Jointly provided by the Annenberg Center for Health Sciences at Eisenhower and Clinical Care Options, LLC HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy Nezam H. Afdhal, MD, FRCPI Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, Massachusetts This activity is supported by an independent educational grant from Janssen Therapeutics. Image: pockygallery/Copyright©2014 Shutterstock Images LLC. All Rights Reserved Image: djem/Copyright©2014 Shutterstock Images LLC. All Rights Reserved HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Virologic Barriers to Resistance Genetic barrier Number and type of nucleotide changes required for a virus to acquire resistance to an antiviral regimen[1] Fitness of Polymerase Inhibitor Mutants[2,3] Viral fitness % Fitness Relative capacity of a viral variant to replicate in a given environment 1 .75 .5 .25 0 1. Rong L, et al. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:30ra32. 2. Le Pogam S et al. J Virol. 2006;80:6146-6154. 3. Le Pogam S, et al. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:1510-1519 HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Resistant Variants Are Present Before and Can Be Selected During Treatment HCV is a mixture of related but distinct populations of virions in each pt[1] Most resistant variants are unfit and may be undetectable prior to therapy[2,3] Antiviral therapy eliminates sensitive variants Sensitive virus Resistant virus Resistant variants expand Antiviral therapy 1. Pawlotsky JM. Clin Liver Dis. 2003;7:45-66. 2. Kuntzen T, et al. Hepatology. 2008;48:1769-1778. 3. Bartels DJ, et al. J Infect Dis. 2008;198:800-807. Image reproduced and adapted with permission from Forum for Collaborative HIV Research. www.hivforum.org HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis HCV NS3/4A Protease Resistance Q80 R155 D168 F43 A156 Lenz O, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1878-1887. Reproduced with permission from American Society for Microbiology. doi:10.1128/AAC.01452-09 Copyright © 2010, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Impact of Treatment Exp, Q80K Depends on Cirrhosis (12 Wks’ SMV + SOF in GT1) No Cirrhosis (OPTIMIST-1[1]) 100 97 97 95 96 Cirrhosis (OPTIMIST-2[2]) 97 100 SVR12 (%) 83 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 n/N = 0 150/ 155 112/ 115 38/ 40 44/ 46 68/ 70 All pts Naive Exp’d 1a + Q80K 1a no Q80K Treatment History HCV GT 20 n/N = 0 92 88 79 74 86/ 103 44/ 50 42/ 53 25/ 34 35/ 38 All pts Naive Exp’d 1a + Q80K 1a no Q80K Treatment History 1. Kwo P, et al. EASL 2015. Abstract LP14. 2. Lawitz E, et al. EASL 2015. Abstract LP04. HCV GT HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis OPTIMIST-2: Resistance Analysis in GT1 Cirrhotics in Whom SMV + SOF Failed Treatment-emergent NS3 mutations detected in 79% (11/14) of evaluable pts who did not achieve SVR12 – Observed at position 168, R155K, or combinations NS5B polymorphism S282T not detected at baseline or at time of treatment failure No NS3 baseline polymorphisms observed aside from Q80K Lawitz E, et al. EASL 2015. Abstract LP04. HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis AASLD/IDSA Guidance for Resistance Testing When Considering SMV + SOF In pts with both genotype 1a HCV infection and compensated cirrhosis, if considering SMV + SOF, test for Q80K polymorphism – If Q80K variant is present, consider a regimen other than SMV + SOF Applies to treatment-naive and treatment-experienced pts Q80K testing not required for: – Pts with genotype 1b HCV infection – Pts without cirrhosis – Pts in whom you are considering other DAAs AASLD/IDSA/IAS-USA. HCV Guidance. HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis ION-2: DAAs Effective Against NS3 RAVs After Boceprevir or Telaprevir 100 93 94 96 97 100 98 98 100 Treatment History Failure of pegIFN/RBV SVR12 (%) 80 Failure of PI 60 40 20 0 40/ 43 62/ 66 45/ 47 62/ 64 LDV/SOF LDV/SOF + RBV 12 Wks 58/ 58 49/ 50 LDV/SOF 58/ 59 51/ 51 LDV/SOF + RBV 24 Wks Virologic failure: 1 breakthrough in 24-wk LDV/SOF + RBV due to nonadherence; 11 relapses (7 in 12-wk LDV/SOF, 4 in 12-wk LDV/SOF + RBV) 14% of pts had NS5A RAVs at baseline; 89% of these achieved SVR12; 71% of pts had NS3 RAVs at baseline; 98% of these achieved SVR12 Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1483-1493. HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis ION-2: NS3 RAVs After Boceprevir or Telaprevir Respond to DAAs 100 93 94 96 97 100 98 98 100 Treatment History Failure of pegIFN/RBV SVR12 (%) 80 60 Failure of PI 40 20 40/ 43 62/ 66 45/ 47 62/ 64 58/ 58 49/ 50 58/ 59 51/ 51 0 LDV/SOF LDV/SOF + RBV 12 Wks LDV/SOF LDV/SOF + RBV 24 Wks Virologic failure: 1 breakthrough in 24-wk LDV/SOF + RBV due to nonadherence; 11 relapses (7 in 12-wk LDV/SOF, 4 in 12-wk LDV/SOF + RBV) 14% of pts had NS5A RAVs at baseline; 89% of these achieved SVR12; 71% of pts had NS3 RAVs at baseline; 98% of these achieved SVR12 Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1483-1493. HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Resistance Analysis of Select NS5A Inhibitors in Genotype 1 HCV Fold-Change in EC50 Position Genotype 1a Genotype 1b M28T Q30R L31M/V Y93H/N L31V Y93H/N Daclatasvir[1,3] > 100 x > 1000 x > 100 x > 1000 x < 10 x < 100 x Ledipasvir[1] 20 x > 100 x > 100 x > 1000 x Ombitasvir[2] > 1000 x > 100 x FDA approved > 100 x <3x > 100 x 3 to 100 x > 10,000 x > 1000 x/? < 10 x < 100 x <3x 1. Cheng G, et al. EASL 2012. Abstract 1172. 2. Krishnan P, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:979-987. 3. Yang G, et al. EASL 2013. Abstract 1199. 4. Ng T, et al. CROI 2014. Abstract 639. HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Impact of Duration of LDV/SOF on SVR12 in Pts With Baseline NS5A Resistance NS5A RAVS with < 100 x resistance SVR12 (%) 100 100 83 95 24/ 29 184/ 193 Treatment Naive 100 96 97 100 92 96 8/ 8 24/ 25 174/ 183 80 60 40 20 n/N = 0 12/ 12 8 Wks 100 SVR12 (%) NS5A RAVS with > 100 x resistance 27/ 27 44/ 46 362/ 373 12 Wks Treatment Experienced 100 95 100 24 Wks 100 99 6/ 6 95/ 96 65 80 60 40 20 n/N = 0 5/ 5 11/ 17 110/ 116 12 Wks Sarrazin C. AASLD 2014. Abstract 1926. 7/ 7 24 Wks No NS5A RAVs HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Durability of Treatment-Emergent NS5A RAVs After Virologic Failure Study of pts not achieving SVR after receiving LDV without SOF 100 100 98 98 95 100 Pts With NS5A RAVs (%) 86 80 60 40 20 n/N = 0 62/ 63 58/ 58 VF Baseline 42/ 43 45/ 45 52/ 55 FU-12 FU-24 FU-48 Registry Study NS5A RAVs persisted in majority of pts for 96 wks Dvory-Sobol H, et al. EASL 2015. Abstract O059. 50/ 58 FU-96 HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Pooled Analysis: RAV Persistence After Failure of PTV/RTV-, OMV-, DSV-Based Tx Follow-up Wk 24 PTV-Containing Regimens 100 OMV-Containing Regimens 100 97 96 97 100 93 89 100 90 46 38 80 RAVs (%) 60 40 DSV-Containing Regimens 80 77 RAVs (%) RAVs (%) 80 Follow-up Wk 48 60 40 60 77 75 57 40 29 20 20 9 n/N = 0 31/ 67 5/57 Any 21/ 4 55 2/53 10/ 13 2/7 D168 R155K n/N = NS3/4A Position Krishnan P. EASL 2015. Abstract O057. 0 20 68/ 49/ 70 51 32/ 21/ 33 21 38/ 25/ 41 28 Any M28V/T Q30E/K/R NS5A Position n/N = 0 33/ 20/ 44 35 27/ 17/ 30 22 Any S556G NS5B Position HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis AVIATOR: No Impact of Baseline RAVs in GT1a Pts Treated With OMV/PTV/RTV + DSV Treatment naive pts or null responders to previous pegIFN/RBV With RAV All differences in SVR24 with vs without baseline RAVs were nonsignificant Without RAV 100 88 94 92 86 92 91 100 40 92 91 80 60 40 20 20 0 78/ 122/ 89 130 200/ 0/1 218 Q80K D168 n/N = 0 100 93 92 80 SVR24 (%) SVR24 (%) SVR24 (%) 60 0 100 80 80 n/N = 100 100 60 50 40 20 12/ 192/ 14 209 M28V/T 3/ 201/ 3 220 Q30R 1/ 203/ 1 222 4/ 200/ 5 218 L31V Y93C/N/H NS3 RAVs NS5A RAVs Krishnan P, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:5445-5454. n/N = 0 7/ 220/ 7 239 1/ 226/ 2 244 S556G C316Y NS5B RAVs HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis LDV/SOF + RBV in GT 1 HCV Pts With Previous Failure on Sofosbuvir Regimens Phase II trial 12 Wks GT1 HCV with previous SOF failure (29% cirrhotic)* (N = 51) SVR12, % LDV/SOF + RBV 98† *25 pts (49%) were previously treated with SOF + pegIFN/RBV, 21 (41%) with SOF ± RBV, 5 (10%) with SOF placebo plus pegIFN/RBV or GS-0938 monotherapy, 1 (2%) with SOF monotherapy. †1 pt who relapsed found to have GT3a HCV infection and enrolled in error. Wyles DL, et al. Hepatology. 2015;61:1793-1797. HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis 24 Wks of LDV/SOF Retreatment After Failure of 8-12 Wks of LDV/SOF-Based Tx GT1 HCV–infected pts with and without cirrhosis previously treated with 8 or 12 wks of LDV/SOF ± RBV or LDV/SOF + GS-966 100 100 SVR12 (%) 80 71 68 74 80 60 60 46 40 20 n/N = 0 29/ 41 15/ 22 14/ 19 All No Yes Cirrhosis Lawitz E, et al. EASL 2015. Abstract O005. 24/ 30 5/ 11 8 Wks 12 Wks Previous Tx Duration 11/ 11 18/ 30 No Yes BL NS5A RAVs HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis 24 Wks of LDV/SOF After Failure of LDV/ SOF-Based Tx: Effect of Baseline RAVs SVR12 by Baseline NS5A RAVs, n/N (%) LDV/SOF for 24 Wks Number of RAVs 0 11/11 (100) 1 11/16 (69) ≥2 7/14 (50) Single NS5A RAV Q30R or M28T 5/5 (100) L31M 4/5 (80) Y93H/N 2/6 (33) NS5B variants emerged during retreatment in 33% of pts (4/12) with virologic failure – S282T: n = 2; L159F: n = 1; S282T + L159F: n = 1 Lawitz E, et al. EASL 2015. Abstract O005. HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis GT1 Pts With NS5A Failure: Who Needs Resistance Testing? If previous failure of any NS5A inhibitors (including DCV + SOF, LDV/SOF, OMV/PTV/RTV + DSV) and minimal liver disease, deferral preferred pending further data – If cirrhosis or other need for urgent treatment, test for NS3 and NS5A RAVs Applies to genotype 1a and 1b HCV infection NS3 and NS5A testing not required for: – Previous failure of NS3/4A PIs (including simeprevir, boceprevir, telaprevir) – Previous failure of NS5B inhibitors (sofosbuvir) – Tx-naive pts (unless considering SMV + SOF in cirrhotic GT1a) AASLD/IDSA/IAS-USA. HCV Guidance. HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Selecting Treatment Based on Resistance Testing Results If genotype 1a or 1b HCV infection and previous failure with any NS5A inhibitors and cirrhotic or other need for urgent treatment: RAV Testing Result No NS5A RAVs NS5A but no NS3 RAVs Retreatment Regimen Duration Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin 24 wks Simeprevir + sofosbuvir + ribavirin 24 wks NS5A and NS3 RAVs AASLD/IDSA/IAS-USA. HCV Guidance. Retreatment in a clinical trial setting HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Is Ribavirin Required for Pts With Cirrhosis? Integrated analysis of > 500 pts with cirrhosis treated with LDV/SOF ± RBV Treatment-experienced pts had previously received HCV PI SVR12, % Total (N = 513) Treatment Naive (n = 161) Treatment Experienced (n = 352) Overall 96 98 95 12 wks ± RBV 95 97 94 24 wks ± RBV 98 99 98 Without RBV With RBV 12 wks without RBV 12 wks with RBV 24 wks without RBV 24 wks with RBV 95 97 92 96 98 100 96 99 96 98 97 100 95 96 90 96 98 100 Although NS5A resistance not measured, RBV overcomes shorter treatment duration in patients with HCV cirrhosis and prior treatment failure Reddy KR, et al. Hepatology. 2015;62:79-86. HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Is Ribavirin Required for Pts With Cirrhosis and NS5A RAVs? Integrated analysis of > 500 pts with cirrhosis treated with LDV/SOF ± RBV Treatment experienced patients had previously received HCV PI SVR12, % (n/N)18 With NS5A RAVs Without NS5A RAVs Overall 12 wks without RBV 12 wks with RBV 24 wks without RBV 24 wks with RBV 91 (86/94) 88 (23/26) 94 (32/34) 85 (17/20) 100 (14/14) 98 (407/417) 95 (86/91) 97 (164/169) 100 (113/113) 100 (44/44) Reddy KR, et al. Hepatology. 2015;62:79-86. HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Personal Recommendations for Resistance in GT3 and GT4 HCV Infection Genotype 3 – Treatment failures on daclatasvir should be tested for NS5A RAVs – BOSON: Adding pegIFN to SOF/RBV appears to help overcome virologic failure due to resistance in GT3[1] – Improved SVR12 vs SOF/RBV alone in both treatment-naive and treatment-experienced pts, with or without cirrhosis Genotype 4 – Resistance testing should be performed if considering retreatment after LDV/SOF failure – Use SMV/SOF/RBV for NS5A RAVs 1. Foster GR, et al. EASL 2015. Abstract LO5. HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Summary Baseline RAVs (especially NS5A) are present in treatment-naive pts Treatment-emergent RAVs (including multidrug-resistant RAVs) seen in treatment failure and in all DAA classes and rarely with SOF NS3 RAVs have low replication efficacy and disappear over 9-18 mos – If considering SMV + SOF: In treatment-naive and treatment-experienced pts with both genotype 1a HCV infection and compensated cirrhosis, ensure no Q80K NS5A treatment-emergent RAVs persistent and a clinical challenge – If failure with any NS5A inhibitors (including DCV + SOF, LDV/SOF, OMV/PTV/RTV + DSV), and treatment is urgent, test for NS3 and NS5A RAVs – Use SMV + SOF + RBV if NS5A but no NS3 RAVs – Use LDV/SOF + RBV if no NS5A RAVs – Treat in clinical trial if both NS5A and NS3 RAVs present Resistance testing may be of benefit in treatment failures