Advertising Measurement A Framework for Evaluating Impact & Results ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics 1 Agenda Context Considerations For Establishing Objectives & Goals Capturing Information Systematically Communicating Insights & Learning A Frame Of Reference Appendix ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Executive Summary Our measurement approach must readily enable business decisions. Comparability is essential for evaluating alternatives Throughout campaign Across vehicles By segment By product We will need to establish & capture common “Advergraphics” in order to evaluate relative business results Apples to apples comparisons Most of the key questions posed by Marketing Leadership require rigorous attribution capabilities While some metrics will be common and/or we will have the ability to aggregate/disaggregate, others will be unique to a specific vehicle. Some of the metrics will also roll-up and down between advertising and the “Engagement Cycle” dashboard. Advertising is relatively continuous & so too should be the metrics On-going sampling or tracking versus static periodic reads ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Marketing Dashboards Best practices of successful marketing dashboards: Tie measures to strategy – aggregated & disaggregated. Finance Customer relationships Brand health Internal efficiency Focus on small set of metrics Organizational focus Ensure stakeholder buy-in People who’s compensation and performance evaluation will be impacted Metric owners Finance Tie to decision making process Design dashboard to feed the decision-making process Frame #’s within a qualitative context ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Marketing Measurement Today In general, companies should spend between 5-10% of their total marketing budget on measurement.1 Measurement Relative Sophistication Today’s Capabilities 80% Insight Gap % of US Companies2 Lo 15% 5% Activity Planned & Systemic Activity Characteristics ROI Questions Activity & Analyses • Labor intensive • Single question or lens focused • Labor intensive, low volume • Advanced analytic tools and techniques are leveraged • Premium associated with data gathering • Measures are often defined “on the fly” • Not limited by need to information gathering to be systematic • Addresses questions or analyses that do not need frequent reexamination • Campaign-centric data accumulation and test design • Designed to produce primary measurement and customer insight High Planned & Systemic • Process intensive • Well-established success metrics • Data provides analysis dexterity (ability to answer multiple questions or be viewed through multiple lenses) • Customer-centric and relationship perspective • Supports single, multiple and ongoing contact streams • Comprehensive view of a complex business • Supports strategic decision-making systemically • Integrated with strategic planning process • Returns financial results 1Source: 2Source: ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Boston Consulting Group & Millward Brown Marketing Leadership Council Advertising Response Curves By Product Financial Services has one of the most challenging consumer response curves1 The complexity of the decision-making process, financial magnitude & the extraordinary influence of external factors are certainly some of the many contributors to this. Impulse Products Trial Rate Personal Care Trial Rate % Consumer Awareness ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Financial Services Trial Rate % Consumer Awareness % Consumer Awareness Source: Millward Brown Response Curves By Vehicle The same weight produces different patterns in awareness build and decay % Awareness Magazine TV TV GRPs Magazine GRPs Time ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Source: Millward Brown Advertising Effectiveness Framework Clients are spending a significant amount of money on advertising and needs measurement insights in order to optimize the impact of these expenditures. The Marketing Leadership Team has a need and desire to begin evaluating advertising effectiveness. Key Question: How Might We Think About Evaluating Advertising? 1. Establishing Clear Objectives & Goals ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics 2. Capturing Information Systematically 3. Communicating Insights & Learning Advertising Objectives & Goals There are many considerations which need to be taken into account when establishing objectives & goals for an individual advertisement and they may vary based upon the strategic intent of each campaign. Specify which part of the customer engagement cycle the advertisement is striving to influence Establish brand objectives (if any) as well as setting specific product objectives Create/reinforce or change Perception or behavior Select a specific target audience Prospect or customer Emerging, Engaged, Established, High Net Worth, Active Trader Understand the context of the campaign as well as the marketplace Integrated stand alone Competitive activity Leading economic indicators & stock market performance Create the learning plan Rigorous test design Data requirements Analytic framework ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Vehicle Impact Varies Across Engagement Cycle As the strategy shifts from expansion towards acquisition, the marketing measurement and infrastructure must evolve. Customer Engagement Cycle Objectives Vehicle TV Awareness Consideration • Breakthrough 4 • Effective Reach Inquiry • Relevance 3 • Delivers rich imagery • Differentiate • Inform 2 • Product & personality Radio Print 4 • Augments Reach 3 • Reinforces key & Frequency messages 2 • More Targeted 3 • Readily enables reach Internet 1 • Targeted but ext. limited reach Direct Mail 1 • Targeted Reach 1 • Product features/ • benefit Sales Force Event/ Sponsorship 1 • Reinforces brand • Portal proliferation 2 • High level • Engage 0 • No significant role image 1 • Reinforces brand 0 • No significant role image 4 • Detailed explanation 1 • Offer inducement 0 • No significant role 4 • Extremely detailed 4 3 • Ongoing source of comparisons 2 • Rich info/exp Expansion • Activate features/benefit • Self directed • Personalized 4 • Highly targeted comparisons Call Center Investment message • Reinforces brand image • Enabling tool • Immediacy • Personalized 4 • Offer inducement 1 • Call to action value • Loyalty mktg vehicle • Penetrate enhanced needs set • Penetrate enhanced needs set 0 • No significant role 1 • Prospecting 2 • Detailed experience 3 • Personalized offer 4 • Customer experience 1 • Prospecting 2 • Enhanced credibility 4 3 • Share of wallet 3 • Rich customer exp. 4 • Effective reach 1 • Can deliver some 1 • Deliver/sample 1 • Reinforces brand 0 • No significant role imagery & key message experience • Positive Association (Halo) ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics • Product features/benefit • Can overcome specific barriers • Real-time dialing • Real time dialing • Depth of knowledge image • Relationship may drive loyalty End-to-End Measurement Advertising metrics will need to span the “Engagement Cycle” and serve as inputs to modeling. TIME Advertising Cycle Metrics Exposure Invest Use/Interaction Perception Message Immediate Relevance Credibility Experience Interest Status Salience Memory Enhancement Brand Interaction • An additional challenge is accounting for the “cumulative” effect of advertising as well as “latency” – Ad impressions accumulate to form brand equity. • As relevance increases so does the time horizon for which the advertising has an impact. • Enhancement is the interaction between experience & expectations where associations are elevated beyond purely functional attributes to beliefs bonding. ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Capturing Information A “Cradle To Grave” approach is required and the measurement metrics and methodology need to be consistent throughout Advertisement Development Execution • Ad strategy & theme – “What” • Early in creative process • Qualitative & Quantitative • May be iterative; pre & post production • Standardized questions – “How” – Main message – Persuasiveness – Likes/dislikes • Clear action standards developed in advance • Precisely specified target market • Evaluating copy & vehicles (integrated campaign) Evaluation • Intercept interviews – Branch – Call center – Web Site • Standardized questions – Communication clarity – Relevance – Appropriateness – Likelihood of action • Tracking – Enjoyment • Business results • Return on marketing investment* (ROMI) – CPI – CPA – Etc. • Brand imagery & equity • Comparison to objectives • Media execution TIGHT LINKAGE • • Awareness Index Persuasion • • Imagery Media Plan • • Recall Message Retention *Caution: Using ROI as a key performance metric for marketing is dangerous because: 1) It gives excessive importance to the “I” 2) Is easier to achieve by reducing costs than increasing revenue 3) Leads to lower marketing spending and sub-optimal, relative to goals, performance ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Source: Marketing Science Institute, “The Long & Short View of Marketing Metrics”, Tim Ambler Integrated Advertising Measurement Holistic advertising measurement is an on-going cycle of testing & learning which requires considerable cross-team collaboration. • Brand Equity • Response Modeling Brand Positioning • Performance Measurement • Qualitative & Quantitative Research • Customer Segmentation • Concept Testing In-Market Monitoring Measurement Objectives Communicatio n Strategy • Execution Insights • Tracking Customer Data Mart Project Point of Entry ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Communicatio n Assessment • Pre-Test Copy/Executio n MRD Advergraphics To enable robust analytics, companies must capture common “AdverGraphics” across all of its advertising – A process challenge “AdverGraphics” -- Demographic type characteristics which describe in detail the nature of the ad itself AND all individual placements Advertisement • • ? ? • ? • • • ? Size – inches & % of page – Print Color or B&W – Print Lenth of ad -- Broadcast Proportion brand: product How many products Which products Message category Proof points Call to action: y/n, desired response channel(s) & #s/URLs Pre-test scores Target audience; prop/cust., EM/EN/ES/AT/HNW; SD/V/D Planning doc Target engagement cycle stage Behavioral objective Strategic intent Creative name, Oasis # Development cost Incentive or promotion: y/n & specific offer Integrated campaign: y/n & other vehicles Broadcast Placement Print Placement ? Show name/program ? Media type: network, spot, cable, etc. ? Position within commercial break: first, last, other ? Daypart ? Audience: audited impressions & demographics ? Audited GRP’s ? Run date(s) ? Cost of airing Network TV; Ad position & Audited Audience MEETING WITH ARNOLD TO REVIEW THEIR DONOVAN SYSTEM - Much of his type of data captured there Network TV has much more robust data capture than other broadcast vehicles Name Publication type Newspaper: financial, national, regional Magazine; business, lifestyle, etc. Frequency; daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly Publications Format; size, color/B&W ? Audited circulation ? Audited GRP’s ? Publication demographics Location within publication (timing • Need to evaluate the option of incorporating syndicated data such as Starch/Samms, MRI/Monroe Mendleson, Neilsen, Arbitron & potentially others ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics varies) Drop date Cost of insertion Currently available Planned or readily incorporated ? Likely, pending detailed MRD questionnaire review Advergraphics Internet AdverGraphics will vary somewhat based upon which Internet vehicles are used In addition to the standard advertisement AdverGraphics outlined on the previous page, for Internet advertising we will also want to capture the degree of motion and the level of graphic delivery (flash & HTML) Paid Search Engine Inclusion • • • • • • Order in which Co is served up Page location where it is placed Ad or link Size Raw # of times served up Proportion of click throughs ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Email • • • • Subject line Number of recipients Response rate HTML, Plain Text or both Banner • • • • • Size Flash or other motion; y/n Triggers for serving Number of banner ads served Proportion of click throughs Attribution Attribution will manifest itself differently across the continuum of measurement options, however planned & systemic is what will be required to answer the insightful questions being asked by Marketing Leadership Activity Measurement Characteristics Advantages Disadvantages Activity & Analyses Measurement Planned & Systemic Measurement • Scale the Call Center pilot • Institute source coding on all marcom • Institute source coding on all marcom • Establish business rules for attribution across touchpoints • Can answer some of the “What” happened • Develop hypotheses about “Why” • Ease of implementation • Short lead time to implementation • Can answer all of “What” & some of “Why” • Precise understanding of market drivers • A frame of reference for interpreting relative performance • Can answer all of the IMM questions; “What, Why & How” • Can generalize & institutionalize learnings • Able to quantify interactions between vehicles • Can’t generalize learnings • Based entirely on consumer recall which has been empirically proven as unreliable • Assumes same response profile across channels • Can’t generalize learning • Ignores the cumulative effect of advertising & attributes impact entirely to the most recent marketing event • Limited understanding of interaction between marketing vehicles • Remains dependent upon rigorous test design • Must capture detailed “AdverGraphics” ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Insight By Vehicle A Combination of Media Generally Has A Greater Impact Than Any Individual Media Type. TV Radio • Creative needs to be brand linked • Awareness responds to GRPs immediately • Impact per GRP tends to be lower than TV • Best if enjoyable and well branded • Position w/in commercial break • Flighting best when dispersed across network/cable/spot & daypart • Benefits greatly from synergies w/TV and can extend TV campaign • High level of targeting • Need 100 GRPs/wk to breakthrough • Synergistic w/other media particularly when there’s a schedule overlap Internet • Active goal-seeking medium can help ads be very effective • Recall on par w/TV1 • Can be effective even without click-through • ‘Rich Media’ #2 x’s more effective than banners Public Relations • Independent source creates greater credibility • Works very effectively as a multiplier for other messages Print • Print w/TV more likely to result in active consideration than TV alone • Active consumption; fast wear out of individual execution • Works best where reader is interested in category Otherwise need strong creative hook to overcome filters • Messages perceived as more credible & less pushy • Interest & prestige can be heightened by context Event/Sponsorship • Tight linkage between event message and brand • Can be effectively leveraged when part of brand multimedia campaign • TV sponsorship can be as powerful as TV advertising • High level of targeting & direct response • Possible irritation ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Source: Millward Brown, Real-Time Marketplace Feedback Differences Between Media TV Magazines Passive Active/selective Product Category Effect Little Large Attention-Getting Wearout Little Rapid ST as Ad LT as Fact Need For Creative “Hook” Less High Recall of Visual Elements Well remembered Less well remembered Little High degree Advertising Exposure How Stored In Memory Mental Processing ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Source: Millward Brown Brand Health Metrics Consumer Engagement Cycle Awareness Top-of-mind awareness • Presence Aided awareness Familiarity • Competitive comparison Share of voice • Effective share of voice Consideration • Hedonic evaluation Understand positioning Recall key copy points Perceived rational attributes & benefits Functional Process Consideration ? Relevance Inquiry Cognitive responses & judgments • Factual recall Perceived emotional attributes & benefits Purchase intent • Brand Portfolio Impact – Family – Category Currently available Planned or readily incorporated ? Likely, pending detailed MRD questionnaire review Measurement Considerations: Objective Investment Current usage Usage trend Cross-utilization Frequency of consumer interaction Brand strength Product performance Attributes Advantages Deficits Customer service satisfaction Expansion • ? ? Customer loyalty Overall – Key proposition elements Likelihood of switching Next month With incentive Affinity Relationship ? Bonded Brand Advocacy Brand Adv Product Adv Favorable Attitudes Information & Action Cognitive Responses & Consumer Judgments “Brand Image & Equity”* Factual Data & Recall “Brand Salience/Relevance” *Note: Brand equity has a strong linear relationship for the next 2 years with Market Share (R2=5) & EBITDA (R2=.7) ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Source: Customer Ergonomics Analyses & MSI; “The Long & Short View of Marketing Metrics”, Tim Ambler Individual Advertisement Metrics Consumer Engagement Cycle Awareness • • • • • • • • • • • Recall key elements Content playback Brand linkage Communication clarity Ease of understanding Awareness index – Cut Through – Branded memorability – Enjoyment – Involvement Effective GRPs/TRPs Effective “Share of Voice” Relative perception of the amt. of advertising Interest Total Communication Consideration ? • • • • Hedonic Relevance New news Difference/ uniqueness Believability Trust/ confidence Reasonable fees/value Corp. values & ethics Persuasion Unaided & aided consideration Inquiry • Perceived Advantage Satisfaction w/customer service • Likelihood to take action; call, click, or visit Intention to invest • Previous investment experience • Knowledgeable Sales Reps Investment • Perceived advantage • “Relative” wealth Expansion • Brand affinity • Number of vehicles & channels Frequency of interaction • Perception of relationship • Confidence & Security − External Factors − Personal − Fidelity Currently available Planned or readily incorporated ? Likely, pending detailed MRD questionnaire review ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Unique Internet & Site Visit Metrics Consumer Engagement Cycle Awareness Page & banner impressions Unique visitors – Cookies 1 machine, logins for multiple pc’s Total visitors Pgs viewed/visit • Effective GRP’s Consideration Inquiry Advertising & promotion click through Downloaded pages Tool usage Visitor origin - Search engine - Paid Inclusion - Referral site • F.S. sites visited Time spent/ page - calculated Site registration – ? Visitors by ISP ? Browser used - @ Investment Trades Value of trade Opt-ins bare minimum Repeat visitors Topics/categ visited/session or /visitor Page exited from Proportion inquiries via Web IP address level Expansion Site registration – In depth & complete Visit frequency Personalized Home Page Alerts set up Elapsed time between visits Time per visit Pages viewed per visit Multi-channel customers • Many of the MRD metrics exclude Internet customers. This research will need to be supplemented or revised to reflect these customers too. • Need to further explore syndicated metrics as Financial Services frame of reference; ComScore, Nielsen Net Ratings, Jupiter Media Matrix Currently available Planned or readily incorporated ? Likely, pending detailed MRD questionnaire review All metrics #/%/$ ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics Communicating Insights Communicating Insights Drives Organization Learning Sequencing analytics Quick read vs. depth Standardized Deep dive Establishing a frame of reference for objective interpretation Normative database Outside your industry Creating institutional knowledge Best practices ©2008-9 Customer Ergonomics. Confidential property of Customer Ergonomics