Ops Group Meeting Slides

advertisement

TT Unit Ops Group

23

rd

January 2015

LT1, 7 Bristo Square

Agenda

1.

Action Points from previous meeting

2. 15/16 location allocation timeline and deadlines

3. 15/16 timetabling:

• Template management

• Activity variants

• Personal TT update

• BI Explorer report update

4. Week numbering/labelling in Enterprise

5. Centralisation of services:

• TT data management

• Location management

6. Future of Student Timetabling – project proposal update

7. TT Unit website updates

8. AOB

1. Action Points from 1

st

July 2014 meeting

ACTION POINT

To further simplify the

Course Timetable Browser disclaimer

OWNER

TT Unit

To link 13/14 data to the

BI Suite so that class list reporting can be tested

IS

To investigate the random allocation of academic names when scheduling a course

TT Unit

UPDATE

Ongoing

Completed

TT Unit will feed back at meeting

2. 15/16 location allocation timeline and deadlines

Oct 2014

Nov 14 Dec 14

Template

Workshops

(February)

Jan 15 Feb 15 Mar 15 Apr 15 May 15 Jun 15 Jul 15

Schools to check location allocations

(early-July to end of

August)

Aug 15

Sep 2015

14 Oct, 2014

Snapshot of 14/15

For Roll Forward and issue opt out notice

3 Nov, 2014

Roll Forward

Opt Out

Deadline

Nov 14

Launch of 1516 SDB 4 Feb, 2015

Official Launch Date

29 May, 2015

Submit

Centrally-allocated

Location requests

15 Jun, 2015

Start

Student

Allocation

6 Jul, 2015

Centrally-Allocated

Location

Allocation

3. 15/16 Timetabling

Area

Template Management

Activity Variants

Update

TT Unit will hold workshops during

Feb/March

TT Unit is reviewing the use of variants

Personal Timetables SA conducted on a daily basis

Jan 2015 - 22,280 students with partial timetables

Aug 2014 – 20, 957

4. Week numbering/labelling in Enterprise

A request was received in October from a School as to whether the Web Timetables could be changed to show the week dates rather than the semester week numbers.

Samples of current view -

• This may be possible but would only show up as “week commencing …”

Is there (could there be) a wider demand for this kind of change in other Schools or is this something that can remain as is?

5. Centralisation of Services

Timetabling Process

School Review Outcome

8

6

4

2

0

12

10

18

16

14

Timetabling Data Location Allocation Student Allocation

Primary

Tier 1

Tier 2

Management of Gen Teach Space

• Centralised management from 15/16:

– Central Area

– King’s Buildings

– Holyrood

• £466k capital funding to upgrade AV kit in identified rooms

• Bookings to be managed by TT Unit – priority system in operation for Schools

Proposed Enhanced Service

TT Unit/LTSTS Service Benefit Service level

Commitment of all timetabling requirements to Enterprise

Ensures quality and consistency of key data

Ensures provision of accurate student personalised timetables

Removal of requirement for Enterprise expertise at

School level

Ability to re-direct resource to other tasks

Longer lead time for Schools to confirm requirements

Core

Centralised booking management of general teaching space

Reduced requirement for Enterprise management at School level

Efficient, single-point-of-contact booking service

School teaching space “priority allocation” system

Longer lead time for Schools to confirm requirements

Core

Centralised booking service for

“specialist” space

TT Unit can manage specialist (i.e. labs, workshops etc) on behalf of Schools

Reduced requirement for Enterprise management at School level

Ability to re-direct resource to other tasks

Optional

Proposed Enhanced Service cont…

TT Unit/LTSTS Service

Central support for general teaching space

Central support for student timetable allocation

Timetable “modelling” service for

Schools

Benefit

Centrally supplied and support AV equipment

Consistent standard of equipment provision

 Centrally managed fabric and furniture upgrade and maintenance

TT Unit service option for any/all

“random” student allocation models

Reduced requirement for Enterprise management at School level

 Ability to re-direct resource to other tasks

Safely introduce new courses to timetable

Modelling to re-shape programme offerings

 Offline modelling exercises to inform timetabling flexibility

Make full use of TT Unit expertise

Service level

Core

Optional

Core

Enhanced Service Funding

• Business case submitted to Colleges Jan 2015

• Request for additional funding to transfer timetabling/booking operations to TT Unit –from

15/16 financial year

• Funding equivalent to 0.4 FTE at Grade 4 per School

• Delivers full range of enhanced service proposal

6. Future of Student Timetabling

Project Update

Key updates

• New project proposal to deliver:

– Full, comprehensive personalised timetable service

– To be delivered by online student self-sign-up system

– Provision of calendar service: Office365 or iCal

• Presented to Knowledge Strategy Committee

(KSC) on 23/01/15

Proposed Project Timescale

Project implementation Timescale

Project start Aug 15

Centralisation of timetable data management Aug 15 – Mar 16

Options appraisal: Calendar service

Options appraisal: Enhanced allocation system

Initial implementation: Calendar service

Pilot scheme: Calendar service

Calendar post-pilot evaluation and enhancement

Initial implementation: Enhanced allocation system

Live implementation: Calendar Service

Pilot scheme: Enhanced allocation system

Aug 15 – Nov 15

Aug 15 – Mar 16

Dec 15 – Feb 16

Mar 16 – May 16

Jun 16 – Aug 16

Oct 16 – Apr 17

Nov 16

Nov 17 – Mar 18

Enhanced allocation system post-pilot evaluation and enhancement May 18 – Jul 18

Training for staff allocation only

Live implementation: Enhanced allocation system

Project close

May 18 – Jul 18

Jul 18

Oct 18

Key project pre-requisites

• Sponsor funding: circa £250k

• Centralisation of timetable data management

1415 Main Allocation Process – Lessons Learnt

(sample)

PART OF OPERATION AREA

Data Preparation

Location allocation

Student Allocation

Miscellaneous

Module instance

Consistency of process/instructions

Contingency planning

Modelling to maximise space

Template awareness and understanding

SPDA management – reverting to UEF

SDB management

LESSON LEARNT

(including any planned improvements for 1516 where possible)

Need to check as thoroughly as possible that the correct module instance has been interacted with (re correct academic year) – future-proofs SA process

In-house documentation existed but this has now been amalgamated into one document that all in the TTU will need to use as guidance

Last year’s 1-person post-MAP allocation system is being replaced by team of 3 TTU members whittling down remaining teaching activities

As more space is removed from our pool of locations we will need to conduct more modelling exercises to anticipate impact/problems

Continue to work closely with Schools through Template

Workshops and Data Collection Workshops to improve quality of data (esp. for SA purposes)

When the SPDAs stop working, our manual back-up process will be activated sooner, allowing manual catching-up to be completed more speedily

All users benefit from a planned refresh of the database and August will continue to be the time this is done in prep for Semester 1

Any other business?

Download