Chapter 1 An Introduction to Rhetoric Key Elements of Rhetoric Rhetoric: The art of analyzing all the choices involving language that a writer, speaker, reader, or listener might make a situation so that the text becomes meaningful, purposeful and effective; the specific features of texts, written or spoken, that cause them to be meaningful, purposeful, and effective for readers or listeners in a situation. Key Elements of Rhetoric Rhetorical Choices: The particular choices a writer or speaker makes to achieve meaning, purpose, or effect. Rhetorical situation: the convergence in a situation of exigency (the need to write), audience and purpose. Rhetorical Triangle: more on this later. Rhetoric is always situational: it has a context – the occasion or the time and place it was written or spoken – and a purpose or goal that the speaker or writer wants to achieve. Rhetoric Man is effective because he has an occasion and a goal or purpose. Think about it, without them, what use is he? He just looks like a rocker from the 80s. When we read any text, we ask about the context in which it was written. Then we consider the purpose. Is the speaker trying to win agreement? persuade us to action? evoke sympathy? make us laugh? inform, provoke, celebrate, repudiate? Sometimes context arises from current events or cultural bias. What is bias? Ex. Someone writes about freedom of speech in a community that has experienced hate graffiti must take that context into account and adjust the purpose of the piece so as not to offend the audience. Think of some examples where you would consider the context of what you have to say. Here it is, the Aristotelian rhetorical triangle Speaker Audience Subject Then you evaluate what you already know about it What others have said about it And what kind of evidence or proof will sufficiently develop your position. Aristotle called the person that a writer took on as a speaker as a persona. A persona is the character the speaker creates when he or she writes or speaks This depends on the context, purpose, subject and audience. Are you speaking as a poet, comedian, scholar, expert, critic, citizen, etc. Before you speak, you must consider your audience. What do they know about your topic? What do they feel about your topic? How will you communicate with them to listen to you? Speaker Audience Subject Ethos- the credibility of the speaker Logos-the reasoning or logic in the speaker’s argument. Pathos- Emotion of the speech (not necessarily the speaker’s, but more explanation in a minute.) Ethos = Ethical appeal Logos = Logical appeal Pathos = Emotional appeal Ethos = Ethics=Ethical appeal If someone is ethical they have credibility. Ethical appeal has to do with the speaker. Is the speaker ethically credible? This does not mean whether or not the speaker is a good person. It means the speaker appeals to the audience as a credible source. If a speaker wants to talk to you about adolescent alcoholism, what kind of speaker would have the most ethical appeal? If a teacher wants to teach you about algebra, what kind of teacher would have the most ethical appeal? Acknowledge a counterargument. to anticipate objections or opposing views. You agree (concede) that an opposing argument may be true, but then you deny (refute) the validity of all or part of the argument. THIS STRENGTHENS YOUR ARGUMENT!!! It shows you really thought about it. Pathos = emotion = emotional appeal Does the writing appeal or create emotions in the reader? Too much emotional appeal is rarely effective, but if a skilled writer tells an anecdote or uses certain figurative language, he or she can create an emotional appeal to the audience. An argument that appeals only to the emotions is by definition weak—it’s generally considered propaganda. When you write or analyze, consider how the essay and its individual paragraphs or sections are arranged. HOW A WRITER STRUCTURES THE ARGUMENT WITHIN A FRAMEWORK DEPENDS UPON HIS OR HER INTENDED PURPOSE AND EFFECT Read pages 13-25 Label your book Arrangement/ Organization Read and take notes on (you can work in groups of three and do three each) The Classical Model Narration Description Process Analysis Exemplification Comparison Contrast Classification and Division Definition Cause and Effect The introduction – introduces the audience to the subject. In latin, the word exordium means “beginning a web.” No matter how long, it piques the interest of the reader. This is where the writer often establishes his or her ethical appeal. Why is this important in this spot? The narration provides factual information and background material on the subject at hand. The level of detail a writer uses depends upon the audience’s knowledge of the subject. This often appeals to emotions because often the writer tries to make the audience have an emotional response to the importance of an issue. The confirmation, usually the major part of the text, includes the development or the proof needed to make the writer’s case—the nuts and bolts of an essay. This contains the most specific and concrete detail in the text. This has the strongest appeal to logos. The refutation addresses the counterargument. It is often a bridge between the writer’s proof and conclusion. This is often placed near the end, but it may be placed anywhere in the writing. The conclusion brings the essay to a close. It can be one or several paragraphs. Here the writer usually appeals to emotions and reminds the reader of the ethos established earlier. Do not repeat what came before, but make sure the last words and ideas of a text are those the audience is MOST LIKELY TO REMEMBER Narration Writers often use narration as a way to enter into their topics. Everyone loves a good story. (Remember that!) Rebecca Walker tells a story about her son to lead into her explanation of why she put together the anthology Putting Down the Gun (p. 412). Description Description emphasizes the senses by painting a picture of how something looks, sounds, smells, tastes, or feels. Description is often used to establish the mood of the piece. Mood plays in to the message and persuasion. Process analysis This explains how something works, how to do something or how something was done, We use this when we explain how to bake bread, set up an Excel spreadsheet, etc. The key to successful process analysis is clarity: it’s important to explain a subject clearly and logically, with transitions that mark the sequence of major steps, stages, or phases of the process Examples Providing a series of examples—facts, cases or instances—turns a general idea into a concrete one. You can use one long one or several in a row. You are familiar with someone saying “Let me give you an example.” Aristotle taught that examples are a type of logical proof called induction. That is a series of specific examples leads to a general conclusion. Read an excerpt from “I know Why the Caged Bird Cannot Read”by Francine Prose. Identify her argument. Comparison and Contrast: juxtaposing two things to highlight their similarities and differences. This is used often on examinations where you have to discuss subtle differences. It is important for readers to sort material into major categories. Answer “What goes together and why?” You may be asked to analyze and essay that offers categories or to apply them. Most of the time a writer’s task is to develop his or her own categories and to find a distinctive way of breaking down a larger idea into parts. Often a definition is used to clarify a term. In discourse, however, often a writer will take an entire essay to establish what is a definition of something. “In Search of the Good Family” by Jane Howard. She analyzes ten characteristics that define a family. This depends upon crystal clear logic. It is often signaled by a why in the title or opening paragraph. In “I know Why the Caged Bird Cannot Read” Francine Prose sets out what she believes are the causes for high school student’s lack of enthusiasm for reading. Check Diagnostic Test answers for at least 1-23. Write four facts you learned. Finish notes Read pg. 26-27 and take notes Be able to answer the question: What causes rhetoric to miss the mark (think speaker, audience, subject, context). Typically a 3 part statement Major premise, minor premise, and conclusion All humans are mortal. Mrs. Sloat is a human. Mrs. Sloat is mortal. Be careful that is logical and not generalized. Ad Hoc Argument- Latin for “To the Thing” or “For it’s Purpose” Adding to your argument on the spot to make it valid Fallacy: Person A: "No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge.“ Person B: "But my uncle Angus likes sugar with his porridge.“ Person A: "Ah yes, but no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge." Circular reasoning Based on a faulty assumption Circular reasoning is bad. Therefore, it is not good. Bellringer- Complete the logos, pathos, and ethos sheet Read “Our Barbies, Our Selves” Identify the parts of the Rhetorical Triangle Identify the context and purpose Identify the writer’s thesis Does she present a counterargument? If so, what? Pick 10 of the terms below On one side write the term On the other side, write key terms from the definition or draw a picture Rhetoric, rhetorical triangle, context, purpose, subject, speaker, audience, ethos, logos, pathos, counterargument, classical model, narration pattern of development, description pattern of development, process analysis, exemplification, comparison/contrast, cause and effect Take the quiz Re-read “Our Barbies, Our Selves” Annotate (take notes/add observations) and highlight Define all college level words Which patterns of development/organizational choices did she use? Highlight/mark examples of logos, pathos, and ethos Do you agree with the Ken paragraph? Why or why not?