Sex differences Messinger Gender film clips Bonobo Biology's role “Experiments with nonhuman primates show that administering testosterone to female fetuses late in gestation yields more typically masculine behavior.” Placement of rat fetuses in utero influences sex-typed behavior Many sex differences are continuous, not categorical E.g. estrogen and testosterone Sex Differences in Early Infancy “girls show stronger visual preferences for a doll (i.e., an object with human attributes) than for a toy truck • (Alexander, Wilcox, & Woods, 2009)… boys shortly after birth show stronger visual preferences for a mechanical mobile than for a face • (Connellan et al., 2000)” Alexander, G. M., & Wilcox, T. (2012). Sex Differences in Early Infancy. Child Development Perspectives, 6(4), 400-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00247.x Feedback Between physical and social features Male newborns ‘Less responsive to social stimuli less able to maintain eye contact Greater difficulties in maintaining affective regulation Smile less and display more irritability, crying, facial grimacing, and lability of emotional states more rapid buildup of arousal engage in less self-comforting’ • Weinberg et al., p. 175 Face-to-face Joy Interest Anger Look @ Mom Look @ Object Neutral/Positive Vocalizations Fussy Vocalizations Boys .26 .55 .07 .42 .35 .13 Girls .16 .68 .03 .35 .45 .06 .09 .04 (Weinberg et al.) Mothers more likely to talk to engage in face-to-face interaction hold and touch their male infants possibly in an attempt to soothe them Differential social expectations Pervasive: TV, media Experimentally demonstrated Define normative expectations of everyday behavior and Define boundaries of acceptable behavior At the most intimate and the most mundane levels Maccoby "By and large, the daily routines of family life do not have much impact on the strong tendency of children to separate into same-sex groups, and probably not on the distinctive activities enacted by male and female groups," Maccoby said. Gender segregation Research on gender typing in individuals is inconclusive Clustering of gender-typed characteristics weak Relations to family characteristics weak Same-sex groupings predominate From 3 – 12, Cross-cultural phenomenon Martin and Ruble • What age do infants understand gender? • How stable are gender roles? – Maccoby (2002) • Longitudinal studies of gender role stability – Studies suggest some level of stability – Lack of longitudinal data with enough detail Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2010). Patterns of Gender Development Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 61, pp. 353-381). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews. Constructivist argument Innate gender-specific proclivities Lead to same sex segregation Which creates gender-specific socialization Children create themselves playing with each other IS THIS POSSIBLE? Same-sex groupings Boys Larger groups More conflict/competition Cohesiveness More autonomous from adults Differential Girls Smaller, more dyadic Less conflict, more responsive Less goal-oriented, more intimate exposure to these groups influences individual behavior Dynamic system approach to gender research Long term changes and short term interactions. Ande Bustamante Lynn Martin, C., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., & Hollenstein, T. (2005). Social dynamics in the preschool. Developmental Review, 25(3–4), 299-327. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.20 05.10.001 Example of Dyadic SSG “Fig. 4A represents the state space pattern that might be seen for a socially competent boy who is solely attracted to other socially competent children. “ “Fig. 4B illustrates a pattern based on sex similarity. In this case, the events represented on this boy’s state space illustrate that he is seen interacting only with boys and it does not matter what type of social behavior they tend to display. “ “Fig. 4C depicts the landscape for a socially competent boy whose state space is shaped by both similarity on social behavior and on sex. The events cluster in the region of socially competent boys. If this pattern occurred, it would suggest that behavioral similarity matters but only in consideration for same-sex peers.” Sex-Segregated Interactions Behaviorally Similar Interactions Cross-sex friendships Pre-school Elementary school Middle school High school / Adolescence … Change 12th grade Boys 5 hrs a week w girls. Girls 10 hrs a week w boys. Larger network of other-sex friends increases odds of romantic relationship What about the development of ASD? Messinger, D. S., Young, G. S., Webb, S. J., Ozonoff, S., Bryson, S. E., Carter, A., Carver, L., Charman, T., Chawarska, K., Curtin, S., Dobkins, K., Hertz-Picciotto, I., Hutman, T., Iverson, J. M., Landa, R., Nelson, C. A., Stone, W. L., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Zwaigenbaum, L. (2015). Early sex differences are not autism-specific: A Baby Siblings Research Consortium (BSRC) study. Mol Autism, 6, 32. doi: 10.1186/s13229-015-0027-y Proportion ASD Relative risk of ASD = 3.18 Sex by domain not affected by group Repetitive Behaviors Social Affect Sex by subtest not affected by group Conclusion Sex differences in ASD prevalence No sex differences in overall symptoms or cognition • Boys (higher RRB) and girls (higher language) with ASD differ in specific performance areas • These sex differences exist in ASD, non-ASD, low-risk Results are consistent with recent reports Sex differences that appear in children with ASD may not be ASD-specific Extreme male brain theory of autism Baron-Cohen Empathizing (theory of mind) “Empathizing is the capacity to predict and to respond to the behavior of agents (usually people) by inferring their mental states and responding to these with an appropriate emotion.” Systemizing “Systemizing is the capacity to predict and to respond to the behavior of nonagentive deterministic systems by analyzing inputoperation-output relations and inferring the rules that govern such systems.” Females and males “At a population level, females are stronger empathizers and males are stronger systemizers. The ‘‘extreme male brain’’ theory posits that autism represents an extreme of the male pattern (impaired empathizing and enhanced systemizing). Specific aspects of autistic neuroanatomy may also be extremes of typical male neuroanatomy.” You can be high in both… or low in both Higher on graph – more empathizing Lower – less empathizing More to right – higher systemizing More left – less systemizing Autistic people show lowest Empathizing (empathizing minus systemizing) AS/HFA>Male>Female AS/HFA>Male>Female Sex differences attenuated in ASD…. Baron-Cohen, S., Cassidy, S., Auyeung, B., Allison, C., Achoukhi, M., Robertson, S., Pohl, A., & Lai, M.-C. (2014). Attenuation of Typical Sex Differences in 800 Adults with Autism vs. 3,900 Controls. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e102251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102251 Homosexuality as a Discrete Class. Previous research on the latent structure of sexual orientation has returned conflicting results, with some studies finding a dimensional structure (i.e., ranging quantitatively along a spectrum) and others a taxonic structure (i.e., categories of individuals with distinct orientations). The current study used a sample (N = 33,525) from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). A series of taxometric analyses were conducted using three indicators of sexual orientation: identity, behavior, and attraction. These analyses, performed separately for women and men, revealed low-baserate same-sex-oriented taxa for men (base rate = 3.0%) and women (base rate = 2.7%). Generally, taxon membership conferred an increased risk for psychiatric and substance-use disorders. Although taxa were present for men and women, women demonstrated greater sexual fluidity, such that any level of same-sex sexuality conferred taxon membership for men but not for women. Norris, A. L., Marcus, D. K., & Green, B. A. (2015). Psychological Science. doi: 10.1177/0956797615598617 Same-sex relationships Normative challenges in the context of disapproval/restriction Female gender identity / relationships Male gender identity / relationships Non-linear course More-linear course Same-sex and mixed-sex parenting indistinguishable Female Bisexuality From Adolescence to Adulthood: Results From a 10-Year Longitudinal Study. Lisa Diamond 3 conceptualizations of bisexuality 1. “Transitional phase” 2. Third type of sexual orientation 3. Heightened capacity for fluidity Present study 79 non-heterosexual women 10 years, 5 assessment points. At each: • Label self sexual identity • Lesbian, bisexual, “unlabeled” • % daily attractions that are same-sex • #of sexual contacts with men & women (since last assessment) Nayfeld Sexual Attractions •Lesbian women had significantly higher same-sex attractions •Same-sex attractions declined significantly among lesbians only •Women who gave up bisexual/lesbian IDs still reported bisexual patterns of attraction in T5 Nayfeld Sexual Behavior Consistent decline in same sex behavior among all women NOT matched by a parallel decline in same-sex attractions In 1995, behavior evenly distributed By 2005, bimodal distribution (either exclusively with men or women) By 2005, most women involved in long term monogamous relationships. 70% of T5 lesbians, 89% of bisexuals, 85% of unlabeled women, 67% of heterosexuals By 2005, 60% of T1 lesbians had had sexual contact with a man, and 30% had been romantically involved with a man Resolved by change in identity to bisexual/unidentified Nayfeld Discussion • • Results consistent with both “third orientation” and “heightened fluidity” models, not “transitional stage” model Bisexuality as stable pattern of attraction to both sexes, with balance varying based on personal and situational factors. Identity change more common than identity stability ID change reflects shifting experiences Adopt labels consistent with relationship status Seek to maximize fit with own prevailing pattern of attraction/behavior Nayfeld Bonobo chimps (Pan paniscus) The species is distinguished by an upright gait, a matriarchal and egalitarian culture, and the prominent role of sexual activity in their society. one of the two species comprising the chimpanzee genus, Pan. The other species in genus Pan is Pan troglodytes, or the Common Chimpanzee. http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/Bonobo Bonobo videos http://www.youtube.com/watch?v= eubDSQrFako sex, walking, wonder http://www.youtube.com/watch?v= Q_izpq0Ar-Y Evolution: "Why Sex?" [Chimps vs. Bonobos], evolutionary speculation