The economics of consumption 1 From: President Ella Eli To: Yale Students Re: Generous Gift My dear students, I am delighted to report that a generous alumna has made a gift of $1000 per Yale student, available immediately. You can come by the office and pick up your check any time. Professor Nordhaus has requested that you detail how you would spend the funds. Would you please write this down in your notebooks in class today. You will find it instructive as you discuss Consumption in class this week. With best wishes, President Ella Eli P.S. Professor Nordhaus has told me about “elevator quizzes,” which are a great idea. This is not an elevator quiz, but you should hold on to your answers for later reference. EE 2 Importance of consumption in macro 1. Consumption is two-thirds of GDP – understanding its determinants is major part of the ball game. 2. Consumption is the entire point of the economy: 3. Consumption plays two roles in microeconomics: a. AD: It is a major part of AD in the short run: recall IS curve in which Y = C(Yd) + I + G + NX b. AS: What is not consumed is saved and influences national investment and economic growth 3 Table 2.1. Personal Income and Its Disposition [Billions of dollars] Bureau of Economic Analysis Last Revised on: August 29, 2012 Item Personal income Compensation of employees, received Proprietors' income Rental income of persons Personal income receipts on assets Personal current transfer receipts Less: Contributions for government social insurance, domestic Less: Personal current taxes Equals: Disposable personal income Less: Personal outlays Equals: Personal saving Personal saving as a percentage of disposable personal income 2011 Percent of income 12,947 8,295 64% 1,157 9% 410 3% 1,685 13% 2,319 18% 919 1,398 11,549 11,060 489 4.2 4 Table 2.4.5. Personal Consumption Expenditures by Type of Product [Billions of dollars] Bureau of Economic Analysis Last Revised on: August 02, 2012 Personal consumption expenditures Goods Durable goods Motor vehicles and parts Furnishings and durable household equipment Recreational goods and vehicles Other durable goods Nondurable goods Food and beverages purchased, off-premises Clothing and footwear Gasoline and other energy goods Other nondurable goods Services Housing and utilities Health care Transportation services Recreation services Food services and accommodations Financial services and insurance Other services Higher education 2011 10,729 3,625 1,146 374 252 340 181 2,478 810 349 428 891 7,104 1,930 1,752 302 395 671 807 956 168 33.8% 10.7% 3.5% 2.3% 3.2% 1.7% 23.1% 7.6% 3.3% 4.0% 8.3% 66.2% 18.0% 16.3% 2.8% 3.7% 6.3% 7.5% 8.9% 1.6% 5 Growth in C and GDP (quarterly) Chicken or egg: - ΔC causes recession? - Recession causes ΔC? .02 .01 .00 -.01 -.02 Consumption GDP -.03 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 6 Alternative Theories of Consumption The basic Keynesian insight is that consumption depends fundamentally on personal income (“consumption function”) This enters into the Keynesian models as C = α + βYd On a closer look, a major puzzle: the short-run and cross-sectional consumption functions looked very different from the long-term consumption function. 7 Consumption and Disposable Income 12,000 Real consumption 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 Real disposable income 8 Short-run v. Long-run Consumption Function 9 Alternative Theories of Consumption There are four major approaches in macroeconomics: *1. Fisher's approach: sometimes called the neoclassical model 2. Keynes original approach of the consumption function *3. Life-cycle or permanent income approaches (Modigliani, Friedman) 4.Rational expectations (Euler equation) approaches (in Jones) *We will do in class, but more Fisher in section. 10 Intertemporal Consumption Choice: Fisher’s model Basic idea: People have expectations of lifetime income; they determine their consumption stream optimally; this leads consumers to “smooth” consumption over their lifetime. Assumptions of two period model: Periods 1 and 2 Income Y1 and Y2 Maximize utility: U(C 2 ) max U(C1 ) + {C1 ,C 2 } (1+ δ) Budget constraint: C1 + C2 Y2 = Y1 + (1+ r) (1+ r) We will do graphical case now and calculus later. 11 Budget constraint: C1+C2/(1+r)=Y1 [no income in retirement] C2 Indifference curve between current and future consumption C 2* E* S1 * C 1* Y1 C1 C2 Key result: consumption independent of timing of income!!! Called “consumption smoothing” C 2* E* S1 * C 1* Y1 C1 Summary to here Income over life cycle is the major determinant of consumption and saving. In idealized case, have consumption smoothing over lifetime. Now move from two-period (Fisher model) to multi-period (life cycle model). 14 Basic Assumptions of Life Cycle Model Basic idea: People have expectations of lifetime income; they determine their consumption stream optimally; this leads consumers to “smooth” consumption over their lifetime. Assumptions: “Life cycle” for planning from age 1 to D. Earn Y per year for ages 1 to R. Retire from R to D. Maximize utility function: max V(C 1 , C 2 , ..., C D ) D (1 ) z U(C z ), for ages z 1 to D. z1 Budget constraint: D (1 r ) z 1 -z Cz D (1 r )-z Yz z 1 Discount rate on utility (δ) = real interest rate (r) = 0 (for simplicity) 15 Techniques for Finding Solution 1. Two periods: max U(C1 ) U(C2 ) U(C1 ) U(Y1 Y2 - C1 ) {Cz } Maximizing this leads to U’(C1)=U’(C2). This implies that C1 = C2 , which is consumption smoothing. The Cs are independent of the Ys. 2. Lagrangean maximization (advanced math econ): D D -z max L C1 ,...,CD = (1+ δ) U(C z ) + λ (1+ r ) C z - (1+ r )-z Yz {C z } z=1 z=1 z=1 D -z Maximizing implies that U’(C1)=U’(C2)=-λ. This implies that Ct C which again is consumption smoothing independent of Y. 16 U U '(C ) U(C ) Since U’(C1)=U’(C2)=… = -λ, C is constant over time. Note: this assumes diminishing marginal utility or U”(C)<0. Make sure you know what this means. C C1 Review of last time Life-cycle model: People plan their consumption over the future Assumptions: “Life cycle” for planning from age 1 to D. Earn constant Y per year for ages 1 to R. Retire from R to D. Maximize discounted utility: max V(C 1 , C 2 , ..., C D ) U(C 1 ) /(1 ) U(C 2 ) /(1 ) 2 subject to the budget constraint: C 1 /(1 r ) C 2 /(1 r )2 Y1 /(1 r ) Y2 /(1 r ) 2 For simplicity, assume r = δ = 0. 18 Initial Solution C, Y, S Diagram of Life Cycle Model Showing Consumption Smoothing Income, Y Consumption, C Saving, S | 0 R age | D 19 Anticipated change in timing of income C, Y, S Income “splash” (Y’) with no W increase Income, Y Anticipated income change of ΔY. Consumption, C’=C Because it is anticipated, no change in lifetime income, so no change in (smoothed) consumption. MPC = 0; MPS = 1. Saving, S’ | R 0 age | D 20 What about anticipated taxes? C, Y, S Income “splash” from tax cut Income, Y No C change! Saving, S’ | R 0 age | D 21 Unanticipated change in permanent income C, Y, S Y’ =unanticipated increase; W increases. Unanticipated windfall of ΔY in period z. Leads to smoothing the windfall over remaining lifetime. (a) one time splash: MPC = ΔY/(D-z). For life expectancy of 40 years, would be MPC = .025. (b) Permanent income increase: MPC = ΔY(R-z)/(D-z) = .6 to .8 Y C’ C | R 0 age | D 22 Example of the Life Cycle Model at Work: • How would the consumption and saving of people with volatile or stable income streams look? • See figure for Internet Entrepreneur and Yale Professor. 23 Major result of LCM: consumption smoothing eLove.com Professor C of both! age R D 24 Example of consumption smoothing: the 2008 tax rebate Changes in C, DY, and S 800 600 C DY S Estimated MPC= 0.25 (+0.04) 400 200 0 -200 -400 06M01 06M07 07M01 07M07 08M01 08M07 25 Vector auto-regressions (VAR) Nobel prize in Economics for 2011 won by Chris Sims (Princeton) in part for development of VAR technique. Vector autoregression (VAR) is a statistical model used to capture the linear interdependencies among multiple time series (vector Yt ): Yt = A0 + A1Yt-1 + A2Yt-2 + A2Yt-2 + et Sims emphasized it as “theory-free estimation.” Example of short run MPC using VAR: MPC = 0.16 ( + 0.04) Smaller than other estimates because of autoregressive properties. Summary: Econometric estimates of short-run MPC > life-cycle theory. 26 How about a nice car? • What is your favorite car? • What do you have? • Why not smooth consumption to get your favorite car? Liquidity constraints • Case of Yale students where income growing rapidly. • Here consumption is limited by borrowing constraint. • In class: A picture of the model with liquidity constraints. • Is this reason for MPC higher than life cycle prediction? (Partially, but cannot explain response of non-constrained consumers) 27 Behavioral economics Basic idea: That people are not optimizers: - Draw upon behavioral psychology: anchoring, loss aversion, hyperbolic discounting, and similar phenomena Real-world examples for all of us: - Procrastination (as in procrastinate saving for the future). - Addictive substances (shop until you drop) Why is it “behavioral”? Because lead to inconsistent decisions that are regretted later - cheating, hangovers, unwanted pregnancies, jail Examples from macroeconomics: - MPC too high; low savings for retirement; subprime mortgages; sticky housing prices; too high discount rate in energy use 28 Press button for Econ 122 29 Elevator quiz 1. Look back to your answer from Monday on how you would allocate your $1000 unexpected generous gift. 2. Explain how this decision fits into the economics of consumption that we discussed in class and in the textbook. 3. We will discuss our answers when you are done. 4. Then hand it in at the end of class. 30 Taxes, interest rates, and saving “Raise the tax on the returns for saving, and people will save less. We can argue the magnitude, but to argue that saving does not respond at all is simply to argue that incentives and disincentives are irrelevant to behavior.” “Of Course Higher Taxes Slow Growth,” J.D. Foster and Curtis Dubay 31 Impact of higher interest rates on saving Important question for economics A common theme: - The country need to reduce taxes to increase savings - Examples: lower marginal tax rates, lower capital gains taxes, move to consumption taxes, - Mechanism: ra = rb (1-τ) What is the economic theory of this? What is econometric evidence on this? 32 C2 CASE I: Higher interest rate leads to lower saving because income effect outweighs substitution effect. E** C 2* [Pension example] E* C 1* C 1* * Y1 C1 C2 CASE II: Opposite case: higher r increases savings as substitution effect dominates E** C 2* E* C 1* * C 1* C1 If we estimate the impact of changes in interest rates on consumption, we get paradoxical case (δs/δr < 0): Dependent Variable: LOG(GCQ) Method: Least Squares Sample (adjusted): 1960Q1 2011Q2 Variable Constant Ln (Yd) LOG(Real wealth) Real 10 year T rate R-squared Adjusted R-squared S.E. of regression Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic -0.456 0.812 0.193 0.000102 0.016 0.011 0.010 0.000 -27.0 71.1 18.9 0.22 0.999 0.999 0.012 Mean dependent var S.D. dependent var Akaike info criterion Prob. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8204 8.40 0.49 -5.93 The impact is essentially zero (and not robust to changes in specifications, samples, etc.) 35 Econometric savings schedule: S(r) 10 8 Real interest rate 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Savings rate 36 37 What is the Effect of Stock Market Booms and Busts on Consumption? Price-earnings ratios, US 40 Roaring 20s 50 30 10 Roading 90s 20 0 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 38 And the housing price collapse… 300 Las Vegas, Miami 250 200 150 100 Detroit 50 88 90 Case-Shiller 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 39 Long-term housing trends Real price of housing (Case-Shiller index) 250 Home Prices: estimate as of January 2009 200 150 100 50 0 1880 1900 Source: Shiller 1920 1940 1960 Year 1980 2000 2020 40 The Wealth Effect on Consumption Wealth effects: – Examples: Suppose the alumna gives you $1000. Or the housing market collapsed as after 2006? What would be the effect on C? Life cycle model predicts that initial wealth (or surprise inheritances) would be spread over life cycle. • Intuition: an inheritance is just like an income splash. So the augmented life cycle model is p Ct = β0 + β1 Y t + β2 Wt p where Y t is permanent or expected labor income and Wt is wealth. 41 Consider a person in the middle of the life cycle C, Y, S Initial wealth (from saving) Y C | Age = z 0 R age | D 42 Now a wealth shock C, Y, S Wealth shock (falling house prices) Y C C’ | Age = z 0 R age | D 43 The stock market, the housing market, and consumption • Economists think that the bursting of housing bubble was a major source of current recession (US, Spain, ….) • Reasons? Decline in consumption (today) and investment (later) • Rationale: the “wealth effect” on consumption • Analysis in the life-cycle model: p – In augmented life-cycle model Ct = β0 + β1 Y t + β2 Wt standard estimates are that β2 = .03 - .06 (example in a minute) – Effect in the “Roaring 90s” and the housing crash today. • This is often called “deleveraging” but a better description is a “wealth effect” (leverage is a balance sheet phenomenon). 44 Regression Dependent Variable: Real consumption expenditures Method: Least Squares with AR correction Sample: 1960.1 2011.2 Variable Coefficient Std. Error P Real Disposable income 0.73 0.025 .0000 Real wealth 0.035 0.0041 .0000 R-squared 0.9997 45 Wealth and Consumption through Two Bubbles 500 12,000 Financial crisis Tech bubble 400 8,000 300 4,000 200 0 100 -4,000 0 -8,000 -100 -12,000 Change in consumption (left scale) Change in new worth (right scale) -200 -16,000 -300 -20,000 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 46 Loss of wealth and savings rate increase 6.8 7 Savings rate (-->) 6.4 6 6.0 5 5.6 4 5.2 3 4.8 2 4.4 1 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Personal savings rate Wealth/income Wealth/income (<--) 2011 47 Key ideas on consumption and saving 1. 2. 3. 4. Consumption derived from consumer maximization Pure model leads to consumption smoothing All kinds of important predictions But pure model has “anomolies” and shows too large a short-run MPC relative to theory 5. Reasons are probably liquidity constraints and behavioral frictions. 6. Note the impact of interest rates and taxes on savings. 7. Remember the wealth effect 48