3011: Geographies of Cyberspace The Geography of the Internet and Digital Divides Martin Dodge (m.dodge@ucl.ac.uk) Lecture 2, Monday 11th October 2004 http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/cyberspace Today’s lecture • theories - technology and society • what is the Internet and how it works? • the geographies of the Internet and the nature of ‘digital divides’ Theories of cyberspace • • • • what is cyberspace? where is cyberspace? who owns it? who controls it? Is it ‘good’? or is cyberspace root of ‘evil’ in society today • how you answer these questions depends on the theory you apply • the key is the way you conceptualise the relationship of technology to ‘the social’ Following Graham (1998) • three broad classes of theory identified – 1. substitution and transcendence ‘impact’ Tech. ‘independent’ ‘dependent’ – 2. co-evolution Tech. ‘recursive’ – 3. recombination Tech. Social ‘joined’ Social Social Substitution & transcendence • the belief that embedded, grounded, human lives can somehow be replaced by technology • deterministic. reductionist (cause-effect) • technological utopianist or dystopian • technology is neutral, independent factor which simply ‘impacts’ on society • often seen that technology will lead to social change; this social change is usually presented as inevitable and beneficial • technical fixes. universal solutions • often this style of reporting in media, presented as ‘theory free’, but espouses a very definite modernist agenda • cyberspace is the new (economic) frontier • cyberspace will bring economic wealth, reinvigorate democracy, bring world peace, etc. etc • flip side is the simplistic dystopian views that cyberspace is causing the moral decay of society, it is root of evils • transcendence of material bounds of human body. Immersed in cyberspace, leaving behind ‘meat-space’& ‘tyranny of geography’ Co-evolution • parallel social production of geographical space and electronic space • recursive relations, technosocial reproductions • social shaping of technology and the technological building of the social • virtual space represents and reproduced real spaces • social depth in communications, not capacity of data exchange • cyberspace supports and often generates physical mobility (e.g. setting up meetings via email) • “New information technologies, in short, actually resonate with, and are bound up in, the active construction of space and place, rather than making it somehow redundant.” (Graham 1998, p. 174) • cities are not dissolving, they are being remade, in complex ways. cities also make cyberspace. recursive interaction • can not ignore the political economy of infrastructure deployment and access. Cyberspace as new spatial fix for global capitalism. Cyberspace enables exploitation of local characteristics, for even more finegrained international division of labour Recombination • actor-network theory. Latour and Callon • technology and the social cannot meaningfully be separated. they are joined and meshed in complex ways • technical objects have agency • “… the hundreds of other actor-networks, are always contingent, always constructed, never spatially universal, and always embedded in the microsocial worlds of individuals, groups and institutions.” (Graham, 1998, p 179) • relational view of power and action • space is continually being constructed, places are in a state of becoming • individual performance of space with a contingent, local actor-network enrolling technologies to solve problems as they occur • “Technologies only have contingent, and diverse, effects through the ways they become linked into specific social contexts” (Graham, 1998, 178) • your cyberspace is very different from mine. You cyberspace is always being remade in the moment What is the Internet? The Internet isn’t cyberspace cyberspace banking data spaces radio Telematic nets military nets fax Internet Corporate intranets email p2p www ftp sms nope, the Web is just a nice window. Its not the Internet So, what is the Internet then? Internet….? • • • • Is where my friends are? email IM, chat news • I can get free stuff • MP3s • essays lots of computers ‘Inside the network’ edges of the network lots of wire Internet “plumbing” • various types of pipes and wires connecting routers • all have different capacity to carry data (known as bandwidth) • transparent to end-users fibre-optic satellites cables tons and tons of AC and a lot of electricity and back-up equipment (photos courtesy of Kazys Varnelis) Software to keep it running and people of course engineers, designers, planners, programmers... So, what is the Internet then? • It is a global communications network built from – – – – – physical things human things software things money regulations and institutions • a social-technical system • differences / parallels with the telegraph, telephone, tv? Why geography matters? • technical and infrastructure geographies • Internet has a material existence “ Nevertheless, the Net cannot float free of conventional geography. Not a single bit could pass through it without miles of copper wire and glass fiber, as well as tons of computing hardware – all of which is very much situated in the physical world. The cables and routing centers of the Internet have specific coordinates on the earth’s surface, even if users of the network seldom give much thought to where their bits are going.” (Source: Brian Hayes, “The infrastructure of the information infrastructure”, American Scientist, May-June 1997, Vol. 85, No. 3, pages 214) The ‘invisibility’ problem where are the wires? where are the servers? data is served from somewhere and delivered to to somewhere Why is the Internet interesting? • it is a disruptive technology - 2 way interaction, not just a 1 way broadcast medium • general purpose technology. vital plumbing for the ‘information society’ • transformative, not revolutionary • defining technological system of C21st • over hyped (dotcom mania, dotcom crash) • the Internet is not everywhere, it is in specific places • rapid diffusion, but diffusion is uneven over time and space. production and consumption of the Internet varies from place to place Building a network A network of networks form the Internet • the Internet is not a single network, it's a collection of networks. • thousands of separate networks - owned by businesses, universities, governments, and other organizations - linked up to share traffic and form the global Internet your Internet experience depends on the slowest link in the chain • the Internet is a network of networks some of the Internet’s networks ‘rules’ that make the Internet work • Its all about ‘inter networking’ • linking together thousands of networks requires: – common protocols (speaking the same language) called TCP/IP (transmission control protocol/internet protocol) – unique addresses (finding the right location) – algorithms to route data (moving stuff) • each network is owned/managed by distinct organisation, with own goals and priorities. however, they can only interconnect successfully if they follow the ‘rules’ The geography of the Internet • many metrics to quantitatively describe the geographies of the Internet – people, language, by access type and cost, (freedom of access?) – number of computers – network links and traffic flows – content production, economic geography – institutions and law – social practices • considered at many scales - local -> global People - how many online? (Source: OECD Communications 2003 Report) People with fast access? (Source: OECD Communications 2003 Report) People - how many online by language ? (Source: www.global-reach.biz/globstats) Geographic density of Internet routers Modeling the internet 's large-scale topology, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/0107417 Digital divides • narrowly defined as unequal access and use of IT and, in particular, the Internet • (of course there have always been spatial and social inequalities in access to technology) • hot political topic in the late 90s, but less so now • location is often a significant determining factor for individuals and and business – – – – can you get access? how much will the access cost? how reliable is access? are you free to access any web sites? (monitoring, censorship) • seeking to even out the inequalities • cleavages of digital divide can be analysed by income, gender, race, age, education, geography (rural-urban), disability, etc, etc • naïve belief in technology as a ‘quick fix’ to social problems. ‘just give the poor kids laptops’ • lack of understanding of complex relationships between ‘technology’ and the ‘social’ • it more than just basic access issue (‘haves’ and ‘have nots’) • issues of skills, content, and control • fundamental issues of distribution of power • digital divide is just the latest visible manifestation of deep seated and persistent inequalities in wealth and power in society • the diffusion of consumption of Internet has been rapid in last few years. significant disparities in material access are fast disappearing • but the problem of the ‘rich get richer’, Castells’s says: • “… it could well happen that while the huddled masses finally have access to the phone-line Internet, the global elites will have already escaped into a higher circle of cyberspace.” (Internet Galaxy, p. 256) • power and control in Internet production remain highly concentrated in a few companies and a few places • Internet reinforcing existing core - periphery inequalities Internet’s unequal geography • Lets look at geographical variation in Internet infrastructure and use • range of scales – – – – – global national city local family (see work of Gill Valentine, ‘cyberkids’) How many online in UK? • OFTEL consumer use of the Internet report, July’03 • 47% UK homes have Internet access • 58% UK homes have a PC • 15% Internet homes use broadband (according to subscriber figures) (Source: http://www.oftel.gov.uk/) July’03 (Source: http://www.oftel.gov.uk/) August’02 July’03 (Source: http://www.oftel.gov.uk/) Significant regional variation in Internet access rates (Source: http://www.e-envoy.gov.uk ) (Source: E-London and the London Plan) Scale of digital divide • City versus Hackney • the City is one of most ‘wired’ places on the planet • yet virtually all connections and capacity bypass geographically adjacent areas of Hackney • allows powerful elites to further disengage from their local environment and at the same time deepen connection with elites half a world away • Internet does not render place meaningless, it makes it easier to exploit difference between places Reading for this lecture • Key article • Barney Warf (2001) “Segueways into cyberspace: multiple geographies of the digital divide” • Castells, Internet Galaxy, chapters 8, 9 – The geography of the Internet – The digital divide in a global perspective Readings for this lecture • Supplemental readings: • Ed Malecki, (2002) "The Economic Geography of the Internet's Infrastructure” • Anthony Townsend (2001) "The Internet and the rise of the new network cities, 1969-1999" • Brian Hayes, (1997) “The infrastructure of the information infrastructure” • Greater London Authority (2002), The Digital Divide in a World City, June 2002 • Janet Abbate, Inventing the Internet Next steps • Friday’s practical gets you exploring Internet geography – watch a short animated film on ‘how the Internet works’ – mapping the routes of data flows through the Internet – putting the results on a new web page