Feasibility Report (for Asset Based Projects) <Project Name> <Location> National Project Management System Feasibility Phase Version: July 2, 2013 Prepared by: Date: CPBN: Sigma Number: FR Template - Asset Based Projects Table of Contents Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................................2 1. Problem/Opportunity Definition ............................................................................................................2 2. Background .............................................................................................................................................3 2.1 Project History.......................................................................................................................................3 2.2 Building Condition .................................................................................................................................3 2.3 Tenant Considerations ..........................................................................................................................3 2.4 Strategic Context...................................................................................................................................4 2.5 Stakeholders..........................................................................................................................................4 3. Project Considerations ............................................................................................................................4 4. Identification & Analysis of Options .......................................................................................................5 5. 4.1 Options Considered ........................................................................................................................5 4.2 Analysis of Non-Financial Factors / Preliminary Risk Assessment ..................................................5 4.3 Non-Feasible Options ......................................................................................................................7 4.4 Feasible Options ..............................................................................................................................8 Recommended Options for Further Analysis ..........................................................................................8 6. Project Team, Approval and Signatures .....................................................................................................8 1 FR Template - Asset Based Projects The Feasibility Report (FR) presents the project parameters and defines the potential solutions to the defined problem, need or opportunity. It expands on each of these potential solutions, providing sufficient detail and nonfinancial evaluations to permit the project leader to recommend to the approving authority all viable potential solutions that should be further analyzed in the next phase (Investment Analysis Report [IAR]). The FR should also justify why any potential solutions were considered to be non-viable or considered to be non-compliant with government policy and/or project objectives and therefore not considered further. Executive Summary 1. Statement of the problem/opportunity Problem/Opportunity definition 2. Previous Approvals, decision or agreements (if applicable) 3. Special issues to Regional Investment Management Board/Real Property Investment Board (if applicable) Risk management Potential political considerations Timing Legal issues Client issues Department’s sustainable development targets Heritage conservation Public sensitivity Recent or ongoing related projects 4. List options to be analyzed 1. Problem/Opportunity Definition 1. Key Issues (factors driving the initiation of the project) Maintain or improve asset Issues related to insufficient effectiveness of a system Improving environmental performances Possible Opportunity Client Requirements Emergency situation 2. Previous approvals, decisions or agreements: Regional Investment Management Board decision (RIMB) Real Property Investment Board (RPIB) Treasury Board approvals (TB) Cabinet or Ministerial decision Interdepartmental agreement Note: This section should not include any indication of the proposed solution. Its purpose is to concentrate on what drives the project. 2 FR Template - Asset Based Projects 2. Background 2.1 Project History - Short history - Relationship to other projects or programs (if applicable) 2.2 Building Condition 1. Brief description of the building Age, area, location, main characteristics, classification of the building, building owner Environmental performance assessment (BOMA BESt, LEED, etc) Heritage considerations Strategic value of asset 2. Future plans for use of asset 3. Overall condition information from Building Condition Report, Properties Facilities Management, Building Management Plan, Asset Management Plan etc. (if applicable) Building systems (Architectural, Structural, Fire Alarm System, Interior Condition, Mechanical Systems, Electrical Systems, Indoor Air Quality, etc.) Limitations Recent renovations Facility Condition Index (FCI) (if applicable) Upcoming requirements Operational, financial, environmental and functional performance Project related problems and impacts Accessibility Impact of current problem on tenants (if applicable) 2.3 Tenant Considerations - - List the Occupants Type and amount of space occupied in form of a table (if appropriate) Client Type of space X Y Storage Office SPS Office m2u m2r Occupancy Instrument (OI) Expiry Date August 31, 2013 December 31, 2014 473.9 494.3 2,744.0 2,982.6 774.3 807.5 Z 6,900.0 7,495.1 September 30, 2015 10,892.2 11,779.5 Information on client changes, movement, issues, etc. (if applicable) 3 FR Template - Asset Based Projects 2.4 Strategic Context 1. Describe how the problems/opportunities relate to current strategies and plans, such as: National Investment Strategy (NIS) Regional Investment Strategy (RIS) Community Based Investment Strategy (CBIS) Portfolio Strategy Strategic Action Plan Asset Management Plan Building Management Plan Client Strategy (Explain the client’s long-term and short-term accommodation strategy, if applicable) 2. Meet with the Portfolio Management Sector, Owner Investor Analyst, Asset Manager, Accommodation Manager and any other relevant stakeholders to ensure that all necessary background information is included; any additional directives from upper management, priorities, budget cuts, strategic and operating review, etc. 2.5 Stakeholders (Relevant groups who may be implicated in the problem/opportunity) 1. List all the relevant stakeholders who have an involvement in the problem/opportunity 2. Briefly describe their stake 3. Project Considerations Highlight any special issues/requirements relative, but not restricted to the following: - Technical requirements Level of urgency Health and safety Environmental requirements Sustainable Development Strategy requirements Requirement based on a current strategy Policy requirements Timing requirements Security requirements Accessibility requirements Requirement to address the condition of the Asset Heritage building Client requirement Other requirements 4 FR Template - Asset Based Projects 4. Identification & Analysis of Options 4.1 Options Considered **Status quo must be fully analyzed and the consequences of maintaining the status quo are identified. Refer to Base Case (Status Quo) Scenario. Identify and describe all reasonable options for satisfying the project requirements It is best to identify a greater number of options and then rule them out Some examples of options for asset-based projects are the following: - Status Quo (maintaining the asset as-is; minor repairs only when necessary) Repairs, replacement, upgrade Renovation, heritage conservation/recapitalization Demolition, disposal, deconstruction Etc. 4.2 Analysis of Non-Financial Factors / Preliminary Risk Assessment 1) Description of options: Option 1: Status Quo Scope: Clearly explain the details of this option (what they consist of) and its limitation Option 2 - Scope: Clearly explain the details of this option (what they consist of) and its limitation This option includes/excludes: Additional scope of work (compared to Option X): Option 3 - Scope: Clearly explain the details of this option (what they consist of) and its limitation This option includes/excludes: Additional scope of work (compared to Option X and Y): 2) Advantage and Disadvantage and Preliminary Risk Assessment Table. For example: Options Option 1: Status Quo Advantages - Disruption: No added disruptions to elevator service by removing elevators from service for upgrading. Preliminary Risk Assessment (High-Medium-Low) Disadvantages - - - Codes and Standards: Does not address non-compliance with current barrier free design, B44 Elevator Safety Code, and safety bulletin from Technical Standards and Safety Authority Future maintenance: Increased capital and maintenance costs due to the replacement of obsolete components of the existing control and drive systems. Tenant satisfaction: Continued tenant dissatisfaction regarding 5 - - Risk of project delays (very low): there is no additional work to be done on the floor Risk of eventual system failure (high): failure of obsolete machinery and energy inefficient operation posing a health and safety risk to occupants and visitors alike FR Template - Asset Based Projects elevator service and reliability including numerous shutdowns and entrapments. - Health and Safety: The - Disruption: Disruption to elevator elevator system will have a service, as one elevator at a time significant overall will be down for approximately improvement to the level of four to five weeks for upgrading. safety. - Tenant Satisfaction: No - Codes & Standards: Full improvements in elevator service compliance with current or reliability. barrier free design, B44 - Future modernization: Elevator Safety Code, and Approximately 15-20% of this safety bulletin from Technical work (and costs) would become Standards and Safety redundant when a major Authority. modernization is carried out in the near future. - Energy Efficiency: No energyrelated savings as the original drive and control equipment would be retained. - Health and Safety: The - Recapitalization Project: Staging Option 3: elevator system will have a and timing of other projects within Complete significant overall the complex may incur revisiting, Elevator improvement to the level of upgrading or changing some base Modernization safety. building which form part of this - Codes and Standards: Full project. compliance with current - Disruption: Longest shutdown barrier free design, B44 time for each elevator. One Elevator Safety Code, and elevator at a time will be out of safety bulletin from Technical service for approximately 12 Standards and Safety weeks. Authority. - Long-Term Solution: Completely refurbished custom cab interiors that should not require refurbishing for another 1015 years. - Tenant Satisfaction: Significant improvement in elevator service and waiting times with the installation of microprocessor based computerized controls and dispatching as well as increased system reliability. - Energy Efficiency: Elevator energy savings of Option 2: Upgrade to Comply With Current B44 Elevator Safety Code Only 6 - Risk of project delays (medium): delays in schedule due to “unknowns” or additional work to meet various Codes & Standards. - Risk of cost overruns (medium): increased costs associated with factors unknown before the construction phase - Risk of project delays (low): delays in schedule due to “unknowns” during the construction phase - Risk of cost overruns (low): increased costs associated with factors unknown before the construction phase or inaccurate as-built drawings FR Template - Asset Based Projects approximately 40% with the installation of solid state motor drives and permanent magnet alternating current gearless drive machines. Some examples of non-financial factors are the following: Project requirement satisfaction Strategic compatibility (Long Term Vision and Plan, NIS, RIS, AMP, CBIS etc.) Impact on diversity or balance of the inventory Timing requirements respected Support goals and objectives of PWGSC Sustainable Development Strategy Client requirements satisfaction Suitability of accommodation Health and Safety Seismic/Code Conservation of Heritage Value Continuity of Operations Flexibility Disruptions to tenants Accessibility Federal presence Good Neighbour Policy Environmental factors Aboriginal considerations Example of risk factors relevant to each option Risk that the project may not fully rectify an identified problem Risk of user needs not being met Risk of changing requirements Risk of not meeting timing requirements Risk of cost overruns Risk of future performance being impaired Risk of environmental degradation Risk of exceeding approved funding Risk of Base building System Failure Risk related to Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Risk related to Fire Code Requirements Risk related to a request for Non-Compliance Risk of Political Pressure Risk of client commitment to the project Risk of changing priorities in the Federal Government or Department Other related risks 4.3 Non-Feasible Options - All options considered but not feasible Clearly explain why the eliminated options are not considered for further analysis 7 FR Template - Asset Based Projects 4.4 Feasible Options - Identify the options which are to be carried forward for in-depth analysis Develop the main options analyzed Relate the asset’s (or Regional Portfolio) strategy with the parameters of the options. Proposed Timeline (project milestones only) 5. Recommended Options for Further Analysis - Combine the results and summarize (short summary) the key findings of the options analysis (determine which options were considered as feasible after risk and non financial analysis) Identify which options are recommended for further analysis in the preparation of the IAR 6. Project Team, Approval and Signatures Position (examples) Project Director Senior Project Leader Senior Project Manager Project Manager Prof. and Tech. Resources Senior Financial Advisor Property Manager Other (specify) Action Organization Date Name Signature Prepared by Project leader Reviewed by Recommended by Approved by 8