Persuasion and Ethics in the Media Age Learning Objectives After reading the chapter, you should be able to: 1. Understand the importance of studying ethics and persuasion 2. Identify specific ethical challenges of the media age 3. Describe various approaches to ethical decision making 4. Assess the openness of a culture to persuasion by using the theory of universal pragmatics 5. Recognize the importance of codes of ethics in several persuasive contexts Key Terms Ethics Speech act Coercion Discourse Violence Ideal speech situation Digital divide Puffery Code of ethics Organization Ethics The study of right or good conduct as it affects the individual (character) and society (Limburg, 1994) Ethical judgments focus on degrees of rightness and wrongness, virtue and vice, and obligation in human behavior (Johannesen et al., 2008) The study of how we should act when faced with equally compelling choices Ethics and Persuasion It is important to discuss ethics and persuasion together because: 1. Persuaders impact others by attempting to make others accept new ideas or change their behavior 2. Persuasion involves the conscious choice of ends and means Coercion – use of force to compel an audience member to do what a persuader desires – denies choice to persuader or audience Violence – use of physical action to force compliance 3. Persuasive behavior can be judged by standards of right and wrong – book’s discussion is guided by the value of choice Ethical Challenges of the Media Age Deception – audience not provided with information to make a choice Example: atypical results used to sell weight-loss program Access – greater access to communication technology increases awareness of possible choices Digital divide – unequal access to communication resources such as telephones, computers, and Internet Ethical Challenges of the Media Age Oppression – advertising that makes products/ideas valuable also makes other products/ideas less valuable Ads tell us who we are and who we should be To establish need for product, advertisers subtly convince audience that they are inferior without it Advertising messages oppress through implied social exclusion of have-nots Privacy – persuaders responsible for protecting information gained through audience analysis Ethically questionable to use highly sensitive personal information to create ingratiating persuasive message Ethical Challenges of the Media Age Conflict of interest – persuaders may have vested interest in creating a convincing but misleading persuasive message Media audience is not always aware of persuader’s role Example: doctors paid by pharmaceutical firm to test drug gave “expert” opinions without disclosing bias created by financial compensation Persuaders may not be impartial advocates Approaches to Ethical Decision Making Universal Ethics Situational Ethics Immanuel Kant – ethical John Stuart Mill – principle of standards are categorical imperatives, are universal and do not vary with person, situation or context Use of rigid universal ethical standards not readily accepted in today’s world Freedom of speech is one ethical standard universally recognized today utility suggests that what is ethical is what produces greatest public good Ethical standards may vary depending on situation Richard Johannesen Three standards to make ethical decisions: 1. Political perspective Assess degree that behavior reflects culture’s political system Reason and logic are fundamental tenets Unrestricted debate and discussion Press has freedom to question leaders and decisions 2. Human-Nature Perspective Communication should reflect importance of reasoning, symbol use, and value judgments Persuasion that dehumanizes an individual is unethical Richard Johannesen 3. Dialogical perspectives Ethical human communication should reflect values of a dialogue, not a monologue Dialogue encourages member and persuader to make a choice Making Ethical Judgments Decisions are seldom clear-cut Made on cultural, organizational, and personal levels Persuaders sometimes make ethical judgments on their own without resorting to public debate Organizations of persuaders often adopt codes of ethics for members and public Public discussion can influence outcome of an ethical question Persuasion and the Public Sphere Jürgen Habermas – theorizes all members of society could openly and rationally discuss important issues Society is a mix of three interests: Work produces goods or services 2. Interaction – use of language and other symbols to achieve social cooperation 3. Power – ability to be free from domination 1. Ideally, society is a mix of all three interests Critical of dominance of capitalistic interests – inhibits audience ability to choose Persuasion and the Public Sphere Habermas’s theory of universal pragmatics describes competent use of communication to achieve emancipation from technical interests Speech acts – statements accomplishing something Speech act Definition Evaluation standard Constative Assert truth or falsity Truthfulness Regulative Use to influence Appropriateness Avowal Express internal state Sincerity Persuasion and the Public Sphere Habermas advocates that discourse serves to question statements of a source Theoretic discourse – resolves constantives: search for arguments to support a statement concerning truth Practical discourse – resolves regulatives: used when appropriateness is questioned Metatheoretical discourse – used to determine what constitutes good evidence or reasonable standards Metaethical discourse – argues about the nature of knowledge itself Sincerity (avowals) not resolved through discourse Persuasion and the Public Sphere Habermas: to achieve a vibrant public sphere, communication must meet the 3 standards of the ideal speech situation, free from controlling interests Freedom of speech for all All individuals have equal access to speak Social norms and obligations are equally distributed Visual Images and Ethics Use of images by persuaders has raised ethical concerns Digital technology allows images to be easily manipulated Examples: COVERGIRL digitally enhanced Taylor Swift’s eyelashes for a mascara ad H&M used virtual models made to look real to advertise clothing Political Persuasion Political consultants must decide whether to work for someone with whom they do not agree Campaign laws are ambiguous No real penalties for lying during a campaign Many election laws are ambiguous, such as current laws regarding “soft money” Political consultants have no accountability to voters Advertising Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ultimate enforcement authority concerning unethical advertising Celebrities who endorse a product or service must use what they are selling Anonymous actors not obligated to be product users Advertising Puffery – use of a persuasive claim that actually has no substantive meaning FTC cannot take action against puffery because claims do not mean anything Advertising creates images of an ideal life that many will never achieve Few legal requirements for ethical advertising: 1. 2. 3. Ad cannot be deceptive Objective claims must be supported by competent studies Advertisers responsible for reasonable implications of consumer ads Organizational Advocacy Organization – a group of people in which activities are coordinated to achieve individual and collective goals Organizational persuaders challenged by combining loyalty to the organization with truthfulness to audience Organizational persuaders challenged whether to be forthright about client identity Journalism Enormous power to influence audience beliefs Journalists must exercise careful ethical judgment Sources checked for credibility Immediacy of Internet news forces quick decisions, increases possibility of misinformation Some online news sites have lower editorial standards Profit motive of news organizations raises ethical issues NCA Credo is designed to instruct educators, practitioners, and the general public about ethical communication Five Guiding Principles Baker and Martinson (2001) developed concise, easily remembers standards – TARES 1. Truthfulness of the message 2. Authenticity of persuader 3. Respect for audience 4. Equity of persuasive appeal 5. Social responsibility for common good Ethics and Audience Members Ethical responsibilities of audience: Be informed – consult several news sources, investigate product values Keep an open mind – pay attention to all sides of an issue to make a sound decision Be critical – question logic and reasoning of persuasive messages Express ethical judgments – keep ethical standards in mind when encountering persuasive messages, and articulate ethical judgments in discussions about persuasion