Workshop Session #2: Measuring Diaper Need & Program Impact . National Diaper Bank Network 2015 Annual Conference Kelley E. C. Massengale, MPH The University of North Carolina at Greensboro Diaper Bank of NC; Durham, NC Phase One Interview Community Partners who distribute diaper bank diapers Analyze interviews Develop two surveys Survey Community Partners who did not do an interview Survey Diaper Recipients Analyze interviews Analyze surveys Phase Two ↘ Develop interview guide Interview Diaper Recipients Analyze interviews Phase Three ↙ Benefits to CBOs of Distributing Diapers • • • • • Positive financial impact Increased communication Increased program retention Increased critical thinking skills for clients Increased connections to other resources -(Massengale, Erausquin, & Old, 2015) As a result of not having enough diapers… Children • Wore diapers longer than usual • Experienced more diaper rashes • Were less happy than usual • Could not attend childcare Parents • Could not attend work or school • Asked others for diapers or money to buy them How Diapers Helped Children • Felt happier • Were healthier • Could attend childcare Parents • Felt happier • Could spend money on other needs • Could pay a medical or non-medical bill • Could attend work or school Families Want More Information • • • • Cloth diapers Appropriate diaper sizes Toilet training How to volunteer at the Diaper Bank Research Project Timeline 2014 • March – Applied for research grant • June – Notice of grant award • July – IRB approval • August – Begin Phase One • October – Begin Phase Two 2015 • January – Begin Phase Three • May – Data analysis & Report writing • June – Share data with Board of Directors • August – Use data for grant applications • September – Share data with community partner; Submit paper to scientific journal • November – Present data at public health conference Why Document Outcomes & Impacts? • Support grant applications • Assess and improve current practices • Documentation for: – Current / future donors – Press releases – Supporters – Policy makers – Community leaders – Future collaborators Partnerships with Academic Researchers • Credibility of trained researchers – Data collection & analysis skills • Confidentiality of researcher who is not diaper bank staff • Access to analytical software & peer-reviewed literature • Experience with publication and grant writing Finding Academic Partners • College / University Departments of: – Public Health, Social Work, Human Development & Family Studies, Nursing, Medicine, Health Psychology, Community Psychology, Public Administration • Look for experience in: – Evaluation – Community-based Research, – Community-based Participatory Research [CBPR] Thank you! Kelley E. C. Massengale, MPH PhD Candidate in Community Health Education Department of Public Health Education University of North Carolina at Greensboro kemassen@uncg.edu Data to Collection • How will you use the data you collected? – Process improvement – Long-term planning – Support grant applications • What types of data to collect? – Recipient demographics – Individual-level outcomes – Community-level outcomes • Who to collect data from? – People involved in diaper distribution – Diaper recipient families • Challenges of data collection (realistic expectations) Why Research? Anecdotal Evidence Research Data • Informally collected data or stories from diaper recipients, community partners, diaper bank staff and volunteers. • Data collected and analyzed in a systematic manner by trained researchers. • Study undergoes ethical review before it starts. • Options for publication and presentation to scientific community. Research on Diaper Banks • Raver, C., Letourneau, N., Scott, J., & D’Agostino, H. (2010). Huggies® every little bottom study: Diaper need in the U.S. and Canada. (Report commissioned by Huggies.) • Smith, M. V., Kruse, A., Weir, A., & Goldblum, J. (2013). Diaper need and its impact on child health. Pediatrics, 132(2), 253-259. • Porter, S., & Steefel, L. (2015). Diaper need: A change for better health. Pediatric Nursing, 41(3), 143-144.