Do White Dwarfs Need Axion Cooling?

advertisement
CollectiveNeutrino
Neutrino Oscillations
Collective
Oscillations
Georg G. Raffelt
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, Thursday 19 May 2011
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Neutrino Oscillations in Matter
Neutrinos in a medium suffer flavor-dependent
refraction
f
W, Z
n
Lincoln Wolfenstein
f
n
n
Z
n
๐‘e − ๐‘n 2 for ๐œˆe
๐‘‰weak = 2๐บF ×
for ๐œˆμ
−๐‘n 2
Typical density of Earth: 5 g/cm3
Δ๐‘‰weak ≈ 2 × 10−13 eV = 0.2 peV
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Neutrino Oscillations in Matter
2-flavor neutrino evolution as an effective 2-level problem
๐œˆ๐‘’
๐œ• ๐œˆ๐‘’
i
=๐ป ๐œˆ
๐œˆ
๐œ‡
๐œ‡
๐œ•๐‘ง
Negative
for ๐œˆ
With a 2๏‚ด2 Hamiltonian matrix
๐ป=
1
2๐ธ
cos ๐œƒ
− sin ๐œƒ
sin ๐œƒ
cos ๐œƒ
๐‘š12
0
0
๐‘š22
cos ๐œƒ
sin ๐œƒ
Mass-squared matrix, rotated by
mixing angle q relative to interaction
basis, drives oscillations
Δ๐‘š2
2๐ธ
∼
4 peV for 12 mass splitting
120 peV for 13 mass splitting
Solar, reactor and supernova neutrinos:
E ∼ 10 MeV
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
− sin ๐œƒ
± 2๐บF
cos ๐œƒ
๐‘๐‘’ −
๐‘๐‘›
2
0
0
−
๐‘๐‘›
2
Weak potential difference
Δ๐‘‰weak = 2๐บF ๐‘๐‘’ ∼ 0.2 peV
for normal Earth matter, but
large effect in SN core
(nuclear density 3๏‚ด1014 g/cm3)
Δ๐‘‰weak ∼ 10 eV
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Suppression of Oscillations in Supernova Core
Effective mixing angle in matter
tan 2๐œƒm =
sin 2๐œƒ
cos 2๐œƒ − ๐‘๐‘’ 2๐ธ 2๐บF Δ๐‘š2
Supernova core
14
−3
๐œŒ = 3 × 10 g cm
๐‘Œ๐‘’ = 0.35
๐‘๐‘’ = 6 × 1037 cm−3
๐ธ ∼ 100 MeV
Solar mixing
Δ๐‘š2 ∼ 75 meV 2
sin 2๐œƒ ∼ 0.94
Matter suppression effect
• Inside a SN core,
flavors are “de-mixed”
• Very small oscillation
amplitude
• Trapped e-lepton
number can only
escape by diffusion
๐‘๐‘’ 2๐ธ 2๐บ๐น Δ๐‘š2 ∼ 2 × 1013
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Snap Shots of Supernova Density Profiles
astro-ph/0407132
• ๐œˆ๐‘’ -๐œˆ๐œ‡,๐œ conversions,
driven by small mixing
angle ๐œƒ13 and
“atmospheric” mass
2
difference Δ๐‘š13
• May reveal neutrino
mass hierarchy
H-resonance (13 splitting)
L-resonance (12 splitting)
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Mikheev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein (MSW) effect
Eigenvalue diagram of 2๏‚ด2 Hamiltonian matrix for 2-flavor oscillations
Antineutrinos
Neutrinos
๐‚๐’™
๐‘š22 2๐ธ
Propagation through
density gradient:
adiabatic conversion
๐‘š12 2๐ธ
๐‚๐’†
“Negative density”
represents antineutrinos
in the same diagram
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
Vacuum
๐‚๐’†
๐‚๐’™
Density
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Stanislaw Mikheev († 23 April 2011)
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Citations of Wolfenstein’s Paper on Matter Effects
Atm nu oscillations
SNO, KamLAND
250
200
MSW effect
SN 1987A
150
100
50
0
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
Annual citations of Wolfenstein, PRD 17:2369, 1978
in the SPIRES data base (total of 3278 citations 1978–2010)
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Three-Flavor Neutrino Parameters
Three mixing angles ๐œƒ12 , ๐œƒ13 , ๐œƒ23 (Euler angles for 3D rotation), ๐‘๐‘–๐‘— = cos ๐œƒ๐‘–๐‘— ,
a CP-violating “Dirac phase” ๐›ฟ, and two “Majorana phases” ๐›ผ2 and ๐›ผ3
๐œˆ๐‘’
1
๐œˆ๐œ‡ = 0
๐œˆ๐œ
0
0
๐‘23
−๐‘ 23
0
๐‘ 23
๐‘23
๐‘13
0
๐‘–๐›ฟ
−๐‘’ ๐‘ 13
39โˆ˜ < ๐œƒ23 < 53โˆ˜
Atmospheric/LBL-Beams
Normal
3
m
t
2
๐œƒ13 < 11โˆ˜
Reactor
m t
Sun
e
m t
e
Atmosphere
1
๐‘12
−๐‘ 12
0
e
3
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
m
t
๐‘ 12
๐‘12
0
0
0
1
33โˆ˜ < ๐œƒ12 < 37โˆ˜
Solar/KamLAND
Δ๐‘š2
72–80 meV2
v
Atmosphere
m t
Sun
e
m t
๐‘’ −๐‘–๐›ฟ ๐‘ 13
0v
๐‘13
Inverted
1
2
0
1
0
2180–2640 meV2
1
0
0
๐›ผ
๐‘– 22
๐‘’
0
0
0
0
๐›ผ
๐‘– 23
๐‘’
๐œˆ1
๐œˆ2
๐œˆ3
Relevant for
0n2b decay
Tasks and Open Questions
• Precision for q12 and q23
• How large is q13 ?
• CP-violating phase d?
• Mass ordering?
(normal vs inverted)
• Absolute masses?
(hierarchical vs degenerate)
• Dirac or Majorana?
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Three Phases of Neutrino Emission
Prompt ne burst
• Shock breakout
No large ๐œˆ๐‘’ detector
• De-leptonization
of
available
outer core
layers
Accretion
Cooling
• Shock stalls ~ 150 km
fluxespowered
and large
• Large
Neutrinos
by
๐œˆinfalling
differences
๐‘’ -๐œˆ๐‘ฅ fluxmatter
Cooling
on neutrino
Smaller
fluxes
and small
time scale
๐œˆ๐‘’diffusion
-๐œˆ๐‘ฅ flux differences
• Spherically symmetric model (10.8 MโŠ™) with Boltzmann neutrino transport
• Explosion manually triggered by enhanced CC interaction rate
Fischer et al. (Basel group), A&A 517:A80, 2010 [arxiv:0908.1871]
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Level-Crossing Diagram in a Supernova Envelope
Normal mass hierarchy
Vacuum
Inverted mass hierarchy
Vacuum
Dighe & Smirnov, Identifying the neutrino mass spectrum from a supernova
neutrino burst, astro-ph/9907423
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Oscillation of Supernova Anti-Neutrinos
Basel accretion phase
model (10.8 ๐‘€โŠ™ )
Original ๐œˆ๐‘’ spectrum
(no oscillations)
Partial swap
(Normal hierarchy)
w/ Earth effects
Detection spectrum
by ๐œˆ๐‘’ + ๐‘ → ๐‘› + ๐‘’ +
(water Cherenkov or
scintillator detectors)
Full swap ๐œˆ๐‘’ ↔ ๐œˆ๐‘ฅ
(Inverted Hier.)
8000 km path length
in Earth assumed
Detecting Earth effects requires good energy resolution
(Large scintillator detector, e.g. LENA, or megaton water Cherenkov)
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Signature of Flavor Oscillations (Accretion Phase)
1-3-mixing scenarios
Mass ordering
A
B
C
Normal (NH)
Inverted (IH)
Any (NH/IH)
sin2 ๐œƒ13
MSW conversion
๐œˆ๐‘’ survival prob.
โ‰ณ 10−3
โ‰ฒ 10−5
adiabatic
non-adiabatic
0
๐œˆ๐‘’ survival prob. cos 2 ๐œƒ12 ≈ 0.7
๐œˆ๐‘’ Earth effects
Yes
sin2 ๐œƒ12 ≈ 0.3
sin2 ๐œƒ12 ≈ 0.3
0
cos 2 ๐œƒ12 ≈ 0.7
No
Yes
May distinguish mass ordering
Assuming collective effects are not important during accretion phase
(Chakraborty et al., arXiv:1105.1130v1)
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Snap Shots of Supernova Density Profiles
astro-ph/0407132
Equivalent
neutrino
density ∝ R-2
Accretion-phase luminosity
๐ฟ๐œˆ๐‘’ ∼ 3 × 1052 erg s
Corresponds to a neutrino
number density of
3×
10 km 2
33
−3
10 cm
๐‘…
H-resonance (13 splitting)
L-resonance (12 splitting)
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Self-Induced Flavor Oscillations of SN Neutrinos
Survival probability ๐‚๐’†
Normal
Hierarchy
atm Dm2
Survival probability ๐‚๐’†
Realistic
nu-nu effect
MSW
effect
q13 close
to Chooz
limit
No
nu-nu effect
Realistic
nu-nu effect
Inverted
Hierarchy
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
Collective
oscillations
(single-angle
approximation)
MSW
No
nu-nu effect
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Spectral Split
Initial
fluxes at
neutrino
sphere
Figures from
Fogli, Lisi,
Marrone & Mirizzi,
arXiv:0707.1998
After
collective
transformation
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
Explanations in
Raffelt & Smirnov
arXiv:0705.1830
and 0709.4641
Duan, Fuller,
Carlson & Qian
arXiv:0706.4293
and 0707.0290
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Collective Supernova Nu Oscillations since 2006
Two seminal papers in 2006 triggered a torrent of activities
Duan, Fuller, Qian, astro-ph/0511275, Duan et al. astro-ph/0606616
Balantekin, Gava & Volpe, arXiv:0710.3112. Balantekin & Pehlivan, astro-ph/0607527. Blennow,
Mirizzi & Serpico, arXiv:0810.2297. Cherry, Fuller, Carlson, Duan & Qian, arXiv:1006.2175.
Chakraborty, Choubey, Dasgupta & Kar, arXiv:0805.3131. Chakraborty, Fischer, Mirizzi, Saviano,
Tomàs, arXiv:1104.4031, 1105.1130. Choubey, Dasgupta, Dighe & Mirizzi, arXiv:1008.0308.
Dasgupta & Dighe, arXiv:0712.3798. Dasgupta, Dighe & Mirizzi, arXiv:0802.1481. Dasgupta,
Dighe, Mirizzi & Raffelt, arXiv:0801.1660, 0805.3300. Dasgupta, Mirizzi, Tamborra & Tomàs,
arXiv:1002.2943. Dasgupta, Dighe, Raffelt & Smirnov, 0904.3542. Dasgupta, Raffelt, Tamborra,
arXiv:1001.5396. Duan, Fuller, Carlson & Qian, astro-ph/0608050, 0703776, arXiv:0707.0290,
0710.1271. Duan, Fuller & Qian, arXiv:0706.4293, 0801.1363, 0808.2046, 1001.2799. Duan,
Fuller & Carlson, arXiv:0803.3650. Duan & Kneller, arXiv:0904.0974. Duan & Friedland,
arXiv:1006.2359. Duan, Friedland, McLaughlin & Surman, arXiv:1012.0532. Esteban-Pretel,
Pastor, Tomàs, Raffelt & Sigl, arXiv:0706.2498, 0712.1137. Esteban-Pretel, Mirizzi, Pastor, Tomàs,
Raffelt, Serpico & Sigl, arXiv:0807.0659. Fogli, Lisi, Marrone & Mirizzi, arXiv:0707.1998. Fogli, Lisi,
Marrone & Tamborra, arXiv:0812.3031. Friedland, arXiv:1001.0996. Gava & Jean-Louis,
arXiv:0907.3947. Gava & Volpe, arXiv:0807.3418. Galais, Kneller & Volpe, arXiv:1102.1471.
Galais & Volpe, arXiv:1103.5302. Gava, Kneller, Volpe & McLaughlin, arXiv:0902.0317.
Hannestad, Raffelt, Sigl & Wong, astro-ph/0608695. Wei Liao, arXiv:0904.0075, 0904.2855.
Lunardini, Müller & Janka, arXiv:0712.3000. Mirizzi, Pozzorini, Raffelt & Serpico,
arXiv:0907.3674. Mirizzi & Tomàs, arXiv:1012.1339. Pehlivan, Balantekin, Kajino, Yoshida,
arXiv:1105.1182. Raffelt, arXiv:0810.1407, 1103.2891. Raffelt & Tamborra, arXiv:1006.0002.
Raffelt & Sigl, hep-ph/0701182. Raffelt & Smirnov, arXiv:0705.1830, 0709.4641. Sawyer, hepph/0408265, 0503013, arXiv:0803.4319, 1011.4585. Wu & Qian, arXiv:1105.2068.
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Flavor-Off-Diagonal Refractive Index
2-flavor neutrino evolution as an effective 2-level problem
๐œˆ๐‘’
๐œ• ๐œˆ๐‘’
i
=๐ป ๐œˆ
๐œ‡
๐œ•๐‘ก ๐œˆ๐œ‡
๐‚
Effective mixing Hamiltonian
๐‘€2
๐ป=
+ 2๐บF
2๐ธ
Mass term in
flavor basis:
causes vacuum
oscillations
๐‘๐‘›
๐‘๐‘’ −
2
0
Z
n
0
๐‘๐‘›
−
2
+ 2๐บF
n
๐‘๐œˆ๐‘’
๐‘⟨๐œˆ๐‘’ ๐œˆ๐œ‡
๐‘⟨๐œˆ๐œ‡ ๐œˆ๐‘’
๐‘๐œˆ๐œ‡
Wolfenstein’s weak
Flavor-off-diagonal potential,
potential, causes MSW caused by flavor oscillations.
“resonant” conversion (J.Pantaleone, PLB 287:128,1992)
together with vacuum
term
Flavor oscillations feed back on the Hamiltonian: Nonlinear effects!
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Synchronizing Oscillations by Neutrino Interactions
• Vacuum oscillation frequency depends on energy ๐œ” = Δ๐‘š2 2๐ธ
• Ensemble with broad spectrum quickly decoheres kinematically
• n-n interactions “synchronize” the oscillations: ๐œ”sync = ⟨Δ๐‘š2 2๐ธ⟩
Average e-flavor
component of
polarization vector
Time
Pastor, Raffelt & Semikoz, hep-ph/0109035
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Three Ways to Describe Flavor Oscillations
Schrödinger equation in terms of “flavor spinor”
๐œˆ๐‘’
๐œˆ๐‘’
Δ๐‘š2 cos 2๐œƒ
i๐œ•๐‘ก ๐œˆ = ๐ป ๐œˆ =
๐œ‡
๐œ‡
2๐ธ sin 2๐œƒ
Neutrino flavor density matrix
๐œŒ=
๐œˆ๐‘’ ๐œˆ๐‘’ ⟩
๐œˆ๐‘’ ๐œˆ๐œ‡ ⟩
๐œˆ๐œ‡ ๐œˆ๐‘’ ⟩
๐œˆ๐œ‡ ๐œˆ๐œ‡ ⟩
sin 2๐œƒ
− cos 2๐œƒ
๐œˆ๐‘’
๐œˆ๐œ‡
Equivalent commutator form of Schrödinger equation
i๐œ•๐‘ก ๐œŒ = ๐ป, ๐œŒ
Expand 2๏‚ด2 Hermitean matrices in terms of Pauli matrices
๐œŒ = Tr ๐œŒ +
1
๐
2
⋅ ๐›” and ๐ป =
Δ๐‘š2
๐
2๐ธ
⋅ ๐›” with ๐ = (sin 2๐œƒ, 0, cos 2๐œƒ)
Equivalent spin-precession form of equation of motion
๐ = ๐œ”๐ × ๐ with ๐œ” =
Δ๐‘š2
2๐ธ
๐ is “polarization vector” or “Bloch vector”
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Flavor Oscillation as Spin Precession
Flavor
direction
๐‘ง
Mass
direction
๐
↑ Spin up
๐œˆ๐‘’
↓ Spin down ๐œˆ๐œ‡
2๐œƒ
Twice the vacuum
mixing angle
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
๐
๐‘ฆ
Flavor polarization vector
precesses around the
mass direction with
frequency ๐œ” = Δ๐‘š2 2๐ธ
๐‘ฅ
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Adding Matter
Schrödinger equation including matter
i๐œ•๐‘ก
๐œˆ๐‘’
๐œˆ๐œ‡ =
Δ๐‘š2
2๐ธ
cos 2๐œƒ
sin 2๐œƒ
sin 2๐œƒ
+ 2๐บ๐น
− cos 2๐œƒ
๐‘๐‘’ −
๐‘๐‘›
2
0
0
−
๐‘๐‘›
2
๐œˆ๐‘’
๐œˆ๐œ‡
Corresponding spin-precession equation
๐ = ๐œ”๐ + ๐œ†๐‹ × ๐ with ๐œ” = Δ๐‘š2 2๐ธ and ๐œ† = 2๐บF ๐‘๐‘’
๐‡eff
๐ unit vector in mass direction
๐‹ = ๐ž๐‘ง unit vector in flavor direction
๐‘ง
๐‡eff = ๐œ”๐ + ๐œ†๐‹
๐‡matter = 2๐บF ๐‘๐‘’ ๐‹
2๐œƒmatter
๐‡vac
2๐œƒvac
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
๐›ฅ๐‘š2
=
๐
2๐ธ
๐‘ฅ
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
MSW Effect
Adiabatically decreasing density: Precession cone follows ๐‡eff
Large initial matter density:
๐‡matter
• ๐œˆ begins as flavor eigenstate
• Ends as mass eigenstate
๐‡eff
๐‡vac
Matter Density
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Adding Neutrino-Neutrino Interactions
Precession equation for each ๐œˆ mode with energy ๐ธ, i.e. ๐œ” = Δ๐‘š2 2๐ธ
๐๐œ” = ๐œ”๐ + ๐œ†๐‹ + ๐œ‡๐ × ๐๐œ” with ๐œ† = 2๐บF ๐‘๐‘’ and ๐œ‡ = 2๐บF ๐‘๐œˆ
๐‡eff
Total flavor spin of entire ensemble
๐=
๐œ” ๐๐œ”
normalize
|๐๐ญ=๐ŸŽ | = 1
Individual spins do not remain aligned – feel “internal” field ๐‡๐œˆ๐œˆ = ๐œ‡๐
๐‘ง
๐
Synchronized oscillations for large
neutrino density ๐œ‡ โ‰ซ ๐›ฟ๐œ”
๐ precesses with ๐œ”sync for large ๐œˆ density
Individual ๐๐œ” “trapped” on precession cones
Precess around ๐ with frequency ∼ ๐œ‡
๐‘ฅ
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Synchronized Oscillations by Nu-Nu Interactions
For large neutrino density, individual modes precess around large common
dipole moment
Pastor, Raffelt & Semikoz, hep-ph/0109035
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Two Spins Interacting with a Dipole Force
Simplest system showing ๐œˆ-๐œˆ effects:
Isotropic neutrino gas with 2 energies ๐ธ1 and ๐ธ2 , no ordinary matter
๐1 = (๐œ”1 ๐ + ๐œ‡๐) × ๐๐Ÿ with ๐ = ๐1 + ๐2 and ๐œ”1,2 = Δ๐‘š2 2๐ธ
๐2 = ๐œ”2 ๐ + ๐œ‡๐ × ๐๐Ÿ
Go to “co-rotating frame” around ๐ direction
๐1 = (๐œ”c ๐ − ๐œ”๐ + ๐œ‡๐) × ๐๐Ÿ
๐2 = (๐œ”c ๐ + ๐œ”๐ + ๐œ‡๐) × ๐๐Ÿ
with ๐œ”c =
1
2
๐œ”2 + ๐œ”1 and ๐œ” =
๐
1
2
๐œ”2 − ๐œ”1
No interaction (๐œ‡ = 0)
P1,2 precess in opposite directions
Strong interactions (๐œ‡ → ∞)
P1,2 stuck to each other
(no motion in co-rotating frame, perfectly
synchronized in lab frame)
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
Mass
direction
๐1
๐2
๐‘ฆ
๐‘ฅ
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Two Spins with Opposite Initial Orientation
No interaction (๐œ‡ = 0)
Free precession in
opposite directions
Even for very small mixing angle,
large-amplitude flavor oscillations
๐1
๐2
๐2 ๐
1
−๐‘ƒ1๐‘ง , ๐‘ƒ2๐‘ง
๐
Time
Strong interaction
(๐œ‡ → ∞)
Pendular motion
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Instability in Flavor Space
Two-mode example in co-rotating frame, initially ๐1 = ↓, ๐2 = ↑ (flavor basis)
๐1 = [−๐œ”๐ + ๐œ‡ (๐๐Ÿ + ๐๐Ÿ )] × ๐๐Ÿ
๐2 = [+๐œ”๐ + ๐œ‡ (๐๐Ÿ + ๐๐Ÿ )] × ๐๐Ÿ
0 initially
๐
๐
๐1
๐ = ๐1 + ๐2
๐1
๐2
๐2 Matter effect transverse to
mass and flavor directions
Both ๐1 and ๐2 tilt around ๐
if ๐œ‡ is large
๐‘ฆ
๐‘ฅ
• Initially aligned in flavor
direction and ๐ = 0
• Free precession ±๐œ”
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
After a short time,
transverse ๐ develops
by free precession
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Collective Pair Annihilation
Gas of equal abundances of ๐œˆ๐‘’ and ๐œˆ๐‘’ , inverted mass hierarchy
Small effective mixing angle (e.g. made small by ordinary matter)
Survival probability
1
๐œˆ๐‘’ ๐œˆ๐‘’
๐œˆ๐‘’ ๐œˆ๐‘’
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
๐œˆ๐œ‡ ๐œˆ๐œ‡
๐œˆ๐œ‡ ๐œˆ๐œ‡
๐œˆ๐œ‡ ๐œˆ๐œ‡
Time
Dense neutrino gas unstable in flavor space: ๐œˆ๐‘’ ๐œˆ๐‘’ ↔ ๐œˆ๐œ‡ ๐œˆ๐œ‡
Complete pair conversion even for a small mixing angle
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Flavor Matrices of Occupation Numbers
Neutrinos described by Dirac field
๐›น ๐‘ก, ๐‘ฅ =
๐‘‘3๐ฉ
2๐œ‹ 3
†
๐‘Ž๐ฉ ๐‘ก ๐‘ข๐ฉ + ๐‘−๐ฉ
๐‘ก ๐‘ฃ−๐ฉ ๐‘’ i๐ฉ⋅๐ฑ
in terms of the spinors in flavor space, providing spinor of flavor amplitudes
†
๐‘Ž
๐‘Ž1
๐œˆ1 (๐‘ก, ๐ฉ)
๐‘1
๐›น1
1 (๐‘ก, ๐ฉ)
๐›น = ๐›น2 , ๐‘Ž = ๐‘Ž2 , ๐‘ = ๐‘2 and ๐œˆ2 (๐‘ก, ๐ฉ) = ๐‘Ž2† (๐‘ก, ๐ฉ) |0⟩
๐‘Ž3
๐›น3
๐‘3
๐œˆ3 (๐‘ก, ๐ฉ)
๐‘Ž† (๐‘ก, ๐ฉ)
3
Measurable quantities are expectation values of field bi-linears ๐›น † ๐›น ,
therefore use “occupation number matrices” to describe the ensemble and
its kinetic evolution (Boltzmann eqn for oscillations and collisions)
(๐œˆ) ๐œŒ๐‘–๐‘— = ๐‘Ž๐‘—† ๐‘Ž๐‘–
(๐œˆ)
๐œŒ๐‘–๐‘— = ๐‘๐‘— ๐‘๐‘–† = 1 − ⟨๐‘๐‘–† ๐‘๐‘— ⟩
Drops out in commutators
Describe ๐œˆ with negative occupation numbers, reversed order of flavor indices
(holes in Dirac sea)
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Flavor Pendulum
Classical Hamiltonian for two spins
interacting with a dipole force ๐œ‡
๐œ‡ 2
๐ป = ๐œ”๐ ⋅ ๐2 − ๐1 + ๐
2
Angular-momentum Poisson brackets
๐‘ƒ๐‘– , ๐‘ƒ๐‘— = ๐œ–๐‘–๐‘—๐‘˜ ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜
Lagrangian top (spherical pendulum
with spin), moment of inertia ๐ผ
๐2
๐ป = ๐œ”๐ ⋅ ๐ +
2๐ผ
Total angular momentum ๐, radius
vector ๐, fulfilling
๐‘ƒ๐‘– , ๐‘ƒ๐‘— = ๐œ–๐‘–๐‘—๐‘˜ ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜ ,
Total angular momentum
๐‘„๐‘– , ๐‘„๐‘— = 0
๐‘ƒ๐‘– , ๐‘„๐‘— = ๐œ–๐‘–๐‘—๐‘˜ ๐‘„๐‘˜
๐ = ๐1 + ๐2
Pendulum EoMs
Precession equations of motion
๐ = ๐ผ −1 ๐ × ๐ and ๐ = ๐œ”๐ × ๐
๐1,2 = (โˆ“๐œ”๐ + ๐œ‡๐) × ๐1,2
EoMs and Hamiltonians identical (up to a constant) with the identification
๐œ”
๐œ‡
๐ = ๐2 − ๐1 − ๐ and ๐œ‡ = ๐ผ −1
Constants of motion: ๐12 , ๐22 , ๐ ⋅ ๐, ๐ ⋅ ๐, ๐2 and ๐ป
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Pendulum in Flavor Space
Precession
(synchronized oscillation)
Polarization vector
for neutrinos plus
antineutrinos
Nutation
(pendular
oscillation)
• Very asymmetric system
- Large spin
- Almost pure precession
- Fully synchronized oscillations
• Perfectly symmetric system
- No spin
- Plane pendulum
Spin
(Lepton asymmetry)
Mass direction
in flavor space
Hannestad, Raffelt, Sigl, Wong: astro-ph/0608695]
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Flavor Conversion in a Toy Supernova
astro-ph/0608695
• Two modes with ๐œ” = ±0.3 km−1
• Assume 80% anti-neutrinos
• Sharp onset radius
• Oscillation amplitude declining
• Neutrino-neutrino interaction
energy at nu sphere (๐‘Ÿ = 10 km)
๐œ‡ = 0.3 × 105 km−1
• Falls off approximately as ๐‘Ÿ −4
(geometric flux dilution and nus
become more co-linear)
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Neutrino Conversion and Flavor Pendulum
1
2
Sleeping
top
1
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3
Precession
and nutation
Ground
state
2
3
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Fermi-Dirac Spectrum
Fermi-Dirac energy spectrum
๐‘‘๐‘
๐‘‘๐ธ
∝
๐ธ2
๐‘’ ๐ธ ๐‘‡−๐œ‚ +1
๐œ‚ degeneracy parameter, −๐œ‚ for ๐œˆ
๐œˆ๐‘’
Same spectrum in terms of w = T/E
• Antineutrinos E ๏‚ฎ -E
• and dN/dE negative
(flavor isospin convention)
๐œ” > 0: ๐œˆ๐‘’ = ↑ and ๐œˆ๐œ‡ = ↓
๐œ” < 0: ๐œˆ๐‘’ = ↓ and ๐œˆ๐œ‡ = ↑
๐œˆ๐‘’
๐œ‚ = 0.2
infrared
๐œˆ๐‘’
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
๐œˆ๐‘’
infrared
High-E tail
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Flavor Pendulum
Single “positive” crossing
(potential energy at a maximum)
Single “negative” crossing
(potential energy at a minimum)
Dasgupta, Dighe, Raffelt & Smirnov, arXiv:0904.3542
For movies see http://www.mppmu.mpg.de/supernova/multisplits
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
General Stability Condition
Spin-precession equations of motion for modes with ๐œ” = Δ๐‘š2 2๐ธ
๐๐œ” = ๐œ”๐ × ๐๐œ”
Small-amplitude expansion: x-y-component described as complex number S
(off-diagnonal r element), linearized EoMs
−i๐‘†๐œ” = ๐œ”๐‘†๐œ” − ๐œ‡ ๐‘‘๐œ”′ ๐‘”๐œ”′ ๐‘†๐œ”′
Fourier transform ๐‘†๐œ” = ๐น๐œ” ๐‘’ ๐‘–Ω๐‘ก , with Ω = ๐›พ + ๐‘–๐œ… a complex frequency
๐œ” − Ω ๐น๐œ” = ๐œ‡ ๐‘‘๐œ”′ ๐‘”๐œ”′ ๐‘†๐œ”′
Eigenfunction is ๐น๐œ” ∝ ๐œ” − Ω
๐‘”๐œ”
−1
๐œ‡ = ๐‘‘๐œ”
๐œ”−Ω
−1
and eigenvalue Ω = ๐›พ + ๐‘–๐œ… is solution of
Instability occurs for
๐œ… = Im Ω ≠ 0
Exponential run-away solutions become pendulum for large amplitude.
Banerjee, Dighe & Raffelt, work in progress
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Stability of Fermi-Dirac Spectrum
๐œˆ
๐œˆ
2๐œ…
๐›พ
Banerjee, Dighe & Raffelt, work in progress
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Stability of Schematic Double Peak
๐œˆ
๐œˆ
Spectrum is unstable in the range
1
1
<
๐œ‡
<
2
2
๐‘Ž+1
๐‘Ž−1
where ๐‘Ž = ๐‘๐œˆ ๐‘๐œˆ .
With ๐‘Ž = 0.7, system is unstable for
0.296 < ๐œ‡ < 37.5
Otherwise the system is stuck.
Banerjee, Dighe & Raffelt, work in progress
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Decreasing Neutrino Density
Certain initial neutrino density
Four times smaller
initial neutrino density
Dasgupta, Dighe, Raffelt & Smirnov, arXiv:0904.3542
For movies see http://www.mppmu.mpg.de/supernova/multisplits
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Spectral Split
Initial
fluxes at
neutrino
sphere
Figures from
Fogli, Lisi,
Marrone & Mirizzi,
arXiv:0707.1998
After
collective
transformation
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
Explanations in
Raffelt & Smirnov
arXiv:0705.1830
and 0709.4641
Duan, Fuller,
Carlson & Qian
arXiv:0706.4293
and 0707.0290
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Multiple Spectral Splits
Inverted
Hierarchy
๐‚๐’†
๐‚๐’†
๐‚๐’™
๐‚๐’™
Normal
Hierarchy
Dasgupta, Dighe, Raffelt & Smirnov, arXiv:0904.3542
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Multiple Spectral Splits in the w Variable
๐œˆ๐‘ฅ
๐œˆ๐‘’
๐œˆ๐‘’
๐œˆ๐‘ฅ
anti-neutrinos
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
neutrinos
• Given is the flux spectrum f(E) for
each flavor
• Use ๐œ” = Δ๐‘š2 2๐ธ to label modes
• Label anti-neutrinos with −๐œ”
• Define “spectrum” as
๐‘“๐œˆ๐‘’ ๐ธ − ๐‘“๐œˆ๐‘ฅ (๐ธ)
๐‘” ๐œ” ∝
๐‘“๐œˆ๐‘ฅ ๐ธ − ๐‘“๐œˆ๐‘’ (๐ธ)
• Swaps develop around every
“postive” spectral crossing
• Each swap flanked by two splits
Dasgupta, Dighe, Raffelt & Smirnov,
arXiv:0904.3542
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Supernova Cooling-Phase Example
Normal Hierarchy
Inverted Hierarchy
Dasgupta, Dighe, Raffelt & Smirnov, arXiv:0904.3542
For movies see http://www.mppmu.mpg.de/supernova/multisplits
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Multi-Angle Decoherence
Precession eqns for modes with vacuum oscillation frequency ๐œ” = Δ๐‘š2 2๐ธ
(negative for ๐œˆ), and velocity ๐ฏ (direction of motion), homogeneous system
๐๐œ”,๐ฏ = ๐œ”๐ × ๐๐œ”,๐ฏ + ๐œ‡
1 − cos ๐œƒ๐ฏ๐ฏ′ ๐๐œ”′ ,๐ฏ′ × ๐๐œ”,๐ฏ
๐œ”′ ,๐ฏ ′
Axial symmetry around some direction (e.g. SN radial direction), measure
velocities against that direction: ๐‘ฃ = cos ๐œƒ
๐๐œ”,๐‘ฃ = ๐œ”๐ × ๐๐œ”,๐‘ฃ + ๐œ‡
๐œ”′ ,๐‘ฃ ′
๐๐œ”′ ,๐‘ฃ ′ × ๐๐œ”,๐‘ฃ − ๐œ‡
๐œ”′ ,๐‘ฃ ′
๐
๐‘ฃ ′ ๐๐œ”′ ,๐‘ฃ ′ × ๐‘ฃ๐๐œ”,๐‘ฃ
๐… (Flux)
• Flux term vanishes in isotropic gas
• Can grow exponentially even with only a small initial seed fluctuation
• Symmetric ๐œˆ๐œˆ system decoheres in both hierarchies
Raffelt & Sigl, Self-induced decoherence in dense neutrino gases, hep-ph/0701182
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Multi-Angle Decoherence
Homogeneous ensemble of ๐œˆ๐‘’ ๐œˆ๐‘’ (symmetric distribution)
Normal hierarchy
isotropic
half-isotropic
Inverted hierarchy
isotropic
half-isotropic
Raffelt & Sigl, Self-induced decoherence in dense neutrino gases, hep-ph/0701182
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Multi-Angle Decoherence of Supernova Neutrinos
Small
asymmetry
Large
asymmetry
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Critical Asymmetry for Multi-Angle Decoherence
Required
๐œˆ๐‘’ ๐œˆ๐‘’ asymmetry
to suppress
multi-angle
decoherence
Effective ๐œˆ flux
Esteban-Pretel, Pastor, Tomàs, Raffelt & Sigl: Decoherence in supernova
neutrino transformations suppressed by deleptonization, astro-ph/0706.2498
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Multi-Angle Matter Effect
Precession equation in a homogeneous ensemble
๐œ•๐‘ก ๐๐œ”,๐ฏ = ๐œ”๐ + ๐œ†๐‹ + ๐œ‡๐ × ๐๐œ”,๐ฏ , where ๐œ† = 2๐บF ๐‘๐‘’ and ๐œ‡ = 2๐บF ๐‘๐œˆ
Matter term is “achromatic”, disappears in a rotating frame
Neutrinos streaming from a SN core, evolution along radial direction
(๐ฏ ⋅ ๐›๐‘Ÿ ) ๐๐œ”,๐ฏ = ๐œ”๐ + ๐œ†๐‹ + ๐œ‡๐ × ๐๐œ”,๐ฏ
Projected on the radial direction, oscillation pattern compressed:
Accrues vacuum and matter phase faster than on radial trajectory
Matter effect can suppress collective conversion unless ๐‘๐œˆ โ‰ณ ๐‘๐‘’
Esteban-Pretel, Mirizzi, Pastor, Tomàs, Raffelt, Serpico & Sigl, arXiv:0807.0659
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Multi-Angle Matter Effect in Basel (10.8 Msun) Model
Schematic single-energy, multi-angle simulations with realistic density profile
no matter
500 1000 1500
Distance [km]
500 1000 1500
Distance [km]
500 1000 1500
Distance [km]
Chakraborty, Fischer, Mirizzi, Saviano & Tomàs, arXiv:1105.1130
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Signature of Flavor Oscillations (Accretion Phase)
1-3-mixing scenarios
Mass ordering
A
B
C
Normal (NH)
Inverted (IH)
Any (NH/IH)
sin2 ๐œƒ13
MSW conversion
๐œˆ๐‘’ survival prob.
โ‰ณ 10−3
โ‰ฒ 10−5
adiabatic
non-adiabatic
0
๐œˆ๐‘’ survival prob. cos 2 ๐œƒ12 ≈ 0.7
๐œˆ๐‘’ Earth effects
Yes
sin2 ๐œƒ12 ≈ 0.3
sin2 ๐œƒ12 ≈ 0.3
0
cos 2 ๐œƒ12 ≈ 0.7
No
Yes
May distinguish mass ordering
Assuming collective effects are not important during accretion phase
(Chakraborty et al., arXiv:1105.1130v1)
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Coalescing Neutron Stars and Short Gamma-Ray Bursts
Gamma rays
+ −
๐‘’ ๐‘’
plasma
• Annihilation rate strongly suppressed if
๐œˆ๐‘’ ๐œˆ๐‘’ pairs transform to ๐œˆ๐‘ฅ ๐œˆ๐‘ฅ pairs
• Collective effects important?
๐œˆ๐‘’ ๐œˆ๐‘’
Density of torus relatively small:
• ๐œˆ๐œ‡ and ๐œˆ๐œ not efficiently produced
• Large ๐œˆ๐‘’ ๐œˆ๐‘’ pair abundance
Accretion disk or torus
100-200 km
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Oscillation Along Streamlines
๐œˆ๐‘’ survival probability for a disk-like
source (coalescing neutron stars)
• No neutrino-neutrino interactions:
Oscillations along trajectories
like a “beam”
• Self-maintained coherence:
Oscillation along “flux lines” of
overall neutrino flux.
Dasgupta, Dighe, Mirizzi & Raffelt, arXiv:0805.3300
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Looking forward to the next galactic supernova
of
May
theoretical
take
anext
long
work
time
to do!
Looking Lots
forward
to
No
the
problem
galactic
supernova
Georg Raffelt, MPI Physics, Munich
3rd Schrödinger Lecture, University Vienna, 19 May 2011
Download