FDN 5000 Research in Education Dr. George H. Olson, Instructor Research Designs Descriptive Research Designs Correlation Research Designs Causal-comparative Designs Experimental Designs Non-experimental Designs Single-subject designs Purposes of Research Designs Provide guidance in conducting research Provide guidance in interpreting research Guidance in recognizing types of research Guidance in recognizing potential threats to the validity of research conclusions Help guard against threats to internal and external validity Descriptive research designs Survey research Longitudinal research designs Cohort designs Quasi-cohort designs Cross-sectional research Case studies Ethnographic studies Correlational research designs Objective: study the relationship between variables Examine scatter plots (e.g., pages 223 and 225 in our text) Compute correlation coefficients range from -1 through 0 to +1 do not imply causation lack of correlation does NOT imply no causation Interpreting correlations Rules of thumb: Correlation coefficient .00 .24 .40 .60 .80 to to to to to .20 .40 .60 .80 1.00 Strength of relationship negligible low moderate substantial high, very high Causal comparative research designs A.k.a. ex-post-facto designs Aimed at discovering cause and effect relationships Defined groups are compared after they have been formed Theory plays an important role In arguing for the cause-effect relationship In eliminating rival explanations Causal comparative designs: An example Of students receiving the following grades…. This proportion is known to drive a car to school A B C D F What should the superintendent 8% 23% 43% 77% 96% conclude? Diagramming Experimental Research Designs Symbols used: T = treatment intervention C = control or comparison condition (often simply no treatment) O = observation (often some test score) R = designates random assignment M = designates matching Examples of Research Design Diagrams (1) T O (2) O1 T (3) O1 T O2 ----------------------- (No Random Assignment) O1 C O2 O2 Three pre-experimental designs Three designs frequently used in education research that… are not sufficient for permitting strong tests of causal hypotheses often due suggest new ideas One-group posttest-only design One-group pretest-posttest design Comparison-group posttest-only design One-group, posttest-only research design T O A treatment followed by an observation Should not be confused with the one-shot case study Threats to internal validity: ALL (except regression and mortality) Threats to external validity: ALL One-group pretest-posttest research design Opre T Opost One of the most frequently used research designs in education Threats to internal validity: extraneous events (history and maturation) statistical regression testing experimenter and subject effects Threats to external validity selection and settings interactions with treatment Comparison-group, posttest-only design T O -------------C O -------------C2 O -------------C3 O Comparison-group, posttest-only design Threats to internal validity Since the comparison groups are nonequivalent, the major threat is selection Other threats include mortality, and subject and experimenter reactive effects Threats to external validity Selection and settings by treatment interaction True experiment research designs Randomized experiments Result in probabilistic equivalence Not a panacea that rules out all threats to internal validity Does not control for experimenter and subject reactive effects. Does not guarantee group equivalency (especially in small samples). Randomized posttest comparison group design R: T O --------------C O Note: R: means RANDOMIZATION Randomized pretest-posttest control group design R: R: Opre T Opost --------------------------Opre C Opost --------------------------Opre C2 Opost Randomized matchedgroup design M: R: T O --------------C O Randomized factorial designs R: TA1,B1 O --------------TA1,B2 O --------------TA2,B1 O --------------TA2,B2 O Factorial Design: Example Method (B)____ Word Type (A) Computer Handwriting B1 B2 Easy A1 20 26 Hard A2 16 20 ____________________________ Quasi-experiments: Time series designs O1 O2 O3 O4 T O5 O6 O7 O8 Pre-observations to establish a baseline A treatment intervention Post-observations to establish new baseline Quasi-experiments: Nonequivalent control groups In these designs, randomization is either not possible or not feasible. Characterized by ... using intact groups for treatment and comparison manipulated independent variable Often, the best we can expect from education research Non-equivalent, control group, pretest-posttest design Opre T Opost ------------------------Opre C Opost Except for reactive effects, most threats to internal validity are controlled Again settings and selection by treatment interactions pose threats to external validity Matched comparison group, posttest design T O M: --------C O Validity depends upon how well matching is achieved Potential threats to internal validity are same as those for posttest-only designs Single-subject designs Similar to time-series designs, only with a single individual Repeated measurements over time (baselines) Subjects serve as their own controls Involve a manipulated independent variable (the intervention) Basic single-subject designs Reversal: A-B-A Double reversal: A - B - A - B Multiple baseline: A-B-A -----------------------A-B-A -----------------------A-B-A -----------------------A-B-A A is a period of no treatment B is a period of treatment Example of a stable baseline Stable Baseline Pattern 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Example of an increasing baseline Increasing Baseline Pattern 100 80 60 40 20 0 Non-experimental research designs Characterized by the lack of manipulation of an independent variable Three types of non-experimental research designs: Causal comparative research designs Correlational research designs Descriptive research designs