Graduates* feedback on their work-related learning

advertisement

GRADUATES’ FEEDBACK ON

THEIR WORK-RELATED

LEARNING EXPERIENCE

PREETI PATEL

ALDinHE Conference March 2015

Southampton Solent University

EMPLOYABILITY

Medicine & dentistry

Subjects allied to medicine

Biological sciences

Veterinary science

Agriculture & related subjects

Physical sciences

Mathematical sciences

Computer science

Engineering & technology

Architecture, building & planning

Total - Science subject areas

Total full-time and part-time work

Work and further study

Further study Unemployed Other

93.0%

82.9%

61.1%

89.4%

71.7%

55.3%

55.9%

74.0%

73.0%

75.5%

70.8%

2.0%

4.0%

4.3%

6.6%

7.3% 19.3%

1.0%

5.5%

2.4%

9.7%

4.9% 26.0%

8.3% 23.0%

2.2% 7.8%

2.9% 11.6%

5.3% 7.3%

4.9% 13.6%

0.2% 0.5%

4.2% 2.3%

7.2% 5.0%

5.2% 1.9%

7.3% 5.8%

8.6% 5.1%

8.6% 4.2%

13.0% 3.0%

8.7% 3.9%

7.2% 4.6%

7.0% 3.7%

From HESA DLHE 2012-13

SKILLS GAP

Graduates’ professional skills

Mind the

Gap

Employers’ expectations

• communication and problem-solving skills,

• social skills including leadership,

• emotional intelligence,

• ability to work with people of difference,

• personal ownership,

• general business acumen,

• add value by working in interdisciplinary teams

EMPLOYABILITY ENHANCEMENT

Work placement

Internship

Work experience

Learning in the workplace

Problem-based learning module

Integrated project module

Work-related module

WORK-RELATED LEARNING

Embedded into 2 nd and 3 rd year BSc computing-related courses

6 months duration, credit-bearing, compulsory on most courses

WoWbiz: a virtual company allowing businesses to get small tasks or projects completed at zero cost.

Students often work in teams – and it is possible for 2 nd years to work alongside 3 rd years.

Experiences include: teaching assistants, IT helpdesk, administrators, web development and animation projects

WORK-RELATED LEARNING

Assessment tool is a learning portfolio which comprises:

• Weekly learning log

• Employer evaluation

• A final report

• Presentation / Demonstration

Feedback mechanisms include:

• Criteria-based written comments from employer

• Annotations on portfolio report by tutor

• Verbal/Peer feedback during presentation

• Verbal feedback during tutor visits

WRL WORKING WELL……

Valerie George

Fine artist/portrait artist studying

Computer Animation

Working with real clients is very important and forces you to ‘own’ your work. You get to put all those class room and work shop hours into action and see where your strengths and weaknesses are. It makes you a better student and much better prepared when you get out into the real world.

My client is very pleased with my work and they say that the real benefit to them is that with a student like myself, they get a fresh look at a project.

WORK-READINESS:

A PILOT STUDY

Study aiming to understand the relationship between learning development in the last stages of an undergraduate’s journey and their first experience of employment.

• Online survey designed to re-engage new graduates

• Follow-up qualitative interview to encourage commentary on workplace practices.

FINDINGS

Responses to online survey indicate the benefits and potential gaps of WRL experience.

Individual interviews shed more light on perceptions of graduates in workplace.

COMMUNICATION AND

INTERPERSONAL SKILLS

25

20

15

10

5

0

Before WRL

After WRL

At workplace

Extemely good

1

2

2

Very good

8

12

16

Good

17

18

22

Not very good

12

7

1

Not good

3

2

0

Improvement expected but a further significant improvement beyond module.

10

5

0

Before WRL

After WRL

At workplace

25

20

15

PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

SKILLS

35

30

Extemely good

0

0

1

Very good

1

2

4

Good

7

9

29

Not very good

26

24

7

Not good

7

6

0

Little improvement during module, but marked change at workplace.

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

SKILLS

25

20

15

10

5

0

Before WRL

After WRL

Now

Extemely good

3

4

12

Very good

14

18

19

Good

23

19

9

Not very good

1

0

1

Not good

0

0

0

Significant improvement in all categories

TEAMWORK SKILLS

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Before WRL

After WRL

Now

Extemely good

3

3

3

Very good

9

10

10

Good

13

23

28

Not very good

12

3

0

Not good

4

2

0

Dramatic change during module, but little change thereafter.

INITIATIVE AND PROBLEM-

SOLVING SKILLS

5

0

Before WRL

After WRL

Now

25

20

15

10

Extemely good

0

2

2

Very good

5

11

15

Good

14

12

22

Not very good

16

11

2

Not good

6

5

0

Half of all respondents moving to ‘good’ category at the workplace.

ORGANISATION AND TIME

MANAGEMENT SKILLS

5

0

Before WRL

After WRL

Now

25

20

15

10

Extemely good

2

2

8

Very good

9

12

23

Good

15

14

9

Not very good

11

9

1

Not good

4

4

0

Most effective at workplace.

FEEDBACK PERCEPTIONS

Ranking each of six skills –

Feedback on communication and interpersonal skills most useful

Feedback on professional conduct skills least useful.

GRADUATE PERCEPTIONS

Significant difference between feedback given during WRL module and feedback on performance and capability at workplace.

Formal appraisal process:

Objective-setting with targets and stretch targets

Financial and non-financial objectives

Accountabilities and goals

Key indicators

Self-assessment and forward-looking development plans

COMPETENCY TERMS (1)

Terminology for competencies

COMPETENCY TERMS (2)

Three competency groups

Functional/Technical:

Engineering, Manufacturing, Sales, Information Systems,

Human Resources, Creative Writing etc.

Core:

Continuous Learning, Judgement and Problem Solving,

Communication and Influence, Flexibility

Leadership:

Performance management, Strategic thinking, Project and process management, resource management

COMPETENCY TERMS (3)

Competency Group – Communication

Listening, reading comprehension, speaking, writing

Competency Group – Cognition

Analysis/reasoning, creative & Innovative thinking, decision making & Judgement, mathematical reasoning, problem-solving, researching information

Competency Group – Personal Effectiveness

Accountability & dependability, adaptability & flexibility, attention to detail, customer focus, development & continual learning, ethics & integrity, results focus & initiative, safety focus, self- management, stress tolerance, tact

Competency Group – Interaction with Others

Influencing others, relationship building, teamwork, valuing diversity

Competency Group – Occupational

Advocating causes, enforcing laws, rules & regulations, facilitating groups, gaining voluntary compliance, interviewing others, managing projects or programs, mediating disputes, negotiating agreements, operating equipment, providing consultation, training

& presenting information

Competency Group – Management Qualities

Business alignment, coaching & mentoring, leadership, fiscal accountability, organisational

& political savvy, planning & organising, staff management, strategic vision

GRADUATE PERCEPTIONS

‘performance

-oriented’

‘culture shock’ ‘reality check’

‘pressure to produce’

‘harsh’

GRADUATE PERCEPTIONS

Department for Business and Innovation

“Students and graduates should be encouraged to take greater responsibility for their employment outcomes.”

Professional identity / significant step up in responsibility

Shadowing

Mentoring

Employability counselling

WORK-READINESS ?

• Learning agreements aligned to performance measuring tools

• More opportunities for practice of and reflection on professional practice and conduct

• Cultivate ability to respond to ‘pressure to produce’

• Appreciation of other desirable skills, for example, judgement, flexibility, influence, continuous learning, innovativeness, accountability and dependability, results focus, stress tolerance, relationship building

Download