Diapositiva 1

advertisement
•
1. Aprill C, Bogduk N. High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance
imaging. Br J Radiol 1992;65:361-9.
•
2. Lam KS, Carlin D, Mulholland RC. Lumbar disc high-intensity zone: the value and significance of provocative
discography in the determination of the discogenic pain source. Eur Spine J 2000;9:36-41.
•
3. Carragee EJ, Paragioudakis SJ, Khurana S. 2000 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: lumbar high-intensity
zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine 2000;25:2987-92.
•
4. Thornbury JR, Fryback DG, Turski PA, et al. Disk-caused nerve compression in patients with acute low-back
pain: diagnosis with MR, CT myelography, and plain CT. Radiology 1993;186:731-8.).
•
5.-Pevsner PH, Ondra S, Radcliff W, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine. A comparison with
computed tomography and myelography. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1986;369:706–7.
•
6.-Albeck MJ, Hilden J, Kjear L, et al. A controlled comparisonof myelography, computed tomography and
magneticresonance imaging in clinically suspected lumbar disc herniation. Spine 1995;20:443–8.
•
7.- Bell GR, Rothman RH, Booth RE, et al. A study of computed-assisted tomography. Part II. Comparison of
metrizamide myelography and computed tomography in the diagnosis of herniated
•
8. Algra PR, Bloem JL, Tissing H, et al. Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and
bone scintigraphy. Radiographics 1991;11:219-32.
•
9. Avrahami E, Tadmor R, Dally O, Hadar H. Early MR demonstration of spinal metastases in patients with normal
radiographs and CT and radionuclide bone scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989;13:598-602.
lumbar disc and spinal stenosis. Spine 1984.
•
•
10. Modic MT, Feiglin DH, Piraino DW et al. Vertebral osteomyelitis: assessment using MR. Radiology
1985;157:157-66.
•
11. Sandhu HS, Sanchez-Caso LP, Parvataneni HK, et al. Association between findings of provocative
discography and vertebral endplate signal changes as seen on MRI. J Spinal Disord 2000;13:438-43.
•
12. Rankine JJ, Gill KP, Hutchinson CE, et al. The clinical significance of the high-intensity zone on lumbar spine
magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 1999;24:1913-9.
•
13. Swanson D, Blecker I, Gebhauer H, Caride VJ. Diagnosis of discitis by SPECT technetium-99m MDP
scintogram. A case report. Clin Nucl Med 1987;12:210-1.
•
14. Van den Bosch MAAJ, Hollingworth W, Kinmonth AL, Dixon AK. Evidence against the use of lumbar spine
radiography for low back pain. Clin Radiol 2004;59:69-76.
•
15. Masaryk T, Drayer BP, Anderson RE, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria for acute low back pain –
radiculopathy 2001.
•
16.- Jackson RP, Cain JE, Jacobs RR, et al. The neuroradiographic diagnosis of lumbar herniated nucleus
pulposus: II.A comparison of computed tomogrpahy (CT), myelography,CT-myelography, and magnetic resonance
imaging.Spine 1989;14:1362–7.
17. Esposito P, Pinheiro-Franco JL, Froelich S, Maitrot D (2006)Predictive value of MRI vertebral end-plate signal
changes(Modic) on outcome of surgically treated degenerative disc disease. Neurochirurgie 52(4):315–322.
•
•
18. Kjaer P, Leboeuf-Yde C, Korsholm L, Sorensen JS, Bendix T(2005) Magnetic resonance imaging and low back
pain in adults:A diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women.Spine 30:1173–1180.
•
19. Kjaer P, Korsholm L, Bendix T, Sorensen JS, Leboeuf-Yde C(2006) Modic changes and their associations with
clinicalfindings. Eur Spine J 15:1312–1319.
•
20. Kuisma M, Karpinnen J, Niinima¨ki J, Ojala R, Haapea M,Helio¨vaara M, Korpelainen R, Taimela S, Natri A,
Tervonen O(2007) Modic changes in endplates of lumbar vertebral bodies:prevalence and association with low back
and sciatic pain amongmiddle-aged male workers. Spine 32(10):1116–1122
•
21. Malinin T, Brown MD (2007) Changes in vertebral bodiesadjacent to acutely narrowed intervertebral discs:
observations inbaboons. Spine 32(21):E603–E607
•
22. Mitra D, Cassar-Pulliccino VN, McCall IW (2004) Longitudinalstudy of vertebral type-1 end-plate changes on MR
of the lumbarspine. Eur Radiol 14(9):1574–1581. Eur Spine J (2008) 17:1766–1768 1767.
•
23.Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR (1988)Degenerative disk disease: assessment of
changes in vertebralbody marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 166(1 Pt 1):193–199.
•
24. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001)Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar
intervertebral discdegeneration. Spine 26(17):1873–1878.
•
25. Pinheiro Franco JL (2008) Modic 1 to Modic 2. J Neurosurg. Spine 8:391–392.
•
26. Toyone T, Takahashi K, Kitahara H, Yamagata M, Murakami Moriya H (1994) Vertebral bone-marrow changes in
degenerative lumbar disc disease. A MRI study of 74 patients with low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:757–764.
•
27. Vital JM, Gille O, Pointillart V, Pedram M, Bacon P, Razanabola F, Schaederle C, Azzouz S (2003) Course of
Modic 1 six months after lumbar posterior osteosynthesis. Spine 28(7):715–720.Eur Spine J (2008) 17:1766–1768
Download