Development of the Constitution Something Must Be Done AOC stink Annapolis Convention – 1786 Originally meant to discuss trade regulations Only five states show up Representatives agree – Must discuss strengthening the government Idea is popular among states Background - The Constitutional Convention of 1787 Met in Philly Examine and recommend changes to the existing Articles of Confederation May – Sept 1787 Composition – Who was there? Wealthy upper class, white men Selected by state legislatures, not popular vote Notable names not present George Washington Ben Franklin Alexander Hamilton James Madison Roger Sherman John Adams (minister to England) Thomas Jefferson (minister to France) Regardless, there was a ton of political talent at this convention Virginia Delegation Led by James Madison Had every intention of creating a new constitution This is Virginia’s mission in Philadelphia Virginia Plan crafted by Madison presented by Edmund Randolph Initial Decisions - The Constitutional Convention of 1787 Presiding officer – George Washington – Why? _____________________________ _____________________________ Every state - one vote Proceedings held in secret Concerned newspapers would criticize decisions Not democratic The delegates want a government that was … Firm, dignified, respected at home and abroad Strong against instability at home From the start, decided the A of C were too flawed Virginians set the tone - introduced Virginia Plan They weren’t authorized to change AOC, but they did it anyway Two Plans Virginia Plan Presented by Edmund Randolph – Gov from Virginia Three branches – legislature strongest Bicameral house 50% required to pass legislation Strong federal government Could veto state laws Smaller states object since they would have no influence New Jersey Plan Proposed by William Paterson – delegate Presented as a series of amendments to the AOC Unicameral house Would create an executive, a judiciary, federal taxes, federal regulation of trade But would require a unanimous vote to pass these taxes, trade regs Larger states rejected since smaller states would have equal power Centrist View The Virginia Plan became seen as a centrist plan because NJ Plan was a glorified A of C Alexander Hamilton introduced the idea of a constitutional monarchy Far more conservative than the Virginia Plan This was calculated to help Va. Plan Connecticut Compromise (Great Compromise) Roger Sherman is the architect for this plan Have a Legislature where the lower house was popularly elected assigned delegates based on population House of Representatives The Upper house would have equal reps from each state The Senate Elected by state legislatures Only need 50% of the vote to pass legislation Model for our legislature Federalist/Anti-Federalist Compromises Independent v. Congressionally controlled judiciary Executive Branch – Art. 2 – Series of compromises Should there be an Executive Branch? How many executives? Control foreign policy, but Senate had to approve all diplomats and treaties President is C-in-C, but only congress can declare war Would there be a popular vote? - No way The people are dummies Birth of electoral college Slavery – Compromises The framers built slavery into the fabric of our government However, they are careful to never use the term “slavery” in the Constitution. 1. 2. 3/5 Compromise Slave Trade and Commerce Clause These items would pose big problems for those trying to remove slavery in the future. Differences Between Articles and Constitution… Passing Legislation Constitution – simple majority – easier to get things done A of C – two-thirds Executive Constitution – a single President – not a lot of power at first (would get stronger) A of C – No executive Power of the Federal Government Constitution – potentially strong A of C – very weak Amendment process Constitution – 2/3 of both houses of Congress + ¾ of State conventions A of C – virtually impossible - need a unanimous vote Constitution The Constitution is a less democratic document Takes power away from common voters More aristocratic Creates a stronger federal government – this is a danger in the eyes of many Ratification Process If two-thirds of the states ratify, the Constitution would go into effect Every state had to go through a ratification process, hold a convention, and elect delegates to the convention This sets up two groups: the Federalists and the Anti- Federalists Federalists –vs- Anti-Federalists Anti-Federalists Opposed Constitution More democratic States rights Wanted strong local government, not fed government Small farmers, small business people, artisans. Felt they didn’t need a strong government to protect their interests Less funded, less educated, less organized Federalists Supported Constitution Most of the distinguished people in the country George Washington, John Adams, Ben Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay Well-funded, well-organized, politically experienced Wanted a strong federal government Wanted a strong executive Wanted a government that was respected abroad and at home put down insurrections Act decisively – even if done by sacrificing some rights Ratification Constitution was drafted and signed by 39 delegates on Sept 17, 1787 Some states were very pro-constitution and they ratified easily. Dec 1787-Jan 1788 Delaware Pennsylvania New Jersey Georgia Connecticut Other states followed between Feb – Jun in 1788 Massachusetts Maryland S Carolina New Hampshire Final group of four NY N Carolina Rhode Island Virginia Why was 9 of 13 states, as Article VII stated was required, insufficient? Federalist Papers 85 pamphlets & essays supporting the Constitution Cited in Constitutional interpretation debates Written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, & John Jay Lens into the ideas of the founding fathers Large government would provide stability and security Federalist #10 – How to create a strong government while preserving freedom Federalist #51 – Separation of powers and checks and balances Bill of Rights Anti-federalists refused to sign the Constitution Anti-federalists tried to influence state ratification processes by writing pamphlets and newspaper articles Did not protect the people against the central government Needed a statement of individual freedoms Required to prevent the country from falling into tyranny They would often take on pseudonyms of the Roman Republic, like Brutus Some argued that the federal government would degenerate into a tyrannical entity Federal Bill of Rights - #1 priority of the new Congress