The Impossible Experiment Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%) Beam composition not fully known Beam diameter ~ 0.5 m at its source Beamline ~ 300 – 1000 km Beam diameter ~ 600 m at the detector Cross sections ~ 10-11 mb Only a small part of the final state known Winter Park 2011 Long Baseline Experiments Soudan Mine, Nova 770 km Homestake Mine Dusel T2K: JPARC-Kamioka ~ 300 km, OPERA: CERN –Gran Sasso ~730 km Winter Park 2011 Long baseline experiments M. Wascko Winter Park 2011 Neutrino oscillation search neutrino oscillations: probability for 2 flavors: à P(º¹ ! º e; t ) = sin 2 2µ sin 2 ¢ m2L ! 4E º Crucial parameter: neutrino energy E Flux: obtained from Event-Generators for hadronic production and subsequent weak decay Energy must be reconstructed from hadronic final state Need to understand ‚classical‘ hadronic interactions Winter Park 2011 Neutrino nucleon cross section QE ‚ DIS ¼ N N' P. Lipari, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 112, 274 (2002) R+ 10-38 cm² = 10-11 mb QE is used for energy reconstruction Winter Park 2011 Quasielastic scattering W, Z axial form factors • FA FP and FA(0) via PCAC • dipole ansatz for FA with • MA= 1 GeV: Winter Park 2011 Axial Formfactor of the Nucleon neutrino data agree with electro-pion prod. data MA ¼ 1.02 GeV world average MA ¼ 1.07 GeV world average Winter Park 2011 Axial Formfactor of the Nucleon Recent Data give significantly larger values for MA MiniBooNE (2010): MA = 1.35 GeV One difference: all old data use H (or D) as target all new data use nuclei (C, O, Fe) as target Winter Park 2011 MA Problem Old neutrino experiments used H and D as targets All modern experiments use heavy nuclei Quasielastic scattering kinematics is used to reconstruct neutrino energy also in oscillation experiments Problem to identify QE on nuclear targets Winter Park 2011 QE Identification Need event generator to reduce data to true QE event Winter Park 2011 GiBUU transport what is GiBUU? semiclassical coupled channels transport model general information (and code available): http://theorie.physik.uni-giessen.de/GiBUU/ GiBUU describes (within the same unified theory and code) heavy ion reactions, particle production and flow Pion, proton and antiproton induced reactions low and high energy photon and electron induced reactions neutrino induced reactions ……..using the same physics input! And the same code! Winter Park 2011 CC nucleon knockout: m56Fe m- N X p n w/o FSI p n w FSI E = 1 GeV Winter Park 2011 Detector Types: QE Identification Cerenkov detector (MiniBooNE, K2K 1kt) measured Too high QE: misidentifies about 20%, pion-induced fakes Tracking detector (Sci-BooNE, K2K, SciFi) measured QE identification is clean, but 30% of total QE cross section is missed Winter Park 2011 Detector Sensitivities: T2K T2K has different detector types: 1. Tracking for near detector 2. Cherenkov for far detector Near Detector sees only about 50% of all QE events Winter Park 2011 Energy Reconstruction and Detector Thresholds Energy reconstruction sensitive to the detector pion thresholds Winter Park 2011 Energy reconstruction via CCQE Rms energy deviations S ~15% energy uncertainty from quasifree qe kinematics alone ~21% uncertainty for Cerenkov detectors, error grows with neutrino energy ~16% uncertainty for tracking detectors Errors in reconstructed º energies larger than expected Winter Park 2011 Energy reconstruction via CCQE à P(º¹ ! º e; t ) = sin 2 2µ sin 2 ¢ m2L ! 4E º Energy uncertainties affect mixing masses, Event identification affects mixing angles Winter Park 2011 ±CP with LBNE Uncertainties at the oscillation maximum due to detector as large as dependence on CP violating phase Wilson, LBNE workshop Event reconstruction hampers determination of CP violating phase Winter Park 2011 Physics Summary Experiments have to rely heavily on event-generators to identify QE events needed for energy reconstruction Quasielastic scattering events contain admixtures of Delta excitations excitations affect nucleon knockout, contaminate QE experiments Energy reconstruction good up to 15 – 20%. Combined error from near and far detectors ~ 20 – 30%. Experiments want 5%! Challenge for event generators! Extraction of axial mass (1 GeV) strongly affected by nuclear structure (RPA correlations), difficult to get both absolute height and slope. Winter Park 2011 Need for Low Energy Nuclear Physics in Neutrino Physics Low-Energy Nuclear Physics determines response of nuclei to neutrinos Need excellent event generators To extract fundamental science Winter Park 2011