November 5, 2003 EDUCAUSE Annual Conference A New Model for Open Sharing Anne H. Margulies “… to enlarge the boundaries of knowledge by undertaking voyages of discovery.” President Thomas Jefferson requesting funding for the Corps of Discovery in a Jan. 18, 1803, letter to the Congress 2 Agenda I. Vision II. Implementation III. Impact 3 Vision 4 Vision Institutional Decision-Making • Fall 1999 — Faculty committee appointed • Fall 2000 — OCW concept recommended to MIT President Charles M. Vest • April 2001 — MIT OCW announced in The New York Times 5 Vision Institutional Decision-Making “OpenCourseWare looks counter-intuitive in a market-driven world. But it really is consistent with what I believe is the best about MIT. It is innovative. It expresses our belief in the way education can be advanced – by constantly widening access to information and by inspiring others to participate.” – Charles M. Vest, President of MIT 6 Vision Vision to Reality • June 2001 — Funding partnership with the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation • September 2002 — MIT OCW Pilot site opened to the public – 50 courses from 23 academic disciplines • September 2003 — OCW officially launched – 500 courses from all five MIT schools and 33 academic disciplines 7 Vision What Is MIT OCW? MIT OpenCourseWare IS NOT: • An MIT education • Intended to represent or replace the actual interactive classroom environment • A distance education initiative MIT OpenCourseWare IS: • A Web-based publication of virtually all MIT course content • Open and available to the world • A permanent MIT activity 8 Vision Why Is MIT Doing This? • Furthers MIT’s fundamental mission • Embraces faculty values – Teaching – Contributing to their discipline • Counters the privatization of knowledge and champions the movement toward greater openness 9 Vision Dual Mission • Provide free access to MIT course materials for educators and learners • Create a model other universities may use to publish their own course materials MIT OCW success rests on four pillars: • Responsive, professional organization Communications Communications Infrastructure TechInfrastructure Tech & Processes Policies & Process Policies Organization Organization OCW Planning&& Evaluation Evaluation Planning • Sensible policies and efficient processes • Reliable, scalable technology infrastructure • Communication with MIT community, external audiences A foundation of continuous planning, evaluation, and feedback. 10 Vision Publication Timeline Phase I: Pilot 2002-03 Phase II: Expansion 2004-07 • Publish courses from five schools, 33 disciplines 9/02 Proof-ofConcept Pilot 50 courses • Publish hundreds of courses • Offer complete curriculum tracks • Work with like-minded institutions on “opencoursewares” 9/03 Launch 500 courses Phase III: Steady State 2008• Publish 2,000 courses • Foster consortium 9/07 Steady State 11 Implementation 12 Implementation Scaling Up to 500 Courses 13 Implementation Publication Process Managing a Course Through the OCW Process Recruit faculty and courses Plan Build Publish Support • Transcribe, convert materials • Identify IP • Input content • Add metadata • • • • • Edit/add • Respond to inquiries • Troubleshoot • Design layout • Scrub content • Clear IP • Initial QA Test site Final QA Faculty signoff Stage for publish OCW = Snapshot of Completed Course 14 Implementation Technology MIT Facilities OCW Publishing Environment Origin Server Search, Feedback Content Distribution Network (Akamai) Thousands of servers around the world deliver MIT OCW course materials 15 Implementation What It Took To Make It Happen • Technology – Implemented Microsoft CMS 2002 with workflow, metadata, and reports – Implemented Apache, Tomcat, Lucene Search Engine, Perl Publishing engine, and Akamai for content delivery – Implemented FileMaker for pipeline management, Netraker for external user surveys, Akamai Sitewise for site statistics 16 Implementation Planning and Evaluation PROGRAM Access Use Web analytics Online intercept surveys Supplemental surveys Interviews Site feedback analysis PROCESS Efficiency Impact Effectiveness Financial reports Level of effort tracking database IP operations tracking database Content audit Faculty survey 17 Impact 18 Impact Data Over Time Monthly Traffic–- Launch Launch 2002 to to October 20032003 OCWOCW Monthly Traffic 2002 October 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 5,000,000 Page PageViews Views 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 t.) O ct 20 03 (e s 20 03 Au g 20 03 Ju ne 20 03 Ap ril 20 03 Fe b 20 02 ec D h 20 02 0 La un c Pages 6,000,000 19 Impact Geographic Data NATION # OF HITS 1. Canada 6,495,090 Top 15 User Countries Outside the United States * 2. United Kingdom 5,466,263 3. Germany 4,769,433 *Web hits as of Sept. 30, 2003 4. Brazil 3,929,334 5. Japan 3,870,805 6. South Korea 3,824,790 7. India 3,640,055 8. France 3,361,879 9. Hong Kong 2,960,400 10. China 2,193,580 11. Taiwan 2,143,839 12. Australia 2,074,719 13. Spain 1,825,894 14. Italy 1,816,695 15. Singapore 1,511,503 20 Impact User Feedback Data • 9,500 emails to ocw@mit.edu – Majority (60+ percent) are grateful or congratulatory – Other inquiries • How to register • Technical questions • Inquiries from other educators • Vendors – Negative responses (less than 3 percent) • 17,000 subscribers to monthly email newsletter 21 Impact Translations • 24 courses in Spanish and Portuguese site through Universia.net partnership • Individual courses in 10 languages 22 Impact Benefits for MIT Faculty • Enables faculty to contribute to their discipline – Providing a common repository of educational materials – Making their materials visible to colleagues • Leads to collaboration – Extending relationships between MIT faculty, students and the world – Stimulating interdisciplinary teaching and research 23 Impact Benefits for MIT Faculty MIT Reaction: Faculty Musical composition by Jonathan Foust, from “A Touch of Grace” 24 Impact Benefits for Educators • Facilitates curriculum development – Establish or revise course offerings • Enables pedagogical development – Develop or enhance methods for teaching a particular course – Establish or revise course syllabi and calendars • Contributes to course content development – Integrate new materials into an existing course – Add elements (e.g. simulations, problem sets, exams) 25 Impact Benefits for Educators World Reaction: Educators Musical composition by Jonathan Foust, from “A Touch of Grace” 26 Impact Benefits for Learners • Offers reference material and learning activities – Explore new areas and gaining new insights – Stay current in a particular area of interest – Review and update previous educational experiences – Utilize reading lists, resource lists as research tool 27 Impact Benefits for Learners World Reaction: Self-learners Musical composition by Jonathan Foust, from “A Touch of Grace” 28 Impact Emerging “OpenCourseWares” • Other OCWs are beginning to appear • Some using the materials, some using the format, some using the idea 29 Impact What Does It Mean? • Continues to be tremendous excitement • The vision is achievable • The impact of MIT OCW will be significant 30 Impact Extending OCW Beyond MIT • Share evaluation findings • Develop and implement outreach “how to” Web site to assist other institutions • Host an annual conference, workshops, and meetings • Provide advice as needed and able 31 “I trust that the discoveries we have made will not remain long unimproved… will promote the cause of liberty and the honour of America… and will relieve distressed humanity.” Meriwether Lewis in a speech at Charlottesville, Va., on Nov. 15, 1806 32 Thank You! • Implementing “OpenCourseWare” on your Campus Discussion Wednesday, November 5, 2003 1 to 2 p.m. Anaheim Convention Center, Room 208A • MIT OpenCourseWare Poster Session Teaching and Learning Track Thursday, November 6, 2003 4:55 p.m. to 6:10 p.m. Exhibit Hall B, Table 29 33