Catur Iswahyudi 1 2 Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) ◦ first security protocol defined in 802.11 Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) ◦ defined by Wi-Fi Alliance WPA2 802.11i 3 In the early 1980s, the IEEE began work on developing computer network architecture standards ◦ This work was called Project 802 In 1990, the IEEE formed a committee to develop a standard for WLANs (Wireless Local Area Networks) ◦ At that time WLANs operated at a speed of 1 to 2 million bits per second (Mbps) 4 In 1997, the IEEE approved the IEEE 802.11 WLAN standard Revisions ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ IEEE IEEE IEEE IEEE 802.11a 802.11b 802.11g 802.11n 5 Speeds of upto 54 Mb/s Operating Range: 10-100m indoors, 300m outdoors Power Output Limited to 1 Watt in U.S. Frequency Hopping (FHSS), Direct Sequence & Infrared (IrDA) (– Networks are NOT compatible with each other) Uses unlicensed 2.4/5 GHz band (2.4022.480 ,5 GHz) Provide wireless Ethernet for wired networks Modes of Operation Ad Hoc mode (Independent Basic Service Set IBSS) Infrastructure mode (Basic Service Set - BSS) Client A Client B Client C Laptop users wishing to share files could set up an ad-hoc network using 802.11 compatible NICs and share files without need for external media. In this mode the clients communicate via a central station called Access Point (AP) which acts as an ethernet bridge and forwards the communication onto the appropriate network, either the wired or the wireless network. Client A Client B Access point There is no physical link between the nodes of a wireless network, the nodes transmit over the air and hence anyone within the radio range can eavesdrop on the communication. So conventional security measures that apply to a wired network do not work in this case. Internal network protected Wireless Access Point Valid User Access Only The three basic security services defined by IEEE for the WLAN environment are as follows: Authentication—A primary goal of WEP was to provide a security service to verify the identity of communicating client stations. This provides access control to the network by denying access to client stations that cannot authenticate properly. This service addresses the question, “Are only authorized persons allowed to gain access to my network?” Confidentiality—Confidentiality, or privacy, was a second goal of WEP. It was developed to provide “privacy achieved by a wired network.” The intent was to prevent information compromise from casual eavesdropping (passive attack). This service, in general, addresses the question, “Are only authorized persons allowed to view my data?” Integrity—Another goal of WEP was a security service developed to ensure that messages are not modified in transit between the wireless clients and the access point in an active attack. This service addresses the question, “Is the data coming into or exiting the network trustworthy—has it been tampered with?” The IEEE 802.11 specification defines two means to “validate” wireless users attempting to gain access to a wired network: opensystem authentication and shared-key authentication. One means, shared-key authentication, is based on Cryptography, and the other is not. The open-system authentication technique is not truly authentication; the access point accepts the mobile station without verifying the identity of the station. It should be noted also that the authentication is only one-way: only the mobile station is authenticated. The mobile station must trust that it is communicating to a real AP. The 802.11 standard supports privacy (confidentiality) through the use of cryptographic techniques for the wireless interface. The WEP cryptographic technique for confidentiality also uses the RC4 symmetric key, stream cipher algorithm to generate a pseudo-random data sequence. The IEEE 802.11 specification also outlines a means to provide data integrity for messages transmitted between wireless clients and access points. This security service was designed to reject any messages that had been changed by an active adversary “in the middle.” This technique uses a simple encrypted Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) approach. Network security attacks are typically divided into passive and active attacks. These two broad classes are then subdivided into other types of attacks. Passive Attack—An attack in which an unauthorized party gains access to an asset and does not modify its content (i.e., eavesdropping). Passive attacks can be either eavesdropping or traffic analysis (sometimes called traffic flow analysis). These two passive attacks are described below. Eavesdropping—The attacker monitors transmissions for message content. An example of this attack is a person listening into the transmissions on a LAN between two workstations or tuning into transmissions between a wireless handset and a base station. Traffic analysis—The attacker, in a more subtle way, gains intelligence by monitoring the transmissions for patterns of communication. A considerable amount of information is contained in the flow of messages between communicating parties. Active Attack—An attack whereby an unauthorized party makes modifications to a message, data stream, or file. It is possible to detect this type of attack but it may not be preventable. Active attacks may take the form of one of four types (or combination thereof): masquerading, replay, message modification, and denial-of-service (DoS). Masquerading—The attacker impersonates an authorized user and thereby gains certain unauthorized privileges. Replay—The attacker monitors transmissions (passive attack) and retransmits messages as the legitimate user. Message modification—The attacker alters a legitimate message by deleting, adding to, changing, or reordering it. Denial-of-service—The attacker prevents or prohibits the normal use or management of communications facilities. Technical countermeasures involve the use of hardware and software solutions to help secure the wireless environment. Software countermeasures include proper AP configurations (i.e., the operational and security settings on an AP), software patches and upgrades, authentication, intrusion detection systems (IDS), and encryption. Hardware solutions include smart cards, VPNs, public key infrastructure (PKI), and biometrics. It should be noted that hardware solutions, which generally have software components, are listed simply as hardware solutions. The IEEE 802.11 specification identified several services to provide a secure operating environment. The security services are provided largely by the Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) protocol to protect link-level data during wireless transmission between clients and access points. WEP does not provide end-to-end security, but only for the wireless portion of the connection Wireless security is a huge headache in IT Wireless security widely misunderstood Wireless security is everyone’s problem even if you don’t “think” you have a WLAN Banning WLANs often result in “improvised” home grown solutions Wireless LANs can be secured Wireless security applicable elsewhere in IT Wireless security is NOT an oxymoron Less dangerous than having an Internet connection direct or indirect Attacks from the Internet can come from anywhere on the entire globe ◦ Web/FTP/Mail/DNS Servers ◦ Back doors R00TK1T5 that can dial home Attacks on Wireless LANs are limited to a couple of kilometers MAC “authentication” SSID “hiding” LEAP authentication Disabling DHCP Antenna placement and signal suppression Switch to 802.11a or Bluetooth Wireless LANs ______________________________________ Dishonorable mention: WEP Access is controlled by limiting a device’s access to the access point (AP) Only devices that are authorized can connect to the AP ◦ One way: Media Access Control (MAC) address filtering ◦ CCSF uses this technique (unfortunately) ◦ See www.ccsf.edu/wifi 24 25 26 Usually implemented by permitting instead of preventing CCSF does this www.ccsf.edu/wifi 27 MAC addresses are transmitted in the clear ◦ An attacker can just sniff for MACs Managing a large number of MAC addresses is difficult MAC address filtering does not provide a means to temporarily allow a guest user to access the network ◦ Other than manually entering the user’s MAC address into the access point 28 Designed to ensure that only authorized parties can view transmitted wireless information Uses encryption to protect traffic WEP was designed to be: ◦ Efficient and reasonably strong 29 29 WEP secret keys can be 64 or 128 bits long The AP and devices can hold up to four shared secret keys ◦ One of which must be designated as the default key 30 31 32 When a node has a packet to send, it first generates CRC for this packet as an integrity check value (ICV). Generates an IV; concatenates it with the secret key; applies RC4 to create RC4 key stream. Performs XOR operation on the above two streams, byte by byte, to produce ciphertext. Appends the IV to the ciphertext and transmits to the receiver. 33 34 35 IV is 24-bit long 224 choices. The probability of choosing the same IV value is more than 99% after only 12,00 frames. Only a few seconds elapse with 11Mbps and 1KByte frame size. IV values are sent in plain text attackers can detect a duplicate value and re-use past keys. 36 Before a computer can connect to a WLAN, it must be authenticated Types of authentication in 802.11 ◦ Open system authentication Lets everyone in ◦ Shared key authentication Only lets computers in if they know the shared key 37 38 39 Authentication is first carried out via ◦ open system authentication, or ◦ shared key authentication Data packets are then encrypted using the WEP encryption process described above. Each packet requires a new IV. 40 Static WEP keys (no periodic updates) High frequency of repeating the same IV ◦ IVs are only 24-bit long ◦ Packets can be replayed to force the access point to pump out IVs. CRC is weak in integrity check. ◦ An attacker can flip a bit in the encrypted data and then change the CRC as well. Authentication is too simple. 41 42 Wireless Ethernet Compatibility Alliance (WECA) ◦ A consortium of wireless equipment manufacturers and software providers WECA goals: ◦ To encourage wireless manufacturers to use the IEEE 802.11 technologies ◦ To promote and market these technologies ◦ To test and certify that wireless products adhere to the IEEE 802.11 standards to ensure product interoperability 43 In 2002, the WECA organization changed its name to Wi-Fi (Wireless Fidelity) Alliance In October 2003 the Wi-Fi Alliance introduced Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) ◦ WPA had the design goal to protect both present and future wireless devices, addresses both wireless authentication and encryption PSK or 802.11X addresses authentication and TKIP addresses encryption 44 Key size increased to 128 bits Larger IVs: 48-bit long Changing security keys through Temporary Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) ◦ Encryption keys are changed (based on a master key) after a certain number of packets have been sent. ◦ An IV is mixed with data (not concatenate). Ciphering scheme is the same as WEP ◦ compatible with old wireless LAN cards 45 WPA uses a new message integrity check scheme called Michael, replacing the CRC function in WEP. A frame counter is added to Michael to avoid replay or forgery attack. 46 Purpose: to upgrade WEP systems to be secure TKIP uses RC4 as WEP ◦ Addresses WEP’s known exposures ◦ Changes the temporal keys every 10000 packets 48 49 Two options: PSK (inexpensive, home/personal networking) 802.11X (expensive, enterprise networking) 50 Pre-shared key (PSK) authentication ◦ Uses a passphrase to generate the encryption key Key must be entered into both the access point and all wireless devices ◦ Prior to the devices communicating with the AP The PSK is not used for encryption ◦ Instead, it serves as the starting point (seed) for mathematically generating the encryption keys Results in a pair-wise master key (PMK) Followed by a 4-way handshake to handle key management and distribution, which uses the PMK to generate a pair-wise transient key (PTK). 51 52 A PSK is a 64-bit hexadecimal number ◦ Usually generated from a passphrase Consisting of letters, digits, punctuation, etc. that is between 8 and 63 characters in length If the passphrase is a common word, it can be found with a dictionary attack 53 People may send the key by e-mail or another insecure method Changing the PSK key is difficult ◦ Must type new key on every wireless device and on all access points ◦ In order to allow a guest user to have access to a PSK WLAN, the key must be given to that guest 54 Three components: ◦ Remote authentication dial-in user service (RADIUS) ◦ authenticator (access point) ◦ supplicant (client) Uses EAP authentication framework ◦ EAP-PSK, EAP-TLS, EAP-TTLS, EAP-MD5 Results in a pair-wise master key (PMK) Followed by a 4-way handshake to handle key management and distribution, which uses the PMK to generate a pair-wise transient key (PTK). 55 • AS verifies client’s digital signature using client’s public key got from client’s certificate Certclient • Get random number p by decrypting with its private key • Client calculates H(c,s,p), compares it with the value sent by As 56 57 58 59 60 Wi-Fi Protected Access 2 (WPA2) ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Introduced by the Wi-Fi Alliance in September 2004 The second generation of WPA security Still uses PSK (Pre-Shared Key) authentication But instead of TKIP encryption it uses a stronger data encryption method called AES-CCMP AES: Advanced Encryption Standard CCMP: Counter Mode with Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication Code Protocol 61 PSK Authentication ◦ Intended for personal and small office home office users who do not have advanced server capabilities ◦ PSK keys are automatically changed and authenticated between devices after a specified period of time known as the rekey interval 62 AES-CCMP Encryption ◦ Encryption under the WPA2 personal security model is accomplished by AES-CCMP ◦ This encryption is so complex that it requires special hardware to be added to the access points to perform it 63 64 The most secure method Authentication uses IEEE 802.1x Encryption is AES-CCMP 65 66 A superset of all WLAN security mechanisms including WEP, WPA and WPA2. PSK (personal) or 802.11X (enterprise) is used for authentication and key management. 67 Captive Portal Infrastruktur Captive Portal awalnya dirancang untuk keperluan komunitas yang memungkinkan semua orang dapat terhubung (open network). Captive portal sebenarnya merupakan mesin router atau gateway yang memproteksi atau tidak mengizinkan adanya trafik hingga user melakukan registrasi/otentikasi Radius server adalah server Remote Authentikasi Dial-in Service (RADIUS), sebuah protokol keamanan jaringan komputer berbasis server yang sering digunakan untuk melakukan authentikasi dan otorisasi serta pendaftaran akun (account) pengguna secara terpusat untuk mengakses jaringan yang aman. Radius server bertugas untuk menangani AAA (Authentication, Authorization, Accounting). Intinya bisa menangani otentikasi user, otorisasi untuk servis2, dan penghitungan nilai servis (billing) yang digunakan user. Radius server bisa dibedakan menjadi 2 : internal mikrotik dan eksternal Hotspot bisa menggunakan internal radius mikrotik, bisa juga menggunakan eksternal. Jika tidak bisa mengautentikasi pada lokal database mikrotik, jika telah dispesifikasikan, maka hotspot mikrotik bisa mencari pada radius eksternal. See more : ◦ http://www.nadasumbang.com/apa-itu-radius-server/ ◦ http://www.nadasumbang.com/setting-hotspot-mikrotik/ ◦ http://www.nadasumbang.com/setting-radius-dan-hotspot-mikrotik/ Security+ Guide to Network Security Fundamentals http://hackingsecuritytools.blogspot.com http://hackwithkali-linux.blogspot.in http://hackers.university/free-wifipassword-hack-tool/ 72