10302 Managerial Economy Final Case Report 102103044 102103012 102208038 102208050 102208048 102208089 施佳綸 王 盈 梁晉綸 鍾智閔 陳彥伶 程于青 -First Part -First Part -Second Part -Second Part -Third Part -Third Part O First Part Agenda Brief introduction of CHT CHT and Taiwan telecom industry Oligopoly O Second Part The pricing policy of CHT Comparison of two kinds of charging method Other Charging methods O Third Part CHT’s History CHT’s Mobile service Brief introduction of CHT O Listed company (TWSE, NYSE, 2000AD) O Establish: 15 June, 1996 O Chairman of BOD: Li- Sing Tsai (蔡力行) O CEO: Mu-Biau Shi (石木標) O Headquarter: Taipei, TW Brief introduction of CHT O Communication service industry- the biggest holder in Taiwan O Service: a) Mobile telecommunication b) Immobile telecommunication c) Internet service CHT and Taiwan telecom industry: Comparison of scale and access Operator CHT Taiwan Mobile FET T Star Asia Pacific Leading enterprise N/A Fubon Far Eastern Group Ting-Hsin International Group Foxconn Technology Group Chairman Li- Sing Tsai Ming-Shing Tsai Shiu-Dung Hsu Guo-Shuai Chao Fang-Ming Lu Domestic investment group MOTC(35%) Fubon(6%), Shing Kong(5%), Cathy(4%) TFN(96%), Fu-ji(4%) Yuan Ding Co.(99%) Ting TW Business Hsin(52%), Bank, Mega LinYuan(20% Bank, MOTC ), FoxLink(10% ), New Kinpo(10%) CHT and Taiwan telecom industry: Comparison of scale and access Operator *Total assets CHT Taiwan Mobile FET T Star Asia Pacific $452,695,974 $157,229,77 0 $126,349,81 5 N/A $41,218,454 Mobile tele., Immobile tele., Internet Mobile tele., Immobile tele., Internet, WiMax, digital service Mobile tele. Mobile tele., Immobile tele., Internet, international commu. (NTD) Main Services Mobile tele., Immobile tele., Internet, CATV *2015 Q1 CHT and Taiwan telecom industry: Market share 7% CHT 36% 25% FET T Star Taiwan Mobile Asia Pacific 6% 26% *2014 Q4 Resource: http://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/news.aspx?site_content_sn=2016&is_history=0 Introduction for Oligopoly Market O Market power: ability to influence price Monopoly/ Monosony Oligopoly/ Oligosony Perfectly competitive market One supplier/ One buyer: With no close substitute. Few supplier/ Few buyer Free entry Telecommunication market Why tele market CANNOT become “Monopoly”? Fair Trade Act Fair Trade Commission Article 7 The term "monopolistic enterprise" as used in this Act means any enterprise that faces no competition or has a dominant position to enable it to exclude competition in the relevant market. Two or more enterprises shall be deemed monopolistic enterprises if they do not in fact engage in price competition with each other and they as a whole have the same status as the enterprise defined in the preceding paragraph. Fair Trade Act Fair Trade Commission Article 9 Monopolistic enterprises shall not engage in any one of the following conducts: 1. directly or indirectly prevent any other enterprises from competing by unfair means; 2. improperly set, maintain or change the price for goods or the remuneration for services; 3. make a trading counterpart give preferential treatment without justification; or 4. other abusive conducts by its market power. joint monopolization How come tele market CANNOT become “Perfectly Competitive Market”? Hard to Entry O High cost to obtain the extra access O Professional technique is difficult to O O O O O perceive Limited License Effect of Scale economy is too high Products’ similarity Enormous capital needed Low replacement cost between products Oligopoly: Network effect O Network externality O Benefit or cost, depend on the total users in network O Indirectly influence (through market) O Critical mass: number of users where demand becomes positive O Demand elasticity Oligopoly: Network effect CHT. .. CHT! CHT!!!!!!!!!!! The Pricing Policy of CHT 4G一般月租專案 4G預付卡 Comparison of two kinds of charging method O Post-paid (1)Charges for a fixed fee for usage under a certain amount, charges more when you exceed (2)More flexible internet usage O Pre-paid (1)Charges only how much you use (2)Only two payment choice Comparison of two kinds of charging method O Pros of Post-paid (1)For customers who use approximately the same amount monthly, as there will be bonus free hours for them (2)Unlike pre-paid service, you can still enjoy the service when you exceed the amount →Post-paid services are for costumers who has a more certain communication habit. Hence, the initial prices are higher. Comparison of two kinds of charging method O Pros of pre-paid (1)User are able to constrain their cost of communication effectively (2)Suitable for people call when only needed →Pre-paid service are for costumers who does not has a certain communication habit. Therefore, there are two kinds of pre-paid card available $300 and $500 Other Charging methods 學生專案 大家講資費專案 放心講資費專案 熱線群組專案 Pricing Policies for other charging methods O Student Program Due to higher communication usage of students, CHT created service programs which has higher monthly fee with higher internet usage service. →Pricing policy toward students Pricing Policies for other charging methods O 大家講資費專案(Let’s talk) For customers who has a large number of contacts. Charges same amount for both inter- and intra- calls, so costumers doesn’t have to worry about costing too much call people inter-network →Pricing policy toward people who use voice communication more often. Ex: business man, House seller Pricing Policies for other charging methods O 放心講資費專案 Programs which allow parents to monitor how much their children use, for parents can set the limitation of communication usage →Pricing policy toward parents who need to control their children’s communication usage O 熱線群組專案 For costumers who has only a few contacts. By setting hot-wire contacts, calling them will be charged only the lowest price per min: 0.72 dollars →Pricing policy toward people who only has a small number of contacts Supply curve of some programs CHT’s History O Monopoly in telecommunications market A business unit of the Directorate General of Telecommunications (交通部電信總局) for over 100 years. O “Telecommunications liberalization" from the late 1980s which aims to make the telecommunications industry more competitive and improve service quality and achieve "separation between government and enterprises". CHT’s History O Chunghwa Telecom founded as a company on June 15, 1996 Chunghwa Telecom Co. Ltd. operated first class and second class telecom services In 1996, its stocks were totally held by government, but its goal was become private company. O Officially became a private company August 12, 2005, the Government of China Telecom's stake to 50%. CHT’s Mobile services O In 1997, 2G O In February 2002, 3G O May 29, 2014, 4G LTE services. the first telcompany in Taiwan to provide 4G LTE services. Reference O O O O O O O O O O O O O O https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%85%86%E8%B1%90%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E5%95%86 %E6%A5%AD%E9%8A%80%E8%A1%8C https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%87%BA%E7%81%A3%E9%90%B5%E8%B7%AF%E7%AE%A1 %E7%90%86%E5%B1%80 https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BA%9E%E5%A4%AA%E9%9B%BB%E4%BF%A1 https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E4%B9%8B%E6%98%9F https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%81%A0%E5%82%B3%E9%9B%BB%E4%BF%A1#.E6.9C.8D.E 5.8B.99.E9.A0.85.E7.9B.AE https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E5%A4%A7%E5%93%A5%E5%A4%A7 https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%B8%AD%E8%8F%AF%E9%9B%BB%E4%BF%A1#.E4.B8.BB.E 8.A6.81.E6.9C.8D.E5.8B.99 http://www.cht.com.tw/aboutus/keyshareholder.html http://ir.aptg.com.tw/irwebsite_c/Quarterly/ http://corp.taiwanmobile.com/files/investor-relations/financial/TWMconsolidated_104Q1_c.pdf http://www.cht.com.tw/ir/upload/content/CHT2015Q1consolidatedCH.pdf http://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/news.aspx?site_content_sn=2016&is_history=0 http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawParaDeatil.aspx?Pcode=J0150002&LCNOS=%20%20 %207%20%20%20&LCC=2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chunghwa_Telecom