IBM Power Systems - IBM i

High Availability Strategies & Planning for 2012

Part 3 of 3 - Part 3 of 3 - HA and DR Technology Positioning

Eric Hess

IBM Power Systems, Advanced Technical Support - Americas

February 2009

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

1

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Agenda - High Availability Strategies & Planning for 2012

 Part 1 of 3 - Introduction to High Availability and Disaster Recovery o

What are your availability requirements ?

o

IBM Power Systems IBM i availability solution

 Part 2 of 3 - Introduction to IBM HA and DR Technologies o

IBM Power Systems IBM i multi- server availability solutions o o

High availability and Disaster recovery

What’s new in IBM Availability?

 Part 3 of 3 - HA and DR Technology Positioning (this module) : o

HA and DR Technology Positioning o

Availability with POWER6 and Virtualization o

Pulling it all together - next steps

The latest client-ready version of this presentation can be found in TechDocs:

IBM Internal: w3.ibm.com/support/techdocs

External: www03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/Web/TechDocs (or ibm.com and search ‘techdocs’)

 Partners: PartnerWorld

In Techdocs, use the search word ‘Hess’ to find this presentation

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

2

© 2009 IBM Corporation

* * * * * * * *

This page for IBM and Business Partners Only

* * * * * * * *

Additional Events

1.

Introduction to HA (HA Strategies & Planning for 2012 part 1 of 3) - Techtalk

2.

Introduction to IBM HA and DR Technologies (HA Strategies & Planning for 2012 part 2 of 3) – Recorded (in Techdocs)

3.

IBM Power HA Strategy

– Techtalk (Thursday Feb 19)

4.

IBM CBU Enhancements – Techtalk

5.

Technology Positioning (HA Strategies & Planning for 2012 part 3 of 3) - Techtalk

6.

IASP Enablement - Techtalk

7.

Sizing PowerHA - Techtalk

8.

Geographical Mirroring for Native IBM i applications - Recorded

9.

Geographical Mirroring for Hosted and VIOS environments - Recorded

10.

DS6000/DS8000 Copy Services HA Sizing and Considerations - Techtalk

11.

iCluster Enhancements - Techtalk

12.

What’s New in IBM i Availability

Speakers for these sessions include: Bob Gintowt, Dave Chorba, Selwyn Dickey, Steve Finnes, Fred

Robinson, Chuck Stupca, Mike Warkentin, and other experts on availability solutions and planning

 Look for email from “STG Sales Education & Events Newsletter” for Techtalk dates

 Techtalks: SmartZone for Power System Technical Training: o

IBM: http://lt.be.ibm.com/smartzone/powertech o

Partner: http://www.ibm.com/services/weblectures/smartzone/powertech

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

3

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Recap of Part 1 and Part 2

 IBM offers a growing number of single system and multi-system availability solutions, including software, OS and storage based technologies

 Assess your use of single server availability options

 All sizes of businesses should assess their business resiliency requirements o

Use methodologies such as Business Impact Analysis (BIA) to better understand exposures and what should be done about them

 IBM i and Power Systems offer 6 fundament technologies for business resiliency (native attached storage)

1.

Logical Replication software

2.

Switched IASP - Independent Auxiliary Storage Pool

3.

IBM i Geographical Mirroring via OS

4.

IBM System Storage LUN Level Switching

5.

IBM System Storage Copy Services – simple copy

6.

IBM System Storage Copy Services with IBM i

 Some HA and DR technologies are unique to the IBM i Virtual Environments o

Understand how application HA / DR requirements interact with design efforts for a virtualized solution environment

 IBM i 6.1 in conjunction with PowerHA offers dramatic HA/DR enhancements

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

10

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Power Systems IBM i Availability Solutions

IBM has a long time investment strategy to deliver advanced i5/OS and IBM i availability in order to meet varying client needs

1989

 Logical Replication (Partner)

 Journaling

 Disk Mirroring and RAID-5

 UPS

1999

 HABP Cluster Partnership

 OS/400 Clusters with

Logical Replication

 Remote Journaling

 Redundant power supplies

 Select concurrent maintenance

 High speed, parallel tape

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

2009

 PowerHA for IBM i

 Independent Auxiliary Storage Pools

 IBM i Geographical Mirroring

 LUN Level Switching

 IBM Copy Services Integration*

 IBM iCluster (Logical Replication)

 Remote Journaling enhancements

 RAID5/6, Hot Spare, Disk Mirroring

 Dual power connections

 Increased server resiliency

 Concurrent node maintenance

 i 6.1 Quisece for backups

 Virtual tape

 IBM Lab Services for advanced availability consulting

 Education/Services Vouchers

* IBM Storage DS6000 and DS8000

11

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

Technology Positioning

Multi-Server Availability Solutions

12

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Common Planning Items and Costs

 DB Journaling o

Storage space and performance for any new journaling activity

 HA Journal Performance, OS Option 42 (optional) o

Can be required for any availability need if journaling has an impact on long running workloads like nightly batch

 SMAPP – System Managed Access Path Protection o

Its use directly effects recovery time of all IASP and Storage copy based solutions

 Efficient tape backup combinations o

Save While Active o

High speed tape o o o

Concurrent or parallel tape designs i 6.1 Quiesce

FlashCopy

Second server or LPAR related hardware

Related vendors technology education and services

14

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

PowerHA and IBM i Switched IASPs

LPAR-1

*SYSBAS

LPAR-2

*SYSBAS

Basic Switched IASPs between LPARs

IASP

5.3, 5.4 or - 6.1

PowerHA for i

Basic Switched IASPs between LPARs o

Redundant LPARs provide protection from

LPAR outage and some planned and unplanned outage requirements o

Single copy of disk cannot address disk outage or backups o

Combine with replication solutions

Switched IASP planning items: o

Primary use is for switching between LPARs o

POWER6 is last generation to support HSL, avoid

Switchable HSL towers between servers o

Is not supported by VIOS environments o

Some Single Points of Failure exist o

Server SPOFs

– use all applicable single server availability options o

Storage - single copy of disk so use better disk protections schemes

15

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

Switched IASPs (1-2)

o o o

Description:

IASP based

Basic, local High Availability – stand alone or foundation for other technologies

Management and automation provided by IBM clusters or PowerHA for i

Business resiliency use: o o o o o o

Local High Availability: Some RTO and RPO benefits when Journaling and SMAPP used

Long distance Disaster Recovery: No , local LPAR solution only

Both local HA and remote DR: No, however, can be combined with replication

Planned outages: Some.

Online backups: No, may use Save-While-Active

Workload balancing: No, since this is a single disk copy and cannot be shared

Typical client environments: o

Small and medium SMB, and as a foundation in Large Enterprise

Availability and recovery characteristics: o o o

No IPL required - vary on the IASP to an active server/LPAR

RTO: 5 minutes to 1 hour depending on design and practice

RPO: Real time

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

Environments o Native IBM i 5.4 & 6.1

o IBM i 5.4 & 6.1

Hosted partitions for

AIX, Linux and IBM i

6.1* o

Windows Integration

* (IBM i 6.1 host and client only)

16

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Switched IASPs (2-2)

Key advantages: o o o o

Storage agnostic – works with any supported internal, external or combination

Strategic foundation, allows addition of other replication technologies as needed

Simple architecture means robust switching and simple to operate

Application change management simplicity

Key considerations: o o o

LPAR only - not strategic between servers since POWER6 is last to support HSL/RIO

Storage and I/O properly designed for uptime and performance (system pool and IASP)

Single copy of data, does not offer concurrent access to data from other server or LPAR o o o o

Typical planning and timelines:

Identify application and data objects to be replicated

Application(s) and data migration proof of concept

Storage I/O hardware planning and implementation as req.

3-6 months from planning to implementation o o o

Typical costs considerations: o

Additional storage or I/O hardware (disk, drawer, 12x, etc.)

HA Switchable Resources – OS option 41

PowerHA for i - 5761-HAS if 6.1

IASP proof of concept ( if required)

Vendors and Resources o o o o o o

Power team to lead architecture

ATS and Techline

Lab Services (fee)

Benchmark Center

GTS (fee)

IASP and PowerHA

Education

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

17

© 2009 IBM Corporation

IBM i and System Storage LUN Level Switching

Source Target

Production

*SYSBAS

LUN

Group

(active)

5.4 and 6.1 Toolkit

HA

*SYSBAS

Switchable LUNs using native attached

DS6000/DS8000 (LPAR or Server level) o

Server level redundancy offers protection from server or LPAR outage o

Add FlashCopy to address backup windows o

Combine with continuous replication solution for advanced HA or DR o

Does not support VIOS

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

DS8000

IASP

FlashCopy

LUN

Group

(none)

IBM i Switchable LUNs

LUN Level Switching planning items: o

Good DS6000 or DS8000 skills o

Proper DS6000 or DS8000 design for performance o

Proper IASP and *SYSBAS design o

Space Efficient FlashCopy assessment o

Multipath used for critical workloads o

Lab Services consulting engagement for design, any proof of concept requirements, and implementation o

IBM i 5.4 or i 6.1

o

SMART Fibre IOA helps reduce costs

18

© 2009 IBM Corporation

LUN Level Switching(1-2)

o o o o

Description:

Function provided by IBM clustering

Local High Availability – stand alone or combined with Switched IASPs

Automation provided by IBM i clusters

Application change management simplicity

Business resiliency use: o o o o o o

Local High Availability: Yes, RTO and RPO benefits when Journaling and SMAPP used

Long distance Disaster Recovery: No , side by side or campus distance

Both local HA and remote DR: No.

Planned outages: Most.

Online backups: Yes, with FlashCopy or SWA

Workload balancing: No, since this is a single disk copy and cannot be shared

Typical client environments: o

Small and medium SMB, and foundation in Large Enterprise

Availability and recovery characteristics: o o o

No IPL required - vary on (switch) IASP to an active server/LPAR

RTO: 5 minutes to 1 hour depending on design and practice

RPO: Real time

Environments o o o o

Native IBM i 5.4 & 6.1

IBM i 5.4 & 6.1

Hosted partitions for

AIX, Linux and IBM i

6.1

Windows Integration

DS6000 and DS8000

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

19

© 2009 IBM Corporation

LUN Level Switching(2-2)

o o o o

Key advantages:

Cost effective, single image local HA

Simple architecture means robust switching and simple to operate

Application change management simplicity

Combines easily with DS6000 and DS8000 Copy Services and Toolkit o o o

Key considerations:

Storage and I/O properly designed for uptime and performance (system pool and IASP)

Requires additional copies, plus external storage costs versus internal

Not yet supported by PowerHA for i

Typical costs considerations: o o o o o o

Typical planning and timelines: o

Application(s) and data migration proof of concept or test

Server and DS Hardware planning and implementation as req.

3-12 months from planning to implementation

Vendors and Resources o o o o o o o

DS storage team to own

DS pre-sales, Disk Magic,

S.E. FlashCopy, etc.

Power team to lead architecture

ATS and Techline

Lab Services (fee)

Benchmark Center (fee)

GTS (fee)

IASP and System

Storage Education o

DS6000 or DS8000 costs over internal storage

Additional storage or I/O hardware (disk, HSL, 12x, etc.)

HA Switchable Resources – OS option 41

IBM i Copy Services toolkit (Lab Services)

IASP proof of concept (if required)

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

20

© 2009 IBM Corporation

PowerHA and XSM Geographic Mirroring

Source Target

LPAR-1

*SYSBAS

IBM i Geographic Mirroring

IASP IASP

5.3, 5.4, or 6.1

PowerHA for i

LPAR-1

*SYSBAS

Tape Backup

Geographic Mirroring Overview o

IBM replication at virtual storage management layer for consistent switchover o

Synchronous replication between servers o

Consistent replication of all data in IASP o

Administrative Domain (5.4 and 6.1) or Logical replication used to replication key system data o

Target can be used for backups to tape (6.1 preferred), if suspending replication is acceptable

(RPO exposure consideration)

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

Geographic Mirroring planning items: o

Provide the extra CPU and memory required to support

Geographic Mirroring environments o

Proper disk design o

Design for Performance o

Avoid disk pool I/O sharing o

Two or more network connections for performance and reliability o

Improper LAN or WAN planning will create end user performance problems o

Separate network path for cluster management o

Assess network related performance impacts when exceeding campus distance

21

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Geographic Mirroring (1-2)

o o o o

Description:

OS based solution, integrated into IBM i 5.4 and i 6.1

Local High Availability (side by side or campus)

Use stand alone or combined with Switched IASP and FlashCopy

Automation provided by IBM clusters or PowerHA for i

Business resiliency use: o o o o o o

Local High Availability: Yes, RTO and RPO benefits when Journaling and SMAPP used

Long distance Disaster Recovery: No , intended for campus or short city distance

Both local HA and remote DR: No

Planned outages: Some.

Online backups: Maybe, SWA on source, or suspend replication and use target copy

Workload balancing: No, since this is a single disk copy and cannot be shared

Typical client environments: o

Small and medium SMB, and basic needs in Large Enterprise

Availability and recovery characteristics: o o o

No IPL required - vary on (switch) IASP to an active server/LPAR

RTO: 5 minutes to 1 hour depending on design and practice

RPO: real time, if journaling and SMAPP are used

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

Environments o o o o o

Native IBM i 5.4 & 6.1

IBM i Hosted partitions for IBM i

Windows Integration

VIOS IBM i client

VIOS-Blades IBM i client

22

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Geographic Mirroring (2-2)

Key advantages: o o o

Storage agnostic – works with any supported internal, external, or virtual storage

Simple architecture means robust switching and simple to operate

Application change management simplicity

Key considerations: o o o

Synchronous replication technology limits distance

CPU, Memory and Storage I/O must be designed to support Geographical Mirroring

Detaching target for backups suspends replication - no valid HA environment during backup to tape and during the subsequent partial resynchronization.

o o o o

Typical planning and timelines:

Application(s) and data migration proof of concept or test

WAN - LAN Network design (redundancy, latency, bandwidth)

Hardware planning and implementation as req.

3-12 months from planning to implementation

Typical costs considerations: o o o o o

Additional storage or I/O hardware (disk, HSL, 12x, etc.)

HA Switchable Resources – OS option 41

PowerHA for i - 5761-HAS if 6.1

WAN or LAN hardware for capacity and performance

IASP proof of concept (if required)

Vendors and Resources o o o o o o o

Power team to lead architecture

ATS and Techline

Lab Services (fee)

Network expertise

Benchmark Center (fee)

GTS (fee)

IASP and PowerHA

Education

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

23

© 2009 IBM Corporation

IBM System Storage Copy Services Software *

Snapshots for backups,

OS and application upgrade role-backs, BI and queries

FlashCopy and Space Efficient FlashCopy

DS6000

Metro Mirror (synchronous)

For local High

Availability

DS8000

Global Mirror (asynchronous)

Distance for HA or DR

Consistency Group

For data migration, or coupled with

FlashCopy for DR

Global Copy (asynchronous copy utility)

For point in time snapshots at DR site

Incremental FlashCopy with Global Copy (point in time)

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

* Describes current native attached

DS6000 or DS8000 functions. Not all

System Storage copy services are available in an IBM i Virtualized environment

24

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Full System Copy Services + Global Mirror

DS8000 DS8000

Production

Backups

Full System

Local Site

FlashCopy

Global

Mirror

FlashCopy

CG

DR

5.4, or 6.1,

Toolkit

Remote Site

Full System Copy Services - GM o

DS6000 or DS8000 (non-VIOS) o

Asynchronous replication between storage servers o

Consistent replication of all data in System ASP (ASP1) o

Not a good HA solution - relies on IPL (boot) to access copy o

Requires target system configuration changes before copy can be used o

Full system replication results in Crash Consistent copy

LUN Level Switching planning items: o

Good DS6000 or DS8000 skills o

Proper DS6000 or DS8000 design for performance o

Space Efficient FlashCopy assessment o

Proper Network assessment and design o

Multipath used for critical workloads o

Lab Services consulting engagement for design implementation o

IBM i 5.4 or i 6.1

o

SMARTIOA fiber helps reduce costs

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

Note, Full System Metro Mirror also an option, but not shown

25

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Full System Copy Services + GM (1-2)

o o o o

Description:

DS6000 and DS8000

Clone copy of system and ASPs (data, OS, program products, temp work areas, etc)

Function provided by SAN subsystem software

Automation can optionally be provide by Lab Services ‘Copy Services Toolkit’ offering

Business resiliency use: o o o o o o

Local High Availability: No.

RPO and RPO benefits when Journaling and SMAPP used

Long distance Disaster Recovery: Yes

Both local HA and remote DR: No, however, can be combined with replication

Planned outages: No.

Online backups: Yes, with FlashCopy and additional LPAR

Workload balancing: Some, via offline point in time snapshots copies

Typical client environments: o

Medium SMB, and as for basic DR in Large Enterprise

Availability and recovery characteristics: o o o

IPL required – abnormal IPL likely - power off source to avoid

RTO: 30 minutes to hours

RPO: seconds - minutes based on consistency group design and network (Metro Mirror RPO = 0)

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

Environments o o o o

Native IBM i 5.4 &

6.1

IBM i Hosted partitions

Windows Integration

Does not support

VIOS

26

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Full System Copy Services + GM (2-2)

o o o o

Key advantages:

Can meet moderate DR requirements

No object out of sync issues

Incorporates into cross platform storage DR solutions

Application change management simplicity

Key considerations: o o o

Unable to address planned outages (changes on target cannot be propagated to source)

Replicates temp data so it uses the largest amount of network capacity of all solutions

Requires additional copies, plus external storage costs versus internal o o o

Typical planning and timelines:

Server and DS Hardware planning and implementation as req.

WAN Network design (latency, bandwidth)

3-12 months from planning to implementation o o o o o

Typical costs considerations:

DS6000 or DS8000 costs over internal storage

Extra copies of disk required for backups and Global Mirror

DS6000 or DS8000 Copy Services software

Lab Services Copy Services toolkit

WAN or LAN hardware for capacity and performance

Vendors and Resources o o o o o o o

Storage team to own presales for Disk Magic, S.E.

FlashCopy, network planning, etc.

Power team to lead architecture

ATS and Techline

Lab Services (fee)

Benchmark Center (fee)

GTS (fee)

IBM DS8000 Education

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

27

© 2009 IBM Corporation

IASP + Copy Services + Metro Mirror

DS8000 DS8000

Production

DR and Test

*SYSBAS

IASP Metro

Mirror

IASP

*SYSBAS

Backup

FlashCopy

*SYSBAS

5.4, or 6.1, Toolkit,

PowerHA

Local Site

Combination DS6000-DS8000 Copy Services cluster solution example

PowerHA or Copy Services Toolkit - MM o

DS6000 or DS8000 (non-VIOS) o o o

Synchronous replication between storage servers

Consistent replication of all data in System ASP (ASP1)

Advanced HA and Backup solution – no IPL required o

Combine with Switched LUNs, other Copy Services, 6.1

Quiesce , etc.

o

Consistent replication of all data in IASP o

Administrative Domain (5.4 and 6.1) or Logical replication used to replication key system data

LUN Level Switching planning items: o

Good DS6000 or DS8000 skills o

Proper DS6000 or DS8000 design for performance o

Space Efficient FlashCopy assessment o

Proper Network assessment and design o

Multipath used for critical workloads o

Lab Services consulting engagement for design implementation o

PowerHA for i or Toolkit o

IBM i 5.4 or i 6.1

o

SMARTIOA fiber helps reduce costs

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

28

© 2009 IBM Corporation

IASP + Copy Services + Global Mirror + Combo

Production

*SYSBAS

HA

*SYSBAS

PowerHA or Copy Services Toolkit Combination o

Global Mirror examples: o o o

DS6000 or DS8000 (non-VIOS)

Synchronous or asynchronous replication between storage servers

Advanced HA, DR and Backup solution o

Local Switched LUNs for HA o

Local FlashCopy with 6.1 Quisce for nightly backups o

Global Mirror for advanced DR across long distances o

Optional ‘D’ copy at remote site allows uninterrupted HA or DR test o

Many other combinations possible

LUN

Group

(active)

DS8000 DS8000

Consistency

Group

LUN

Group

(none)

IASP

Global

Mirror

IASP

Production

*SYSBAS

FlashCopy

Local Site

Optional

Golden

(D) Copy

DR Site

5.4, or 6.1,

Toolkit,

PowerHA

Note: *SYSBAS disks are logical representations only, and may be disks located within the DS6000 or DS8000

29

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

External Storage Copy Services Network Requirements

IASP based SAN copy solutions require less network bandwidth than full system SAN copy

o

Only IASP data is replicated o

Examples show significant ongoing network cost savings using IASPs with asynchronous SAN copy services o

Previous experience suggests that a

300Mbs network between sites for full system replication can be reduced to

90Mbs by using IASPs o

IASP based cluster solutions provide the best RTO and RPO, with lower network costs www.systeminetwork.com

Business Continuity with External Storage-

Article ID: 20782

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

5250 Interactive Application

SAP Application

30

© 2009 IBM Corporation

IASP + Copy Services + MM or GM (1 of 2)

o o o o

Description:

DS6000 and DS8000

Storage level replication function provided by SAN subsystem software

IASP based for more granular replication

Automation provided by PowerHA or Toolkit

Business resiliency use: o o o o o o

Local High Availability: Yes, RTO and RPO benefits when Journaling and SMAPP used

Long distance Disaster Recovery: Yes.

Both local HA and remote DR: Yes, using combinations

Planned outages: Yes.

Online backups: Yes, with FlashCopy or Save-While-Active

Workload balancing: Some, via offline point in time snapshots copies

Typical client environments: o

Medium SMB, Large Enterprise (usually too costly for small SMB)

Availability and recovery characteristics: o o o

No IPL required - vary on (switch) IASP to an active server/LPAR

RTO: 5 minutes to hour depending on design and practice

RPO: Real time, if journaling and SMAPP are used

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

Environments o o o o

Native IBM i 5.4 &

6.1

IBM i Hosted partitions

Windows Integration

Does not support

VIOS

32

© 2009 IBM Corporation

IASP + Copy Services + MM or GM (2 of 2)

o o o o o o

Key advantages:

Can meet advanced HA, DR and backup requirements

Fully integrated into IBM i via PowerHA or Toolkit – unique to IBM storage solutions

No object out of sync issues, robust switching and simple to operate

Incorporates into cross platform storage DR solutions

Application change management simplicity

Large number of installation and extensive IBM experience and skills

Key considerations: o o o

Costs – GM requires additional copies, plus external storage costs versus internal issues

DS6000 or DS8000 skills as required

Move to IASPs o o o o

Typical planning and timelines:

Application(s) and data migration proof of concept or test

Identify application and data objects to be replicated

6-18 months from planning to implementation

Storage I/O hardware planning and implementation as req.

o o o o o

Typical costs considerations:

DS6000 or DS8000 costs over internal storage

Extra copies of disk required for backups and Global Mirror

PowerHA for i and/or Copy Services software

Lab Services Copy Services toolkit

WAN or LAN hardware for capacity and performance

Vendors and Resources o o o o o o o

Storage team to own pre-sales for Disk Magic,

S.E. FlashCopy, network planning, etc.

Power team to lead architecture

ATS and Techline

Lab Services (fee)

Benchmark Center (fee)

GTS (fee)

IASP, PowerHA and

Storage Education

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

33

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Logical Replication

Source

Production

Data

3 rd party software

IBM i Remote Journaling

Management and Control

DB and Non-DB objects

Typical Logical Replication Infrastructure

Backup

Copy

Apply

Process

Target

Tape Backup

5.4 or 6.1

Logical Replication Overview o

IBM Remote Journaling is used for replication of

DB and other object types o

Vendor unique logic provides replication for other objects types or other DB needs o

Vendor provides management and control o

Target copy is available for read-only workload o

Higher tier products can support broadcast replication to 2 or more copies

Logical Replication planning items: o o

Are skills are in place to plan, implement, operate and maintain

Do not use ‘replicate everything’ design planning approach o

Poor application change management will cause out of sync issues o

For critical HA, limit use of target read-only copy o

High I/O queries can delay the apply process o

Add 3 rd copy if needed o

Understand backup requirements o

A target copy backup with SWA by itself does not replace the need to quiesce source server applications or users

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

34

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Solution Comparisons: Logical Replication (1-2)

Description: o o o o

Add-on vendor software – does not require any optional OS features

Journal (logging) based replication and management (journaling required)

Replication by object

Automation provided by ISV. Use of IBM base cluster in complex designs suggested

Business resiliency use: o o o o o o

Local High Availability: Yes , with RPO benefits from synchronous Remote Journaling

Long distance Disaster Recovery: Yes , via journaling or asynch Remote Journaling

Both local HA and remote DR: Yes , multiple copies via cascade or broadcast options

Planned outages: Most .

Online backups: Yes, replication may continue, while apply process on B/U is halted

Workload balancing: Some , via concurrent access and proper planning and controls

Typical client environments: o

Small SMB, medium SMB, and Large Enterprise

Availability and recovery characteristics: o o o

No IPL required. Wait for apply process on B/U to complete.

RTO: 15 minutes to small hours depending on design, practice

RPO: near real time to minutes based on date type, activity, distance

Environments o All environments, including VIOS

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

35

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Solution Comparisons: Logical Replication (2-2)

Key advantages: o o o o

Storage agnostic – works with any supported internal, external or combination

Only solution to offer concurrent access to data on target

Able to support simultaneous replication to local HA and remote DR copies

Smaller network bandwidth required than other solutions

Key considerations: o o o

Tends to require more monitoring, operations and development team resources

Target RPO can fall behind during write intensive batch jobs or during backups on target

Some applications can be problematic in keeping data synchronized

Typical planning and timelines: o o o o

Journal and vendor product planning

Identify application and data objects to be replicated

3-12 months from planning and implementation

Must be fully tested on a regular basis (e.g. 3-6 months)

Typical costs considerations: o o o o o

Vendor software and options

Operations resource to monitor daily

Proper network

Education and services for proper design and implementation

HA Journal Performance Option 42 might be needed

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

Vendors and Resources

IBM iCluster o www.ibm.com/systems/p ower/software/availability

Vision Solutions o www.visionsolutions.com

Maximum Availability noMAX o www.maxava.com

Trader’s Quick-Edd o www.quick-softwareline.com

36

© 2009 IBM Corporation

IBM i 6.1 PowerHA

 Provides choices in design, implementation and management of IBM i 6.1 and SAN

Storage IASP Cluster based replication technologies for HA and DR

PowerHA for i (5761-HAS)

a.k.a HASM

Cross Site Mirroring (XSM)

“HA Switchable Resources” - option 41 – IBM i

Geographic Mirroring

IBM i storage mgmt page level replication

Synchronous

• Any internal or external storage

Metro Mirror (SAN)*

SAN hardware replication

Synchronous

IBM SAN storage only

Global Mirror (SAN)*

SAN hardware replication

Asynchronous

IBM SAN storage only

FlashCopy (SAN)*

SAN hardware replication

Point in time

IBM SAN storage only

* This new support and capability added to IBM i and XSM with PowerHA and 6.1, IBM SAN Only

See www.redbooks.ibm.com: Implementing PowerHA for IBM I - SG24-7405-00 (Nov 2008)

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

37

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Copy Services toolkit with IBM i 6.1 PowerHA for i

Functions

IBM i operating system product

(PowerHA LPP )

Requires PowerHA LPP

PowerHA for i

Yes

N/A

Cluster switch/failover

Start/Stop FlashCopy

Yes

Yes

Health check provided

Resets multipath for disk registration on switchover

Automates cluster node starting for switchover/FlashCopy

Supports IBM i5.4

Automate queise function

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

Provides DS scripts for replication

Full System or non IBM i replication management

Provides CL programming interface for

IBM storage

Yes

No

No

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

Toolkit ( stand alone environment )

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes- via tool kit release which supports PowerHa

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

39

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

IBM i Availability Technologies

Virtualized Environments

40

© 2009 IBM Corporation

HA and DR Technologies for IBM i Virtual Environments

 VIOS (hosting IBM i partition) - Power servers and IBM Power blades o

IBM and ISV Logical Replication o

IBM i XSM Geographical Mirroring (PowerHA) with DS4000 or SVC o

IBM Storage Copy Services (full copy, manual process only) o

DS4000 Point in time copy: FlashCopy or Volume Copy o o

DS4000 Continuous copy: Synchronous Enhanced Remote Mirroring (Metro Mirror)

SVC Copy Services (SAN Volume Controller)

 Notes o o

PowerHA for i does not support copy services of DS4000 or SVC

Lab Services ‘Copy Services Toolkit’ does not support copy services of DS4000 or SVC o o o o

Full-system FlashCopy and VolumeCopy requires that the production IBM i logical partition

(LPAR) be powered off or in a restricted state

New 6.1 ‘Quiesce’ function not supported with DS4000 or SVC copy services

See planning documentation for other planning items and restrictions

IBM i and Midrange External Storage

• www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247668.html?Open

• IBM i Virtualization and DS4000 Read-me First (October 20th, 2008)

• www-03.ibm.com/systems/resources/systems_i_os_i_virtualization_and_ds4000_readme.pdf

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

41

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

Choosing a Solution

Summary

42

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Selection Criteria

 Generalizations (e.g. categorizing into major problem sets) can distort the answer

 Should use as a guide to potentially rule out certain solution types

 In practice, consider all major and supporting decision factors such as: o o o o o o o o o o o

Up time requirements

Recovery time objective

Recovery point objective

Resilience requirements

Concurrent access requirements

Geographic dispersion requirements

Tolerance for end user disruption

Outage type coverage

Experience, skills and resources

Cost and budget

Service and support i5/OS High Availability Clusters:

Data Resilience Solutions

Document Version 1.0

Version date: October 22, 2004

Authors:

Steven J Finnes

Robert T Gintowt

Michael J Snyder

© Copyright IBM Corporation 2004.

All rights reserved.

See Redpaper redp0888: www.redbooks.ibm.com

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

43

© 2009 IBM Corporation

* * * * * * * *

This page for IBM and Business Partners Only

* * * * * * * *

Additional Events

1.

Introduction to HA (HA Strategies & Planning for 2012 part 1 of 3) - Techtalk

2.

Introduction to IBM HA and DR Technologies (HA Strategies & Planning for 2012 part 2 of 3) – Recorded (in Techdocs)

3.

IBM Power HA Strategy

– Techtalk (Thursday Feb 19)

4.

IBM CBU Enhancements – Techtalk

5.

Technology Positioning (HA Strategies & Planning for 2012 part 3 of 3) - Techtalk

6.

IASP Enablement - Techtalk

7.

Sizing PowerHA - Techtalk

8.

Geographical Mirroring for Native IBM i applications - Recorded

9.

Geographical Mirroring for Hosted and VIOS environments - Recorded

10.

DS6000/DS8000 Copy Services HA Sizing and Considerations - Techtalk

11.

iCluster Enhancements - Techtalk

12.

What’s New in IBM i Availability

Speakers for these sessions include: Bob Gintowt, Dave Chorba, Selwyn Dickey, Steve Finnes, Fred

Robinson, Chuck Stupca, Mike Warkentin, and other experts on availability solutions and planning

 Look for email from “STG Sales Education & Events Newsletter” for Techtalk dates

 Techtalks: SmartZone for Power System Technical Training: o

IBM: http://lt.be.ibm.com/smartzone/powertech o

Partner: http://www.ibm.com/services/weblectures/smartzone/powertech

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

44

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Thank You

IBM i High Availability Strategies & Planning for 2012

Part 3 of 3

Eric Hess, texas@us.ibm.com

IBM 2009

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

Technical Sales

Support Americas

45

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Trademarks and Disclaimers

Copyright IBM Corporation 1994-2009. All rights reserved.

References in this document to IBM products or services do not imply that IBM intends to make them available in every country.

Trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both can be found on the World Wide Web at http://www.ibm.com/legal/copytrade.shtml.

Intel, Intel logo, Intel Inside, Intel Inside logo, Intel Centrino, Intel Centrino logo, Celeron, Intel Xeon, Intel SpeedStep, Itanium, and Pentium are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries.

Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States, other countries, or both.

Microsoft, Windows, Windows NT, and the Windows logo are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both.

UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group in the United States and other countries.

Java and all Java-based trademarks are trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States, other countries, or both.

Other company, product, or service names may be trademarks or service marks of others.

Information is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind.

The customer examples described are presented as illustrations of how those customers have used IBM products and the results they may have achieved. Actual environmental costs and performance characteristics may vary by customer.

Information concerning non-IBM products was obtained from a supplier of these products, published announcement material, or other publicly available sources and does not constitute an endorsement of such products by IBM. Sources for non-IBM list prices and performance numbers are taken from publicly available information, including vendor announcements and vendor worldwide homepages. IBM has not tested these products and cannot confirm the accu racy of performance, capability, or any other claims related to non-IBM products. Questions on the capability of non-IBM products should be addressed to the supplier of those products.

All statements regarding IBM future direction and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice, and represent goals and objectives only.

Some information addresses anticipated future capabilities. Such information is not intended as a definitive statement of a commitment to specific levels of performance, function or delivery schedules with respect to any future products. Such commitments are only made in IBM product announcements. The information is presented here to communicate IBM's current investment and development activities as a good faith effort to help with our customers' future planning.

Performance is based on measurements and projections using standard IBM benchmarks in a controlled environment. The actual throughput or performance that any user will experience will vary depending upon considerations such as the amount of multiprogramming in the user's job stream, the I/O configuration, the storage configuration, and the workload processed. Therefore, no assurance can be given that an individual user will achieve throughput or performance improvements equivalent to the ratios stated here.

Photographs shown may be engineering prototypes. Changes may be incorporated in production models.

Eric Hess, IBM 2008

46

© 2009 IBM Corporation