Integrated Master Plan (IMP) and Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) Felix Sanchez Project Management for ARA Engineers and Scientists Desired Learning Objectives Understand the features and benefits of IMP and IMS Understand why the IMP is a “top down” document Understand why the IMS is a “bottoms up” document Be able to construct IMP and IMS for a representative project IMS IMP Student Exercise 2c: • Be able to construct an IMP for a complex project • Be able to construct an IMS for a complex project 2 Leadership and Good Management are Essential to Project Success “A poor plan is planning to fail” Deltek, EVM Compare Cost to Budget 3 Designing the Program Structure Schedule and Pre-Cost Proposal Estimate – Day 1 and 2 Overview Define the Program Structure • Review SOW • Design the WBS – driven by SOW Design the Team Organization • Driven by WBS • Driven by customer (IPT, contract requirements, etc.) • Driven by size of project or cost Design the Plan and Schedule • Integrated Master Plan • Integrated Master Schedule Identify the staff and allocate the resources (Resource Loaded Network) Use WBS and staffing to budget and do a pre-cost proposal (ROM – within customer’s bogey) 4 Five Elements for Program Management 1. Organization: Define contractual effort and assign responsibility for work. Program Organization Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) 2. Planning and Budgeting: Task Definition Plan, schedule, budget and authorize work. Schedules 3. Cost Reporting: Budget (Resource Loaded Network) Accumulate cost of work and material. Cost Reporting 4. Analysis: Compare planned and actual costs to performance and analyze variances. Develop estimates of final cost. Performance Performance Measurement Measurement 5. Close Out: Variance Analysis Reports (VAR) Estimate at Completion (EAC) Ensure within cost and schedule and market follow-on efforts. Close Out Close Out 5 Planning the Work Integrated Master Plan – why a “Top Down” plan? Integrated Master Schedule – why a “Bottoms Up” plan? IMS IMP 6 WBS vs. Integrated Master Plan WBS defines what tasks must be completed to meet the program’s objectives and insures the projects entire work has been included IMP ensures you are meeting a contractual and management key events and requirements in the given timing/sequence • Time-based analysis • Provides a top-down view of the project 7 3 Steps: Work-Schedule-Budget Integration 1.1. Define Define thethe WorkWork 2. Schedule Schedule Activities 2. Activities 3. Allocate Budgets 3. Allocate Budgets Total Total Program Program 300 80 75 Summary Summary Level Level 65 80 25 Task Task Level Level 20 35 5 10 5 10 Work Work Packages Packages 5 8 Three Steps to Integrate Work-Schedule-Budget The First Step: define the work • Use SOW, System Spec., Contract Clauses, WBS, CDRLs, etc. • Consolidate all work into Master Plans: Management Plan, Test Plan, Manufacturing Plan, Systems Engineering Plan, etc. ▪ At ARA we call this a “Project Plan” • Combine all work with the timing/sequence Integrated Master Plan The Second Step: define the schedule • Apply due dates based on contractual milestones, hand off items to other Divisions or teams or subs, need dates, review dates, etc. • Add time duration of tasks and interdependency of tasks Integrated Master Schedule 9 Three Steps to Integrate Work-Schedule-Budget The Third Step: allocate the budget • Allocate what it costs and who is going to do the work (cost estimating will be covered later in the course) • Adjust for any changes made by: ▪ Estimating or Contracts and Pricing Team ▪ Negotiations with the customer ▪ Taking out your management reserve 10 The Way the IMP Works Top Down Document First Flight of UAV – a Deliverable Completed Multiple supporting accomplishments for each event Multiple supporting accomplishments for each event SOW WBS First Flight Readiness Review Completed Criteria Event readiness or completion provides a measure of progress Event UAV Flight Clearance Granted Accomplishment 11 Integrated Master Plan (IMP) IMP is an event-based plan of what SOW requires • Identifies the timing of the sequence of key events ▪ Documents the accomplishments (desired result) necessary to complete the work ▪ Identifies criteria (evidence) that accomplishment is completed • Tracks all requirements and deliverables to ensure compliance with the SOW and Contract (and Earned Value, if required) Good resource allocation on complex projects requires an Integrated Master Plan Must have some form of IMP (timing/sequence of events) to manage your project IMP is a “top down” planning tool IMP 12 Typical IMP Structure 2.0 MAIN BODY - Example Event X0000. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Accomplishment X0100. System Detailed Design Complete Criteria X0100A System Test Plan Approved Criteria X0100B Design Trade Studies Approved, etc. Accomplishment X0200. Subsystem Detailed Design Ready to Release for Building Prototype Unit 13 Sample IMP Excel Template Integrated Master Plan Template ID WBS No. 0 2200 1 2210 2 2211 3 2212 4 2220 5 etc. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Event Event 1 Accomplishments Criteria SOW Para. Accomplishment 1.1 Criteria 1.1.1 Criteria 1.1.2 Accomplishment 1.2 Criteria 1.2.1 Criteria 1.2.2 Accomplishment 1.3 Criteria 1.3.1 Criteria 1.3.2 Event 2 Accomplishment 2.1 Criteria 2.1.1 Criteria 2.1.2 Criteria 2.1.1 Criteria 2.1.2 Accomplishment 2.2 Criteria 2.2.1 Criteria 2.2.2 Accomplishment 2.3 14 Summary: Integrated Master Plan Often used during source selection to evaluate your: • Proposed approach • Management/Planning capability • Risk assessment/mitigation capability After contract award • Becomes baseline for key events – customer can make it part of the contract • Program control mechanism Provides insight into overall effort • Incorporates major subcontractor’s IMP Resulting IMP structure is used to set up ARA project structure in BST (discussed later) IMP is the foundation for Integrated Master Schedule 15 IMP to IMS Now that you have every task and sequence that needs to be done – “the master plan” Need to put into chronological order • Apply dates based on contractual milestones, handoff items, need dates, review dates, set back times • Account for duration of all tasks and interdependency of tasks Why do we need an Integrated Master Schedule? 16 Break Time IMP to IMS 17 Integrated Schedules Add Value Predicts program performance Clarifies: • Goals • Objectives • Responsibilities Assesses and analyzes status Supports negotiation and contract agreements Integrated Schedules Facilitates communication Supports all business planning Measures baseline performance A tool to plan contingencies Increases likelihood of performance to plan Coordinates and integrates all activities 18 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) An integrated, multi-layered schedule of program tasks required to complete IMP work • Directly traceable to the IMP, WBS, SOW • From IMP, add detailed tasks (work packages and planning packages), time duration/dates, and dependencies for tasks to accomplish IMP • PM determines minimum level of tasks to get to an IMS (PDR, CDR, etc.) that satisfies customer IMS is a fully networked “bottoms up” schedule for project • Supports interrelationships between tasks and ARA Divisions • Supports critical path analysis if required IMS detail useful for week-to-week (or day-to-day, if very complex) tracking and execution of your project IMS – A Living Document 19 Design Review Integrated Master Plan WBS 31000 Events Design Reviews Accomplishments 1. Preliminary Design Complete Criteria 1a. Subsystem performance requirements allocated to unit b. Duty cycle defined c. Prelim drawings released X 2. Critical Design Complete 2a. Subsystem design complete b. Requirements allocated to design c. Detailed drawings released 20 Sample IMS Template in Excel Integrated Master Schedule Template ID WBS No. Event Accomplishments Criteria 0 3000 Event 1 1 3100 Accomplishment 1.1 2 3110 Criteria 1.1.1 3 3111 4 3112 5 3113 6 3200 Criteria 1.1.2 7 etc. 8 9 10 11 Accomplishment 1.2 12 Criteria 1.2.1 13 14 15 Criteria 1.2.2 16 Accomplishment 1.3 17 Criteria 1.3.1 18 Criteria 1.3.2 19 Event 2 20 Accomplishment 2.1 Tasks DurationDependency Start Finish SOW Para. Task 1.1.1.1 Task 1.1.1.2 Task 1.1.1.3 Task 1.1.2.1 Task 1.1.2.2 Task 1.1.2.3 Task 1.1.2.4 Task 1.2.1.1 Task 1.2.1.2 etc etc 21 Integrated Master Schedule Structure ID Name Start 07 Mar 1 2 3 Event 1 5 Criteria 1.1.1 Task 1.1.1.1 Criteria 1.1.2 Accomplishment 1.2 5/5/07 Criteria 1.2.1 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Task 1.2.1.1 5/5/07 5/5/07 10 Event 2 3/5/07 11 Accomplishment 2.1 3/5/07 14 Aug 12/5/07 7 13 Jul 28/4/07 12/5/07 12 Jun Qtr 1, 2008 28/4/07 Task 1.1.2.1 9 May Qtr 4, 2007 28/4/07 6 8 Apr Qtr 3, 2007 28/4/07 Accomplishment 1.1 4 Qtr 2, 2007 Criteria 2.1.1 Task 2.1.1.1 Criteria 2.1.2 26/7/07 26/7/07 35/07 22 For Each “Criteria” – Identify Detailed Tasks Estimates are developed by the Task Leaders • Detailed Tasks often called Work Packages (near-term effort) and Planning Packaged (long-term effort) ▪ Must have a defined scope or task description ▪ Should have clear exit criteria representing completion or full functionality ▪ Short span of effort (2-4 months) bound by milestones representing physical accomplishments (start and completion) • Responsibility identified to a Team or a Division Planned “value” assigned (hours/dollars) associated with physical accomplishment Integrated into scheduling system The sum of task budgets (bottoms up estimate) equal total program cost at completion 23 IMP to Top-Level IMS to Detailed IMS to CPR Summary of Charts – Let’s Discuss Each One… Event Accomplishment Criteria Evidence of Completion Work Package Resp. Prime System Requirement Review/ System Design Review (SRR/SDR) Develop Weapon System Requirements (SRR) Sub #1 Analyze ORD and Capture Weapon System Rqmnts in Rqmnts Database Weapon Sys Rqmnts Database Established Sub #1 WBS/SOW IMP WBS # 2100 2100 2100 IMP Number 04 04 04 01 01 01 Networked Top Level Integrated Master Schedule Test Instr/DS CDR Component CDR Component PRR PrelimSIRR Final SIRR Sys A CDR Kit B ADR Top Level IMS 1st Test RR Subsystem CDR Sys C CDR Kit A S/W CDR Kit B S/W CDR SRR/SDR Kit A PRR Final Test RR Kit B PRR Test Deployment Test Complete Modline PRR Unit #2 Delivery FFF Integ Last Veh Del Supt Trng Comp Supp.Syst/Trng System CDR WTT CDR Kit A CDR Detailed IMS 2nd Test RR Sys B CDR Supp.Syst CDR IMP # Work Package Title 04 System Requirement Review/ System Design Review 0401 Develop Weapon System Requirements (SRR) 040101 Analyze ORD and Capture Wpn Sys Rqmnts in Rqmnts Database 04010101 Select and Define Requirements Data Base Structure 04010102 Capture ORD Requirements 04010103 Capture ORD Desires 04010104 Derive Weapon System Requirements Sept October July August Duration 3 7 10 2128 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 1320 327d 154d 40d 5d 29d 24d 20d 100% 100% 100% 100% Cost Performance Report (CPR) Cost Performance Report WBS Current Period Budgeted Cost Work Work Scheduled Performed 2100 100 110 Cumulative To Date Variance Actual Cost WP Cost 90 10 Schedule 20 200 210 200 10 0 24 IMP to Top-Level IMS to Detailed IMS to CPR WBS/SOW IMP WBS # 2100 2100 2100 IMP Number 04 04 04 01 01 01 Event Accomplishment Criteria Evidence of Completion Work Package Resp. Weapon Sys Rqmnts Database Established System Requirement Review/ System Design Review (SRR/SDR) Prime Develop Weapon System Requirements (SRR) Sub #1 Analyze ORD and Capture Weapon System Rqmnts in Rqmnts Database Sub #1 Networked Top Level Integrated Master Schedule Test Instr/DS CDR Component CDR Component PRR PrelimSIRR Final SIRR Sys A CDR Kit B ADR 1st Test RR Subsystem CDR Sys C CDR Top Level IMS SRR/SDR 2nd Test RR Final Test RR Test Deployment Test Complete Sys B CDR Kit B S/W CDR Kit A CDR Kit A S/W CDR Kit A PRR WTT CDR Kit B PRR Modline PRR Unit #2 Delivery FFF Integ Last Veh Del Supt Trng Comp Supp.Syst/Trng System CDR Supp.Syst CDR 25 IMP to Top-Level IMS to Detailed IMS to CPR Networked Top Level Integrated Master Schedule Test Instr/DS CDR Component CDR Top Level IMS Component PRR PrelimSIRR Final SIRR Sys A CDR Kit B ADR 1st Test RR Subsystem CDR Sys C CDR SRR/SDR Kit B S/W CDR Kit A CDR Detailed IMS 2nd Test RR Final Test RR Test Deployment Test Complete Sys B CDR Kit A S/W CDR Kit A PRR WTT CDR Kit B PRR Modline PRR Unit #2 Delivery FFF Integ Last Veh Del Supt Trng Comp Supp.Syst/Trng System CDR Supp.Syst CDR IMP # Work Package Title 04 System Requirement Review/ System Design Review 0401 Develop Weapon System Requirements (SRR) 040101 Analyze ORD and Capture Wpn Sys Rqmnts in Rqmnts Database 04010101 Select and Define Requirements Data Base Structure 04010102 Capture ORD Requirements 04010103 Capture ORD Desires 04010104 Derive Weapon System Requirements Sept October July August Duration 3 7 10 2128 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 1320 327d 154d 40d 5d 29d 24d 20d 100% 100% 100% 100% 26 IMP to Top-Level IMS to Detailed IMS to CPR Detailed IMS Sept October July August Duration 3 7 10 2128 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 1320 IMP # Work Package Title 04 System Requirement Review/ System Design Review 0401 Develop Weapon System Requirements (SRR) 040101 Analyze ORD and Capture Wpn Sys Rqmnts in Rqmnts Database 04010101 Select and Define Requirements Data Base Structure 04010102 Capture ORD Requirements 04010103 Capture ORD Desires 04010104 Derive Weapon System Requirements 327d 154d 40d 5d 29d 24d 20d 100% 100% 100% 100% Cost Performance Report (CPR) WBS Current Period Budgeted Cost Work Work Scheduled Performed Cost Performance Report 2100 100 110 Cumulative To Date Variance Actual Cost WP Cost 90 10 Schedule 20 200 210 200 10 0 27 IMP to Top-Level IMS to Detailed IMS to CPR Cost Performance Report Cost Performance Report (CPR) WBS Current Period Budgeted Cost Work Work Scheduled Performed 2100 100 110 Cumulative To Date Variance Actual Cost WP Cost 90 10 Schedule 20 200 210 200 10 0 28 IMS – Must Trace Horizontally (sequentially) Program Master Schedule Start Design TEL TSTM System Schedule Start Design Support Manufacturing Design Complete Deliver Test Complete Mfg Complete Supplier Management Schedule Dwg Rel Design Complete Production Ops Schedule Issue Delivery Receive Test P.O. Material Complete Receive Material Mfg Complete Parts Fabrication Assembly Engineering Test Schedule Mfg Complete Test Complete Production Ops Schedule Test Complete Inspect Complete Set-Up Test Test Deliver Inspect Package Deliver 29 Horizontal Traceability Reflects the impact of any schedule slips on the program Dictates that the schedules created and maintained in each Division are based on • Program milestones • Each preceding and succeeding organization’s requirements Defines the interdependencies between tasks Allows evaluation of schedule impact due to variations on subsequent tasks and milestones 30 IMS – Must Trace Vertically (“Sum of the Parts”) Program Master Schedule Start Delivery Start Design Design Complete Mfg Complete TEL TSTM Hardware IPT Schedule Engineering Design Subsys Attach Task Lead Schedule Subsys Attach Structural Design HEL TSTMS Conceptual Drawing 31 Vertical Traceability Ensures that all Divisions are using the same schedule information and all levels of schedules are supportive of program schedule requirements Work packages are planned to the time span of the Task The Task start and end dates trace to higher level descriptions of the work 32 Single Numbering Scheme Single number scheme aides cross-referencing with IMP, IMS, WBS and SOW Will discuss later how to track IMP/IMS tasks and WBS in BST • BST constraints: ▪ Not more than 10 levels (0-9) into BST ▪ Will provide “cheat sheet” of BST nomenclature correlated to WBS levels • Example template in Simulation 2 exercise 33 Summary: WBS, IMP, IMS PM Best Practices Clearly demonstrates to customer that the program is: • Structured • Executable within schedule and cost • With an acceptable risk The principle progress tracking tools for your project Tailor the level of detail for the complexity of your project and your customer’s desires WBS, IMP, IMS are key ingredients and can provide a competitive advantage in • • • • Program planning Proposal preparation Source selection Program execution You can expect to see IMP/IMS in future RFPs Useful reference: IMP & IMS Preparation and Users Guide, Defense Acquisition Guidebook (Sect 4.5.2 and 4.5.3) (Provided as resource in E-Book) 34