ACM Code of Ethics and Professionalism (Excerpt) GENERAL MORAL IMPERATIVES Contribute to society and human well-being Avoid harm to others Be honest and trustworthy Be fair and take action not to discriminate Honor property rights including copyrights and patent Give proper credit for intellectual property Respect the privacy of others Honor confidentiality ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP IMPERATIVES Articulate social responsibilities Enhance the quality of working life Proper and authorized uses of computing and communication resources Ensure that those affected by a system have their needs clearly articulated; validate the system to meet requirements Protect the dignity of users Intellectual Honesty McConnell, Code Complete Refusing to pretend you’re an expert when you’re not Readily admitting your mistakes Trying to understand a compiler warning rather than suppressing the message Clearly understanding your program – not compiling it to see if it works Providing realistic status reports Providing realistic schedule estimates & holding your ground when mgmt asks you to adjust Whistle Blowing What are the alternatives? When is it okay? When is it not a choice? Ethics of a project fairness to the knowing users implications for unknowing users Are all projects worth doing? Intended misuse Potential misuse Unexpected consequences Google glasses Hyperlinks Responsibility to users Making it clear that its another site Protection from inappropriate material Responsibility to other site owners Bypassing advertisements ○ Ticketmaster and Microsoft Use of their resources (e.g., images) What is Intellectual Property? Ownership and property Rights of ownership: Blackstonian Bundle Exclude anyone from the property Use it as sees fit Receive income from Transfer property to someone else Intellectual property: intellectual objects Intellectual Property v. Real Property Physical objects Zero-sum gain: one user at a time Significant cost in both development and replication Intellectual objects Used by many at once Significant cost in development, marginal cost in replication Need for Protection need to recover the development costs knowledge of future ownership is incentive to increase value Arguments against IP Free flow of ideas First amendment freedom of speech Creative ideas build on society and culture Pay what you want Music, Textbooks, Games, Books, Software Legal Protection Copyright Patent Trademark Copyright: How Long? 1790: 14 + renew 1909: 28 + renew 1976 : author + 50, corporate 75 1998: author + 70, corporate 95 Digital Rights Management Enabling copying is criminal Preclude through architecture Problems Constrains who can use ○ Exceptions will be too constrained for someone Tracks who is viewing Digital Millenium Copyright Act (‘66) Illegal to … bypass technical measures used to protect access manufacture or distribute technologies primarily designed or produced to circumvent technical measures remove or alter copyright management information Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes (Aug ‘00) 8 studios sued 2600 Magazine ○ posting DeCSS bypasses Content Scrambling System (CSS) - commercially distributed DVD Copying copyrighted materials Responsibility of those enabling it Software Network providers Cases: software Napster Grockster Bit Torrent Cases: network providers Verizon Six Strikes APIs: Oracle v Google Issue: Android APIs are very Java-like Android VM was built in a “cleanroom environment” Oracle sued over the APIs Ruling: not copyrightable Ruling overturned Patents Physical objects Process, machine or composition of matter NOT laws of nature, scientific principles, algorithms Criteria Novel Not previously described Non-obvious Useful Patents Hardware, software, processes NOT laws of nature, scientific principles, algorithms Can patent new applications or combinations Criteria Novel Not previously described Non-obvious Useful A man "has a right to use his knife to cut his meat, a fork to hold it; may a patentee take from him the right to combine their use on the same subject?" -- Thomas Jefferson Software & Business Process Patents Processes vs. algorithms What is non-obvious? Examples Name Your Price (Priceline) One-click (Amazon) Opinions Marco Arment (inherently problematic) Paul Graham (patents === software patents) Recent Activity German legislature: resolution calling for cessation New Zealand considering outright ban US courts appear to be backing off Bilski v Kappos (Supreme, 2010) ○ Hedging the risk of commodities fluctuation ○ Claims denied CLS v Alice (Circuit, 2013) ○ Trading platform to assure that neither side renigs ○ Claims denied Trademarks Word, phrase or symbol “Pithily” identifies Infringement: used by someone else Dilutions Blurring – dissimilar products Tarnishment – negative or compromising Has been applied to domain names Cybersquatting Parody or criticism Domain Names Cybersquatting .net, .org, .com, … Punctuation (hyphenation, etc.) Phrases, nicknames Parody, criticism, complaint (cybergriping) Property rights vs. free speech Bringing people to the site under false pretenses Including the name in the url vs. appearing to be the site