1. 2. Rebuttal Your choice: › › › › 3. Definition Evaluation Ethical Causal Proposal The internship, even though it includes actual operation of the facilities of the employer, is similar to training which would be given in an educational environment. The internship experience is for the benefit of the intern. The intern does not displace regular employees, but works under close supervision of existing staff. The employer that provides the training derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the intern; and on occasion its operations may actually be impeded. Something is (or is not) ______________ because it does (or does not) have features A, B, C… criteria Fox Searchlight interns were NOT trainees because they performed menial tasks of little educational value to them, but that were essential to the company and would otherwise be performed by employees. Thus, the interns should have been paid. Simple definition argument: Criteria ------------------------------- Match (or non-match) presented, not argued argued Extended definition argument: Criteria ------------------------------- Match (or non-match) argued argued Basketball Cheerleading Ping pong Video-gaming Swimming Fishing Baseball Skeet-shooting Figure-skating Boxing Bowling Shuffle-board Croquet Whether or not cheerleading is a varsity sport affects colleges complying with Title IX (law ensuring gender equity in education and sports). If cheerleaders count as athletes, other women’s sports might not be funded. If cheerleaders do NOT count as athletes, they may not command the respect and funding they deserve. It must have coaches, practices, and competitions during a defined season. It must have a governing organization. It must have competition as its primary goal -- not merely the support of other athletic teams. Free speech? Covered by First Amendment, as it was: › A speech act › At a public institution Consequence: frat could be disbanded, but frat bros could remain in school. “Hostile educational environment”? Purpose was to discriminate/exclude. University is legally obligated to provide non-hostile environment. Consequence: Two frat brothers were expelled. Dictionaries, general and specialized. Best for formal definitions. Official documents or laws. Also best for formal definitions. Experts explaining a concept or setting guidelines. Best for operational definitions. You: sometimes you need to construct one yourself. Often happens when defining from example. Wikipedia says , “Art is the process of deliberately arranging elements in a way that appeals to the senses or emotions.” According to Aristotle, art is the imitation of nature. For a general dictionary, most impressive you could use is the Oxford English Dictionary. Have access to it through our library; can find it like a database by searching alphabetically in E-Resources. Definition arguments concern whether or not something meets the criteria to fit in a category. Individual writers and groups choose definitions to suit their purposes (that favor their arguments). Placing something in a category comes with consequences; something is at stake. Rape victim Illegal immigrant Pro-life Rape survivor Undocumented immigrant Anti-choice Is big-time college sports like a “plantation system of slavery”? Is the use of animals at Sea World or in the circus a form of “slavery”? Is abortion a “holocaust” or “genocide”? Are elite college athletes “amateurs” or “professionals”? Is sexting “child pornography”? Should teens charged with “child pornography” then be registered as “sex offenders”? Are children on reality television shows “child actors”? (If so, they would have same rights as actors in terms of work day, schooling, etc.) 1. List out as many possible issues of definition as you can: Controversial or competing terms Analogies Categories 2. Choose at least one of those terms, analogies, or categories to explore, considering: The ways in which that term, analogy, or category might be appropriate. The ways in which that term, analogy, or category might be inappropriate. Are there specific people/groups who do or do not use that term, analogy, or category? How might their interests or political perspectives shape their choice to use or not use that concept? What are the possible consequences of using or not using that concept? What is at stake?