El Salvador, Mrs. Eunice Olán, Director of Assistance to Migrants

DIRECTORATE FOR ASSISTANCE TO

MIGRANTS

1. MISSION:

To develop programmes oriented toward preventing irregular migration and to help strengthen policies and strategies ensuring full coordination of the repatriation of Salvadoran nationals, promoting social, productive, and education programmes to enable them to reincorporate into our society and thus, to help create better conditions for citizen security and economic growth.

2. VISION:

To be a leading unit within the institution, at a national and international level, developing procedures and programmes to facilitate the expedited, orderly, and safe repatriation of Salvadoran nationals and ensure their reintegration into society .

EL SALVADOR AND MIGRATION

• The United States defines an undocumented migrant as every person born outside the United States that is not a legal resident in the country, either having entered in an illegal manner or having stayed for a period that is longer than the period established in the visa.

• El Salvador appears as the second source of migrants to the United States: From 430,000 in 2000 to

530,000 in 2009 – a 25% increase and an annual average of 10,000 persons in one decade.

However, Salvadoran migrants account for only 5% of the irregular population in the United States.

• The list of the 10 primary countries of origin of migrants to the United States includes Guatemala as the third with 290,000 in 2000 and 480,000 in 2009; Honduras, with 160,000 in 2000 and 320,000 in

2009, and the Philippines with 200,000 in 2000 and 270,000 in 2009.

• By region, the total number of migrants from Mexico, Canada, Central America, and the Caribbean was 8.5 million in 2009, followed by 980,000 from Asia and 74,000 from South America, according to

“Diario de Hoy” Newspaper – 2010.

• California continues to be the favourite state of destination of migrants: 2.6 million migrants live there, accounting for 24% of the total number. However, a reduction in the percentage of migrants living in California has been observed compared to 2000, with a percentage of 30%.

CONDITIONS FAVOURING MIGRATION

• Unemployment

• Lack of opportunities

• Poverty and migration

• Migration from rural to urban areas as a result of lack of agricultural productivity

• Family disintegration

• Domestic violence, causing many women to escape from their aggressor, together with their children

• Lack of living alternatives, especially for young persons

• Family reunification

• The armed conflict forced many persons in productive age to escape from the effects of the conflict

• Natural disasters (earthquakes)

• Underpaid employment and deplorable working conditions

RISKS AND DIFFICULTIES OF MIGRATION

• Risks are different for female migrants than for male migrants.

• Disintegration of family bonds.

• Abuse of authority, physical mistreatment, sexual abuse, abduction, extortion, humiliations, assault by migrant smugglers and traffickers and from drug cartels.

• “While they seek employment to provide for their families, they suffer abuse and, in many cases, even death”.

• Boys, girls, adolescents, young adults, and women are victims of the crime of trafficking, under the modes of: organ trafficking, illegal adoption, slavery, forced labour, commercial sexual exploitation, illegal marriage, etc.

• Acquiring debts with migrant smugglers named “Coyotes”, loss of property, money, immoveable goods, and others.

FACING THE RETURN TO THE COUNTRY WHERE THEY WERE BORN

• Difficulty with the Spanish language, especially those persons who migrated at a very young age.

• Weak or inexistent family bonds.

• Depending on their age, the lack of possibilities to continue studying or begin studying.

• Limited possibilities for incorporating into the labour market, since their experiences are not congruent with the needs and realities in the country.

• Difficulty to obtain identity documents, which are required for every procedure.

• In some cases, they are rejected or cast out by their families, and this motivates them to migrate again.

• Lack of knowledge of their own country – in terms of geography, institutional bureaucracy.

• Lack of possibilities to adjust due to high cost of living, salaries that are not appropriate for the work performed

(compared to the US).

• Stigmatized or labelled as deported persons and a sub-group of society, some have tattoos bot do not belong to gangs.

• Some return without legs or arms, are disabled and become a burden to their families.

WHAT ACTIONS HAVE WE IMPLEMENTED SINCE 2009?

A project to modernize the Repatriation Unit, currently known as the

Directorate for Assistance to Migrants.

Before

After

Improving assistance to persons returning from Mexico

Before

After

Assistance to persons returning from the US has been improved. Logistical support is now provided to them: Telephone calls to reach their families, transportation to terminals, one night accommodation, etc.

Awareness-raising processes on irregular migration for persons collaborating with the

Directorate of Assistance to Migrants.

Addressing the topic with a human rights approach.

IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE PROVIDED

This person received new clothes. His former clothes were stained since he was arrested while he was at work.

A wheelchair was donated to a migrant who was repatriated on May 22, 2011 with a diagnosis of amputation of the left foot due to accident.

On May 3, 2011 a girl was received, who voluntarily returned from the US. She survived a fire where her mother and a sister died on December 30, 2010.

Reception actions were coordinated with representatives from ISNA, MIRE, and members from the girl’s family.

On September 3, 2011 another man, was received. The Ministry of Public Health assessed Mr Pineda. Diagnosis:

Schizophrenia and mental disability.

On August 22, 2011 a man was received. Actions were coordinated with the Ministry of Public Health and Social Assistance, AIES.

Diagnosis: schizophrenia. He was admitted to the National Psychiatric

Hospital “Doctor José Manuel Molina

Martínez”.

STATISTICS FOR 2011

OVERVIEW OF REPATRIATION BY LAND, 2011

MONTH

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

MARCH

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUGUST

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

TOTAL

Nº OF BUSES

16

25

29

32

35

25

23

23

25

22

26

15

296

537

549

572

519

321

7071

MEN

435

601

789

738

806

668

536

WOMEN

53

77

105

102

128

69

127

140

118

103

121

59

1202

40

53

30

61

28

465

43

67

32

29

BOYS

12

36

34

19

16

8

21

11

209

26

31

25

10

GIRLS

7

16

19

736

736

713

722

419

8947

TOTAL

507

730

947

909

1032

794

702

GENDER

MONTH

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

MARCH

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUGUST

SEPT.

OCTOBER

NOV.

DECEMBER

SUB-TOTAL

TOTAL

MALE

1103

1189

1326

1039

1555

1537

1237

1132

1211

1249

1366

1159

FEMALE

96

107

141

108

139

169

151

426

213

75

76

105

15103

16909

1806

OVERVIEW OF REPATRIATIONS BY AIR, 2011

AGE TYPE OF FLIGHT

Total

1199

1296

1467

1147

1694

1706

1388

1558

1424

1324

1442

1264

ADULTS CHILDREN

1195 4

1290 6

1460

1141

1673

1687

1365

7

6

21

19

23

1542

1417

1315

1433

16

7

9

9

1251 13

16769

16909

140

Total

1199

1296

1467

1147

1694

1706

1388

1558

1424

1324

1442

1264

COMMERCIAL FEDERAL

105 1094

31 1265

34

36

40

34

40

1433

1111

1654

1672

1348

35

32

28

32

1523

1392

1296

1410

47 1217

494

16909

16415

Total

1199

1296

1467

1147

1694

1706

1388

1558

1424

1324

1442

1264

BACKGROUND

No criminal

Record

522

617

834

606

822

960

744

915

791

722

723

873

Criminal

Record

677

679

633

541

872

746

644

643

633

602

719

391

9129

16909

7780

Total

1199

1296

1467

1147

1694

1706

1388

1558

1424

1324

1442

1264

PLANS FOR 2012

•To continue with the process of adapting and fitting out the Directorate for

Assistance to Migrants to receive repatriated persons from the United

States and provide comprehensive assistance to populations returning by land and by air.

•To decentralize services for repatriated populations.

•To register repatriated populations in the Integrated Immigration System with the aim of generating indicators for decision-making.

•To strengthen cooperation between various State institutions involved in the topic of migration: RREE, ISNA, PNC, FGR, etc.

•To participate, as appropriate, in the councils that have been established under the Special Law on Migrants and their Families and the National

Council Against Trafficking in Persons.