3-1 CHAPTER 3 Analysis of Financial Statements Ratio analysis Du Pont system Effects of improving ratios Limitations of ratio analysis Qualitative factors Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3-2 Balance Sheet: Assets 1999E Cash 14,000 71,632 ST investments AR 878,000 Inventories 1,716,480 Total CA 2,680,112 Gross FA 1,197,160 Less: Deprec. 380,120 Net FA 817,040 Total assets 3,497,152 Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press 1998 7,282 0 632,160 1,287,360 1,926,802 1,202,950 263,160 939,790 2,866,592 All rights reserved. 3-3 Liabilities and Equity 1999E 1998 Accounts payable 436,800 524,160 Notes payable 600,000 720,000 Accruals 408,000 489,600 Total CL 1,444,800 1,733,760 Long-term debt 500,000 1,000,000 Common stock 1,680,936 460,000 Retained earnings (128,584) (327,168) Total equity 1,552,352 132,832 Total L & E 3,497,152 2,866,592 Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3-4 Income Statement Sales COGS Other expenses Depreciation Tot. op. costs EBIT Interest exp. EBT Taxes (40%) Net income Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press 1999E 7,035,600 5,728,000 680,000 116,960 6,524,960 510,640 88,000 422,640 169,056 253,584 1998 5,834,400 5,728,000 680,000 116,960 6,524,960 (690,560) 176,000 (866,560) (346,624) (519,936) All rights reserved. 3-5 Other Data 1999E 1998 250,000 100,000 EPS $1.014 ($5.199) DPS $0.220 $0.110 Shares out. Stock price $12.17 $2.25 Lease pmts $40,000 $40,000 Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3-6 Why are ratios useful? Standardize numbers; facilitate comparisons Used to highlight weaknesses and strengths Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3-7 What are the five major categories of ratios, and what questions do they answer? Liquidity: Can we make required payments as they fall due? Asset management: Do we have the right amount of assets for the level of sales? (More…) Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3-8 Debt management: Do we have the right mix of debt and equity? Profitability: Do sales prices exceed unit costs, and are sales high enough as reflected in PM, ROE, and ROA? Market value: Do investors like what they see as reflected in P/E and M/B ratios? Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3-9 Calculate the firm’s forecasted current and quick ratios for 1999. CA CR99 = CL $2,680 = $1,445 = 1.85x. CA - Inv. QR99 = CL $2,680 - $1,716 = = 0.67x. $1,445 Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 10 Comments on CR and QR 1999 1998 1997 Ind. CR 1.85x 1.1x 2.3x 2.7x QR 0.67x 0.4x 0.8x 1.0x Expected to improve but still below the industry average. Liquidity position is weak. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 11 What is the inventory turnover ratio as compared to the industry average? Sales Inv. turnover = Inventories $7,036 = = 4.10x. $1,716 1999 1998 1997 Ind. Inv. T. 4.1x 4.5x 4.8x 6.1x Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 12 Comments on Inventory Turnover Inventory turnover is below industry average. Firm might have old inventory, or its control might be poor. No improvement is currently forecasted. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 13 DSO is the average number of days after making a sale before receiving cash. Receivables DSO = Average sales per day Receivables $878 = Sales/360 = $7,036/360 = 44.9 days. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 14 Appraisal of DSO DSO 1999 44.9 1998 39.0 1997 36.8 Ind. 32.0 Firm collects too slowly, and situation is getting worse. Poor credit policy. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 15 Fixed Assets and Total Assets Turnover Ratios Fixed assets Sales = turnover Net fixed assets = $7,036 = 8.61x. $817 Total assets = turnover Sales Total assets $7,036 = = 2.01x. $3,497 (More…) Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 16 FA TO TA TO 1999 8.6x 2.0x 1998 6.2x 2.0x 1997 10.0x 2.3x Ind. 7.0x 2.6x FA turnover is expected to exceed industry average. Good. TA turnover not up to industry average. Caused by excessive current assets (A/R and inventory). Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 17 Calculate the forecasted operating capital requirement ratio (OCR). Operating Net operating = working capital + capital Net fixed assets Net operating = ($14,000 + $878,000 + working capital $1,716,480) - ($436,800 + $408,000) = $1,763,680. Operating capital = $1,763,680 + $817,040 = $2,580,720. (More…) Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 18 OCR = Operating capital/Sales = $2,580,720/$7,035,600 = 36.7%. 1999 1998 1997 Ind. OCR 36.7% 31.8% 33.2% 29.5% The OCR is not improving. It is worse than the industry average. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 19 Calculate the debt, TIE, and fixed charge coverage ratios. Total debt Debt ratio = Total assets $1,445 + $500 = = 55.6%. $3,497 EBIT TIE = Int. expense $510.6 = = 5.8x. $88 Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press (More…) All rights reserved. 3 - 20 Fixed charge = FCC coverage EBIT + Lease payments = Interest Lease Sinking fund pmt. + + expense pmt. (1 - T) $510.6 + $40 = = 4.3x. $88 + $40 + $0 All three ratios reflect use of debt, but focus on different aspects. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 21 How do the debt management ratios compare with industry averages? D/A TIE FCC 1999 55.6% 5.8x 4.3x 1998 95.4% -3.9x -3.0x 1997 Ind. 54.8% 50.0% 3.3x 6.2x 2.4x 5.1x Too much debt, but projected to improve. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 22 After-tax operating profit margin (ATOPM) ATOPM = EBIT(1 - T) = $510,640(1 - 0.4) Sales $7,035,600 = 4.4%. 1999 1998 1997 Ind. ATOPM 4.4% -7.1% 3.7% 4.3% Very bad in 1998, but projected to exceed industry average in 1999. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 23 Profit Margin (PM) NI $253.6 PM = Sales = $7,036 = 3.6%. PM 1999 3.6% 1998 -8.9% 1997 2.6% Ind. 3.5% Very bad in 1998, but projected to exceed industry average in 1999. Looking good. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 24 Basic Earning Power (BEP) EBIT BEP = Total assets $510.6 = $3,497 = 14.6%. (More…) Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 25 BEP 1999 14.6% 1998 1997 Ind. -24.1% 14.2% 19.1% BEP removes effect of taxes and financial leverage. Useful for comparison. Projected to be below average. Room for improvement. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 26 Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) Net income ROA = Total assets $253.6 = $3,497 = 7.3%. (More…) Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 27 Net income ROE = Common equity = $253.6 = 16.3%. $1,552 ROA ROE 1999 7.3% 16.3% 1998 1997 Ind. -18.1% 6.0% 9.1% -391.0% 13.3% 18.2% Both below average but improving. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 28 Effects of Debt on ROA and ROE ROA is lowered by debt--interest expense lowers net income, which also lowers ROA. However, the use of debt lowers equity, and if equity is lowered more than net income, ROE would increase. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 29 Calculate and appraise the P/E and M/B ratios. Price = $12.17. NI $253.6 EPS = Shares out. = 250 = $1.01. Price per share $12.17 P/E = = = 12x. EPS $1.01 (More…) Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 30 Com. equity BVPS = Shares out. $1,552 = = $6.21. 250 Mkt. price per share M/B = Book value per share $12.17 = $6.21 = 1.96x. (More…) Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 31 P/E M/B 1999 12.0x 1.96x 1998 -0.4x 1.7x 1997 9.7x 1.3x Ind. 14.2x 2.4x P/E: How much investors will pay for $1 of earnings. High is good. M/B: How much paid for $1 of book value. Higher is good. P/E and M/B are high if ROE is high, risk is low. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 32 Explain the Du Pont System ( Profit margin )( TA turnover NI Sales Sales x TA )( x 1997 2.6% x 2.3 1998 -8.9% x 2.0 1999 3.6% x 2.0 Ind. 3.5% x 2.6 Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press ) Equity multiplier = ROE x x x x TA CE = ROE. 2.2 21.6 2.3 2.0 = 13.2% = -391.0% = 16.3% = 18.2% All rights reserved. 3 - 33 The Du Pont system focuses on: Expense control (PM) Asset utilization (TATO) Debt utilization (EM) It shows how these factors combine to determine the ROE. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 34 Simplified Firm Data A/R $ 878 Debt Other CA 1,802 Equity Net FA 817 Total assets $3,497 L&E Sales day $1,945 1,552 $3,497 $7,035,600 = = $19,543. 360 Q. How would reducing DSO to 32 days affect the company? Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 35 Effect of reducing DSO from 44.9 days to 32 days: Old A/R = $19,543 x 44.9 = $878,000 New A/R = $19,543 x 32.0 = 625,376 Cash freed up: $252,624 Initially shows up as additional cash. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 36 New Balance Sheet Added cash A/R Other CA Net FA Total assets $ 253 Debt $1,945 625 Equity 1,552 1,802 817 $3,497 Total L&E $3,497 What could be done with the new cash? Effect on stock price and risk? Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 37 Potential use of freed up cash Repurchase stock. Higher ROE, higher EPS. Expand business. Higher profits. Reduce debt. Better debt ratio; lower interest, hence higher NI. (More…) Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 38 Inventories are also too high. Could analyze the effect of an inventory reduction on freeing up cash and increasing the quick ratio and asset management ratios. Such an analysis would be similar to what was done with DSO in previous slides. All these actions would likely improve stock price. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 39 Would you lend money to this company? Maybe. The situation could improve, and the loan, with a high interest rate to reflect the risk, could be a good investment. However, company should not have relied so heavily on debt financing in the past. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 40 What are some potential problems and limitations of financial ratio analysis? Comparison with industry averages is difficult if the firm operates many different divisions. “Average” performance is not necessarily good. Seasonal factors can distort ratios. (More…) Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 41 Window dressing techniques can make statements and ratios look better. Different accounting and operating practices can distort comparisons. Sometimes it is difficult to tell if a ratio value is “good” or “bad.” Often, different ratios give different signals, so it is difficult to tell, on balance, whether a company is in a strong or weak financial condition. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 42 What are some qualitative factors analysts should consider when evaluating a company’s likely future financial performance? Are the company’s revenues tied to a single customer? To what extent are the company’s revenues tied to a single product? To what extent does the company rely on a single supplier? (More…) Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved. 3 - 43 What percentage of the company’s business is generated overseas? What is the competitive situation? What does the future have in store? What is the company’s legal and regulatory environment? And so on. Copyright © 1999 by The Dryden Press All rights reserved.