Lecture - FUSTIPEN

advertisement

Do we understand

Quantum Decay?

Vladimir Zelevinsky

NSCL/ Michigan State University

FUSTIPEN, Caen

May 28, 2014

Quantum Decay: exponential versus non-exponential

* [Kubo] - exponential decay corresponds to the condition for a physical process to be approximated as a Markovian process

* [Silverman] - indeed a random process, no “cosmic force”

* [Merzbacher] - result of “delicate” approximations

Three stages : short-time main (exponential) Oscillations?

long-time

Why and when decay cannot be exponential

Initial state “memory” time

Internal motion in quasi-bound state

Remote power-law

There are “free” slow-moving non-resonant particles, they escape slowly

Example 14 C decay: E

0

=0.157 MeV t

2

=10 -21 s

=73

6

Time dependence of decay, Winter’s model

Winter, Phys. Rev., 123,1503 1961.

7

Winter’s model:

Dynamics at remote times background

8

Probability distribution

Scattering cross section off a single resonance near threshold and survival probability

Radiating state and parameters of the time dependence of its wave function

Internal dynamics in decaying system

Winter’s model t

2 t

1

1

0

Is it possible to have oscillatory decay?

Current

Decay oscillations are possible

• Kinetic energy - mass eigenstates

• Interaction (barrier)- flavor eigenstates

• Fast and slow decaying modes

Survival probability

[1] A Volya, M. Peshkin, and V. Zelevinsky, work in progress

Download