Module Code Module Title Modular Credits Faculty BMA5016A LEADERSHIP IN ORGANIZATIONS BMA5016A A/P Audrey Chia / Dr Chia Ho Beng (Management And Organisation) Aims & Objectives This course aims to: Enable you to reflect on your own leadership Deepen your understanding of the nature of leadership Increase your knowledge of the theoretical frameworks that can be used to think about leadership, and build your ability to apply those theories in your thinking and behaviour as a leader; Provide the opportunity to gain insights into leader behaviours and sharpen your leadership skills. Learners’ responsibilities To gain the most from this course, it is imperative that you be prepared for all classes. You should have read the cases and completed the readings and other assignments before coming to class. You will be responsible for participating actively in case discussions, critiques, debates or project work. In terms of attitude, be willing to question, think critically and learn from others. Outside of classes, my main mode of communication with the class will be via IVLE and e-mail. It will be your responsibility to check your NUS mailbox regularly, and to also read the announcements, updates and other materials uploaded to the IVLE. Readings and resources Readings for this module will be posted on the e-reserves for this module. Please check the IVLE regularly for announcements, updates, the class forum and other supplementary materials. Schedule Time 8.30 - 9.00 am Day 1: The Substance of Leadership Breakfast 1. Course Introduction 2. Overview of leadership 9.00 am – 10.30am a. Nature or Nurture? b. The Full-range model of leadership 10.30am - 11.00 am Tea break c. Transformational and authentic leadership d. Leading with vision d. How am I doing? e. The field today FILL IN before coming to class, and bring this to class: Multifactor leadership questionnaire (Diagnostic tool for self-evaluation) 11.00am – 1 pm READ BEFORE COMING TO CLASS: Zhang Ruimin, 2007. Raising Haier. Harvard Business Review, 85(2): 141-146. (We will use this as a case. Be prepared to comment on Zhang’s leadership style and practices). Chen, Ming-Jer & Miller, Danny. 2011. The Relational Perspective as a Business Mindset: Managerial Academy of Management Perspectives 25(3): 6-18. 1 pm – 2 pm The Power of Idealistic Realism – How great leaders inspire and transform. HBR Blog Lunch 2. Leadership, the personal compact and behaviour a. The personal compact b. Employee engagement READ BEFORE COMING TO CLASS: Deshpande R. and R. Raina (2011) The Ordinary Heroes of the Taj (this will serve as a Case) 2.00pm – 3.30pm Ghosn, C., 2002. Saving The Business Without Losing The Company. Harvard Business Review, 80(1):37-45. Cappelli, Peter, Singh, Harbir, Singh, Jitendra & Useem, Michael. 2010. The India Way: Lessons for the U.S. Academy of Management Perspectives 24(2): 6-24 3.30pm - 3.45pm 3.45pm - 5.00pm Optional Supplementary reading: Engaging for Success. Chapters1-4. Tea Break Debrief of Taj case Building Commitment Learning Summary Time 8.30am – 9.00am Day 2 The Context of Leadership Breakfast 3. Leaders in the organizational context a. Organisations as strong situations b. Rationalisations c. Structural impediments to ethical leadership and behaviour READ BEFORE COMING TO CLASS: 9.00am - 10.30am Case: Good Intentions gone Awry at the National Kidney Foundation Discussion Questions: 1. How is leadership related to responsibility? In what ways and to what extent was T.T. Durai a responsible leader? In which ways was he not responsible? 2. Comment on Durai’s actions as revealed in the court proceedings. Do you agree with how he justified his actions? Elaborate. 3. How did Durai manage to command such respect and admiration from his staff while engaging in unorthodox organizational practices? 4. In light of recent cases of malfeasance in organizations, how do you think Durai’s actions would be viewed if the NKF was not a charity but a profit-oriented organization? Consider the operating environment and stakeholder reactions in your answer. 5. What can the new NKF board do to regain public donors’ trust and support? What lessons can we learn from this case? 10.30am - 11.00am 11.00am – 1pm 1 pm – 2 pm Vikas Anand, Blake E. Ashforth, and Mahendra Joshi, 2004. Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2): 39-53. Tea Break 3. Leaders in the organization context (conti.) Lunch 4. Collaborative leadership a. Working with others in a team b. Challenges of virtual leadership READ BEFORE COMING TO CLASS: 2.00pm – 3.00pm Case: Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley Discussion Questions: 1. 2. Should Rob Parson be promoted? Imagine that you are Nasr and have to talk to Rob Parson. What would you say? Ancona, D., Malone, T.W., Orlikowski, W.J., Senge, P. M., 2007. In Praise of the incomplete leader. Harvard Business Review, Feb 2007, 85 (2), 92-100. Eisenstat, R.A., Beer, M., Foote, N. & Fredberg, T.; Norrgren, F., 2008. The Uncompromising Leader. Harvard Business Review, July-Aug 2008, 51-57. Santora, Joseph C.; Esposito, Mark. 2011. Do Happy Leaders Make for Better Team Performance? Academy of Management Perspectives 25(4): 88-90. 3.00pm - 3.15pm Tea Break 3.15pm - 5.00pm In-class Test. This will be a succinct case, for analysis. Time 8.30 am – 9.00am Day 3 The future of leadership Breakfast 5. Looking forward a. Leaders at every level b. Learning leaders, learning organizations c. Leading in networks READ BEFORE COMING TO CLASS: 9.00am - 10.30am Case: Gen Y in the Workforce Discussion Questions: How do you view Josh’s behaviours (‘look at me’ move, ‘overly solicitous greeting the boss’ or ‘bypassing the boss’)? Do you think they are acceptable at work? Is there anything wrong with the ‘sugarcoating’ approach? Can it be regarded as inspirational motivation component in Transformational Leadership? What are some contributing factors to generational differences? How can Sarah and Josh work together more effectively? 10.30am - 11.00am 11.00am – 1pm 1 pm – 2 pm 2.00pm – 3.30pm 3.30pm - 3.45pm 3.45pm - 5.00pm Goleman, D., 2000. Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, Mar/Apr2000, 78(2), 7890 Erickson T.J., 2010.The Leaders We Need Now. Harvard Business Review, May 2010, 88(5), 63-66 Tea Break Looking forward (conti.) Lunch Learning from one another: presentations Tea Break Learning from one another: presentations (conti.) Wrap-up ASSESSMENT Preparation and participation (including IVLE Forum) 30% In-class test 35% Presentation 35%