To what extent was the INC achieving its aims? Lord Minto – Viceroy after Curzon. Arrived in India at a time of great tension and protest over the partition of Bengal. Wanted to diffuse tension and maintain control for the empire. John Morley – Liberal secretary of State for India. 1906 election produced a Liberal landslide. Morley wanted a more humane administration, leading to Indian selfgovernment. The INC had grown and split into militant and moderate factions. The militants favoured force and the moderates were fearful of provoking the British and losing ground. Fear of mutiny in the Punjabi army. The British saw the need to use the moderates to control, or at least influence, the ‘extremists’. Which tactics were persuading the British to change? The INC protests were aimed at ending the partition of Bengal and a perceived British policy of ‘divide and rule’. The INC was dominated by a Hindu majority, and this raised worries among Muslims that any future concessions by the British would favour Hindus at the expense of Muslims. A Muslim deputation to Lord Minto at Simla, asked for a separate Muslim electorate; reminded Minto of the service Muslims had performed for the empire; and warned of the dangers of democracy. Minto pledged to guarantee Muslim rights in the future – why? More Indians were allowed into the administration – 60 elected Indians were allowed to serve on the Viceroy’s executive council. The provincial councils were enlarged. Indians could be in the majority but the officials were British. Separate electorates were provided for Muslims and Hindus. Morley appointed 2 Indians to his Whitehall advisers and Minto appointed the AdvocateGeneral of Bengal as his law member. The reforms came into effect in 1909. Should the INC celebrate the Morley-Minto reforms as a success for their agitation? Would ordinary Indians think the INC had done a good job? How would British administrators look on working with the newly elected Indian councillors? What might be the attitude of Muslims to a)the British and b) the INC?