Quality in Forensic Service Accuracy & Reliability Are Present, Just Like on CSI, Right? Carl M. Selavka, Ph.D., D-ABC Director Massachusetts State Police Crime Laboratory Sudbury, Massachusetts And Now, A Word From My Sponsor: Disclaimers The opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official positions of the: Disclaimed Agencies Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety Department of State Police Crime Laboratory System Disclaimed Agencies NIJ DHHS ABC FEPAC AAFS ASCLD NEAFS ACS Disclaimed Agencies NCST&L (Participants, Attendees, Those Actually Awake) That Title Presentation Summary • The Real Forensic World • Quality is Easy, Right? • Structure from Chaos • Legal Synergy • This is GOOD! The Real Forensic World • From Crime Commission to Discovery • On-Site First-Responders & Investigators • Evidence Recognition, Presentation to Key Responders, Documentation, Collection & Transport Integrity • Triage to Avoid Exhaustive Examinations • The Examinations Themselves…. The Real Forensic World • Interpretations of Elicited & Missing Data • Contextual Elements Insure “Probative” Forensic Reports • Iterative Evidentiary Management Yields “Non-Advocacy” Credibility • Presentation in Court Provides Forensic Defensibility Quality Assurance Quality in Forensic Science • Quality (Webster’s II – 1984) Essential Character An Inherent Attribute Degree of Excellence • Assurance A Statement Intended to Inspire Confidence Ideal Lab Management • Is Our QA Program Proper? • Is the Personnel System OK? • Do We Use Good Science? • Do We Report Correctly? • Are We Defensible? Infrastructure Standardization National Standards Quality Assurance Quality Control Infrastructure Quality Assurance ASCLD/LAB ASCLD / LAB American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors / Laboratory Accreditation Board Other Accreditations • ISO 17025 (Guide 25) • NAME – Death Investigation • IAI – Fingerprints • AFTE – Firearms, TMs • ABFT – Toxicology Other Accreditations • NATA, SCC, NAMAS • See the URL for More: www.ascld-lab.org Click On “Resources” Click “Forensic Links” and you’ll get 36 Recognized Sites!! Why ASCLD / LAB? • Objective Process • Impartial Review • Consensus Standards • Peer-Based Infrastructure Is the Personnel System OK? ABC (www.criminalistics.com) ABFT (www.abft.org) IAI (www.theiai.org) Certification is NOT an End Unto Itself Certification is a passageway - a commitment to continued professional development Proficiency Tests (PTs) Recognize Possibly Deviant Results That QA Guarantee… • Differentiate Anecdotal Issues From Systemic Performance Improvement Opportunities • Document Corrective Actions • Reestablish Competency Documentation Change the Examiner’s Job Why Is This a Good Approach to Certification? • Objective Process • Impartial Review • Consensus Standards • Peer-Based Quality in Forensic Science • Accreditation – ASCLD/LAB & Others • Certification AAFS Forensic Specialties Accreditation Board 2004 NIJ Guide – Appendix C 9 FSAB-Recognized Programs 14 Organizations Listed Infrastructure Standardization Do We Use Good Science? Do We Report Correctly? T/SWG - ___ ASTM T / SWG Technical or Scientific Working Group for / on _____ (18 Total) Technical WG = NIJ • TWG-BSI Bombing Scene Investigation • TWG-CSI Crime Scene Investigation • TWG-DI Death Invesigation • TWG-DE Digital Evidence • TWG-EYEE Eyewitness Evidence • TWG-FASI Fire/Arson Scene Investigation • TWG-MFFI Mass Fatality Forensic ID Scientific WG = FBI • SWG-STAIN Bloodstain Pattern Analysis • SWG-DE Digital Evidence • SWG-DAM DNA Analysis Methods • SWG-GUN Firearms and Toolmarks • SWG-FAST Friction Ridge Analysis, Study and Technology • SWG-IT Imaging Technologies • SWG-MAT Materials Analysis • SWG-MGF Microbial Genetics & Forensics • SWG-DOC Forensic Document Exam Scientific WG = DEA • SWG-DRUG for the Analysis of Seized Drugs Technical WG = NCFS • TWG-FEX Fire & Explosions Investigations ASTM American Society for Testing & Materials – Committee E30 on Forensic Sciences (Now ASTM International) ASTM International • 9 E30 Technical Groups • 6 E30 Specialty Groups • 25 E30.01 Criminalistics Standards Why Is This a Good Approach to Standardization? • Objective Process • Impartial Review • Consensus Standards • Peer-Based Quality in Forensic Science • Accreditation – ASCLD/LAB & Others • Certification – AAFS FSAB & Others • Standardization ASTM Committee E30 on Forensic Sciences NIJ, FBI, DEA and NCFS Sponsors 2004 NIJ Guide – Appendix D 19 Standardization Groups Infrastructure Quality Forensic Services Standardization Required Quality Assurance • National Agencies? • State Agencies? NY, OK, TX Crime Laboratories Exempt Categories Plentiful Examiners = NO • Municipal Agencies? • Local Governments? What You Should Expect From Forensic Practitioners Practical Quality Guarantees We Provide FEPAC Forensic Science Education Programs Accreditation Commission Infrastructure Quality Forensic Services Standardization Accreditation Certification Educational Harmonization QA Take-Away: • Accuracy is NOT Ensured • Reliability is NOT Ensured • In Our Advocacy Process, Accuracy & Reliability Rest in the Eye of the Beholder Yes, You Can. Can You All Now Run With the Big Dogs? Acknowledgements NCST&L Organizing Committees & Leadership Team - Professor Carol Henderson Massachusetts State Police - Colonel Robbins & Command Staff - MSP Crime Lab System