Science & Math General Education Division III Third Open Meeting Brief Review Brief Review Survey of DPU SM faculty regarding SM gen ed requirements Brief Review Survey of DPU SM faculty regarding SM gen ed requirements General dissatisfaction with current requirement Based on lack of goals & concern whether courses provide exposure to scientific method General consensus on goal of teaching SM skills rather than set of “facts” Brief Review Survey of DPU SM faculty regarding SM gen ed requirements Two Div III open meetings and creation of Working Group Brief Review Survey of DPU SM faculty regarding SM gen ed requirements Two Div III open meetings and creation of Working Group Consensus on initial SM gen ed goals (TOSLS): 2 broader goals Understand methods of inquiry that lead to scientific knowledge Organize, analyze, and interpret quantitative data and scientific information Brief Review Survey of DPU SM faculty regarding SM gen ed requirements Two Div III open meetings and creation of Working Group Assessment of incoming students’ scientific literacy skills this year (TOSLS) Brief Review Survey of DPU SM faculty regarding SM gen ed requirements Two Div III open meetings and creation of Working Group Assessment of incoming students’ scientific literacy skills this year Active-learning workshop with Ed Prather Brief Review Survey of DPU SM faculty regarding SM gen ed requirements Two Div III open meetings and creation of Working Group Assessment of incoming students’ scientific literacy skills this year Active-learning workshop with Ed Prather SM advising document (salmon colored paper) Brief Review Survey of DPU SM faculty regarding SM gen ed requirements Two Div III open meetings, Brown Bags, and creation of Working Group Assessment of incoming students’ scientific literacy skills this year Active-learning workshop with Ed Prather SM advising document WISER website (inc. previous meeting notes) Moving forward Moving forward We each have a 3-year Faculty Fellowship to continue facilitating this project Moving forward We each have a 3-year Faculty Fellowship to continue facilitating this project Transparency with other divisions (Chairs Meeting Oct. 9 at Pres. Casey’s house) Moving forward We each have a 3-year Faculty Fellowship to continue facilitating this project Transparency with other divisions (Chairs’ Meeting Oct. 9 at Pres. Casey’s house) We are writing an NSF-IUSE grant proposal with Michael Roberts for money to continue this project NSF---IUSE grant proposal NSF---IUSE grant proposal Category: Institutional & Community Transformation—Exploration Up to $250,000 over 2 years NSF---IUSE grant proposal Category: Institutional & Community Transformation—Exploration Up to $250,000 over 2 years Due Oct. 24! Met with Rockman for external assessment NSF---IUSE grant proposal What we hope to accomplish: Learning Community on Science/Math education Clear Division 3 Gen Ed Goals Departmental Goals for SM courses Workshops on course transformation Pilot the “Big Ideas” class (designed around divisional goals) Implement meaningful assessment in classes and university-wide Share model with other divisions & schools NSF---IUSE grant proposal Money for: Reading groups Divisional meetings Workshops on teaching strategies Departmental Retreats Development of “Big Ideas” course Conference attendance Goals for this year Goals for this year Strengthen our Learning Community Reading Group Share ideas for new course activities Goals for this year Strengthen our Learning Community Departmental retreats/discussions Departmental Learning Goals for SM courses Departmental Learning Goals for majors Goals for this year Strengthen our Learning Community Departmental retreats/discussions Pilot a “Big Ideas” course for SM general education-2014/2015 Michael will talk about later Goals for this year Strengthen our Learning Community Departmental retreats/discussions Pilot a “Big Ideas” course for SM general education-2014/2015 Collect assessment data Goals for this year Strengthen our Learning Community Departmental retreats/discussions Pilot a “Big Ideas” course for SM general education-2014/2015 Collect assessment data Which is where we need help for the upcoming IUSE grant… Assessment (30 minutes) Attitudinal & Affective measures Pretest and posttest 4 examples at your tables Peruse & discuss with tablemates Are we interested in self-efficacy/affect and/or perception of nature of science? Can you envision any of these being useful in your class or helpful to this project? Share feedback with larger group Assessment (30 minutes) Are we interested in self-efficacy/affect and/or perception of nature of science? Can you envision any of these being useful in your class or helpful to this project? SMQ: Science Motivation Questionnaire (pink sheet) 30 items Can substitute discipline name for “science” 5 subscales Intrinsic motivation & personal relevance Self-efficacy & assessment anxiety Self-determination Career motivation Grade motivation SMQ: Science Motivation Questionnaire (pink sheet) Pros Good reliability & validity Fairly widely used Pretty brief Cons One of the subscales is not as strong Assesses motivation, but not epistemology or perceptions of science TOSRA: Test of Science Related Attitudes (blue sheet) 70 items 7 subscales Social implications of science Normality of scientists Attitude to scientific inquiry Adoption of scientific attitudes Enjoyment of science lessons Leisure interest in science Career interest in science TOSRA: Test of Science Related Attitudes (blue sheet) Pros Comprehensive Commonly used Can select subscales Cons Long Developed for younger audience Some items may be outdated ACS: Attitudes & Conceptions in Science (yellow sheet) 26 items Includes some discipline-specific items 3 subscales Attitudes toward learning science Attitudes toward science Conception of science ACS: Attitudes & Conceptions in Science (yellow sheet) Pros Pretty brief Measures both attitudes towards science and conception of science Cons Some subscales have few general science items Attitudes towards science scale is weaker Not widely used SAI II: Scientific Attitude Inventory (green sheet) 60 items 6 subscales Beliefs about whether science laws can change Limitations of science Scientific dispositions Science as theoretical vs. practical Value of public understanding of science Interest in a science career SAI II: Scientific Attitude Inventory (green sheet) Pros Commonly used Measures epistemology as well as motivation Cons Negative items could be difficult to answer Long Originally validated for high school students Additional measures RISC—Research on the Integrated Science Curriculum Managed online at Grinnell Faculty questionnaire to complete first 78 items Self-ratings, including experience with certain science and learning tasks, opinions about self and science Additional measures VNOS (Views of Nature of Science) Questionnaire VOSI (Views of Scientific Inquiry) Questionnaire VASI (Views of Scientific Inquiry) Questionnaire All open-ended format and responses need to be scored. Additional measures There well. are discipline-specific measures as Consider using smaller classroom assessments throughout the semester (e.g., Angelo & Cross) “Big Ideas” class “Big Ideas” class Address science literacy learning goals from multiple disciplines/contexts (transfer) Engaging courses that non-majors want to take and faculty want to teach (the FYS of STEM dreams) “Big Ideas” class What’s the big idea? Model for team-teaching the course What’s the big idea? Thematic Pivotal courses ideas Contemporary issues What’s the big idea? Thematic courses Water Science of Consciousness Climate Change Complex Systems What’s the big idea? Examples at Otterbein College (geared to upper level, lacking explicit learning goals) • • • • • • • • • Origins (Paleontology/ Molecular Biology) The Atom (Chemistry/ Physics) Why sex? (Ecology/ Molecular Biology) Exobiology (Physics/ Microbiology) Water (Ecology/ Chemistry) Biological Sciences-Plagues and Pandemics Earth Science & Society- Coral Reef Resources Earth Science & Society-Energy Resources Energy and Society What’s the big idea? Pivotal Ideas Evolution + Classical mechanics/Quantum mechanics + Cognitive Revolution + … What’s the big idea? Contemporary Climate Issues change + Epigenetic effects + … What’s the big idea? Please take 10 minutes to discuss the Big Ideas courses that would most excite you and excite students. Then each table will report their favorite ideas. “Big Ideas” class What’s the big idea? Model for team-teaching the course Model for team-teaching the course Modules 5 faculty, 5 sets of X students, rotate Model for team-teaching the course Modules 5 faculty, 5 sets of X students, rotate Lecture All + “labs”/discussion faculty and students meet together, e.g. once a week Each faculty also meets for a lab/discussion section with a separate subset of students Model for team-teaching the course Modules 5 faculty, 5 sets of X students, rotate Lecture + “labs”/discussion All faculty and students meet together, e.g. once a week Each faculty also meets for a lab/discussion section with a separate subset of students Alternative model? Model for team-teaching the course Please take 5 minutes to discuss possible models for team-teaching the course. Then we’ll ask if there was a consensus for one of the aforementioned models, or whether an alternative model gained traction. “Big Ideas” class Want to be involved in further development of these ideas and piloting? Suggestions? Interest in Learning Community? Topics? Frequency (1, 2, 4 x month)? Time (lunch, day of week)? Other topics we should be exploring? Departmental concerns? WISER site http://www.depauw.edu/academics/ce nters/ctl/wiser/ Calendar of events Notes from all meetings Educational Resources Student Information