WHY CLEAN COAL IS STILL RELEVANT Max Fine, mwf24@pitt.edu, Mahboobin, 4:00 Abstract "We sit on top of a 300-year supply of coal” in the words of Saskpower CEO Robert Watson is why clean coal remains valid in this day and age. This right here is why we need to revisit how we use coal. We have some of the largest coal reserves in the world, but we usually export it. This is due to the environmental regulations that power plants are required to adhere to. Most of the coal we mine is very low quality coal, which when burned emits far more greenhouse gasses that the high quality coal most domestic users burn. This means that this coal is normally unusable for American industry. However, scientists have found ways to increase the quality of mined coal, and reduce the emissions they generate. Of course, both these things are easier said than done. When I said one could increase the quality of the coal I wasn’t being entirely accurate. This turns the coal into a flammable gas, from which at least some of the CO2 can be removed. This gas is a superior fuel when actually burned, meaning less of it can be used to produce the same amount of power. The other option is to make coal less environmentally destructive by removing CO2 from the emissions from burning the coal. There are several proven methods to remove CO2 from the emissions. Of course then the captured CO2 must be disposed of. There are several ongoing studies about subterranean storage of waste CO2. Many groups are watching with interest to see if such methods are viable for long-term storage. The final consideration is the economic viability of clean coal. . Facilities built in order to convert coal to its gaseous form and use it are much more expensive than conventional power plants. Modifying existing plants is also a considerable expense. If it is feasible, these measures could buy us enough to move to fully renewable energy sources. KEY WORDS Clean Coal – Carbon Capture-Reduced Carbon Footprint-Sustainable Energy CLEAN COAL: AN INTRODUCTION Coal has been the primary fuel used to create electricity from the beginnings of the organized power grid. In 2008 coal provided 49.8% of all electricity produced in the United States [1]. To produce this amount of energy 1.2 billion short tons of coal were burned domestically. THE CHEMISTRY OF COAL The definition of coal is in fact a bit broader than one might expect, as it is not a pure substance, but rather a type of rock that is made of several compounds. “ “In short, coal is a chemically and physically heterogeneous, “combustible” sedimentary rock that consists of both organic and inorganic material.”[1] Coal is primarily made of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, with varying amounts of nitrogen and sulfur depending on the type of coal. Coal is “graded” based on how far through its formation process it is. Coal starts out as peat, then dries and hardens into lignite, which is the lowest grade of coal. For each subsequent category of coal, the coal becomes drier, harder, and usually lower in impurities (namely sulfur). When coal is burned it mainly produces carbon dioxide, with smaller amounts of sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and other gases. CARBON EMMISIONS REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY Preprocessing Coal The simplest way, at least from the outset, to reduce coal CO2 emissions is to reduce the amount of coal burned. Most modern coal plants use pulverized coal, which is a system that normalizes the size of coal pieces to the most efficient size for the method of combustion used at the plant. There are three commonly used systems for burning solid coal: fixed bed, fluidized bed, and suspension. Fixed be is simply placing coal on a flat plane and burning. This is the least optimal method for steam generation, and as such shall not be discussed further. Fluidized bed is the current standard for coal boilers. Within this system the fuel, in this case coal, an inert material, such as sand, and limestone are suspended above the floor of the combustion area. This is accomplished by the action of air distributed below this floor. The inert material aids the spreading of the fuel, and lowers heat waste by storing thermal energy, that is the released to ignite additional fuel. During the combustion the limestone decomposes due to the heat, into lime and CO2. This lime then reacts with waste sulfur gas through the equation CaO+SO2+1/202CaSO4. Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Carbon Capture The most mature at technology for reducing coal carbon emissions is to capture the carbon dioxide in the waste gases and store it in a stable medium. The most common current method of post-combustion CO2 capture is to pass the flue gas through a through an absorption column after being cooled. Within this absorption column the flue gas rises through a solvent, which strips the CO2 out of the gas. The CO2 free gas then exits through the top of the column, while the solvent, with the dissolved CO2, is collected at the bottom. The solvent is then pre-heated before being fed into a heat exchanger. Within this exchanger the solvent flows downward as the temperature decreases, which releases the CO2. The solvent flows out the bottom, while highly concentrated CO2 escapes through the top. This CO2 can then be collected for storage or other use. Why is clean coal a good idea? Clean coal presents an alternative to immediately shifting our power plants to natural gas or other type of fuel. It is more economical to refit existing power plants to use clean coal technologies rather than build new plants that conform to modern regulations. Furthermore, coal as a fuel has a much lower cost to extract than many other power plant fuels in common use. The techniques used for storing the gases removed from coal smoke are also useful in extracting natural gas from mining wells. Furthermore, this technology is much more mature than many of the renewable power generators that are its competitors. This will allow a much faster deployment of clean coal to widespread use. REFERENCES [1] Miller, Bruce G. (2010) “Clean Coal Engineering Technology.” Elsevier Science & Technology (Book) SOURCES CONSULTED U.S. Department of Energy. (2016) “Clean Coal Research.” U.S. Dept. of Energy. (Webpage) http://energy.gov/fe/science-innovation/clean-coal-research This source is the United States Department of energy portal to their supported clean coal research. I wish to use this page to demonstrate the U.S. government’s stance on clean coal. This will also relate to the economics of clean coal, as government supported technologies are often subsidized. C. C. Mann (2014). “Renewables aren’t Enough, Clean Coal is the Future” Wired Magazine (Web Article) http://www.wired.com/2014/03/clean-coal/ This magazine article from wired magazine offers a view into why we should use clean coal, instead of immediately switching to renewable energy sources. This source also discusses the implications and logistics of storing emitted carbon dioxide. R. P. Siegel (2014). “Clean Coal: Pros and Cons” Triple Pundit (Webpage) http://www.triplepundit.com/special/energy-options-prosand-cons/clean-coal-pros-cons/ This web article offers a devils advocate look into clean coal. It focuses on the downsides of clean coal, which will point me towards further research into the cons of clean coal. Furthermore, it is the only article I have seen that looks into health issues surrounding coal power plants. R. Kunzig (2014). “Clean Coal Test: Power Plants Prepare to Capture Carbon” National Geographic. (online article). http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2014/03/1 40331-carbon-capture-kemper-coal-climate/ TOPIC AREA: CHEMICAL ENINEERING Clean coal belongs in the chemical engineering topic section as it is about the transformation of materials. Chemical engineering is a profession based on manipulating various materials in order to achieve a goal. The goal of clean coal research is to transform low quality coal into a better form of fuel, or adjust the process used in burning said coal to be less environmentally damaging. This sits squarely within the mandate of chemical engineering, and as such it is a good candidate for this conference.