ISyE 6203 Wrap Up Exam Review John H. Vande Vate Fall 2011 1 1 Summary • • • • • • • • • • Review of Probability & Regression Forecasting Building a distribution of demand Safety Inventory/Lead time: Using inventory to protect against demand variability Pooling Sourcing: Newsvendor and Extensions Revenue Management Make-to-stock & Make-to-Order Alternative approach to managing variability Distortions to the logic of logistics 2 2 The Big Idea • When combining random variables, some of the “noise” cancels. How much cancels depends on the correlation. 3 3 Noise Canceling • X1, X2 independent, identically distributed rvs • Var[2X1] = 4 2X • Stdev[2X1] = 2X • Var[X1 + X2] = 22X + 2*Cov(X,X) • Stdev[X1 + X2] = 2 2Cov( X , X ) 2 X 2 X • About 30% of the variability canceled 4 4 How can we: • • • • Add across customers? Add across products? Add across time? When do these conflict? 5 5 The Big Idea • Average Daily Sales: 1280.196 • Std Dev. In Daily Sales: 1546.472 • Average Weekly Sales: 6400.981 • Std Dev. In Weekly Sales: 5971.578 • Avg Weekly Sales = 5*Average Daily Sales • What about the relationship between the variabilities? • 5*Std Dev. In Daily Sales = 7732.361 What does the Big Idea say we should expect? 6 6 Laws of Forecasting • Law 1: Forecasts are wrong • Law 2: Forecast Demand not Sales • Law 3: It is generally easier to forecast aggregate data than it is to forecast the details. (Big Idea) • Law 4: It is generally easier to forecast a short time into the future that to forecast far into the future • Law 5: Simpler forecasts are generally better forecasts 7 7 Demand Distribution • We know the forecast is WRONG • But it does give us some information • What Actual Sales will be is uncertain, but we can develop a distribution for it • What are the chances Actual Sales are larger than X? Smaller than Y? … 8 8 Actual to Forecast Ratios Frequency 12 Ratio < 1 Over forecast 10 8 Ratio > 1 Under forecast 6 4 2 4. 5 4 3. 5 3 2. 5 2 1. 5 1 0. 5 0 0 • the Avg is 1.1 (What does that mean?) • σ the Std Dev is 0.87 9 9 Context • Forecasting to account for predictable variability • Managing the remaining variability • Distribution for demand (given a forecast) • Levers for managing – – – – Inventory Time Capacity Influencing demand 10 10 Lead Time Variability Constant Avg Demand Continuous Review If Lead Times are variable • D = Average (daily) demand • D = Std. Dev. in (daily) demand • L = Average lead time (days) • sL = Std. Dev. in lead time (days) • Average lead time demand – DL • Std. Dev. in lead time demand – L = L2D + D2 s2L • Remember: Std. Dev. in lead time demand drives safety stock 11 11 Safety Stock in Periodic Review Constant Avg Demand Periodic Review • Probability of stock out is the probability demand in T+L exceeds the order up to level, S • Expected Demand in T + L D(T+E[L]) • Variance in Demand in T+L Remember our key fact (T+E[L]) D2 +D2 L2 • Order Up to Level: S= D(T+E[L]) + safety stock • How to set the safety stock? 12 12 With a Forecast • Forecast of what? Forecast of demand in T+L time periods – that’s what we have to cover with our Order-Up-To-Level S • How far into the future? Do we make this forecast one year in advance? One month in advance? One week in advance? A forecast of the demand over the T + L time periods starting “now” – That’s what we need to have to place the order – it goes into our inventory POSITION immediately 13 13 A/F ratios for the next T+L time Distribution of Error Cumulative Distribution of Ratios Error Ratios 35% Ratio 100% 30% 90% < 1 Over forecast Ratio > 1 Under forecast 80% 25% 70% 20% 60% 15% 50% 10% 40% 5% 30% V should be just over 2.0 to ensure a 90% chance A/F ≤ v 0% 20% 0 0 to 0.5 0.5 to 1.0 1.0 to 1.5 1.5 to 2.0 2.0 to 2.5 2.5 to 3.0 10% • the Avg is 1.1 0% • σ the Std Dev is 0.87 0.00 We0.25 0.50 week 0.75 and1.00 1.25is 41.50 2.00 2.25the 2.50 3.00 • Example: order every lead time weeks,1.75 we want to know next 5 weeks demand when we place this order. This order will determine S and so the inventory available to cover the next T+L time periods 14 14 Example • If v = 2.1 and T+L = 5 weeks, that means setting an order up to level of 10.5 = v*(T+L) weeks of supply ensures a 90% chance we won’t run short. • In a perfect world, we would only need T+L weeks of supply to cover T+L weeks of demand so our Safety Stock in this setting is (v-1)*(T+L) = 5.5 weeks of supply. 15 15 Example • Now we can re-insert the forecast: If we forecast 10,000 units of sales over the next 5 weeks, then we should place an order up to carry our inventory POSITION to 21,000 = 2.1*10,000 units • 10,000 units over 5 weeks is a rate of r = 2,000 units per week. 21,000 units is 10.5 weeks of demand • Safety Stock rises and falls with the forecast but Safety Lead Time remains 5.5 weeks. 16 16 Pooling • • • • • • Collective Lead time demand N(n, n ) This is true if their demands and lead times are independent! That’s our big idea at work. Collective safety stock is n z Total of individual safety stocks is nz Typically demands are negatively or positively correlated What happens to the collective safety stock if demands are – positively correlated? – Negatively correlated? Pooling always reduces inventory, but how much varies • pooled2 = 22 + 2*Covariance • 22 - 2*2 ≤ pooled2 ≤ 22 + 2*2 • So pooled ≤ 2, the unpooled standard deviation 17 17 Newsvendor • Balance the Risks and Rewards Reward: (Selling Price – Cost)*(1-P) Risk: (Cost – Salvage)*P If Salvage Value is > Cost? (Selling Price – Cost)*(1-P) = (Cost – Salvage)*P P= (Selling Price – Cost) (Selling Price – Cost) (Selling Price – Cost Cost – Salvage) (Selling Price – Salvage) 18 18 Objective for the “first 10K” • Return on Investment: Expected Profit Invested Capital • Questions: – What happens to Expected Profit per unit as the order quantity increases? – What happens to the Invested Capital per unit as the order quantity increases? – What happens to Return on Investment as the order quantity increases? – Which styles will show the higher return on investment? 19 19 Different View • Maximize S Expected Profit(Qi) • S.t. S ci Qi = Invested Capital Target • That maximizes the ROIC for the “portfolio” • How to do it? 20 20 Different View • Use Lagrange • Maximize S Expected Profit(Qi) • - Tax Rate* S ci Qi • At a given Tax Rate, the answer maximizes the ROIC over all portfolios with that amount of Invested Capital. • Increasing the Tax Rate reduces the Invested Capital • So, we can carve out the frontier of high ROIC portfolios vs Invested Capital 21 21 Relative Sales Rates Item 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Full Price 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Full Price Mean Std Dev 1 - Ratio of Sales Rates 10% 20% 1.30 1.34 1.39 1.27 1.23 1.83 1.77 1.83 1.79 1.44 - 10% 1.31 0.06 40% 2.63 2.94 3.00 2.67 2.81 20% 1.73 0.16 40% 2.81 0.16 A discount of 10% lifts weekly sales by 31% Mean Std Dev 1 - 1.31 0.06 1.73 0.16 2.81 0.16 22 22 Two Constraints • P = Average Sales Rate at Full Price • x[price] = Weeks we sell at price • S = Units we salvage max P*(60x[60] + 54*1.31x[54] + 48*1.73x[48] + 36*2.81x[36] ) + 25S s.t. x[60] + x[54] + x[48] + x[36] 15 s.t. P*(x[60] + 1.31x[54] + 1.73x[48] + 2.81x[36]) + S = 2000 s.t. x[60] 1 (This is a bound. Like x[54] 0) non-negativity 23 23 The 3 Levers • Manage variability with – Inventory: • The classic buffer against changes in and uncertainty about demand. • The cost is working capital and risk of obsolescence and damage, extra handling, etc. – Capacity: • Changes in production rate, overtime, extra shifts, furloughs, shutdowns, etc. • The cost is fixed capital invested in idle capacity, disruptions to workforce, suppliers, carriers, … – Time: • Making the customer wait either via longer delivery commitments or backordering or • The cost is in customer satisfaction, competitiveness, lost sales, etc. 24 24 Priorities • Make-to-Stock – Protect capacity – Balance between • availability (the time buffer) and • inventory • Make-to-Order – No (finished goods) inventory – Balance between • Order-to-delivery time • Capacity 25 25 KOVP The Push-Pull Interface Production System before KOVP Early Order Assignment Start Order Assignment Bodyshell work Sort Sort Paint shop Assembly Production System with KOVP Make to Stock Late Make-to-Order Frozen Horizon Order Assignment Sort Start order assignment OSM Bodyshell work Paint shop Assembly 26 26 DELL BRH1 – Manufacturing Manufacturing Flow Manufacturing Layout Servers Notebooks Shipping INBOUND New Lean Lines Desktops Finished Goods RAM Cabinets Lean Lines OUTBOUND Entrada fábrica 27 27 Ship-to-Average & Forecasts Percent Error 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Daily Weekly Monthly Quarterly 140 Forecast quantity 120 100 daily weekly monthly quarterly 80 60 40 20 28 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 28 Ship to Average Deflate shipments: Avg. forecast (x weeks) * deflation factor Inventory Position Max. Inventory Position (almost) constant shipment quantities ! Time Inflate shipments: Avg. forecast (x weeks) * inflation factor 29 29 Shipment Comparison ship-to-forecast 700 shipments (shipment adjustment: 66%) 800 600 500 400 300 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 weeks ship-to-average 700 shipments (shipment adjustment: 14%) 800 600 500 400 300 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 weeks Definition: Shipment Adjustment: shipment quantity changes more than 10% compared to previous 30 one 30 The Point • The message of supply chain management is that supply chain competes against supply chain. • Look to reduce cost, improve performance in the supply chain, not just your company • Variability costs money so manage the variability you transmit to suppliers • … 31 31 Two Contradictory “Facts” • Companies generally will not allow taxes and the like to influence logistics decisions • Supply Chain Engineers are Tax (& Duty & Tolls &…) Engineers 32 32 Final Exam • Four questions – Short answer questions on the course lectures since mid-term • 1 Question on: The Big Idea, A/F ratios, safety inventory, safety lead time • 1 Question on: Obermeyer • 1 Question on: Retail Pricing • 1 Question on Projects 33 33