Experimental and QuasiExperimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10 Research Design It is the outline, plan, or strategy for the procedures you will use to address your research question. Research Designs – What are some limitations of these? One-group after design 1. Treatment Response measure One-group before-after design 2. Response Measure 1 Treatment Response Measure 2 Compare Research Designs – What are some limitation of these? Nonequivalent posttest-only design Cardiac Bypass & Revascularization Cardiac Revascularization Response Measure Cognitive Functioning at 6-months follow-up Response Measure Cognitive Functioning at 6-months follow-up What are the requirements of true research designs? Requirements of True Research Design Design is adequate to answer the research question (i.e., test the hypothesis). Control for extraneous variables Results are generalizable. Why Pre-testing Your Participants Increased sensitivity of the study Ceiling effect Initial position Initial comparability Evidence of change What are the limitations of this design? True Research Design Randomized to: Anxiety Management Usual Care Response Measure Decisional Regret & Distress Response Measure Decisional Regret & Distress Factorial Design Two or more independent variables are studied in order to determine their independent and interactive effects on the dependent variable. Interaction Effect The effect of one factor (independent variable) depends on the level of the other factor (other independent variable). Main Effects & Interactions High High High Low Lightness Seasonal Affect Disorder Non-Seasonal Affect Disorder High Low Lightness Advantages of Factorial Designs More than one hypothesis can be tested. Potentially confounding variables can be built into the design as factors. Enables interaction effects to be tested. Within Participant After-Only Design Same research participants in all experimental treatment conditions. Repeated measures design. Overcomes concerns about creating equivalence between groups. Requires fewer participants. Most serious limitation is the confounding influence of a sequence effect. Combining Within and Between Participant Designs Factorial design based on a mixed model. Can include as many independent variables as is necessary. Combining Within and Between Participant Designs Before - After Design Participants Selected Pre-treatment Measures May want to match before randomizing Between-Subject Factor Randomized to: Experimental Group Control Group Post-treatment Measure Post-treatment Measure Repeated Measure Factorial Design Does stress management work similarly in medicated and unmedicated hypertensives? Unmedicated hypertensives Randomized to: Beta Blocker & Stress management Beta Blocker, no Stress management Placebo & Stress management Placebo, no Stress management Post measure at 6-months Post measure at 6-months Post measure at 6-months Post measure at 6-months • Main effect for beta blocker • Main effect for stress management • Interaction effect for drug and stress management Main & Interaction Effects Drug & Stress Man. Placebo & Stress Man. Drug, No Stress Man. Placebo, No Stress Man. 112 108 104 100 96 92 88 84 80 Drug & Stress Man. Placebo & Stress Man. Drug, No Stress Man. Placebo, No Stress Man. 112 108 104 100 96 92 88 84 80 Pre Main Effect Post Pre Post Interaction Effect Selecting the Appropriate Design The design must be one that addresses your research question. What control techniques can and should you apply to help you arrive at an unambiguous answer. Between or within-in design or mixed model. Quasi-Experimental Design Quasi-Experimental Does not meet all of the requirements necessary for controlling the influence of extraneous variables. Most common criteria not met is random assignment. While you cannot infer cause and effect, well designed quasi-experiments enable you to demonstrate that rival interpretations are implausible. Non -Equivalent Control Group Design: Typical Rival Hypotheses Increasing treatment effect I outcome A selection-maturation effect Increasing Treatment Effect I Outcome Experimental Group Control Group Pre-test Post-test Increasing Treatment and Control Group Outcomes Both groups’ scores increase over time but one group changes to a greater extent than the other group. Effect could be due to a treatment effect or to a selection-maturation interaction. HADS Depression 14 12 10 Time 1 8 Time 2 6 Time 3 4 2 0 Experimental Control ANOVA – time and time by group effect, depression decreased in both groups but levelled off in control Group at follow-up while continuing to decrease in experimental. Increasing Treatment Effect II Outcome Control Group Experimental Group Pre-test Post-test Cross-Over Effects Control Group Experimental Group Pre-test Post-test Time Series Analyses Useful when you cannot randomize participants and where it is possible to obtain a series of assessments of the dependent variable at pre-treatment and post-treatment. Time Series Analysis Treatment Applied Classic Studies: Effect of Reduced Speeding on Traffic Accidents in Connecticut In 1955 there were a record number of traffic accidents ( n = 324) so the Governor (Abraham Ribicoff) introduced a law to reduce the speed limit. In 1956 there were 284 traffic accidents, a reduction of 12.3%. Governor concluded that his intervention worked but the effects could just as easily been due to regression to the mean. Classic Studies: Effect of Reduced Speeding on Traffic Accidents in Connecticut Campbell and Ross (1968) used interrupted time series design to test if the reduced trend in traffic accidents was plausible. Compared traffic accident trend in Connecticut with control States. Classic Studies: Effect of Reduced Speeding on Traffic Accidents in Connecticut 15 Control State 14 13 • • • • 10 • 12 11 • • • Connecticut • 9 ‘51 ‘52 ‘53 ‘54 ‘55 ‘56 ‘57 ‘58 • ‘59 Class Exercise Specify your research question Your scientific hypothesis Specify your design Break into groups of 5