Media Capable? Yes Source: HSCMRNT005PGAA 5 Datasheet (Mouser.com) Honeywell Sensors Dimensions http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Honeywell/HSCMRNT005PGAA5/?qs=%2fha2pyF uPvmffYIGgrGx0aQ%3d%3d Pressure BOM Component Componen ID t Supplier Supplier ID Quanitity/Dimensions Price/Unit P1 Honeywell Mouser HSCMRNT005PGAA5 Board Electronic Mount Pressure Sensor 2 P2 PASCO Sensor PASCO PS-2181 2 Free P3 Pressure Taps PASCO ME-2224 6 Total Cost Notes $45.78 $91.56 May only need 1 (48.85) - Already Owned $16.00 $96.00 Comes as a set of 6 Might be able to borrow for free (Rep mentioned it) Pressure Risks 5 Technical Not being able to generate required values 6 Technical Seal on the pressure tap leaks 7 Technical Not being able to calibrate within time constraints 9 Resource System components will be expensive 11 Safety Electricity and water combination can cause dangerous conditions Owner: Jack PRESSURE TEST PLAN 1. Prove Sensor Functionality a. Flow through a pipe with decreased diameter in the center b. Pressure taps at two points c. Measure the pressure drop 2. Calibration of the Sensors a. Obtain a full tank of known pressure b. Measure the pressure and correct accordingly Subsystem - Compliance Tank 1. Flow Diagram a. Energy, Material, and Information I/O b. Interfaces 2. Cylinder or rectangular prism? a. Pros and cons b. Feasibility 3. Bill of Materials (Draft) 4. Subsystem Risks 5. Preliminary Ideas for Testing Plans Forced Air Air Height Pressure Compliance Pressure Flow Flow Energy LabVIEW Pressure vs. Time Pressure Transducer AC Power Information Material Cylindrical Tanks Pros Fewer pieces Less interfaces to seal Cons Price limits diameter Interfacing with tubing and pressure taps Rectangular Tanks Pros Flat surfaces easier to machine and interface Cons More pieces that need to be machined and sealed Compliance (mL/mmHg) Cylindrical Arterial Compliance Tank Polycarbonate 5.75ID [in] Acrylic 5ID [in] 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 2 4 6 Height (inches) 8 10 12 Cylindrical Venous Compliance Tank 35 Acrylic 9.75ID [in] Compliance (mL/mmHg) 30 Polycarbonate 5.75ID [in] 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 Height (inches) 20 25 Rectangular Arterial Compliance Tank Compliance (mL/mmHg) 9 8 4x4x12 [in] 7 4x8x16 [in] (Donovan) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Height (Inches) 12 14 16 Rectangular Venous Compliance Tank 40 Compliance (mL/mmHg) 35 12x12x16 [in] 30 12x8x16 [in] (Donovan) 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 2 4 6 8 Height (inches) 10 12 14 16 Technical Risks - Compliance Tank Resource & Safety Risks - Compliance Tank Compliance BOM - Cylindrical Compliance BOM - Rectangular • 6-sided tank would be around $200 Compliance - Preliminary Testing Plans 1. Air tight seal a. pressurize, use soap, and look for bubbles 2. Generate chart to allow students to know which height corresponds to a desired condition - scale on box 3. Excel spreadsheet for liquid height and corresponding compliance values Resistance Agenda 1. Flow Diagram 2. Valve and Resistance Analysis 3. Bill of Material and Alternative Bill of Materials 4. Risks 5. Test Plans Resistance Flow Valve and Resistance Analysis Resistance can be modeled after Ohm’s Law in that: R=ΔP/F where ΔP is the height difference and F is the mean flow rate. [http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/89/2/893.full.pdf] Valve and Resistance Continued For Valves resistance and friction can be modeled as: hf=(Kv^2)/2g Where K is the resistance coefficient, f is the Darcy friction factor, V is the velocity and hf is the Frictional Loss or Head Loss. Considering using a Gate valve for purposes of the design. ● Resistance will have to be tested manually ○ Test each resistor position and correlate them to the pressure output seen ■ Create a graph of resistor position vs pressure output Valve Considerations Other potentials: Linear Actuator and Globe Valve Resistance BOM Current BOM Subsystem Component ID Valve Component Bronze Gate ValveClass 125, 3/4" NPT Female, Non-rising Stem V1 Supplier Supplier ID Quanitity / Dimensions Price/Unit Total Cost McMaster Carr 4619K14 1 $27.96 Notes May be alternated for linear $27.96 actuator Alternative BOM Subsystem Linear Actuator Globe Valve Component ID Component Supplier Supplier ID LA1 25mm Diamter Actuator Anaheim TSFCA25 Exteded strew with Automatio -150-21motor n 023-LW4 GV Low-Pressure Bronze Globe Valve, 3/4" NPT Female, EPDM Disc McMaster Carr 4695K65 Quanitity / Dimensions Price/Unit Total Cost 11 1 Notes $39.00 Can only apply 10 Newtons $39.00 of Force. $37.44 Meant for low pressure flows, overall length of 2 $37.44 5/16” Resistance Risks Resistance - Preliminary Testing Plans 1. Calibration a. Make sure when impedance is 0 R=ΔP/F is obeyed. b. Make sure when impedance is at max there is no flow through the system after this point. 2. Calculate theoretical head loss through circuit and perform head loss experiment on the pipe and valve to confirm compliance to the theoretical model (initial set up for MSD) LabVIEW LabVIEW Considerations F. M. Donovan (1975) Design of a Hydraulic Analog of the Circulatory System for Evaluating Artificial Hearts, Biomaterials, Medical Devices, and Artificial Organs, 3:4, 439-449 Venous • Waveform consistency • Same parameters give same waveforms each time • Interfacing with pressure sensors • One program for both teams Arterial Preliminary Life Span Calculation Considerations: What will likely fail first? Is that part expensive? Is that part easy to replace? New risks Mitigated Risks Risk Chart Draft System Bill of Materials (1 of 2) Draft System Bill of Materials (2 of 2) Project Plan - what we achieved Project Plan - deliverables for next phase End of MSD I Deliverables 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. “Working” theoretical model Finalized, completed and accurately priced Bill of Materials CAD drawing 100% done Test plan for design 90% complete Theoretical risk list complete with ideas as to how to minimize potential effects Understanding of deliverables for MSD II Short list of contests this design could enter Ways to Improve Efficiency 1. More organized direction for research of parts and materials 2. Better collaboration with P16080 3. More organized group meetings Goals for Phase IV 1. Choose the most efficient pressure sensor 2. Decide on dimensions for compliance tanks 3. Decide on internal versus external resistances 4. Interactions with P16080 • LabVIEW • Flow meter • Interfacing ASEE 123rd Annual Conference & Exposition • Abstract submitted on October 20th, 2015 • Abstract decision deadline: November 9, 2015