FUNDS MANAGEMENT UPDATES EPMC Roberta Tomasini DSMC-SPME Bldg 226, Rm 203 (703) 805-3764 e-mail: roberta.tomasini@dau.mil 1 Topics • FM Scope • FM Updates • Time Now - FM Perspective • Responding to Higher Hqtrs 2 From Requirement to Capability Annual Funding Life Cycle Cost Cost Analysis CAIV POE Fiscal Environment Funding Full Policies Funding Estimate ICE Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution CCA Incremental Funding AoA FYDP SPG POM PDM MFP JPG BES PBD (Exceptions) MBIs Congressional Enactment HAC SAC Budget Resolution HASC SASC HBC SBC President’s Budget Authorization & Appropriation Laws Acquisition Program Baseline Operational Concept Functional Area Analysis Capability Docs Feedback Commitment Budget Authority Obligation Reprogramming Expenditure Budget Execution Outlay Force Structure Modernization Operational Capability Readiness Sustainability FM Updates Overview • Cost Analysis: Cost Terms, Affordability, Breaches, Most Probable Cost • Funding Policies: Buy-to-Budget • PPBE: MID 913, OSD Budget Analysts (Separate Session After Lunch) • Congressional Enactment: Appn Subcommittees • Budget Execution: “Taxes”, OSD/Service Goals, Reprogramming Rules 4 Life Cycle Cost Terms A Life Cycle Cost RDT & E Development Costs of Prime Equipment & Support Items MILCON Facilities E Operations & Support • O&M, MILPERS F PROCUREMENT Prime Equipment B Development Cost PROCUREMENT Support Items Flyaway Cost C Weapon System Cost PROCUREMENT Initial Spares D Procurement Cost Disposal • O&M & others G Program Acquisition Cost 5 Affordability • Service Shares? • Service Splits? • Budget Shares? 6 MDAP Breach Parameters SAR APB Schedule Milestones 6 Month Slip From Previous SAR Cost 15% Program Acquisition 15% PAUC Growth Unit Cost (PAUC) 15% APUC Growth Growth RDT&E Growth Procurement Growth 15% Avg Procurement MilCon or O&M Growth Unit Cost Growth (APUC) Quarterly SAR Program Deviation Rpt (PM notifies MDA) Reports Required 6 Month Slip From APB Objective Unit Cost Rpt (UCR) N/A 15% PAUC Cost Growth 15% Avg Procurement Unit Cost Growth Quarterly/Exception DAES Component notifies Congress (>=15%) SecDef Certification (>=25%) NOTE: There are also performance breaches which are not included in this chart 7 SecDef Certification of Breaches 4 Parts to Certification: 1. Program is in the national interest and it must be had for national security 2. There is no other alternative 3. Costs are under control 4. Management is in place to keep costs under control 8 Most Probable Cost (MPC) • AKA Most Likely Cost • OSD( C ) expects it to be at 50% chance of overrunning or underrunning • The Fin Mgt Reg (DoD 7000.14R) says you should budget to MPC 9 Buy-to-Budget for Acquisition of End Items • US Code Title 10, Section 2308 – Can buy more end items than specified in the Appropriations Act, if 4 conditions are met: • • • • Requirement exists and is expected to remain unchanged NO additional funding needed Funding needed doesn’t exceed what’s in law The amount appropriated is sufficient for the end item to be fully funded – Noncompetitive acquisitions are limited to increases of not more than 10% of the quantity approved in the J&A • Congressional defense committees must be notified NLT 30 days after the date of the decision • Source: DoD 7000.14-R, Vol 2A, Chapter 1, Para 010204 10 HAC/SAC Subcommittees (109th) HAC Subcommittees (10) SAC Subcommittees (12) Agriculture/Rural Dev/FDA/Related Agencies Defense Energy & Water Dev/Related Agencies Foreign Ops/Export Financing/Related Programs Homeland Security Interior/Environment/Related Agencies Labor/HHS/Education/Related Agencies Transportation/Treasury/HUD/Judiciary/DC Military Quality of Life/VA/Related Agencies Science/State/Justice/Commerce/Related Agencies Agriculture/Rural Dev/Related Agencies Defense Energy & Water Dev State, Foreign Ops & Related Programs Homeland Security Interior & Related Agencies Labor/HHS/Education & Related Agencies Transportation/Treasury/Judiciary/HUD Military Construction & VA Commerce/Justice/Science Legislative Branch District of Columbia 11 APPORTIONMENT PROCESS: “Taxes” $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Congress Concurrent Budget Resolution Authorization Continuing Resolution Appropriation OMB Apportionment Investment -- Full amount Expense -- Qtrly OSD Comptroller Allocation Sub-Allocation Appropriation (Budget Authority) Service Comptroller Impoundment Rescission Deferral Withhold Administrative Technical Withhold Taxes -- SBIR Contingencies MAJCOM/PEO Comptroller Allotment PMO Program Management Office 12 OSD/Service Goals • Handouts provided in class 13 Below Threshold Reprogramming APPRN MAX INCREASE RDT & E $10 M PROC O&M MILPERS MILCON $20 M MAX DECREASE * Lesser of $10 M or 20% LEVEL OF CONTROL OBL AVAIL PROGRAM ELEMENT 2 YEARS * Lesser of $20 M or 20% LINE ITEM No Limit, BUDGET ACTIVITY $15 M unless specified $10 M No Congressional restriction No Lesser of $2 M or Congressional restriction 25% 3 YEARS ( 5 YEARS SCN) SOME BA 1 SUB-ACTIVITY LIMITATIONS ON DECREASES (OPERATING FORCES) 1 YEAR BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 YEAR PROJECT 5 YEARS Reference Source: DoD 7000.14R, Vol 3, Ch 6, dated Aug 2000 RDT&E & Proc thresholds increased from $4M & $10M to $10M & $20M per USD (C) Memo, 15 May 03 (valid for FY03 and FY04) * MAX DECREASE for FY04 changed to “LESSER of threshold amt or 20% of appropriation amt” per USD (C) Memo, 4 Nov 03 -- For FY03 and prior, MAX DECREASE is “GREATER of threshold amt or 20% of appropriation amt” 14 Resource Allocation Process CY04 CY05 CY06 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Execution FY04 2nd Yr 3rd Yr FY04 and prior Enactment FY05 PB FY06 FY07 2nd Yr Execution FY05 3rd Yr FY05 and prior Planning Program/Budgeting Enactment FY06-11 SPG/JPG FY 06-11 POM FY 06-07 BES FY06 PB FY 07-11 SPG/JPG FY08 FY06 and prior Program/Budgeting Planning FY 07-11 FOL/CP Enactment PB FY07 Exec FY07 & prior Program/Budgeting Planning FY 08-13 SPG/JPG SPG – Strategic Planning Guidance BES – Budget Estimate Submission 2nd Execution JPG – Joint Programming Guidance CP – Change Proposal FY 08-13 POM FY 08-09 BES POM – Program Objective Memorandum FOL – Fact-of-Life Changes 15 Responding to Higher Headquarters Proposed Budget Execution Cut: Caselette Caselette provided in class 16 PPBE 17 Management Initiative Decision (MID) 913 (May 2003) Major Initiatives: • Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) shifted from the first to the second year of a new administration • Move to a two-year cycle • Off-year Strategic Planning Guidance (SPG)/Joint Programming Guidance (JPG) is optional (at the discretion of SECDEF); will not introduce major changes in off-year • Off-year review focus on execution and performance • Create a single standardized programming and budgeting system for data collection and management 18 MID 913 Changes to Program/Budget/Execution Review: • Transition to a true biennial process • Incorporate metrics and cost models – Focus on outputs: what are we getting for our money? • Over time, metrics will become the analytical underpinning to ascertain whether the appropriate allocation of resources exists 19 PPBE Phases • Planning – Assess capabilities / review threat – Develop guidance • Programming – Turn guidance into achievable, affordable packages – Six-year program (Future Years Defense Program) • Budgeting – Test for efficient funds execution – Scrub budget years – Prepare defensible budget • Execution Review (concurrent with program/budget review) – Develop performance metrics – Assess actual output against planned performance – Adjust resources to achieve desired performance goals 20 Four Years in the Biennial Cycle Corresponding to Four-Year Presidential Terms Year 1 (Review and Refinement): Early National Security Strategy (NSS) Off-year SPG/JPG as required (at discretion of SECDEF) Limited Changes to Baseline Program Year 2 (Formalize the Agenda): Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) – Aligned with PB submission in second year of an administration Fiscal Guidance Issued On-year SPG/JPG (implementing QDR) POM/BES Submissions Year 3 (Execution of Guidance): Off-year SPG/JPG as required (at discretion of SECDEF) Limited Changes to Baseline Program Year 4 (Ensuring the Legacy): Fiscal Guidance Issued On-year SPG/JPG (refining alignment of strategy and programs) POM/BES Submissions 21 Planning Phase SEP DEC 1st Year President National Security Council CIA/DIA/JCS/OSD NSS Notes • SPG replaces Draft Defense Planning Guidance (DPG) • JPG replaces DPG 1st year of a new administration MAR APR/MAY 2nd Year COCOM – Combatant Commander CPR – Chairman’s Pgm Recommendation JPD – Joint Planning Document JPG – Joint Programming Guidance NSS – National Security Strategy NMS – National Military Strategy QDR – Quadrennial Defense Review SPG – Strategic Planning Guidance CPR SECDEF JCS COCOMs SERVICES NMS JPD Strategy also reflected in QDR (2nd year of new administration) SPG JCS, OSD, COCOMs, SVC HQs, ETC. JPG 22 Concurrent Program/Budget Review AUG OSD/ OMB 3-Star Group Issue Resolution SECDEF SLRG POM Services PEO/PM, SVC HQs COCOMs BES NOV OCT JCS CPA JAN/FEB BES – Budget Estimate Submission COCOM – Combatant Commander CPA – Chairman’s Pgm Assessment MBI – Major Budget Issues PB – President’s Budget PBD – Program Budget Decision PDM – Program Decision Memo POM – Program Objectives Memo SLRG – Senior Leadership Review Group Notes • 3-Star Group replaces Program Review Group (PRG) • SLRG replaces Defense Resources Board (DRB) OSD/ OMB Adv Ques/ Hearings PBDs Updates FYDP PDM DEC Services / PEO / PM Answer / Reclama MBI PB Updates FYDP 23 FY 07–11 Program/Budget Process Overview • Procedural changes for FY 07-11 may not be institutionalized • USD(C) & Dir, PA&E co-leads for process • OSD emphasis is keeping biennial budget process & minimizing off-year changes; FY 06 Pres Bud is baseline • Fact-of-Life (FOL) changes for FY07 allow Services/Agencies to “fix” FY 07 due to PBD 753 & other defined issues; programmatic decisions will NOT be revisited • Out-years impacted by PBD 753 should be deferred, to the extent possible, to the FY 08– 13 cycle • Services/Agencies will prepare Change Proposals (CPs) to implement very limited, defined adjustments • OSD will prepare CPs required to implement BRAC/QDR decisions • Senior Leadership Review Group (SLRG) will meet periodically to review/decide issues • Services/Agencies not to propose offsets to National Intelligence Program (NIP) for nonNIPs 24 FY 07–11 Program/Budget Schedule • • • • May 31 Aug 1 Aug 15 Sep 6 • Sep 23 • Sep 28 • Sep 30 • Oct-Nov • Dec 20 • Jan Military Departments’ composite rates due FOL budget estimate notification memos due OSD disposition of FOL changes Service/Agency CPs due; accepted & other OSD-directed documentation due electronically Hardcopy data submission complete Detailed budget justification material due OSD completes review of Service/Agency CPs (accept/reject) BRAC/QDR review & related OSD-generated CPs Program & Budget review complete DoD budget submitted to OMB 25 Off-Year Process 2005 (FY 07-11) 1 AUG FOL Notification Memo to USD(C) & Dir, PA&E 15 AUG OSD Staff Review 6 SEP Svcs/Agencies Accepted FOLs Entered into OSD Data Base 30 SEP OCT-DEC JAN-FEB Budget Lock Pres Bud OSD Completes Services/Agencies CP Review SLRG Review of CPs OSD FOL Decisions Electronic OSD-Required R/P Forms Due Services & Agencies PDM(s) & PBDs Issued Services/Agencies CPs Due to OSD FOL - Fact -of- Life CP - Change Proposal SLRG - Senior Leadership Review Group QDR - Quadrennial Defense Review BRAC - Base Realignment & Closure PDM - Program Decision Memorandum PBD - Program Budget Decision R-Forms - Research & Development Forms P-Forms - Procurement Forms 20 DEC OSD – Prepared BRAC/QDR CPs Submitted 26 BACKUP SLIDES 27 Responding to Higher HQ Don’t – Say program is unexecutable with a 1% cut – Give long impact statements that say nothing – Not respond Do – Discuss scope not done relative to user’s needs – Provide user’s priority on work not done – Address impact to program’s change in risk and/or major program milestones – Be prepared for 5%, 10%, 25%, and 50% proposed cuts 28 Obligation Plan What · · · · Spending Plan Monthly Prediction All Available Years Required for Each Program Element / Line Item How · Anticipated Obligation Rate · Don’t Show Preponderance of : ·· 1st Quarter Awards ·· 4th Quarter Awards Deviation Who · Prepared by PMO · Coordinated with PCO · Reviewed by Comptroller Each Budget Update Why · Supports Budget Enactment · Analyze for Budget Execution · If Not On Plan... (Maybe Not A Firm Requirement) · Best Prediction for Future Performance · Variances: Planned vs Actual · PMO Written Explanation · Each Month More Vulnerable: ·· Potential Billpayer ·· Report Card/Predict Trends Decisions · · · · Basis for BES & Pres Budget Basis for Appropriation Impacts on Program Reviews Impacts on Billpayer Exercises 29 Obligation Plan FY 99 RDT&E OBLIGATION/EXPENDITURE A/0 Jun 99 Obligations Plan Mth Plan Cum Actual Cum Variance Cum Var Cum % Expenditures Plan Mth Plan Cum Actual Cum Variance Cum Var Cum % $M (TY) Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 5 5 5 25 2 2 16 15 10 5 5 5 5 10 15 40 42 44 60 75 85 90 95 100 3 4 5 6 8 12 32 34 35 2 6 10 34 34 32 28 41 50 40% 60% 67% 85% 81% 73% 47% 55% 59% 1 1 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 2 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 25 25 0 1 4 7 12 17 21 5 10 0% 50% 80% 70% 80% 85% 84% 17% 29% 5 40 10 50 5 55 30 Execution Laws • Misappropriation Act [Title 31, U.S. Code, Sec 1301] – Requires funds to be used only for the purposes and programs for which the appropriation was made. – AKA “The Purpose Statute” • Anti-Deficiency Act [Title 31, U.S. Code, Sec 1341 & 1517 ] – Prohibits making or authorizing an obligation in excess of the amount available. – Forbids obligation to pay money from the US Treasury in advance of an appropriation. – Requires agency to fix responsibility for violations of the Act. • Bona Fide Need Rule: – Requires funds to be used only for needs or services in the year of the appropriations obligation period. 31 CONTRACT FUNDS STATUS REPORT (DD Fm 1586) • Formerly required by DoD 5000.2-R to obtain funding data on contracts over six months in duration • Purpose of CFSR is to assist Components in: • Updating and forecasting contract fund requirements; • Planning and decision making on funding changes; • Developing fund requirements and budget estimates in support of approved programs; • Determining funds in excess of contract needs and available for deobligation •Obtaining rough estimates for termination costs • No specific dollar threshold specified but generally applicable to non- firm fixed priced contracts in excess of $ 1.2 Million (in FY 96 constant dollars) • As an exception, applicable to unpriced portions of firm fixed price contracts estimated to be in excess of 20 % of initial contract value 32 Working Capital Funds • DEFINITION: Revolving funds or Working Capital Funds are used to finance operations from the time that specific work is begun until payment is received from the customer • STATUTORY BASIS: Title 10, U.S. Code (Section 2208), the SECDEF may direct establishment of working capital funds within DoD • PURPOSES: – Finance inventories of such supplies as SECDEF may designate – Provide working capital for industrial-type activities and commercial-type activities that provide common services within or among military departments and DoD agencies 34 Defense Business Operations Fund (DBOF) • Congress established DBOF as a revolving fund in 1991 • DBOF was initially created to consolidate nine stock and industrial funds • Reasons: - Improvements in business practices - Full cost visibility - Stabilized rates - Application of standard policies across business functions 35 DBOF to Working Capital Funds • FY 1997 Defense Authorization Act directed DoD to conduct comprehensive study of DBOF and present study findings and proposed improvement plan to Congress for approval. • DoD initiated some of the needed changes, creating these working capital funds: – – – – – Army Working Capital Fund Navy Working Capital Fund Air Force Working Capital Fund Defense-Wide Working Capital Fund Defense Commissary Agency Working Capital Fund 36 Working Capital Funds Congress Revolving Fund Annual Appropriation $$ Payment Customer “One-time” Corpus $$ Financing Order Goods or Services Provided Business Area 37 How Do Working Capital Funds Work? • Individual Business Areas operate as a business with “break even” budgets • Stabilized rates and prices established to cover full cost of operating and overhead costs – Rates remain unchanged in year of execution – Rates adjusted in following year to account for any shortfalls or profits 38 Working Capital Funds & Functions Army Working Capital Fund Depot Maintenance Information Services Ordnance Supply Management Navy Working Capital Fund Base Support Depot Maintenance - Aircraft Depot Maintenance - Marine Corps Depot Maintenance - Ships Information Services Ordnance Research and Development Supply Management Transportation 39 Working Capital Funds & Functions Air Force Working Capital Fund Depot Maintenance Information Services Supply Management Transportation USTRANSCOM Defense - Wide Working Capital Fund Defense Printing Distribution Depots Financial Operations Information Services Reutilization & Marketing Supply Management DAPS DLA DFAS DFAS, DISA, DLA DLA DLA Defense Commissary Agency Working Capital Fund Commissary Operations 40 Life Cycle Cost Categories Program Cost % Includes: Operations and Support Costs System Ships O&S Yrs 30 Aircraft 20 Missiles 20 Tracked Vehicles 20 Disposal Cost Investment Cost R & D Cost CE PDRR DISPOSAL EMD PRODUCTION, DEPLOYMENT and OPERATIONAL SUPPORT 41