Analyze Assure Standard IP Network Model for Comparing Voice Quality of IP Telephony Devices Dolby VoIP? How close are we to better than PSTN Sound? Jack Douglass, Spirent Chair TIA TR30.3 Accelerate How close are we to better than PSTN Sound? • An objective method of measuring and comparing the Audio Quality and Performance of IP Telephony Equipment in the presence of Network Impairments is needed – A Standard Network Model for Evaluating Multimedia Transmission Performance Over Internet Protocol – Audio Quality must be measured over time-varying network impairments that are statistically accurate – TIA TR30.3 is working with the ITU-T on a Statistically Based IP Network Model • Will become TIA-921when released • Submit to ITU-T for consideration as a Recommendation Converged IP Telephony Network is Very Complex and has Many Impairments Signaling Path Network Topologies that need be considered when testing Audio Quality over a Converged Network Converged Network Reference Model Diagram A TE D Telco Switch L Gateway IP Network L A D Telco Switch Gateway R,G,S* Gateway L L R,G,S* R,G,S* Gateway TE Parameters & Impairments that Need to be Considered when Simulating an IP Network • • • • • • • • • • • Network Architecture Types of Access Links QoS controlled Edge Routing Route Flapping Link Failure Load Sharing Time Drift MTU Size Packet Loss Background Traffic (Congestion, Bandwidth, Utilization, Network Load) One Way Delay Sources of IP Network Impairments IP Network Model Source Device A LAN A Local Access B Local Access A 64 kbit/s *128 kbit/s 256 kbit/s 1000BaseX *384 kbit/s * 100BaseT Switch 512 kbit/s 100BaseT Hub *768 kbit/s 10BaseT *T1 (1.536 kbit/s) * WLAN (~4 Mbit/s) E1 (1.920 kbit/s) ---------------------E3 (34 Mbit/s) Occupancy level *T3 (44 Mbit/s) Packet loss ADSL (~256 kbit/s) *Cable (~256 kbit/s) Fiber (1-10 Gbit/s) -------------------Occupancy level QoS edge router Core IP Network Route flapping One-way delay Jitter Packet loss 64 kbit/s *128 kbit/s 256 kbit/s *384 kbit/s 512 kbit/s *768 kbit/s *T1 (1.536 kbit/s) E1 (1.920 kbit/s) E3 (34 Mbit/s) *T3 (44 Mbit/s) ADSL (~2 Mbit/s) *Cable (~3 Mbit/s) Fiber (1-10 Gbit/s) -------------------Occupancy level QoS edge router * Case used in impairment tables LAN B 1000BaseX * 100BaseT Switch 100BaseT Hub 10BaseT * WLAN (~4 Mbit/s) ---------------------Occupancy level Packet loss Destination Device B Packet Delay Example of Test Profile with Time Variable Network Impairments Time Time Varying Statistically Based IP Network Impairment Conditions (ICs) IC1 LOO X% IC2 LOO X% IC100 LOO X% Time • Each Impairment Condition is assigned a Likely-hood of Occurrence (LOO) based on real IP Network Statistics, Network Architecture, Classes of Service • The goal is to have approximately 100 test combinations so that an automated run of the test suite completes in less than a day. Test Profiles Based on QoS Classes Test Profiles QoS Class (Y.1541) Applications (Examples) Node Mechanisms A (VoIP, MoIP, FoIP, ToIP) 0 Real-Time, loss sensitive, Jitter sensitive, high interaction (VoIP, VTC) B (VoIP, MoIP, FoIP, ToIP) 1 Real-Time, Jitter sensitive, interactive (VoIP, VTC). C (FoIP only) 2 Transaction Data, Highly Interactive (Signaling) 3 Transaction Data, Interactive 4 Low Loss Only (Short Transactions, Bulk Data, Video Streaming) Long Queue, Drop priority Any route/path 5 Traditional Applications of Default IP Networks Separate Queue (lowest priority) Any route/path Strict QoS. Guaranteed no over subscription on links. Separate Queue with preferential servicing, Traffic grooming Network Techniques Constrained Routing and Distance Less constrained Routing and Distances Constrained Routing and Distance Separate Queue, Drop priority Less constrained Routing and Distances • Statistically based models can be created for different QoS Classes PESQ, PSQM, MOS, R-Factor, Throughput, Connect Rate, etc. Example of Network Model Coverage (NMC) Curve Parameter X Vs Network Model Coverage Percentage Device A Device B Device C 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Percentage of Network Coverage 80 90 100 Examples of Communication Equipment that can be tested over the Converged Network Model • Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) and IP telephones • PSTN Video H320 and H324 • IP Network Devices such as User Agents, Call Agents, • • • • Media Servers, Media Gateway Controllers, Gatekeepers, Application Servers, Edge Routers, Gateways, IP Phones, IAF (Internet Aware Fax) Voice-over-IP (VoIP) gateways T.38 facsimile devices and gateways V.150.1 and voiceband data (VBD) modem-over-IP gateways TIA-1001 (and V.toip) textphone-over-IP gateways TR30.3 Test Standards • TIA/EIA 496A-1989: Interface Between Data Circuit Terminating Equipment (DCE) and the Public Switched Telephone Network – Included Network Model for Evaluating Modem Performance • TIA/EIA TSB 37A-1994: Telephone Network Transmission Model for Evaluating Analog Modem Performance, which became ITU-T Recommendation V.56bis-1995 • EIA/TIA TSB 38-1994: Test Procedures for Evaluation of 2-Wire 4 Kilohertz Voice Band Duplex Modems, which became ITU-T Recommendation V.56ter-1996 • ANSI/TIA/EIA 3700-1999: Telephone Network Transmission Model for Evaluating Analog Modem Performance • ANSI/TIA/EIA 793 -2000: North American Telephone Network Transmission Model for Evaluating Analog Client and Digitally Connected Server Modems • ANSI/TIA 876 – 2002: North American Network Access Transmission Model for Evaluating xDSL Modem Performance Value of Converged Network Model • Predicts product performance under statistically based network conditions • • • • • Finds design weaknesses Find compatibility issues between network equipment Facilitates isolating and resolving field problems Assists in evaluating different technologies Competition for better performance over the Network Model drives the industry to create better quality products Target Audience for Converged Network Model • • • • • • Operating Companies Service Providers Manufacturers Design Engineers Test houses Magazines and product reviewers How will TIA-921 help the Industry Achieve Better than PSTN sound? • PSTN quality sound on the IP Network has not yet been achieved • The Network Model will provide a standard test bed – objectively compare the Audio Quality of various IP Telephony devices – Competition to perform better on the Network Model will help drive the Quality of IP Telephony sound to be better that PSTN sound