Breast Cancer and the Environment Research Center Kami Silk, PhD Co-Investigator, Communication Core Department of Communication Michigan State University Principal Investigators Sandra Z. Haslam, Ph.D. Professor of Physiology PI and Center Director Charles Atkin, Ph.D. Professor of Communication PI Purpose To explore the causes of breast cancer by creating a network of research centers in which: multidisciplinary teams of scientists, clinicians, and breast cancer advocates work together on a unique set of scientific questions that focus on • chemical, physical, biological, and social factors in the environment that • work together with genetic factors and lead to breast cancer Overall Goal • To develop public health messages for • young girls and women who are at high risk for breast cancer • about the role(s) of specific environmental stressors in breast cancer • and how to reduce exposures to these stressors. Breast Cancer and the Environment Research Center Granting Agencies: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences National Cancer Institute Funded for 7 years MSU Foundation supplemental funds for 3 years Four Funded Centers NIEHS and NCI funded 4 centers across the country • Michigan State University • University of Cincinnati • University of Pennsylvania • University of California, San Francisco BCERC Components • Administrative Core • Community Outreach and Translation Research Core • Basic Biology Research (all centers) • Epidemiology Research* (U.C., U.P., U.C.S.F.) MSU Center Components Administrative Core • Coordinate all MSU center activities • Coordinate all MSU collaborative interactions with the three other centers MSU Center Breast Biology Research Project Environmental Effects on the Molecular Architecture and Function of the Mammary Gland across the Lifespan Definition of Environmental Stressors Chemicals Diet Activity Stress (socio-economic, psychological) Basic Science Collaborative Project Progesterone and mammary gland development A. Normal mammary gland development using mouse model. B. How do environmental stressors such as diet and chemical/hormonal exposures during pregnancy and prior to puberty alter normal development at puberty and eventual sexual maturity? C. How do alterations in normal development at puberty and sexual maturity caused by environmental stressors affect breast cancer development after exposure to a known carcinogen? Biology Core Team Principal Investigator: Dr. Sandra Haslam Physiology Co-Investigators: Dr. Richard Miksicek Dr. Karl Olson Dr. Susan Conrad Dr. Richard Schwartz Dr. Timothy Zacharewski Physiology Physiology Microbiology & Molecular Genetics Microbiology & Molecular Genetics Biochemistry & Environmental Toxicology MSU Center Community Outreach and Translation Core (COTC) Develop and implement strategies to translate the scientific findings of the research centers into information for the public and policy makers and determine if they are effective Activities in collaboration with advocates: Develop educational materials for children and adults Conduct public awareness forums, workshops and meetings Develop and evaluate new approaches to disseminate research findings Outreach and Translation Core Team Principal Investigator: Charles Atkin, PhD, P.I. Communication Co-Investigators: Pam Whitten, PhD Telecommunication Kami Silk, PhD Communication Karen Shirer, PhD MSU Extension William Donohue, PhD Communication Janet Osuch, M.D., M.S. Surgery & Epidemiology Advocate Roles • Work in partnership with the biology and epidemiology scientists to integrate consumer concerns into the research protocols • Work in partnership the scientists and the outreach core to disseminate education about the project and its findings in their communities Community Advocates Carol Callaghan, MPH Latecia Matthews, BS President, Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, Greater Lansing Affiliate Lana Pollack, MA Faith Access to Community Economic Development Christine Pearson, BA Chief, Cancer Prevention & Control Section, MDCH President, Michigan Environmental Council Vicki Rakowski, RN Executive VP for Medical Activities, Great Lakes Division of the American Cancer Society MSU COTC Activities Provide communication expertise to other COTC Assist with the annual conference Develop materials that communicate breast cancer risk information Thus far, conducted formative research Focus groups Content Analysis Phone survey MSU Focus Group Study Community-based formative research Ten focus groups (N=91) 6 adolescent girl groups 4 mother groups EAs, AAs, Latinos 4 counties in Michigan Data transcribed and coded MSU Focus Group Study Awareness of breast cancer Beliefs about severity, susceptibility, and efficacy Beliefs about breast cancer, role of the environment (physical and lifestyle) Useful for audience analysis to tailor message content MSU Focus Group Study Evidence of knowledge deficits Evidence of lack of link between breast cancer and the environment, particularly among adolescents Evidence of lack of understanding of the role of prevention in decreasing risk Evidence of lack of motivation to engage in healthy behaviors Barriers to Effective Health and Risk Communication Abstractness Complexity Low audience involvement Lack of perceived susceptibility “everything causes cancer” Lack of future orientation Emotional and physical constraints Low health literacy and innumeracy Challenges How can we address barriers and create effective health messages? Note: There is NOT a simple formula for success. Effective Message Construction What is your goal? Conduct formative research Let theory guide message construction Theoretical “toolbox” Cite credible sources Simplicity Use emotional and rational appeals Effective Message Construction Present multiple types of evidence Narrative Statistical Present statistical evidence in multiple formats Use clear pictorial representations Use intense language Future PSAs Developed as results of studies emerge Targeted to adolescents & women Focused on healthy diet and increased physical activity Imbed protective factor against breast cancer in the message Professional and creative Guided by formative research & message testing Helpful Resources Maibach, E., & Parrott, R. (1995). Designing health messages: Approaches from communication theory and public health practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Rice, R.E. & Atkin, C.K. (2001). Public Communication Campaigns (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2002). Making health communication programs work. NIH Publication No. 02-5145. Thank you!