Cognitive Coaching Professional Conversations Focused on Educator Growth and Improved Student Learning Pitt County Schools December 9, 2012 Before We Begin… • visit: http://region1rttt.wikispaces.com/ Add this wikispace to your favorites Download and save the presentation found under “Region 1 Events” Complete the ticket out the door at the end of the training 2 Can We Agree? To be actively involved Value differences Agree to disagree Listen Don’t take it personally Be honest Stay focused on established purpose and goals Refrain from conducting ‘side bar’ conversations Outcomes Participants will… express and determine how the Cognitive Coaching process can be used in their current role. identify and apply the skills needed to be an effective coach. understand the Cognitive Coaching Cycle. apply their new knowledge of Cognitive Coaching strategies to various scenarios. What Do You Know About Cognitive Coaching? • Individually and silently think about the question above • Identify what you already know about Cognitive Coaching and write your ideas on sticky notes (1 thought per note) • Share your ideas with the group The Mission of Cognitive Coaching “To produce self-directed persons with cognitive capacity for high performance both independently and as members of a community.” ~Costa and Garmston What is Cognitive Coaching? • A practice based on the idea that metacognition • A practice which provides personal insights into the learner’s own thinking processes What is Cognitive Coaching? (cont’d) • A way of thinking and communicating which: – Enhances understanding and higher level thinking – Helps others become their own problemsolvers – Creates collaborative rather than dependent relationships – Develops genuine trust and rapport – Support others in feeling competent in challenging work environments Research Based Benefits 1. Coaching is linked with higher test scores 4. Coached teachers report 2. Teachers who are coached report higher teacher efficacy 5. Coaching schools have higher self-ratings for professionalism 3. Teachers who are coached demonstrate more reflective, complex thinking about their practice 6. Coaching schools have more collaboration higher job satisfaction 7. Coached teachers report feeling more supported professional and personally 9 To effectively engage people, it is helpful to identify two main subsystems in the brain. The•Blue Zone Affiliation, generosity, goodwill • Reflective • Affiliation, generosity, goodwill • Options considered • Reflective • Imaginative/creative • Higher order learning • Options considered • Slow/resource intensive • Imaginative/creative • Manages impulsive desires • Labels emotional states • Higher order learning • Not ‘fully functional’ until • Slow/resource intensive adulthood • Seat of optimism • Manages desires Blueimpulsive Zone - approximates • Not ‘fully functional’ until the newer part adulthood of the brain The Red Zone • Focused • Focused onon self self • Sensitive to threat • Sensitive to threat • Engages “fight/flight” • Engages • Resistant to“fight/flight” change • Low order learning only • Resistant to change • Fast/efficient/instinctive • Low order learning • Engages impulsive desiresonly • Anger/fear/depression • Fast/efficient/instinctive • Highly developed at birth • Engages impulsive desires • Seat of pessimism • Anger/fear/depression Red Zone • Highly- approximates developed atthe birth “old” part of the brain 10 Maximizing the Blue Zone: cognition leads broad-based growth Status Certainty Autonomy Relatedness Fairness It is this combination that occurs when a person is engaged by another. Minimizing the Red Zone: reduces the activity and impact of the red zone 11 www.gr8education.com States of Mind Efficacy Flexibility Consciousness Craftsmanship Interdependence DRAFT Efficacy • Knowing that one has the capacity to make a difference and being willing and able to do so Flexibility • Knowing one has and can develop options to consider and be willing to acknowledge and demonstrate respect for empathy for diverse perspectives. Consciousness • Monitoring one’s own values, intentions, thoughts and behaviors and their effects. Craftsmanship • Seeking precision, refinement and mastery. Striving for exactness of critical thought processes. Interdependence • Contributing to a common good and using group resources to enhance personal effectiveness. Five States of Mind Activity • Work with a partner • Choose two States of Mind • Think of “real world” examples • Share with the group 5 Minute Break Effective Coaching Requires… Trust and Rapport Components of Trust • Being present • Being aware of oneself, others and the environment • Being open • Listen without judgment and with empathy • Seek to understand • View learning as mutual • Honor the person • Honor the process Building Rapport Home Family and Friends Entertainment Work Vision The Johari Window A Communication Tool Things I know about myself Things others know about me Things others don’t know about me Things I don’t know about myself Arena Blind Spot Hidden Arena Unknown Arena Johari Activity • Divide into pairs • Write what you know or see about your partner • Share what was written with your partner • Discuss what you have learned about yourself Effective Coaching Skills “When coaches and teachers interact equally as partners, good things happen.” Jim Knight Seven Partnership Principles • • • • • • • Equality Choice Voice Reflection Dialogue Praxis Reciprocity Lunch "How Coaching Works" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UY75MQte4RU&feature=email Communicating Meaning 65% Non Verbal Components 35% Verbal Components • Posture • Pitch • Gesture • Volume • Proximity • Inflection • Muscle Tension • Pace • Facial Expression • Words Communication Knowledge and Skills for Effective Coaching • Paralanguage • Response Behaviors • Structuring • Mediative Questioning Paralanguage • Nonverbal & Verbal Cues – Posture – Gesture – Inflection – Pitch – Volume – Rate of Speech – Language Choices – Breathing Response Behaviors • Silence • Acknowledging • Paraphrasing • Clarifying • Providing Data & Resources Structuring • A coach clearly communicates expectations about purposes and the use of such resources as time, space, and materials. • Expectations should be based on a common understanding of the purposes for the coaching, the roles the coach should play, time allotments, and placement of the coach during observation. Mediative Questioning “It’s not the answers that enlighten us, but the questions.” • Questions are intentionally designed to engage and transform thinking and perspective. • Questions must meet three criteria: – Invitational in form – Engage complex cognitive processes – Intentional Judgmental vs. Non-Judgmental Questioning Example: • Why did you do it that way? • What would you do differently next time if you could? 35 Let’s Practice Question Development Issue Thinking “I’d really like to be less stressed at work, but the tasks just keep piling up…” Problem 1. Read the statement above 2. Individually write down the first 3 questions that come to mind • • Eliminate anything that is tending towards advice Focus on the thinking to change perception 3. Collaborate now with your table buddies to put together a 'top 5' list of appropriate questions 36 The Cognitive Coaching Cycle Three Phases of the Process PLANNING REFLECTING EVENT (Observation) Planning Conversations Pre-conference • Planning Map Clarifying Goals Determining the success indicators Anticipating approaches, strategies and decisions Identifying a personal learning focus Reflecting on the coaching process The Event Observation • Look for indicators of success • Look for the effectiveness of approaches, strategies, and decisions • Collect data as deemed necessary during the pre-conference Reflecting Conversations Post-conference • Reflecting Map Summary of impression and recalling supporting information Analyze causal factors that impacted the event Construct new learning Commit to the application Reflect on coaching process and design refinement Cognitive Coaching Practice Person A – Observer (Pay attention the verbal and non-verbal behaviors of the coach. Record your observations.) Person B – Coach Person C – Colleague or Parent Role Play Scenario #1 A colleague says to you, “I’ve done everything I know to do and this teacher is still having difficulty with classroom management.” Role Play Scenario #2 A parent comes to the principal and says, “I’ve had it with that teacher! I want my child taken out of her class TODAY!” Role Play Scenario #3 A colleague says to you, “I’ve been feeling overwhelmed with integrating the new Instructional Standards into my lessons. The students know more that I do.” Questions Session Evaluation • Visit: http://region1rttt.wikispaces.com/ Complete the ticket out the door at the end of the training References • Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (2002). Cognitive Coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools (2nd ed.). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon. • Ellison, J., & Hayes, C. (2006). Effective School Leadership: Developing Principals through Cognitive Coaching. Norwood, MA: ChristopherGordon. • Tschannen-Moran, B., Tschannen-Moran, M. (2011). The Coach and the Evaluator. Educational Leadership, 69,10-16. • Knight, J. (2011). What Good Coaches Do. Educational Leadership, 69, 18-22. • Aguilar, E., Goldwasser, D., & Tank-Crestetto, K. (2011). Supporting Principals Transforming Schools. Educational Leadership, 69, 70-76. Web Resources • http://www.pd360.com/pd360.cfm#tab=home&page=homeWall • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UY75MQte4RU • www.gr8education.com • http://www.businessballs.com/johariwindowmodeldiagram.pdf • http://www.coachingnetwork.org.uk/resourcecentre/whatarecoachingandmentoring.htm • http://sites.google.com/site/group2presentation/home • http://www.svsd410.org/CCS/Cognitive%20Coaching.asp • http://www.cognitivecoaching.com/ • http://www.cls.utk.edu/pdf/ls/Week2_Lesson12.pdf • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isiSOeMVJQk&feature=BFa&list=ULvfxFSvDvSqA&lf=mfu_in _order Contact Information Beth Edwards, PD Lead, Region 1 elizabeth.edwards@dpi.nc.gov (252) 916-6842 Dianne Meiggs, PD Lead, Region 1 dianne.meiggs@dpi.nc.gov (252) 340-0113