3.2 IMP & IMS - childrensmedicaleducation.org

advertisement
Integrated Master
Plan (IMP)
and
Integrated Master
Schedule (IMS)
Felix Sanchez
Project Management
for ARA Engineers and Scientists
Desired Learning Objectives




Understand the features and benefits of IMP and IMS
Understand why the IMP is a “top down” document
Understand why the IMS is a “bottoms up” document
Be able to construct IMP and IMS
for a representative project
IMS
IMP
 Student Exercise 2c:
• Be able to construct an IMP for a complex project
• Be able to construct an IMS for a complex project
2
Leadership and Good Management are
Essential to Project Success
“A poor plan is planning to fail”
Deltek, EVM
Compare Cost to Budget
3
Designing the Program Structure
Schedule and Pre-Cost Proposal Estimate – Day 1 and 2 Overview
 Define the Program Structure
• Review SOW
• Design the WBS – driven by SOW
 Design the Team Organization
• Driven by WBS
• Driven by customer (IPT, contract requirements, etc.)
• Driven by size of project or cost
 Design the Plan and Schedule
• Integrated Master Plan
• Integrated Master Schedule
 Identify the staff and allocate the resources (Resource Loaded
Network)
 Use WBS and staffing to budget and do a pre-cost proposal
(ROM – within customer’s bogey)
4
Five Elements for Program Management
1. Organization:
Define contractual effort and assign responsibility for work.
Program
Organization
Work Breakdown
Structure (WBS)
2. Planning and Budgeting:
Task
Definition
Plan, schedule, budget and authorize work.
Schedules
3. Cost Reporting:
Budget (Resource
Loaded Network)
Accumulate cost of work and material.
Cost
Reporting
4. Analysis:
Compare planned and actual costs to performance and analyze
variances. Develop estimates of final cost.
Performance
Performance
Measurement
Measurement
5. Close Out:
Variance Analysis
Reports (VAR)
Estimate at
Completion (EAC)
Ensure within cost and schedule and market follow-on efforts.
Close
Out
Close Out
5
Planning the Work
 Integrated Master Plan – why a “Top Down” plan?
 Integrated Master Schedule – why a “Bottoms Up” plan?
IMS
IMP
6
WBS vs. Integrated Master Plan
 WBS defines what tasks must be completed to meet
the program’s objectives and insures the projects
entire work has been included
 IMP ensures you are meeting a contractual and
management key events and requirements in the
given timing/sequence
• Time-based analysis
• Provides a top-down view of the project
7
3 Steps: Work-Schedule-Budget Integration
1.1. Define
Define
thethe
WorkWork
2. Schedule
Schedule
Activities
2.
Activities
3.
Allocate
Budgets
3. Allocate
Budgets
Total
Total
Program
Program
300
80
75
Summary
Summary
Level
Level
65
80
25
Task
Task
Level
Level
20
35
5
10
5
10
Work
Work
Packages
Packages
5
8
Three Steps to Integrate
Work-Schedule-Budget
 The First Step: define the work
• Use SOW, System Spec., Contract Clauses, WBS, CDRLs, etc.
• Consolidate all work into Master Plans: Management Plan, Test
Plan, Manufacturing Plan, Systems Engineering Plan, etc.
▪ At ARA we call this a “Project Plan”
• Combine all work with the timing/sequence
Integrated Master Plan
 The Second Step: define the schedule
• Apply due dates based on contractual milestones, hand off items
to other Divisions or teams or subs, need dates, review dates, etc.
• Add time duration of tasks and interdependency of tasks
Integrated Master Schedule
9
Three Steps to Integrate
Work-Schedule-Budget
 The Third Step: allocate the budget
• Allocate what it costs and who is going to do the work
(cost estimating will be covered later in the course)
• Adjust for any changes made by:
▪ Estimating or Contracts and Pricing Team
▪ Negotiations with the customer
▪ Taking out your management reserve
10
The Way the IMP Works
Top Down Document
First Flight of UAV – a
Deliverable Completed
Multiple supporting
accomplishments
for each event
Multiple supporting
accomplishments
for each event
SOW
WBS
First Flight Readiness
Review Completed
Criteria
Event readiness or
completion provides a
measure of progress
Event
UAV Flight Clearance
Granted
Accomplishment
11
Integrated Master Plan (IMP)
 IMP is an event-based plan of what SOW requires
• Identifies the timing of the sequence of key events
▪ Documents the accomplishments (desired result) necessary to
complete the work
▪ Identifies criteria (evidence) that accomplishment is completed
• Tracks all requirements and deliverables to ensure compliance
with the SOW and Contract (and Earned Value, if required)
 Good resource allocation on complex projects requires
an Integrated Master Plan
 Must have some form of IMP (timing/sequence of
events) to manage your project
IMP is a “top down” planning tool
IMP
12
Typical IMP Structure
2.0 MAIN BODY - Example
Event
X0000. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW
Accomplishment X0100. System Detailed Design Complete
Criteria
X0100A System Test Plan Approved
Criteria
X0100B Design Trade Studies Approved, etc.
Accomplishment X0200. Subsystem Detailed Design Ready to Release for Building Prototype Unit
13
Sample IMP Excel Template
Integrated Master Plan Template
ID WBS No.
0
2200
1
2210
2
2211
3
2212
4
2220
5
etc.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Event
Event 1
Accomplishments
Criteria
SOW Para.
Accomplishment 1.1
Criteria 1.1.1
Criteria 1.1.2
Accomplishment 1.2
Criteria 1.2.1
Criteria 1.2.2
Accomplishment 1.3
Criteria 1.3.1
Criteria 1.3.2
Event 2
Accomplishment 2.1
Criteria 2.1.1
Criteria 2.1.2
Criteria 2.1.1
Criteria 2.1.2
Accomplishment 2.2
Criteria 2.2.1
Criteria 2.2.2
Accomplishment 2.3
14
Summary: Integrated Master Plan
 Often used during source selection
to evaluate your:
• Proposed approach
• Management/Planning capability
• Risk assessment/mitigation capability
 After contract award
• Becomes baseline for key events – customer can make it part of the
contract
• Program control mechanism
 Provides insight into overall effort
• Incorporates major subcontractor’s IMP
 Resulting IMP structure is used to set up ARA project
structure in BST (discussed later)
IMP is the foundation for Integrated Master Schedule
15
IMP to IMS
 Now that you have every task and sequence
that needs to be done – “the master plan”
 Need to put into chronological order
• Apply dates based on contractual milestones, handoff items,
need dates, review dates, set back times
• Account for duration of all tasks and interdependency of tasks
Why do we need an Integrated Master Schedule?
16
Break Time
IMP to IMS
17
Integrated Schedules Add Value
Predicts
program
performance
Clarifies:
• Goals
• Objectives
• Responsibilities
Assesses and
analyzes
status
Supports
negotiation and
contract
agreements
Integrated
Schedules
Facilitates
communication
Supports all
business
planning
Measures
baseline
performance
A tool to plan
contingencies
Increases
likelihood of
performance
to plan
Coordinates
and integrates
all activities
18
Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)
 An integrated, multi-layered schedule of program tasks required
to complete IMP work
• Directly traceable to the IMP, WBS, SOW
• From IMP, add detailed tasks (work packages and planning packages), time
duration/dates, and dependencies for tasks to accomplish IMP
• PM determines minimum level of tasks to get to an IMS (PDR, CDR, etc.)
that satisfies customer
 IMS is a fully networked “bottoms up” schedule for project
• Supports interrelationships between tasks and ARA Divisions
• Supports critical path analysis if required
 IMS detail useful for week-to-week
(or day-to-day, if very complex)
tracking and execution of your project
IMS – A Living Document
19
Design
Review
Integrated Master Plan
WBS
31000
Events
Design
Reviews
Accomplishments
1. Preliminary Design
Complete
Criteria
1a. Subsystem performance
requirements allocated to unit
b. Duty cycle defined
c. Prelim drawings released
X
2. Critical Design
Complete
2a. Subsystem design complete
b. Requirements allocated to
design
c. Detailed drawings released
20
Sample IMS Template in Excel
Integrated Master Schedule Template
ID WBS No. Event
Accomplishments
Criteria
0 3000
Event 1
1 3100
Accomplishment 1.1
2 3110
Criteria 1.1.1
3 3111
4 3112
5 3113
6 3200
Criteria 1.1.2
7 etc.
8
9
10
11
Accomplishment 1.2
12
Criteria 1.2.1
13
14
15
Criteria 1.2.2
16
Accomplishment 1.3
17
Criteria 1.3.1
18
Criteria 1.3.2
19
Event 2
20
Accomplishment 2.1
Tasks
DurationDependency Start Finish SOW Para.
Task 1.1.1.1
Task 1.1.1.2
Task 1.1.1.3
Task 1.1.2.1
Task 1.1.2.2
Task 1.1.2.3
Task 1.1.2.4
Task 1.2.1.1
Task 1.2.1.2
etc
etc
21
Integrated Master Schedule Structure
ID
Name
Start
07
Mar
1
2
3
Event 1
5
Criteria 1.1.1
Task 1.1.1.1
Criteria 1.1.2
Accomplishment 1.2
5/5/07
Criteria 1.2.1
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Task 1.2.1.1
5/5/07
5/5/07
10
Event 2
3/5/07
11
Accomplishment 2.1
3/5/07
14
Aug
12/5/07
7
13
Jul
28/4/07
12/5/07
12
Jun
Qtr 1, 2008
28/4/07
Task 1.1.2.1
9
May
Qtr 4, 2007
28/4/07
6
8
Apr
Qtr 3, 2007
28/4/07
Accomplishment 1.1
4
Qtr 2, 2007
Criteria 2.1.1
Task 2.1.1.1
Criteria 2.1.2
26/7/07
26/7/07
35/07
22
For Each “Criteria” – Identify Detailed Tasks
 Estimates are developed by the Task Leaders
• Detailed Tasks often called Work Packages (near-term effort)
and Planning Packaged (long-term effort)
▪ Must have a defined scope or task description
▪ Should have clear exit criteria representing completion or full
functionality
▪ Short span of effort (2-4 months) bound by milestones
representing physical accomplishments (start and completion)
• Responsibility identified to a Team or a Division
 Planned “value” assigned (hours/dollars) associated
with physical accomplishment
 Integrated into scheduling system
The sum of task budgets (bottoms up estimate) equal total
program cost at completion
23
IMP to Top-Level IMS to Detailed IMS to CPR
Summary of Charts – Let’s Discuss Each One…
Event
Accomplishment
Criteria
Evidence of Completion
Work Package
Resp.
Prime System Requirement Review/ System Design Review (SRR/SDR)
Develop Weapon System Requirements (SRR)
Sub #1
Analyze ORD and Capture Weapon System Rqmnts in Rqmnts Database Weapon Sys Rqmnts Database Established
Sub #1
WBS/SOW
IMP
WBS
#
2100
2100
2100
IMP
Number
04
04
04
01
01 01
Networked Top Level Integrated Master Schedule
Test Instr/DS
CDR
Component
CDR
Component
PRR
PrelimSIRR
Final SIRR
Sys A CDR
Kit B
ADR
Top
Level
IMS
1st Test RR
Subsystem
CDR
Sys C CDR
Kit A S/W
CDR
Kit B S/W
CDR
SRR/SDR
Kit A PRR
Final Test RR
Kit B PRR
Test Deployment
Test Complete
Modline PRR
Unit #2 Delivery
FFF Integ
Last
Veh
Del
Supt
Trng
Comp
Supp.Syst/Trng
System CDR
WTT CDR
Kit A CDR
Detailed IMS
2nd Test RR
Sys B CDR
Supp.Syst CDR
IMP # Work Package Title
04
System Requirement Review/ System Design Review
0401
Develop Weapon System Requirements (SRR)
040101
Analyze ORD and Capture Wpn Sys Rqmnts in Rqmnts Database
04010101
Select and Define Requirements Data Base Structure
04010102
Capture ORD Requirements
04010103
Capture ORD Desires
04010104
Derive Weapon System Requirements
Sept
October
July
August
Duration 3 7 10 2128 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 1320
327d
154d
40d
5d
29d
24d
20d
100%
100%
100%
100%
Cost Performance Report (CPR)
Cost Performance Report
WBS
Current Period
Budgeted Cost
Work
Work
Scheduled
Performed
2100
100
110
Cumulative To Date
Variance
Actual
Cost WP
Cost
90
10
Schedule
20
200
210
200
10
0
24
IMP to Top-Level IMS to Detailed IMS to CPR
WBS/SOW
IMP
WBS
#
2100
2100
2100
IMP
Number
04
04
04
01
01 01
Event
Accomplishment
Criteria
Evidence of Completion
Work Package
Resp.
Weapon Sys Rqmnts Database Established
System
Requirement
Review/
System
Design
Review
(SRR/SDR)
Prime
Develop
Weapon
System
Requirements
(SRR)
Sub #1
Analyze ORD and Capture Weapon System Rqmnts in Rqmnts Database
Sub #1
Networked Top Level Integrated Master Schedule
Test Instr/DS
CDR
Component
CDR
Component
PRR
PrelimSIRR
Final SIRR
Sys A CDR
Kit B
ADR
1st Test RR
Subsystem
CDR
Sys C CDR
Top
Level
IMS
SRR/SDR
2nd Test RR
Final Test RR
Test Deployment
Test Complete
Sys B CDR
Kit B S/W
CDR
Kit A CDR
Kit A S/W
CDR
Kit A PRR
WTT CDR
Kit B PRR
Modline PRR
Unit #2 Delivery
FFF Integ
Last
Veh
Del
Supt
Trng
Comp
Supp.Syst/Trng
System CDR
Supp.Syst CDR
25
IMP to Top-Level IMS to Detailed IMS to CPR
Networked Top Level Integrated Master Schedule
Test Instr/DS
CDR
Component
CDR
Top
Level
IMS
Component
PRR
PrelimSIRR
Final SIRR
Sys A CDR
Kit B
ADR
1st Test RR
Subsystem
CDR
Sys C CDR
SRR/SDR
Kit B S/W
CDR
Kit A CDR
Detailed IMS
2nd Test RR
Final Test RR
Test Deployment
Test Complete
Sys B CDR
Kit A S/W
CDR
Kit A PRR
WTT CDR
Kit B PRR
Modline PRR
Unit #2 Delivery
FFF Integ
Last
Veh
Del
Supt
Trng
Comp
Supp.Syst/Trng
System CDR
Supp.Syst CDR
IMP # Work Package Title
04
System Requirement Review/ System Design Review
0401
Develop Weapon System Requirements (SRR)
040101
Analyze ORD and Capture Wpn Sys Rqmnts in Rqmnts Database
04010101
Select and Define Requirements Data Base Structure
04010102
Capture ORD Requirements
04010103
Capture ORD Desires
04010104
Derive Weapon System Requirements
Sept
October
July
August
Duration 3 7 10 2128 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 1320
327d
154d
40d
5d
29d
24d
20d
100%
100%
100%
100%
26
IMP to Top-Level IMS to Detailed IMS to CPR
Detailed IMS
Sept
October
July
August
Duration 3 7 10 2128 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 1320
IMP # Work Package Title
04
System Requirement Review/ System Design Review
0401
Develop Weapon System Requirements (SRR)
040101
Analyze ORD and Capture Wpn Sys Rqmnts in Rqmnts Database
04010101
Select and Define Requirements Data Base Structure
04010102
Capture ORD Requirements
04010103
Capture ORD Desires
04010104
Derive Weapon System Requirements
327d
154d
40d
5d
29d
24d
20d
100%
100%
100%
100%
Cost Performance Report (CPR)
WBS
Current Period
Budgeted Cost
Work
Work
Scheduled
Performed
Cost Performance Report
2100
100
110
Cumulative To Date
Variance
Actual
Cost WP
Cost
90
10
Schedule
20
200
210
200
10
0
27
IMP to Top-Level IMS to Detailed IMS to CPR
Cost Performance Report
Cost Performance Report (CPR)
WBS
Current Period
Budgeted Cost
Work
Work
Scheduled
Performed
2100
100
110
Cumulative To Date
Variance
Actual
Cost WP
Cost
90
10
Schedule
20
200
210
200
10
0
28
IMS – Must Trace Horizontally
(sequentially)
Program Master Schedule
Start
Design
TEL TSTM System Schedule
Start
Design
Support
Manufacturing
Design
Complete
Deliver
Test
Complete
Mfg
Complete
Supplier Management
Schedule
Dwg
Rel
Design
Complete
Production Ops Schedule
Issue
Delivery Receive
Test P.O.
Material
Complete
Receive
Material
Mfg
Complete
Parts
Fabrication
Assembly
Engineering Test Schedule
Mfg
Complete
Test
Complete
Production Ops Schedule
Test
Complete
Inspect
Complete
Set-Up
Test
Test
Deliver
Inspect
Package
Deliver
29
Horizontal Traceability
 Reflects the impact of any
schedule slips on the program
 Dictates that the schedules created and maintained in
each Division are based on
• Program milestones
• Each preceding and succeeding organization’s requirements
 Defines the interdependencies between tasks
 Allows evaluation of schedule impact due to variations
on subsequent tasks and milestones
30
IMS – Must Trace Vertically
(“Sum of the Parts”)
Program Master Schedule
Start
Delivery
Start
Design
Design
Complete
Mfg
Complete
TEL TSTM Hardware IPT Schedule
Engineering Design
Subsys
Attach
Task Lead Schedule
Subsys Attach
Structural Design
HEL TSTMS Conceptual Drawing
31
Vertical Traceability
 Ensures that all Divisions are using the same schedule
information and all levels of schedules are supportive of
program schedule requirements
 Work packages are planned to the time span of the Task
 The Task start and end dates trace to higher level
descriptions of the work
32
Single Numbering Scheme
 Single number scheme aides cross-referencing with IMP, IMS,
WBS and SOW
 Will discuss later how to track IMP/IMS tasks and WBS in BST
• BST constraints:
▪ Not more than 10 levels (0-9) into BST
▪ Will provide “cheat sheet” of BST nomenclature correlated to WBS levels
• Example template in Simulation 2 exercise
33
Summary: WBS, IMP, IMS
PM Best Practices
 Clearly demonstrates to customer that the program is:
• Structured
• Executable within schedule and cost
• With an acceptable risk
 The principle progress tracking tools for your project
 Tailor the level of detail for the complexity of your project
and your customer’s desires
 WBS, IMP, IMS are key ingredients and can provide a
competitive advantage in
•
•
•
•
Program planning
Proposal preparation
Source selection
Program execution
You can expect to see IMP/IMS in future RFPs
Useful reference: IMP & IMS Preparation and Users Guide, Defense Acquisition Guidebook
(Sect 4.5.2 and 4.5.3) (Provided as resource in E-Book)
34
Download