City of Baltimore OutcomeStat Andrew Kleine Budget Director | City of Baltimore About Baltimore • Form of Government: Strong Mayor • FY16 Operating Budget: $2.7 billion • Land Area: 81 square miles • FY16 Capital Budget: $672.9 million • Population: 622,793 residents • FY16 Full Time Positions: 14,486 Baltimore CitiStat CitiStat’s history is rooted in the NYPD CompStat model Baltimore CitiStat “A leadership strategy that a mayor can employ to mobilize city agencies to produce specific results” – Robert Behn, Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government Tenets: • Accurate and timely intelligence shared by all • Rapid deployment of resources • Effective tactics and strategies • Relentless follow-up and assessment The CitiStat Process CitiStat relies heavily on the 311 Service Request Platform The CitiStat Process CitiStat Copycats CitiStat has given rise to many other State and City models State of Maryland Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Buffalo, New York State of Washington Atlanta, Georgia New Orleans, Louisiana Bridgeport, Connecticut Somerville, Massachusetts Innovation Award CitiStat won the Innovations in American Government Award in 2004 from the Harvard Kennedy School Mayor O’Malley giving CitiStat finalist presentation at Kennedy School Burrows Baited Rat Rubout Requests CitiStat Strengths CitiStat Strengths CitiStat Shortcomings Routine Finger pointing contest Lose forest for the trees Outcome Budgeting What is it? Outcome Budgeting OLD WAY NEW WAY Starting Point: Last year’s spending Starting Point: Next year’s goals Funding Targets: By agency Funding Targets: By Priority Outcome Agency Submission: How allocation will be spent Agency Submission: Proposal to achieve Results Debate: What to cut Debate: What to keep Priority Outcomes Better Schools Safer Streets Innovative Government Stronger Neighborhoods A Cleaner City Growing Economy A Healthier City Budget Cycle Mayor establishes priorities Budget is passed CLS City Council Review Agency Proposals Board of Estimates Review Results Team Review Mayor’s Decisions Drilling Platform Performance Measures Service 798 – YouthWorks Summer Jobs Program Type Output Efficiency Effectiveness Outcome Measure # of youths participating in Youth Works program Average cost per participant % of responses rated as “very good” or “outstanding” on employer surveys submitted by worksite supervisors % of youth who increase their work readiness skills measured by Skills for Success Assessment tool FY11 Target 5,000 $1,400 85% FY11 Actual 5,000 $1,200 86% FY12 Target 4,500 $1,200 85% FY13 Target 5,000 $1,200 85% 85% 73% 85% 80% FY11 Actual 175 90% $115,000 58% 29% FY12 Target 235 100% $115,800 58% 29% FY13 Target 200 90% $120,000 59% 29% FY11 Actual 655 19 10% 135 168 FY12 Target 2,000 31 90% 250 250 FY13 Target 3,000 33 90% 250 150 Service 683 – Street Management Type Output Efficiency Efficiency Effectiveness Outcome Measure FY11 Target Lane Miles Resurfaced or Reconstructed (internal + contractor forces) 200 % of potholes repaired within 48 hours of reporting 100% Resurfacing cost per lane mile $115,000 % of streets meeting acceptable pavement condition standard 59% % of citizens rating street and sidewalk maintenance as good or excellent 29% Service 749 – Blight Elimination Type Output Efficiency Effectiveness Outcome Outcome Measure Number of properties advertised for sale Number of dispositions per Real Estate Agent % of disposition completed within 120 days Number of properties sold # of HCD controlled city owned vacant buildings in transitional neighborhoods FY11 Target 1,500 25 80% 200 295 Generating Results Without Outcome Budgeting, high effectiveness services would have received across the board cuts. Outcome Budgeting protected services from cuts or even increased funding. • Youth Violence Prevention • Family League After School Programs • Operation CARE • Crime Cameras Services that have not demonstrated value have been reduced or eliminated to in favor of high performing high priority services. • Baltimore Rising • Office of Community Development • Liquor Board staffing reduction Efficiencies Have Been Identified • Consolidating CARE into the Health Department saves $250,000 a year in administrative costs • Reducing the Police Marine Unit from year-round to on-call posture has saved $1 million. • A collaboration between the Fire and Health departments assigns nurses to frequent 911 callers and has reduced their calls by 50% Shortcomings Labor intensive Lack of ownership Not fully integrated with ongoing performance management Constrained by dollars, time and imagination New status quo? Performance Management A successful approach to city management: establishes meaningful goals, funds the services and investments to achieve them, monitors progress towards these goals, and is informed and modified based on evidence and feedback from a wide variety of stakeholders. CitiStat helps set targets, mobilize resources, and monitor progress. Outcome Budgeting helps better align funds with the services and investments that produce priority results. A Need for Strategic Planning City of Baltimore OutcomeStat Outcome Budgeting + CitiStat OutcomeStat Background OutcomeStat is based on the principles of Results-Based Accountability as laid out in Mark Friedman’s book Trying Hard Is Not Good Enough. OutcomeStat Goals Create a strategic plan for the City of Baltimore structured around the measurable indicators for each of the Mayor’s seven Priority Outcomes. Better align Outcome Budgeting and CitiStat in a way that builds on the innovative frameworks that already exist, and keeps Baltimore at the forefront of innovation in Government. Identify multi-year targets for each of the Priority Outcome Indicators, and an action plan for turning-the curve. Increase opportunities for Citizen Participation in the City’s strategic planning and decision making processes. New Outcome Indicators A Safe & Healthy Start Kindergarten Readiness Academic Achievement College & Career Ready • • • • • Shootings • Property Crime • Perception of Safety • • • • Blight Elimination Neighborhood Investment Sustainable Transportation Recreation Visits • Employment Rate • Number of Jobs • Visitors • Procurement • Prompt Payment • Special Events • • • • Cleanliness of Waterways Energy Usage Recycling Rate Perception of Cleanliness • Heroin-Related Deaths • Mental Health • Childhood Asthma Turn-the-Curve Process Turn-the-Curve Process Turn-the-Curve Process FY16 Budget Process FY16 Budget Process Population Level Turn-the-Curve OutcomeStat Website Data Visualizations Maps OutcomeStat Conference Results OutcomeStat Conference Results Buy-in on Story Behind the Curve for all indicators Understanding of what other organizations view as challenges for Baltimore and how they’re willing to help Prioritized strategies for turning-the-curve on all indicators Group of people engaged in OutcomeStat and awaiting next steps OutcomeStat Conference Results Results from Participant Survey: 95% are supportive of the OutcomeStat process after attending the Conference 88% believed team accomplished the objectives for each indicator Listed opportunity to collaborate and develop strategies with variety of stakeholders as most valuable Wanting to know next steps was common outstanding question OutcomeStat Going Forward Align with Budget Process Budget Proposals from Agencies will demonstrate alignment with indicator goals & the action plan items Regular OutcomeStat Sessions Meet regularly (quarterly or bi-annually) to measure progress on indicators & action plan items Grow OutcomeStat Website Link indicators to various service level Performance Measures, Maps, & Real-Time Data Visualizations Lessons Learned Get leaders in the right mindset Need them to be open-minded to new ideas and criticism Don’t let them off the hook They need to do the hard work of Turn the Curve planning, including setting targets and finding low cost/no cost actions Make sure they own the plan All of the stakeholders must commit to their roles Questions? Andrew Kleine Budget Director | Baltimore City Andrew.Kleine@baltimorecity.gov @baltimorebudget budget.baltimorecity.gov