Feedback sheets
BBA102 – Assessment of Group Project – weighted 30%
TASK: Critical Evaluation of assigned topic: ___________________________________
Group members:
Class Group ID _____
Member ID’s
Lecturer/Tutor _________________Class Day & Time ________________
Marks
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Process
Inadequate bibliographic
details. Poor citation
technique; Inadequate
arrangement of ‘intel’.
Academic writing. Innovation and
imagination used in the
compilation process.
Content
Much of the material was
irrelevant to the topic.
No breadth or depth of
analysis.
An inappropriate or
poorly developed theme.
Internal inconsistencies,
absence of logical
relationships in
development of theme.
Marked weaknesses in
style; spelling mistakes,
poor syntax - sentence &
paragraph construction.
Weak in source
consultation. Inadequate
reading or inappropriate
reading – poor
referencing.
Failed to satisfy the
terms of the assessment.
Inadequate theoretical
base. Badly designed. No
evidence of personal
judgement. Failed to
relate theory to practice.
Both depth and breadth of
analysis were clear and author
justified critical judgements.
Strong theme, developed in a
balanced way.
High standard sustained when
developing logical relationships
and internal consistency.
Style
Research &
Sources
Development
Comments:
A very pleasing and elegant style.
Worth reading for its written
expression alone.
Very broad reading of wellselected source material.
Critical observation of all
consulted sources.
Excellent referencing
Terms of assessment clearly
fulfilled. Theoretical base entirely
appropriate.
Sound design.
Evidence of personal judgement
throughout.
Originality in development and in
relating theory to practice.
BBA102 – Assessment of Group___________ Presentation on: _________________________
Analysis of Group/Individual Presentations – feedback sheet – weighting = 10 marks
Attribute being
evaluated
NAME/ID
Assigned and
Background
Research:
Evidence of indepth reading &
other investigation
Spkr 1
Spkr 2
Spkr 3
Spkr 4
Spkr 5
Max
Mark
20
Content of the
Presentation:
Evidence of the
depth of analysis,
the relevance of
key issues, clarity
of theme(s)
20
Inherent Quality
of Presentation:
logical
development,
skilful argument,
method of
synthesis,
quality of
recommendations/
conclusions, careful
crafting of the
theme.
30
Technical detail:
Citation of relevant
sources.
5
Presentation:
oral presentation,
quantity v’s quality,
audio-visuals,
appearance of
presenters, speech,
confidence,
stimulation of
discussion.
25
Total
100
Factored out of
10
Other Comments:
Version 2.1
Unit Outline Template Diploma
Once printed this document is no longer a controlled document
Page 2 of 3
Student Peer Assessment spreadsheet
Score each team member out of 100 on each of the assessment criteria
listed below
CIRCLE your name as the ASSESSOR on this
sheet
Use multiples of 5 in your
eg 75; 25; 50;
assessments
100
Unit studied:
Group identifier:
Date:
Student ID #
Family name
Given name
100
100
100
100
100
100
Attended
Contributed
Volunteered
Completed
regular
to group
additional
Accurate
with
given
Level of
innovation
&
meetings
outcomes
assistance
assigned
tasks on
time
tasks
creativity
Version 2.1
Unit Outline Template Diploma
Once printed this document is no longer a controlled document
100
Level of
100
Team
player
800
Total
interest
indiividual
shown
Score
Page 3 of 3