2: Organising the Toolkit: Two Models: Bloom’s and Dimensions of Learning Word Association (to generate new questions or solutions): ‘my teaching philosophy’ (questions) ‘remembering and using the range of strategies in lesson plans’ (solutions) launchpad word (as dissimilar as possible): fish Bloom’s Cognitive Taxonomy: ‘doing what (cognitively) to what (knowledge)’ Cognitive dimension Foundational thinking Higher order thinking Teacher ownership Student ownership 1. Remember 2. Understand 3. Apply 4. Analyse 5. Evaluate 6. Design/Creat e Acting like an encyclopaedia where one finds information, facts, data Acting like Thomas Edison the inventor of the light bulb, always improving, designing, planning Acting link a ‘how to’ manual, applying previously learnt data in similar or new situations What icon could we draw to represent each? Acting like a sorting Which metaphor tray, examining and breaking up an issue fits which into its component cognitive level? parts Factual knowledge Knowledge dimension Conceptual knowledge Procedural knowledge Meta knowledge Acting like a dictionary, understanding words, concepts, cause-effect and ‘reasons for’ Single pieces of information e.g. frogs are amphibians Groups of facts e.g. amphibians Skills (single) and processes (groups of skills)e.g. Ways of learning/learning strategies for particular types of knowledge e.g. classifying 1 Acting like a judge, based on the evidence How to use it to organize/select strategies? Teaching strategies can be located in one or more of the cognitive/knowledge levels. (e.g. KWHL, 321:RIQ, PMI, MAS, comparing, classifying, jigsaw/envoy, round robin/rotating papers) used to facilitate what kind of thinking? How to use it to focus student thinking within a strategy: explicit thinking intentions and explicit thinking instructions . . . Think-pair-share . . . what’s hard for students when doing the first part of this? Cognitive Level Draw lines to link correctly Thinking Tool/Strategy Remember Explain-pair-share Understand Rate/decide-pair share Apply List-pair-share Analyse Improve/design-pair share Evaluate Write/draw-pair-share Design/create Discuss-pair-share So we need to decide what kind of thinking we’re asking students to do, and choose strategies and instructions that help them do that kind of thinking . . . Applying it . . . Some questions: 1. To what extent have you been successful in your teaching? 2. What are the main subjects you will be teaching? 3. Discuss your life as a student-teacher. 4. Why do you want to go into teaching? 5. How could you improve your lesson delivery? 6. Show how being a teacher will make your more employable. Activity 1: Rank these questions from simplest to most complex from a cognitive point of view. Activity 2: Pick a thinking tool to help develop depth to the task: SWOT analysis chart (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) Fishbone diagram Cause-effect map (one or more causes, effects, sub-effects, depending on the question focus) Extent barometer (divide question into various sub-areas) MAS chart (modify or replace elements, add new feature, change size of one or more elements) Word Association (random word, word association with it until link develops to answer problem/question) So the ANATOMY of a TASK or QUESTION . . . 1. 2. 3. Cognitive outcome (purpose e.g. analyse, evaluate) Knowledge context (topic i.e. the stuff you’re teaching about) Thinking tool(s) (evidence i.e. the material you’ll base your assessment on e.g. a SWOT analysis) 2