Plan for an International Study of Hybrid Flexible Electronics Duane Shelton August 27, 2008 A hybrid flexible camera system that is a big step toward a bionic eye—from Illinois "We believe that some of the most compelling areas of future application involve the intimate, conformal integration of electronics with the human body, in ways that are inconceivable using established technologies." "This approach allows us to put electronics in places where we couldn't before. We can now, for the first time, move device design beyond the flatland constraints of conventional systems." John Rogers, Nature, August 7, 2008 An E-skin for robots -- from Japan Researchers have developed a rubber that is able to conduct electricity well, paving the way for robots with stretchable "e-skin" that can feel heat and pressure like humans.. "Objects that come into contact with humans are often not square or flat. We believe interfaces between humans and electronics should be soft." Takao Someya, University of Tokyo, in Science August 7, 2008 World Technology Evaluation Center, Inc. WTEC mission Inform U.S. agencies, universities, and research community of science and technology abroad in critical fields Baltimore, College Park, Lancaster, Johnstown, Arlington. Acknowledgements …and over 400 expert panelists, thousands of foreign hosts Why conduct international assessments? Guide U. S. R&D investments Look for good ideas abroad (tech transfer) Find opportunities for cooperation Compare U.S. status with that abroad Justify investment in R&D. Pointing with alarm is an example Why point with alarm? Research and education are changing rapidly abroad Greatly increased investments are producing substantial outputs—we can learn from abroad Further, since we care about U.S. leadership of engineering, we need more resources to compete Pointing with alarm can be a powerful motivator, e.g. Rising Above the Gathering Storm report—next a Chinese case study Chinese research output •Each year PRC increases R&D by 19% (US 3%) •Shelton model ties this input to scientific paper output Paper Share (Forecast After 2005) 35.0 30.0 25.0 US 20.0 EU27 15.0 PRC 10.0 5.0 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 0.0 2000 Percent of OECDgroup 40.0 WTEC past and present: over 60 studies since 1989 Brain-Computer Interfaces (TATRC, NSF, NIBIB, NINDS, 2 foundations) Catalysis by Nanostructured Materials (NSF, DOE, AFOSR, DTRA) Simulation-Based Engineering & Science (24 programs at 4 agencies) WTEC also staffs the NNCO and provides workshops and IT support WTEC future Continue onsite research support at NNCO Plan Government-wide initiative on simulation-based engineering & science International study on stem cells for tissue engineering International study of hybrid flexible electronics WTEC methods Write grant proposals that can pass peer review* Establish a coalition of sponsors who have resources to make it happen Recruit a great panel from Government nominations* Conduct the study effectively; Government participates in decisions—like where to go* Maintain good host relations, so we can return in future studies Publish an outstanding report* * More in appendix From Draft Statement of Work What is the position of foreign R&D relative to the U.S.? What are the barriers in development that can be learned abroad? What are the innovations and ideas that are worth exploring in the U.S.? What are the opportunities for international collaboration? Proposed timeline for study Nov. 08 Kick-Off Meeting (All Panelists, Sponsors) Jan. 09 U.S. Baseline Workshop (Optional) Feb. 09 Site Visits Asia (First Priority?) Mar. 09 Site Visits Europe (Optional) Apr. 09 Final workshop at NSF Jul. 09 Final report draft Sponsorship Benefits: International Assessment Study Leverage of full study for approximate price of a workshop Advances interagency cooperation Recognition in report and website Advance review of report Ideas for initiatives and cooperation Find out what your counterparts abroad are up to Basic International Assessment Study; Options Later 5-person panel of U.S. experts Kickoff meeting with panel and sponsors Study 15 to 20 sites in one week (either in Europe or Asia). Workshop to present findings to professional community Written report: Introduction, Exec Summary plus 4 technical chapters, appendix has site report for each site. Options Added to Basic Study Additional study tour week in second region: Europe or Asia U.S. baseline workshop More bibliometric study More panelists for broader scope Book by major publisher Distinguished panelists NSF Director (Colwell) Directors of DOE Office of Science (Trivelpiece, Dresselhaus) Chief of Naval Research (Mooney) Director of NIGMS (Cassman) Chief Scientist of the USAF (Feigenbaum) Vice presidents for research of IBM, Bell Labs, Seagate Technology Presidents or provosts of UC (Berkeley, San Diego and UC system) and Rensselaer Over 400 other engineers and scientists WTEC senior staff experience Duane Shelton (Universities, NSF, U.S. House) Mike DeHaemer (Captain USN (ret.) skipper of SSBN, Universities) Dave Nelson (ex-Director of NITRD, the Government-wide IT initiative) Geoff Holdridge (NRC, NSF, staff director of NNCO) NSF/WTEC “umbrella” grants Grant Amount WTEC1 (2001) WTEC2 (2004) WTEC3 (2007) $3.7 million International Studies 7 $5.3 million 7 $1.8 million 3 Underway •At Loyola there were six such peer-reviewed grants. •WTEC is now a 501(c)(3) nonprofit research institute. •Grants include other tasks, especially workshops and NNCO support Impacts: support of initiatives DARPA Flat Panel Displays Initiative DOD/DOC Electronic Packaging Initiative NTSC Electronics Manufacturing Initiative National Nanotechnology Initiative Benign Manufacturing MUSES Program Spin Electronics Program Announcement Tissue Engineering Strategic Plan Conducting a study efficiently Staff experience means that most problems can be avoided based on precedent WTEC locations mean: Low overhead (29%) Affordable salary scale Close enough to meet in Washington area Advance work / host review Cultivating good relations with hosts is critical Some hosts are resistant, but WTEC is well known abroad NSF image helps greatly in obtaining access Advance work is expensive, but makes the study tour more effective Hosts review site and final reports Report editing Our reports are of academic quality with full citations, etc. Analytical chapters written by experts Site reports are merely an appendix They are edited several times We always have to extract chapters from holdouts Published in 9 books; we now have an international technology series with Springer with 3 published, 1 in press Preliminary Bibliometrics SCI Papers in Hybrid Electronics and Related Fields 200 180 160 140 120 World 100 US EU27 80 60 40 20 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007