CISM:
Does It Help or Not?
Rev. KC Schuler, MDiv, BCC
Supervising Chaplain
ThedaCare
(and ICISF Trained Trainer)
kc.schuler@thedacare.org
Most slides borrowed from ICISF: Group Crisis Response Training
At the heart of any field of study or practice
resides a basic vocabulary. Unfortunately, the
field of crisis and disaster mental health
intervention has been plagued by the lack of a
standardized nomenclature.
So, we will begin with a review of several key
terms and concepts that will help clarifiy some of
the issues and the materials later presented.
Critical Incident Stress (CIS)
is also known as
Post Traumatic Stress (PTS),
which is not the same as
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).
CIS/PTS is a normal response
of normal people to an abnormal event.
CIS/PTS reactions may look similar to some
symptoms of PTSD.
If the CIS/PTS does not get resolved,
it may turn into the disorder (PTSD).
Only a trained, Mental Health professional
can diagnose PTSD.
Definitions


CRITICAL INCIDENTS are unusually
challenging events that have the potential to
create significant human DISTRESS and can
overwhelm one’s usual coping mechanisms.
In other words, and abnormal event that
evokes a normal response (CIS/PTS) to that
abnormal event
Definitions

The psychological DISTRESS in response to
critical incidents such as emergencies,
disasters, traumatic events, terrorism, or
catastrophes is called a
PSYCHOLOGICAL CRISIS
(Everly & Mitchell, 1999)
Psychological Crisis
An acute RESPONSE to a trauma, disaster,
or other critical incident wherein:
1. Psychological homeostasis (balance) is
disrupted (increased stress)
2. One’s usual coping mechanisms have failed
3. There is evidence of significant distress,
impairment, dysfunction (PTS/CIS)
(adapted from Caplan, 1964, Preventive Psychiatry)
IMPORTANT!
Crisis intervention targets
the RESPONSE,
not the EVENT, per se.
Thus, crisis intervention and disaster
mental health interventions must be
predicated upon assessment of need.
Crisis Intervention (CI)

An active, short-term, supportive, helping
process.

Acute intervention designed to mitigate the
crisis response (CIS/PTS).

NOT psychotherapy or a substitute for
psychotherapy.
Crisis Intervention (CI)
Goals:
1. Stabilization
2. Symptom reduction
3. Return to adaptive functioning, or
4. Facilitation of access to continued care
(adapted from Caplan, 1964, Preventive Psychiatry)
Crisis Intervention (CI):
Lessons Learned From The Military

Salmon (1919, NY Med J) “Nothing could be
more striking than the comparison between the cases
treated near the front and those treated far behind the
lines…As soon as treatment near the front became
possible, symptoms disappeared…with the result that
sixty percent with a diagnosis of psychoneurosis were
returned to duty from the field hospital” (p. 994).
Principles of Crisis Intervention (CI):
(Most Were Developed By The Military)







Proximity
Immediacy
Expectancy
Innovation
Brevity
Simplicity
Pragmatism
Crisis Intervention:
Leadership Communication

Intentional or unintentional communication:
1.
Compassion: Deep awareness of the suffering of
another coupled with the wish to relieve it
2.
Disdain: To regard or treat with contempt;
despise
3.
Indifference: Having no particular interest or
concern; apathetic
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English
Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2006 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
The Need in EMS?



Incidence of Posttraumatic Stress with EMS in urban
setting (NYC)
(9.3%) met the strict DSM-III-R criteria for PTSD
Another (10%) had the required number and
combination of symptoms for PTSD, but these
symptoms had not persisted for the 1 month required
by the DSM-III-R criteria.
Thus, a total of 19.3% of subjects who completed the
survey were shown to be suffering from PTSD
symptoms.
Development of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Urban Emergency Medical Service Workers,
Medscape Psychiatry & Mental Health eJournal 2(5), 1997. © 1997 Medscape
The Need in EMS? (cont.)

The interaction between age and several other factors,
however, was significant, including:
 Study participants between the ages of 18 and 24
who graduated from a rural high school were
nearly 3 times as likely to have PTSD as those
from urban or suburban high schools
 The prevalence of PTSD increased significantly
with the total number of previous medical
emergency work jobs
Development of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Urban Emergency Medical Service Workers,
Medscape Psychiatry & Mental Health eJournal 2(5), 1997. © 1997 Medscape
Review for Canadian Armed Forces
Ritchie, P. (2002)



Literature suggests value in “debriefing”
CISD (“debriefing”) should only use group format
CISD should be offered as part of a larger integrated
intervention system (CISM)



Participation is Voluntary and involves informed consent
CISD contraindicated if basic physiological, shelter, &
safety needs not met
Positive outcome may be other than prevention of PTSD
(provides information, support, may increase cohesion,
positively viewed)
Lessons Learned From
Community Mental Health

Early Psychological Intervention may reduce the need
for more intensive psych services.
(Langsley, Machotka, & Flomenhaft, 1971, Am J Psyc;
Decker, & Stubblebine, 1972, Am J Psyc)

Early Psychological Intervention may mitigate acute
distress .
(Bordow & Porritt, 1979, Soc Sci & Med; Bunn & Clarke,
1979, Br. J Med. Psychol; Campfield & Hills, 2001, JTS;
Flannery & Everly, 2004, Aggression & Violent Beh.)
Lessons Learned From
Community Mental Health

Early psychological Intervention may reduce EtOH
use.
(Deahl, et al, 2000, Br J Med Psychol; Boscarino, et al., 2005)
Lessons Learned From
Consultation Psychiatry
(Stapleton, Medical Crisis Intervention, 2004)

Early Psychological Intervention is improved
by increased training in a standardized CI
paradigm
Results:
 trained
d=.57 vs.
 untrained d=.29
Lessons Learned From
Consultation Psychiatry
(Stapleton, Medical Crisis Intervention, 2004)

Early Psychological Intervention outcome is
enhanced via multiple sessions
(multiple contacts d=.60 vs. single contact d=.33)
(plateau at 2-3 sessions, Boscarino, et al., 2005)

Early Psychological Intervention is enhanced
via the use of multiple interventions on PTS
(multiple interventions d=.62 vs. single interventions d=.55)
Lessons Learned From The Workplace

Post disaster crisis intervention (CISM) was
associated with reduced risk for:



binge drinking (d=.74)
alcohol dependence (d=.92)
PTS symptoms (d=.56)
(Boscarino, et al, IJEMH, 2005).
Lessons Learned From The Workplace
Post disaster crisis intervention (CISM) was
associated with reduced risk for:




major depression (d=.81)
anxiety disorder (d=.98)
global impairment (.66)
compared with comparable individuals who did not receive
this intervention
(Boscarino, et al, IJEMH, 2005).
“There is now emerging evidence that prompt delivery of
brief, acute phase services in the first weeks after an
event can lead to sustained reduction in morbidity years
later, reducing the burden of secondary functional
impairment, presumed daily average life years lost
(DALYS), and costs to both the individual and the
public” (p. 15).
Schreiber, M. (Summer, 2005). PsySTART rapid mental health triage and
incident command system. The Dialogue: A Quarterly Technical Assistance
Bulletin on Disaster Behavioral Health, 14-15.
Value Added of Crisis Intervention:
Screening & Increasing Access To Care


Only 11% of victims of violent crime responded to
institutional invitations to express attitudes regarding crime &
punishment
Less than 7% of sexual assault victims chose to utilize free
psychotherapy within walking distance of their home
(Rose, et al., Psychological Medicine, 1999).

Formal mental health utilization post 9/11 increased only ~3%
in civilians and emergency personnel even though prevalence
of PTSD estimated at 7-20% and depression at ~9%
(see Johns Hopkins Center for Public Health Preparedness -- JHCPHP,
2005)
Value Added of Crisis Intervention:
Screening & Increasing Access To Care

First responders are often resistant to seeking Mental Health
treatment, therefore crisis intervention may be their only
access to “mental health services”
(North, et al., 2002, J. T. Stress)

While ~ 85% of military sampled who served in
Iraq/Afghanistan recognized problems, only ~44% were
willing to seek assistance
(Hoge et al., NEJM, 2004)

Less than 50% of civilian disaster workers, who screened + for
mental health concerns sought treatment
(Jayasinghe, et al, 2005, IJEMH)
Reasonable Evidence-based Conclusions

More and better controlled research is still needed

Care must be taken in setting up a support response

Data reviewed support use of group “debriefing” with
emergency services personnel (Arendt & Elklit,
2001)

Data reviewed tend to support use of group
“debriefing” subsequent to disasters, war, robbery
(see NIMH, 2002, tables 2-3)
Reasonable Evidence-based Conclusions



The research does not support single session,
individualized interventions after medical, surgical
distress with minimal training (nurses with 15 min
training)
The research does support multi-component
intervention systems
NIMH (2002), Institute of Medicine (2003), NVOAD
(2005) recommend acute phase “psychological first
aid”
“In all the controversy, criticism and research debate on
the merits of debriefing [early intervention], certain
constants are emerging. The most effective methods for
mitigating the effects of exposure to trauma…, those
which will help keep our people healthy and in service,
are those which use early intervention, are multi-modal
and multi-component. That is, they use different ‘active
ingredients’ …, and these components are used at the
appropriate time with the right target group.”
Dr. Hayden Duggan
International Association of Fire Chiefs’ ICHIEFS
on-line resource, Sept 1, 2002
Acceptance of Psychological Debriefings (PD)
“Since PD is fully accepted as standard practice for
emergency services personnel and well-received by
group members and organizations, it is hard to find
fault in its application in a mass disaster
such as the terrorist attacks…on september 11, 2001.”
(Litz, et al., Clin. Psyc. 2002)
Crisis Intervention (CI): Key Points

Crisis Intervention is not intended to be the practice of
psychiatry, psychology, social work, nor counseling, per se, it
is simply psychological/emotional first aid

Consistent with NIMH guidelines and Federal “crisis
counseling” models, crisis intervention may be practiced by
mental health clinicians, as well as, medical personnel, clergy,
& community volunteers (although we believe mental health
guidance, supervision, or oversight is essential)

AGAIN, Crisis intervention does not appear to
“prevent” PTSD in primary victims.
Resistance, Resilience, & Recovery

In the present context, the term Resistance
refers to the ability of an individual, a group,
an organization, or even an entire population,
to literally resist manifestations of clinical
distress, impairment, or dysfunction associated
with critical incidents, terrorism, and even
mass disasters.
Resistance, Resilience, & Recovery

Resistance may be thought of as a form of
psychological/ behavioral immunity to distress
and dysfunction.

Pre-incident training/preparation may be best
way to build resistance
Resistance, Resilience, & Recovery

In the present context, the term Resilience
refers to the ability of an individual, a group,
an organization, or even an entire population,
to rapidly and effectively rebound from
psychological and/or behavioral perturbations
associated with critical incidents, terrorism,
and even mass disasters.
Resistance, Resilience, & Recovery

Resilience is an ordinary, not extraordinary response
associated with:





Capacity to make and follow out realistic plans
Positive view of self, strength, and abilities
Communication and problem solving skills
Capacity to manage strong feelings
Crisis and disaster mental health intervention may be
the best way to enhance natural Resiliency, in
addition to pre-incident preparation.
Resistance, Resilience, & Recovery


The term Recovery refers to the ability of an
individual, a group, an organization, or even an entire
population, to literally recover the ability to
adaptively function, both psychologically and
behaviorally, in the wake of a significant clinical
distress, impairment, or dysfunction (PTS/CIS)
subsequent to critical incidents, terrorism, and even
mass disasters.
Crisis intervention, Treatment, and rehabilitation
speeds Recovery.
Goals of a Multi-Component Crisis
Intervention System
An outcome-driven continuum of care
Create Resistance
Enhance Resiliency
Speed Recovery
Assessment
Intervention
Evaluation
Assessment
Intervention
Evaluation
Assessment
Intervention
Evaluation
[Kaminsky, et al, (2005) RESISTANCE, RESILIENCE, RECOVERY. In Everly & Parker,
Mental Health Aspects of Disaster: Public Health Preparedness and Response. Balto: Johns
Hopkins Center for Public Health Preparedness.]
CISM is a strategic intervention
system.
It possesses numerous
tactical interventions of which
CISD is one.
The challenge in crisis intervention is not only
developing TACTICAL skills in the “core
intervention competencies,”
but is in knowing when to best
STRATEGICALLY employ the most
appropriate intervention for the situation.
Core Competencies Of Comprehensive
Crisis Intervention






Assessment/triage benign vs. malignant symptoms
Strategic planning and utilizing an integrated multicomponent crisis intervention system within an
incident command system
One-on-one crisis intervention
Small group crisis intervention
Large group crisis intervention
Follow-up and Referral
Can Intervention Be Harmful ?
The Case of Psychotherapy...

Smith, Glass, & Miler (Benefits of Psychotherapy,
1980) meta-analytic review of 400 studies --> 9%
negative outcome

Shapiro & Shapiro (Psychol. Bulletin, 1982) over
1800 “effects” --> 11% negative, 30% null effect

Lambert (2003) estimated 5-10% of patients
deteriorate during treatment
Can Crisis Intervention Be Harmful ?
Theoretical Mechanisms/ Issues
(see Dyregrov, IJEMH, 1999; Watson, et al., in Ursano & Norwood, 2003)

Excessive catharsis, disclosure, rumination

Pathologizing otherwise “normal” reactions

Vicarious traumatization in groups

Coercive peer pressure in groups

Scapegoating in groups
Can Crisis Intervention Be Harmful ?
Theoretical Mechanisms/ Issues
(see Dyregrov, IJEMH, 1999; Watson, et al., in Ursano & Norwood, 2003)

Triggering of previous traumatic memories

Intervention may be premature (inappropriate timing)

May be inappropriate with highly aroused persons

May interfere with natural coping mechanisms

May not be accompanied by adequate assessment or follow-up
7 Phases of a CISD
COGNITIVE
INTRODUCTION
Re-entry
FACT
TEACHING
THOUGHT
SYMPTOMS
REACTION
AFFECTIVE
Reducing Risk of Adverse Reactions

Keep CISD within the multi-component
context of CISM:
CISD should never be a stand alone intervention. It
should only be used when it is part of a package of
interventions which includes follow-up services.
Reducing Risk of Adverse Reactions

The group CISD process should never be used
for individuals since it was designed for
groups

CISD should not be used to achieve
psychotherapeutic outcome: CISD is not
psychotherapy nor a substitute for
psychotherapy
Reviews which have been critical of small
group “debriefing” cite 3 primary concerns:

Traumatic story-telling may traumatize other participants
(Watson, et al., 2003, in Trauma & Disaster; Stokes, 2002, Cautions
& Contraindications for Debriefings)

Probing into affective domain with those who experience
numbing & avoidance may trigger pathognomonic retraumatization
(North, 2003, in Trauma & Disaster; Stokes, 2002)

Inappropriate timing for hyper-aroused individuals
(NIMH, 2002)
To address concerns related to
group “debriefing”

Maintain/facilitate an educational and story-telling format
(Shalev, et al., 2003, Terrorism & Disaster)

Utilize homogeneous groups so as to prevent
traumatization from “new” information (similar levels of
exposure and function:



do not include bystanders, etc. with professionals
Judgement call about mixing professions (Fire, EMS, Law
Enforcement) note: ICISF discourages mixing
Avoid delving into the affective aspects with groups that
are experiencing heightened arousal, avoidance, or
numbing (North, 2003; Stokes, 2002)
To address concerns related to
group “debriefing”

Unless the magnitude of impairment is such that the
individual represents a threat to self or others, crisis
intervention should be voluntary.

The interventionist must be careful not to interfere
with natural recovery or adaptive compensatory
mechanisms.

The CISD has not ended until the majority of the
group has returned to the cognitive domain – and/or
may require individual referrals to higher level of
care
Summary Risks vs. Benefits of CISM



The risk of adverse outcome is associated with
all human intervention and helping practices
including medicine, surgery, and counseling.
Improper, inadequate training would appear
the greatest risk factor associated with crisis
intervention, as well as those practices just
mentioned.
Thus, training and supervision may be the best way to
reduce the risk of adverse outcome, rather than
simply calling for an end to such helping practices.
Effectiveness Of
Peer Support Personnel References

Peer Support Personnel are essential in the CISM process





Authentic Normalization
Rapport
Clarification of protocol/process
Etc.
Truax & Carkhuff, 1967,
Toward Effective Counseling

Durlak, 1979,
Psychological Bulletin

Hattie, Sharpley, Rogers, 1984,
Psychological Bulletin
Important CISD Considerations &
Ground Rules










Strict Confidentiality agreed upon by participants and team
Timing is important
Location and physical environment appropriate
Closed circle format
Participation voluntary
No notes, recording devices
No breaks (Try to limit breaks until after group is finished)
Not operational critique, not investigation
Not a “blame” session
Not therapy, nor substitute for treatment
Additional Information
and More Slides
•
International Critical Incident Stress Foundation
http://www.icisf.org/
http://www.icisf.org/articles/
•
Crisis Intervention and Critical Incident Stress Management: A Defense of
the Field
http://www.icisf.org/articles/Acrobat%20Documents/CISM_Defense_of_Fiel
d.pdf
•
National Organization for Victim Assistance NOVA
http://www.trynova.org
THE NEED

Over 80% Americans (general population) will be
exposed to a traumatic event (Breslau) About 9% of
those exposed develop PTSD (40-70% in cases
involving rape/torture)
(Surgeon General, 1999, Report on Mental Illness)

Disasters may create significant impairment in 4050% of those exposed
(Norris, 2001, SAMHSA)
THE NEED

About 50% of disaster workers likely to develop
significant distress
(Myers & Wee, 2005, Dis. Men. Hlth)

As many as 45% of those Directly Exposed to mass
disasters may develop PTSD or Depression
(North, et al., 1999, JAMA)

Dose-response relationship with exposure is a key
factor in development of PTSD (DSM-IV R)
THE NEED

PTSD PREVALENCE: 10-15% OF LAW
ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL
(see Everly & Mitchell, 1999)

PTSD PREVALENCE: 10-30% OF THOSE IN FIRE
SUPPRESSION (see Everly & Mitchell, 1999)

By comparison: PTSD PREVALENCE: VIETNAM
VETERANS 16% (National PTSD Study)
THE NEED

PTSD PREVALENCE: ~12%, Iraq – Desert Storm
VETERANS (Hoge, et al., 2004, NEJM)

PTSD PREVALENCE: unknown% with current
Iraq/Afghanistan War Veterans
(VA system receiving public criticism for lack of support and
experts anticipating high numbers, May 2007 NYTimes)
By way of background…
The National Volunteer Organizations
Active in Disaster (NVOAD)
represents a consortium of
non-governmental agencies
providing disaster relief.
NVOAD member organizations represent
the largest group of non-governmental
providers of disaster mental health services
in North America.
NVOAD Consensus Points (2005)



Early Psychological Intervention (EPI) is
valued
EPI is a multi-component system to meet
the needs of those impacted
Specialized training in early psychological
intervention is necessary
NVOAD Consensus Points (2005)


EPI is one point on a continuum of
psychological care. This spectrum ranges
from pre-incident preparedness to postincident psychotherapy -- when needed
Cooperation, communication, coordination
and collaboration are essential to the
delivery of EPI
NVOAD Interventions (2005)







Pre-incident preparation
Incident assessment and strategic planning
Risk and crisis communication
Acute psychological assessment and triage
Crisis intervention with large groups
Crisis intervention with small groups
Crisis intervention with individuals, face-toface and hotlines
NVOAD Interventions (2005)




Crisis planning and intervention with
communities
Crisis planning and intervention with
organizations
Psychological first aid (PFA)
Facilitating of access to appropriate levels of
care when needed
NVOAD Interventions (2005)


Assisting special and diverse populations
Spiritual assessment and care



All NVOAD recognize need for spiritual care
Self care and family care including safety and
security
Post incident evaluation and training based on
lessons learned
Employee Assistance Professional’s Association
Disaster Response Task Force
(EAPA, 2002)


EAPS should develop workplace disaster plans
Plans should consist of a continuum of
interventions, including:


Pre-Incident Training/Coordination (early CISM
intervention training, resiliency training, risk
assessment, policy development)
Acute response protocols
Employee Assistance Professional’s Association
Disaster Response Task Force
(EAPA, 2002)

Plans should consist of a continuum of
interventions including:



Post-Incident Response (defusing, CISD, crisis
management briefings, assessment/ referral, selfcare)
Follow-up (supervisory briefings, assessment,
training)
Post-Incident Review and Plan Reformulation