Problem Patient or Problem Prescription? Ken Roy, MD Tulane Department of Psychiatry Addiction Recovery Resources of New Orleans 504-780-2766 www.arrno.org Scope Problem patients Problem prescriptions Classes of addicting drugs Recognition of addiction What to do about problem patients Potential Problem Patients Family history of alcoholism External locus of control Pain persistent or out of proportion Litigation Multiple meds Problem Prescriptions Soma, Fiorinal, Valium, Xanax Ritalin, Adderall Vicodin, Percodan, Ultram, OxyContin Classes of Addicting Drugs Related to the reinforcing pathway Three main classes Sedative hypnotics and opioids contain the vast majority of problem prescriptions Sedative Hypnotics Active in the GABA system Alcohol Benzodiazepines (Rohypnol) Barbiturates (Fiorinal) Anxiolytics & Hypnotics (Ambien, Soma, Sonata) Opiates Active in the endorphin systems Vicodin, other oxy & hydro codones Especially ES formulations & OxyContin Ultram Methadone Stimulants Active in the dopamine system Amphetamines (Adderall) Others (Ritalin, Cylert) *Decongestants The Case Against Chronic Sedative Hypnotics Short term anxiolytic in non-recovering patients No controversy Effects on the GABA system Effects on mood, anxiety and insomnia Alternatives The GABA System Cause tolerance (40,42,43) Down regulate receptors (36,37,38) And receptor function (39,40) Decrease effect of endogenous anxiolytics (41) Cause physical dependence (59) Mood, Anxiety and Insomnia Paradoxical anxiety with long term use (45) Cause depression (54,55,56,57) Not effective long term for sleep (44) Make opiates less effective (58) No evidence of long term efficacy for PTSD (60) Alternatives to Sedative Hypnotics (Benzo’s) SSRI’s and TCA’s Better for GAD (46,47,48,49) Better for panic (49,50,51,52) Better for agoraphobia (53) Better for “stress” (61) Quetiapine, Trazodone, Doxepin, etc. The Case Against Chronic Opiates Chronic Pain Acute vs. chronic pain The effects on the endogenous opiate system The effects on the perception of pain The effects on activity and behavior Alternatives to chronic opiate analgesia in Acute vs.Chronic Pain Acute - perioperative, traumatic, infectious No controversy (except monitoring for relapse) Chronic Malignant or progressive No controversy Non malignant Huge controversy (1) Chronic Non-Malignant Pain Subjective pain relief Few studies Urban - 5 patients (2) Taub & Tennant - both anecdotal (3,4) Portnoy - reduced perception of pain in 1/3 (5) Improvement in function Not demonstrated (1,6) It Doesn’t Work “Overall, the use of opioids in chronic pain of non malignant origin will achieve analgesic benefit in some patients, while improved function has not yet been adequately demonstrated.”(1) “Until opioid therapy can be shown to yield long term outcomes that are superior, we cannot endorse it as a treatment of choice for chronic non cancer pain.” (7) Even in Non Addicts “In patients with treatment resistant chronic regional pain of soft tissue or musculoskeletal origin, nine weeks of oral morphine in doses of up to 120 mg daily may confer analgesic benefit with a low risk of addiction, but is unlikely to yield psychological or functional benefit.” (6) The Endogenous Opiate System Tolerance B-Endorphin neurons become tolerant after chronic morphine administration (8) Release of Pro-opiomelanocortin-derived peptides decreased in tolerance (9) Pro-opiomelanocortin synthesis and B-Endorphin utilization down-regulated in morphine tolerance (10,11) The Perception of Pain Chronic opiates cause sensitization Hyperalgesia caused by noxious stimulation is similar to hyperalgesia caused by chronic opiates (15) Thermal hyperalgesia develops in morphine tolerance (16) Activity and Behavior Depression Opiates and opiate system implicated in model of learned helplessness (17,18) Opiates cause depression (19,20) Potential for relapse Opiate use increases potential for relapse (21,22,23) Alternatives Multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment programs Nerve Blocks (24) Psychotherapy (25,26,27,28,29) Acupuncture (30) Exercise (25,31,32) Spiritual growth and recovery (33) Substance Abuse Ubiquitous Social problem Legal problem Economic Problem Criteria for Substance Abuse Recurrent use affecting role obligations Recurrent use where hazardous Recurrent use causing legal problems Recurrent use causing social or interpersonal problems Prevalence Almost 50% of persons age 21 abuse alcohol 70% drink 22% of persons 18 – 22 years of age use illicit drugs 76% are employed Rate in college students 21% Treatment Harm reduction strategies Designated Driver Education and conversation Response to behavior Don’t excuse behavior Don’t remove consequences Most people discontinue SUBSTANCE ABUSE unless they develop SUBSTANCE DEPENDENCE Criteria for Substance Dependence A maladaptive pattern of use, causing significant impairment or distress as manifested by three (or more) of the following seven criteria, occurring at any time in the same twelve months Tolerance, as defined by: a need for increased amounts to achieve effect markedly diminished effect from using the same amount Substance Dependence continued withdrawal, as manifested by: characteristic withdrawal syndrome the same substance is used to avoid or relieve withdrawal symptoms the substance is taken in larger amounts or over a longer period than was intended there is a persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control use Substance Dependence continued a great deal of time is spent in activities necessary to obtain or use the substance or recover from it’s effects important social, occupational, or recreational activities are given up or reduced because of substance use Substance Dependence continued the substance use is continued despite knowledge of having a persistent or recurring physical or psychological problem that is likely to have been caused or exacerbated by the substance (ulcer, depression, etc.) Incidence of Substance Dependence 14.1% National Comorbidity Study 1994 Other drug dependencies in 7.5% of these 5% to 15% is the range in previous studies Substance Dependence Shorthand Compulsion Loss of Control Continued use in the face of adverse consequences The Disease of Addiction Criteria for a disease Recognizable symptoms Predictable Course Common Cause The Course of Addictive Disease Progressive Affects all organ systems Associated with the cause of death A disease of relationships Disturbance in the relationship with self and others Based on dishonesty in the form of denial The Cause of Addictive Disease Genetic Experience - Family History Family Studies Twin Studies Adoption Studies Importance of Disease Orientation Cause - not Effect of Something Else Therefore a primary illness Helps to understand Denial Providers don’t blame their patients Patients Have a Healthy Target to Work on Impact on Treatment Abstinence is the Only Reasonable Goal Denial is the Primary and Universal Symptom Preserves the Right to Drink or Use Identification With Others Possible Use Alters Neurotransmitters OK Not to Have Coping Skills Treatment Takes Time Levels of Care can provide time Contribution of Environment Similarity to TB Impact of Using on Emotional Development Abstinence Similarity to Diabetes AA/NA/GA/RR not MM Common Experiences Fellowship Impact on Emotional Development Getting Help Public Sector Overcrowded, under funded, restrictive 32 Detox beds – 900 waiting for treatment Private Sector Effective, welcoming, shame reducing Requires Parity (Non-discrimination) for maximal effectiveness Current insurance coverage inadequate and often inappropriate So, what do I do? Call it like you see it Don’t shame the patient May point out consequences Be realistic, don’t try to “scare” the patient Refer to appropriate addiction specific practices JPSAC Public ARRNO Private – Insurance, etc