1 Negotiation Strategies Critical Concepts We negotiate everyday in all situations Negotiation can be mastered – need to understand the integral rules, strategies and practices. Power negotiating – ability to motivate the other party in a manner that is favorable to the negotiator’s objectives while making the other party feel as though he/she won. 2 The Process 3 Stages: Beginning – clarify objectives Middle – gather, confirm, exchange info End – agreement through compromise Important to take the negotiation through all 3 stages 3 Four Variables Power Time Knowledge Leverage How to use them to the negotiator’s best advantage 4 Power The 2 most common sources are: Competition – increases value The Written Word – credibility and authenticity 5 Another Source of Power Investment Time – incentive to reach agreement Money – obvious resources 1. Persuasive Capacity 2. Strong Sense of Commitment 6 Time Human Nature & Deadlines Timelines Hurried Negotiations – risk making concessions 7 Knowledge Diligent Research Information Gathering Priorities Deadlines Real Needs Organizational Pressures 8 Leverage Availability of other Resources Quality Power Financial Risk & Reward Marketability/Noteriority Walmart the perfect example 9 Beginning Power Negotiating Strategies The reluctant buyer/seller The moon, stars and sun The flinch The feel, felt, found technique First offer The vice technique 10 Middle-Stage Strategies The trade-off The set-aside technique Splitting the difference Referring to a higher authority 11 Ending Strategies Nibbling Good guy/bad guy The hot potato 12 Other Approaches Win/Win or Integrative Approach: Prospects for both side’s gains Reconcile positions Stability of results Open, empathetic communication 13 Tricks of the Trade Broadening the pie Nonspecific compensation Logrolling Cost-cutting Bridging 14 Other Approaches The Win/Lose or Distributive Approach Seek maximum gains Impose maximum loses Inherent instability Triangle balance on its apex 15 Other Approaches The Mixed Approach A mix between win/win and win/lose Long-term relationships need a more integrative approach (win/win) Stability of the outcome 16 Stability of the Outcome Focus on objectives (ancillary points destructive in the beginning) Fairness Flexibility Listen and compromise Trade-offs and concessions 17 Negotiation is not a Competitive Sport Negotiation is a series of episodes Always need to find and reach agreements If lock into a position – narrow range of acceptable outcomes Short-term thinking yields short-term gains and is counter-productive Feeling like a loser – decreases likelihood of commitment and fulfillment 18 Negotiation is not a Competitive Sport Treating a counter-part as an opponent and not a partner negatively impacts the collaborative process and decreases the chances for commitment. Every negotiation is an episode in an ongoing relationship Bargaining and trust are essential Mutual understandings 19 Negotiation is not a Competitive Sport Bluffing v. Lying Spying v. Information-Gathering Autonomy v. Coalition Building 1. Are underlying interests common, complementary or in conflict? 2. Is the decision-making process combative, competitive or collaborative? 20 Interest-Based Negotiations Concentrate on overall interests of both parties Building an agreement that is fair and durable – meaningful commitment It is a process – requires confidence in authority and performance 21 Create an Interest Map Compile a list of: Opposing stakeholders – who are they? Interests in the outcome – be creative, list hot-buttons, do a reality check Reasons – ask questions This facilitates planning a strategy 22 Conflict Negotiating Define the conflict Differentiate between views of conflict Understand the conflict process Annihilating, competing, avoiding, compromising, collaborating, accommodating 23 Conflict Negotiating 1. Conflict can be constructive or destructive 2. An optimal level of conflict: Prevents stagnation Stimulates creativity Releases tension Initiates change 24 Autocratic Managers 1. Inherent authority precludes the need to negotiate 2. Handing out orders is antagonistic, one-sided negotiations 3. Impinges commitment and stability 25 Accommodating Manager 1. Concerned with what others want to the detriment of their own needs 2. Conflict avoidance leads to non-negotiation and overriding of self-interests 3. All negotiation inherently has some conflict 4. Must take responsibility and look for compromise to lead effectively 26 5 Modes of Responding to Conflict 1. Collaborative (integrative) – win/win 2. Competitive (distributive) – win/lose 3. Yielding 4. Avoiding 5. Compromising 27 2 Levels of Negotiations 1. Rational decision-making (substantive) 2. Psychological (emotional) Separate the person from the issue Use objective standards Pay attention to the flow of negotiations Pay attention to the intangibles 28 Types of Negotiators Aggressive Long-pauser Mocking Interrogator Cloak of reasonableness Divide and conquer Act dumb 29 Preparing for Negotiation Whose interests are at stake? What are the interests? What are the sources of power? What are the options? What strategies are best? 30 Types of People Hostile aggressive Complainers Clams Super-agreeables Negativists Know-it-alls Indecisive stallers 31 BATNA Know your BATNA (best alternative to a negotiated agreement): Identify alternatives and strategies Determine “deal points/walk-away points” 32 How do you Know if you are an Effective Negotiator? Who has the power? Who are the stakeholders? Is it about outcome, process or both? How do you determine effectiveness? Are ethical and legal considerations? Is collaborative, competitive or mixed most effective? How wide is the impact? 33