Visual Perception
Cecilia R. Aragon
IEOR 170
UC Berkeley
Spring 2006
Acknowledgments
• Thanks to slides and publications by Pat
Hanrahan, Christopher Healey, Maneesh
Agrawala, and Lawrence Anderson-Huang.
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
2
Visual perception
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Structure of the Retina
Preattentive Processing
Detection
Estimating Magnitude
Change Blindness
Multiple Attributes
Gestalt
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
3
Visual perception and psychophysics
Psychophysics is concerned with establishing
quantitative relations between physical
stimulation and perceptual events.
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
4
Structure of the Retina
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
5
Structure of the Retina
• The retina is not a camera!
• Network of photo-receptor
cells (rods and cones) and
their connections
[Anderson-Huang, L.
http://www.physics.utoledo.edu/~lsa/
_color/18_retina.htm]
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
6
Photo-transduction
• When a photon enters a receptor cell (e.g. a rod
or cone), it is absorbed by a molecule called 11cis-retinal and converted
to trans form.
• The different shape
causes it to ultimately
reduce the electrical
conductivity of the
photo-receptor cell.
[Anderson-Huang, L. http://www.physics.utoledo.edu/~lsa/_color/18_retina.htm]
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
7
Electric currents from photo-receptors
• Photo-receptors generate an
electrical current in the dark.
• Light shuts off the current.
• Each doubling of light causes
roughly the same reduction of
current (3 picoAmps for
cones, 6 for rods).
• Rods more sensitive, recover
more slowly.
• Cones recover faster,
overshoot.
• Geometrical response in
scaling laws of perception.
Spring 2006
[Anderson-Huang, L. http://www.physics
.utoledo.edu/~lsa/_color/18_retina.htm]
IEOR 170
8
Preattentive Processing
How many 5’s?
385720939823728196837293827
382912358383492730122894839
909020102032893759273091428
938309762965817431869241024
[Slide adapted from Joanna McGrenere http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~joanna/ ]
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
10
How many 5’s?
385720939823728196837293827
382912358383492730122894839
909020102032893759273091428
938309762965817431869241024
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
11
Preattentive Processing
• Certain basic visual properties are detected
immediately by low-level visual system
• “Pop-out” vs. serial search
• Tasks that can be performed in less than 200 to
250 milliseconds on a complex display
• Eye movements take at least 200 msec to
initiate
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
12
Color (hue) is preattentive
• Detection of red circle in group of blue circles is
preattentive
[image from Healey 2005]
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
13
Form (curvature) is preattentive
• Curved form “pops out” of display
[image from Healey 2005]
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
14
Conjunction of attributes
• Conjunction target generally cannot be detected
preattentively (red circle in sea of red square
and blue circle distractors)
[image from Healey 2005]
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
15
Healey applet
on preattentive processing
http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/healey/PP/index.html
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
16
Preattentive Visual Features
line orientation
length
width
size
curvature
number
terminators
intersection
Spring 2006
closure
color (hue)
intensity
flicker
direction of motion
stereoscopic depth
3D depth cues
IEOR 170
17
Cockpit dials
• Detection of a slanted line in a sea of vertical
lines is preattentive
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
18
Detection
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
19
Just-Noticeable Difference
• Which is brighter?
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
20
Just-Noticeable Difference
• Which is brighter?
(130, 130, 130)
Spring 2006
(140, 140, 140)
IEOR 170
21
Weber’s Law
• In the 1830’s, Weber made measurements of the justnoticeable differences (JNDs) in the perception of weight
and other sensations.
• He found that for a range of stimuli, the ratio of the JND
ΔS to the initial stimulus S was relatively constant:
ΔS / S = k
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
22
Weber’s Law
• Ratios more important than magnitude in
stimulus detection
• For example: we detect the presence of a
change from 100 cm to 101 cm with the same
probability as we detect the presence of a
change from 1 to 1.01 cm, even though the
discrepancy is 1 cm in the first case and only .01
cm in the second.
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
23
Weber’s Law
• Most continuous variations in magnitude are
perceived as discrete steps
• Examples: contour maps, font sizes
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
24
Estimating Magnitude
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
25
Stevens’ Power Law
• Compare area of circles:
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
26
Stevens’ Power Law
s(x) = axb
s is the sensation
x is the intensity of the
attribute
a is a multiplicative constant
b is the power
b > 1: overestimate
b < 1: underestimate
Spring 2006
[graph from Wilkinson 99]
IEOR 170
27
Stevens’ Power Law
Sensation
Exponent
Brightness
0.33
Smell
0.55 (Coffee)
Loudness
0.6
Temperature
1.0 (Cold)
Taste
1.3 (Salt)
Heaviness
1.45
Electric Shock
3.5
[Stevens 1961]
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
28
Stevens’ Power Law
Experimental results for b:
Length
Area
Volume
.9 to 1.1
.6 to .9
.5 to .8
Heuristic: b ~ 1/sqrt(dimensionality)
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
29
Stevens’ Power Law
• Apparent magnitude scaling
[Cartography: Thematic Map Design, p. 170, Dent, 96]
S = 0.98A0.87
[J. J. Flannery, The relative effectiveness of some graduated point symbols in the presentation
of quantitative data, Canadian Geographer, 8(2), pp. 96-109, 1971] [slide from Pat Hanrahan]
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
30
Relative Magnitude Estimation
Most accurate
Position (common) scale
Position (non-aligned) scale
Length
Slope
Angle
Least accurate
Spring 2006
Area
Volume
Color (hue/saturation/value)
IEOR 170
31
Change Blindness
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
32
Change Blindness
• An interruption in what is being seen causes us
to miss significant changes that occur in the
scene during the interruption.
• Demo from Ron Rensink:
http://www.psych.ubc.ca/~rensink/flicker/
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
33
Possible Causes of Change Blindness
[Simons, D. J. (2000), Current approaches to change blindness,
Visual Cognition, 7, 1-16. ]
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
34
Multiple Visual Attributes
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
35
The Game of Set
•
•
•
•
Color
Symbol
Number
Shading
A set is 3 cards such that
each feature is
EITHER the same on
each card OR is
different on each card.
[Set applet by Adrien Treuille, http://www.cs.
washington.edu/homes/treuille/resc/set/]
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
36
Multiple Visual Attributes
• Integral vs. separable
 Integral dimensions
 two or more attributes of an object are perceived holistically
(e.g.width and height of rectangle).
 Separable dimensions
 judged separately, or through analytic processing (e.g.
diameter and color of ball).
• Separable dimensions are orthogonal.
• For example, position is highly separable from
color. In contrast, red and green hue perceptions
tend to interfere with each other.
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
37
Integral vs. Separable Dimensions
Integral
Separable
[Ware 2000]
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
38
Gestalt
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
39
Gestalt Principles
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
figure/ground
proximity
similarity
symmetry
connectedness
continuity
closure
common fate
transparency
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
40
Examples
Proximity
Connectedness
[from Ware 2004]
Figure/Ground
[http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Modules/MC10220/visper07.html]
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
41
Conclusion
 What is currently known about visual perception
can aid the design process.
 Understanding low-level mechanisms of the
visual processing system and using that
knowledge can result in improved displays.
Spring 2006
IEOR 170
42